Colectomy in patients with liver disease: albumin-bilirubin score accurately predicts outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Patients with liver disease undergoing colectomy have higher rates of complications and mortality. The Albumin-Bilirubin score is a recently developed system, established to predict outcomes after hepatectomy, that accounts for liver dysfunction. METHODS: All patients undergoing colectomy were identified in the 2015-2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program colectomy-targeted database. Demographics and outcomes were compared between patients with Albumin-Bilirubin Grade 1 vs. 2/3. Multivariable regression was performed for outcomes including colorectal-specific complications. Areas under the receiver operative characteristic curves were calculated to determine accuracy of the Albumin-Bilirubin score. RESULTS: Of 86,273 patients identified, 48% (N = 41,624) were Albumin-Bilirubin Grade 1, 45% (N = 38,370) Grade 2 and 7% (N = 6,279) Grade 3. Patents with Grade 2/3 compared to Grade 1 had significantly increased mortality (7.2% vs. 0.9%, p < 0.001) and serious morbidity (31% vs. 12%, p < 0.001). Colorectal-specific complications including anastomotic leak (3.7% vs. 2.8%, p < 0.001) and prolonged ileus (26% vs. 14%, p < 0.001) were higher in patients with Grade 2/3. Grade 2/3 had increased risk of mortality (odds ratio 3.07, p < 0.001) and serious morbidity (1.78, p < 0.001). Albumin-Bilirubin had excellent accuracy in predicting mortality (area under the curve 0.81, p < 0.001) and serious morbidity (0.70, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Albumin-Bilirubin is easily calculated using only serum albumin and total bilirubin values. Grade 2/3 is associated with increased rates of mortality and morbidity following colectomy. Albumin-Bilirubin can be applied to risk-stratify patients prior to colectomy.

Preoperative Opioid and Benzodiazepine Use: Influence on Abdominal Surgical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative opioid use has shown association with worse outcomes after surgery. However, little is known about the effect of preoperative benzodiazepines with and without opioids. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of preoperative substance use on outcomes after abdominal surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Patients undergoing abdominal operations including ventral hernia, colectomy, hysterectomy, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, nephrectomy, and hiatal hernia were identified in an opioid surgical steward program by a regional NSQIP consortium between 2019 and 2021. American College of Surgeons NSQIP data were linked with custom substance use variables created by the collaborative. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed for 30-day outcomes. RESULTS: Of 4,439 patients, 64% (n = 2,847) were women, with a median age of 56 years. The most common operations performed were hysterectomy (22%), ventral hernia repair (22%), and colectomy (21%). Preoperative opioid use was present in 11% of patients (n = 472), 10% (n = 449) were on benzodiazepines, and 2.3% (n = 104) were on both. Serious morbidity was significantly (p < 0.001) increased in patients on preoperative opioids (16% vs 7.9%) and benzodiazepines (14% vs 8.3%) compared with their naïve counterpart and this effect was amplified in patients on both substances (20% vs 7.5%). Multivariable regression analyses reveal that preoperative substance use is an independent risk factor (p < 0.01) for overall morbidity and serious morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative opioid and benzodiazepine use are independent risk factors that contribute to postoperative morbidity. This influence on surgical outcomes is exacerbated when patients are on both substances.

Controller size matters: User proficiency is affected by endoscopic controller size.

BACKGROUND: Endoscope controllers are traditionally a one-size-fits-all design. However, this design may not fit the modern workforce in endoscopy-related fields. Our study aims to determine if endoscopic controller size, independent of user dexterity, affects user proficiency. METHODS: 54 endoscopically naive participants completed a baseline dexterity test, followed by large-controller endoscopic and small-controller bronchoscopic simulation exercises. Participants were stratified by surgical glove size (≥7.5 and < 7.5) and gender. RESULTS: Endoscopy time was longer in participants with <7.5 size gloves (p = 0.01) and in females (p < 0.001). However, participants with glove size <7.5 had better dexterity measures (p = 0.04). There was no difference in bronchoscopy time based on glove size (p = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Participants with larger hands were more proficient with the larger controller despite being less dexterous than their counterparts. This advantage was less pronounced with the smaller controller. Our findings suggest that endoscopic controllers should be modified in design to accommodate all providers.

