Variability in Current Procedural Terminology Codes for Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Reconstruction: A National Survey.

BACKGROUND: Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes are an important part of surgical documentation and billing for services provided within the United States. This limited coding language presents a challenge in the heterogenous and rapidly evolving field of craniofacial surgery. The authors aimed to survey members of the American Society of Maxillofacial Surgery (ASMS) to characterize the variability in coding practices in the surgical management of craniofacial trauma. METHODS: A cross-sectional of 500 members of the ASMS survey was carried out. Descriptive statistics were calculated. The effect of various practice characteristics on coding practices was evaluated using Chi-squared tests and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: In total, 79 participants responded including 77 plastic surgeons. About 75% worked in academic centers and 38% reported being in practice over 20 years. Coding practices were not significantly associated with training background or years in practice. Unilateral mandibular and unilateral nasoorbitoethmoid fractures demonstrated the greatest agreement with 99% and 88% of respondents agree upon a single coding strategy, respectively. Midface fractures, bilateral nasoorbitoethmoid fractures, and more complex mandibular demonstrated considerable variability in coding. CONCLUSION: There is a wide variability among members of the ASMS in CPT coding practices for the operative management of craniofacial trauma. To more accurately convey the complexity of craniofacial trauma reconstruction to billers and insurance companies, the authors must develop a more descriptive coding language that captures the heterogeneity of patient presentation and surgical procedures.

Evaluating the July Effect in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Part I-Mandibular Fractures.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the timing of mandibular fracture repair within the academic year affects the complication rate using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ACS-NSQIP database was accessed and queried from 2008 to 2017 for all Current Procedural Terminology codes pertaining to open treatment of mandibular fractures. The cases were stratified into 2 groups based on academic quarter: the quarter 1 (Q1) group (July-September) and the remaining-quarters group. The inclusion criteria encompassed all Current Procedural Terminology codes in the ACS-NSQIP registry that defined mandibular fractures and age greater than 18 years. Demographic characteristics, as well as medical and surgical complications, were compared between the 2 cohorts. Descriptive statistics were calculated to characterize and compare patient cohorts, and Fisher exact test and χ2 analyses were performed to compare complication rates between groups. RESULTS: The Q1 group included 614 cases, and the remaining-quarters group included 1,454. The most common individual complications included wound dehiscence (1.6% overall; 2.1% in Q1 group vs 1.4% in remaining-quarters group, P = .22), combined superficial and deep-space infection (4.9% overall; 4.4% in Q1 group vs 3.3% in remaining-quarters group; P = .91 and P = .21, respectively), and reoperation (3.9% overall; 4.6% in Q1 group vs 3.6% in remaining-quarters group, P = .29). Medical complications including acute kidney injury, venous thromboembolism, urinary tract infection, and sepsis or septic shock were rare (<1%). Complication rates did not significantly differ between the third quarter and the remainder of the year on bivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not support the idea of a "July effect" regarding postoperative outcomes after mandibular fracture repair. Further studies are needed to elucidate this phenomenon within all procedures under the wide umbrella of the specialty.

Evaluating the July Effect in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Part II-Orthognathic Surgery.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if there is an increased postoperative complication rate in orthognathic surgery during the first academic quarter (Q1) (July to September). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was accessed to identify cases with Current Procedural Terminology codes pertaining to orthognathic procedures from 2008 to 2017. Procedures were separated into 2 groups based on time in the academic year: Q1 (July to September) versus remaining quarters (RQ). The inclusion criteria were Current Procedural Terminology codes representing operations resulting in movement of the dentate portion of the jaws and age of 18 years or older. Patient demographic characteristics and perioperative complications were compared between the groups. Descriptive statistics, Fisher exact tests, and χ2 tests were executed. RESULTS: The Q1 cohort included 877 cases, and the RQ cohort included 2,062 cases. The average age of patients was 47.0 ± 19.5 years in Q1 versus 47.2 ± 19.4 years in RQ. The most frequent complications were blood transfusion (11.97% in Q1 vs 12.57% in RQ, P = .64), reoperation (8.67% in Q1 vs 8.84% in RQ, P = .87), and combined superficial and deep-space infection (5.02% in Q1 vs 5.76% in RQ, P = .51). Medical complications involving other organ systems were rare (<1%). Analyses showed no significance between complication rate and time of year. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that there is no association between time of year and complication rates after orthognathic surgery. Additional investigations could be useful in shining light on this topic as it pertains to the training of future surgeons.

Fixation Points in the Treatment of Traumatic Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: Controversy remains regarding the optimal degree of anatomic exposure, reduction, and fixation required during open reduction and internal fixation of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures. We critically examined the reported data to compare the patient outcomes after various degrees of ZMC reduction and internal fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were designed to test the null hypothesis of no difference in outcomes between different degrees of fixation of ZMC fractures. The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Elsevier text mining tool database, and clinicaltrials.gov trial registries were queried. The quality of evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method. RESULTS: Of 1213 screened studies, 13 met the inclusion criteria. Fracture instability at 3 months was greater with 2-point fixation (61.1%) than with 3-point fixation (10.6%; relative risk, 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4 to 3.3). Less vertical orbital dystopia was seen with 3-point fixation than with 2-point fixation (mean difference, 0.9 mm; 95% CI, 0.6 to 1.3 mm). The incidence of infection and malar asymmetry did not differ between the groups. The quality of evidence was very low to low. CONCLUSIONS: The reported data were limited by low quality, retrospective studies. However, the meta-analysis of randomized control trial data suggested a superiority of 3 points of exposure and fixation regarding fracture stability. When 2 points appear to provide stable fixation, the potential benefits of a third point should be weighed against the cost, operative time, and exposure/periosteal stripping on a case-by-case basis.

Components of Patient Satisfaction After Orthognathic Surgery.

The purpose of this study was to compare overall patient satisfaction after orthognathic surgery with the following specific categories: appearance, functional ability, general health, sociability, and patient-clinician communication. A 16-question survey was developed and administered to include patients at either 6 or 12 months after orthognathic surgery between June 2013 and June 2014 at the University of Pennsylvania and Massachusetts General Hospital. The predictor variables included age, sex, type of procedure, medical comorbidities, intra- or postoperative complications, and presence of paresthesia. The outcome variable was patient satisfaction overall and in each category based on a Likert scale (0: not satisfied at all to 5: very satisfied).A total of 37 patients completed the survey and had a high overall rate of satisfaction (100% of responses were 4 or 5 on Likert scale). Overall satisfaction had the highest correlation with appearance (ρ=0.52, P=0.0009) followed by sociability (ρ=0.47, P=0.004), patient-clinician communication (ρ=0.38, P=0.02) functionality (ρ=0.19, P=0.26), and general health (ρ = -0.11, P = 0.51). Patients had high satisfaction scores for orthognathic surgery. Satisfaction with postoperative appearance had the strongest correlation with overall satisfaction.