Trends in General Surgery Resident Experience with Colorectal Surgery: An Analysis of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Case Logs.

OBJECTIVE: Colorectal surgery is a core component of general surgery. The volume of colorectal surgery performed by general surgery residents throughout training has not been studied. This study aims to analyze trends observed in colorectal-specific case numbers logged by general surgery residents over 16 years. DESIGN: Case number data for general surgery residents was extracted from the publicly available, annually published Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) database from 2003 to 2019. Cases were categorized as open or laparoscopic colectomy/proctectomy, colectomy with ileoanal pull-thru, abdomino-perineal resection (APR), transanal rectal tumor excision (TRE), anorectal procedure, colonoscopy, and total colorectal cases. The average case numbers per category was calculated for each year. Linear regression analyzed trends in case categories for all residents and those logged as surgeon chief and junior residents. SETTING: ACGME accredited general surgery residency programs. PARTICIPANTS: Not applicable. RESULTS: General surgery residents reported increased numbers of all, chief, and junior resident colorectal cases over the study period (124.5-173.7 cases/yr; 38.4-53.0 cases/yr; 86.4-120.6 cases/yr, all p = 0.00). Average cases for all, chief, and junior residents have increased for laparoscopic colectomy/proctectomy (4.6-26.4 cases/year; 2.7-12.9 cases/year; 2.0-13.5 cases/year, all p = 0.00), anorectal surgeries (26.7-37.7 cases/year; 5.4-9.9 cases/year; 21.3-27.8 cases/year, all p = 0.00), and colonoscopies (35.9-70.6 cases/year, p = 0.00; 6.6-14.1 cases/year, p = 0.01; 29.4-56.5 cases/year, p = 0.00). Average cases for all, chief, and junior residents have decreased for open colectomy/proctectomy (52.0-34.9 cases/year; 21.2-14.3 cases/year; 30.9-20.6 cases/year, all p = 0.00), APR (3.3-2.7 cases/year, p = 0.00; 1.8-1.3 cases/year, p = 0.00; 1.5-1.4 cases/year, p = 0.02), TRE (1.9-1.1 cases/year; 0.7-0.4 cases/year; 1.2-0.6 cases/year, all p = 0.00). Ileoanal pull-thru did not demonstrate a linear trend. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in exposure to colectomies/proctectomies, anorectal procedures and colonoscopies is encouraging, as these common colorectal operations will be encountered in general surgery practice. The observed low case numbers for TRE, APR, and ileoanal pull-thru suggest a need for specialized training.

Rethinking the routine: Preoperative laboratory testing among American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 and 2 patients before low-risk ambulatory surgery in the 2017 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program cohort.

BACKGROUND: Routine preoperative laboratory testing is not recommended for American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 1 or 2 patients before low-risk ambulatory surgery. METHODS: The 2017 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set was retrospectively queried for American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 and 2 patients who underwent low-risk, elective outpatient anorectal, breast, endocrine, gynecologic, hernia, otolaryngology, oral-maxillofacial, orthopedic, plastic/reconstructive, urologic, and vascular operations. Preoperative laboratory testing was defined as any chemistry, hematology, coagulation, or liver function studies obtained ≤30 days preoperatively. Demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were compared between those with and without testing. The numbers needed to test to prevent serious morbidity or any complication were calculated. Laboratory testing costs were estimated using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data. RESULTS: Of 111,589 patients studied, 57,590 (51.6%) received preoperative laboratory testing; 26,709 (46.4%) had at least 1 abnormal result. Factors associated with receiving preoperative laboratory testing included increasing age, female sex, non-White race/ethnicity, American Society of Anesthesiologists class 2, diabetes, dyspnea, hypertension, obesity, and steroid use. Mortality did not differ between patients with and without testing. The complication rate was 2.5% among tested patients and 1.7% among patients without tests (P < .01). The numbers needed to test was 599 for serious morbidity and 133 for any complication. An estimated $373 million annually is spent on preoperative laboratory testing in this population. CONCLUSION: Despite American Society of Anesthesiologists guidelines, a majority of American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 and 2 patients undergo preoperative laboratory testing before elective low-risk outpatient surgery. The differences in the rates of complications between patients with and without testing is low. Preoperative testing should be used more judiciously in this population, which may lead to cost savings.

Use of Preoperative Laboratory Testing Among Low-Risk Patients Undergoing Elective Anorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Many low-risk patients receive preoperative laboratory testing (PLT) prior to elective outpatient surgery, with no effect on postoperative outcomes. This has not been studied in patients undergoing anorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to determine if PLT in this population was predictive of perioperative complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 2015-2018 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) databases were queried for elective ambulatory anorectal surgeries. PLT was defined as chemistry, hematology, coagulation, or liver function studies obtained ≤30 days preoperatively. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 1 and 2 patients were included who underwent elective, ambulatory, benign anorectal surgery. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative outcomes were compared between those who did and did not receive PLT. Postoperative outcomes were defined as wound-related, procedure-related, major complications, unplanned readmission, and death occurring within 30 days. Multivariate regression analysis determined patient characteristics predictive of receiving testing. RESULTS: Of 3309 patients studied, 48.6% received PLT. On multivariate analysis, older age, female sex, Black race, ASA class 2, and comorbidities were predictive of receiving testing. The complication rates were similar between patients who did and did not receive testing (4.3% versus 3.5%, P = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: PLT is performed in over half of low-risk patients receiving elective anorectal surgery. There was no difference in the rate of postoperative complications between patients who received testing or not, nor with normal versus abnormal results. PLT can be used more judiciously in this population.

An update on surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pathologic hemorrhoids are common among adults age 45-65. Hemorrhoids are characterized as internal or external, and grades 1-4 based on severity. The type and grade dictate treatment, with surgical treatment reserved for grades 3/4. The aim of this study is to compare clinical outcomes of various surgical treatments. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials that compare surgical treatments for grade 3/4 hemorrhoids. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was done using NetMetaXL and WinBUGS. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies with 3137 participants and 14 surgical treatments for grade 3/4 hemorrhoids were included. Pain was less in patients with techniques such as laser (OR 0.34, CI 0.01-6.51), infrared photocoagulation (OR 0.38, CI 0.02-5.61), and stapling (OR 0.48, CI 0.19-1.25), compared to open and closed hemorrhoidectomies. There was less recurrence with Starion (OR 0.01, CI 0.00-0.46) and harmonic scalpel (OR 0.00, CI 0.00-0.49), compared to infrared photocoagulation and transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization. Fewer postoperative clinical complications were seen with infrared photocoagulation (OR 0.04, CI 0.00-2.54) and LigaSure (OR 0.16, CI 0.03-0.79), compared to suture ligation and open hemorrhoidectomy. With Doppler-guided (OR 0.26, CI 0.05-1.51) and stapled (OR 0.36, CI 0.15-0.84) techniques, patients return to work earlier when compared to open hemorrhoidectomy and laser. CONCLUSION: There are multiple favorable techniques without a clear "gold standard" based on current literature. Open discussion should be had between patients and physicians to guide individualized care.

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncological surgery.

The COVID-19 global pandemic is changing the practice of oncologic surgery. Accustomed to fighting cancer with all available means, surgeons are now being asked to delay treatment or make use of alternate strategies to conserve resources. Telemedicine is being widely employed. We present our thoughts on this topic and where we might be in the next several months.

Emergent Colon Resections: Does Surgeon Specialization Influence Outcomes?

BACKGROUND: Relationships between high-volume surgeons and improved postoperative outcomes have been well documented. Colorectal procedures are often performed by general surgeons, particularly in emergent settings, and may form a large component of their practice. The influence of subspecialized training on outcomes after emergent colon surgery, however, is not well described. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether subspecialty training in colorectal surgery is associated with differences in postoperative outcomes after emergency colectomy. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: Three tertiary care hospitals participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project were included. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing emergent colon resections were identified at each institution and stratified by involvement of either a colorectal surgeon or a general or acute care surgeon. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Propensity score matching was used to isolate the effect of surgeon specialty on the primary outcomes, including postoperative morbidity, mortality, length of stay, and the need for unplanned major reoperation, in comparable cohorts of patients. RESULTS: A total of 889 cases were identified, including 592 by colorectal and 297 by general/acute care surgeons. After propensity score matching, cases performed by colorectal surgeons were associated with significantly lower rates of 30-day mortality (6.7% vs 16.4%; p = 0.001), postoperative morbidity (45.0% vs 56.7%; p = 0.009), and unplanned major reoperation (9.7% vs 16.4%; p = 0.04). In addition, length of stay was ≈4.4 days longer among patients undergoing surgery by general/acute care surgeons (p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective design, with potential selection bias attributed to referral patterns. CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for underlying disease states and illness severity, emergent colon resections performed by colorectal surgeons were associated with significantly lower rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality when compared with noncolorectal surgeons. These findings may have implications for referral patterns for institutions. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A767.

Comparative Effectiveness and Risks of Bowel Preparation Before Elective Colorectal Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between bowel preparation and surgical site infections (SSIs), and also other postoperative complications, after elective colorectal surgery. BACKGROUND: SSI is a major source of postoperative morbidity/costs after colorectal surgery. The value of preoperative bowel preparation to prevent SSI remains controversial. METHODS: We analyzed 32,359 patients who underwent elective colorectal resections in the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2014. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed; propensity adjustment using patient/procedure characteristics was used to account for nonrandom receipt of bowel preparation. RESULTS: 26.7%, 36.6%, 3.8%, and 32.9% of patients received no bowel preparation, mechanical bowel preparation (MBP), oral antibiotics (OA), and MBP + OA, respectively. After propensity adjustment, MBP was not associated with decreased risk of SSI compared with no bowel preparation. In contrast, both OA and OA + MBP were associated with decreased risk of any SSI (adjusted odds ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.64; and adjusted odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.40-0.50, respectively) compared with no bowel preparation. OA and MBP + OA were associated with decreased risks of anastomotic leak, postoperative ileus, readmission, and also shorter length of stay (all P < 0.05). Bowel preparation was not associated with increased risk of cardiac/renal complications compared with no preparation. CONCLUSIONS: The use of MBP alone before elective colorectal resection to prevent SSI is ineffective and should be abandoned. In contrast, OA and MBP + OA are associated with decreased risks of SSI and are not associated with increased risks of other adverse outcomes compared with no preparation. Prospective studies to determine the efficacy of OA are warranted; in the interim, MBP + OA should be used routinely before elective colorectal resection to prevent SSI.

Should all endoscopically excised rectal polyps be tattooed? A plea for localization.

BACKGROUND: More than 5-8 % of endoscopically removed rectal polyps presumed to be benign contain invasive carcinoma. Tattooing has been advocated for follow-up localization of the resection site. Despite proven benefits, the authors propose that tattooing is not routinely performed when benign-appearing rectal polyps are endoscopically excised, thereby confounding management when invasive cancer is found. The secondary goal of the study was to determine the frequency of localization, polyp characteristics, and accuracy of predicting malignant potential at the authors' institution. METHODS: All patients with rectal neoplasia discovered during endoscopic polypectomy from 1 January 2003 to 1 August 2010 were retrospectively identified from Temple University Hospital's Tumor Registry. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from medical records including polyp size, gross appearance, pathology, resection margins, location based on preoperative colonoscopy, initial removal technique, tattoo performance, and ensuing procedures. RESULTS: During the study period, 49 patients had colonoscopic excision of presumed benign rectal polyps with ensuing diagnosis of neoplasia in the specimen. The malignant histology included adenocarcinoma (n = 5), carcinoma in situ (n = 21), carcinoid (n = 22), and composite carcinoid (n = 1). Only two polyps were tattooed at the initial polypectomy. Three polyps were "suspicious for malignancy." None of the suspicious polyps were tattooed. One of the suspicious lesions was an adenocarcinoma, and the remaining two were benign. The distance from the anal verge was noted in only seven patients. The predominant excision technique was hot snare polypectomy (n = 29). None of the incomplete polyp excisions for 15 patients were "suspicious for malignancy" or tattooed. Several strategies were used to manage incomplete resections including surveillance (40 %), repeat colonoscopic polypectomy (27 %), and surgery (33 %). CONCLUSIONS: Most malignant rectal polyps are neither diagnosed nor tattooed at initial colonoscopy. Moreover, the distance of the polyp from the anal verge is rarely measured, and gross characteristics are not well described. Tattooing of all endoscopically excised rectal polypectomy sites would avoid confounding of subsequent identification and management.