Nasal symptomatology, obstruction, and paranasal sinus opacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

CONCLUSION: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) more frequently suffer from nasal symptoms as well as upper respiratory tract obstruction compared with the healthy population. OBJECTIVE: The relationship between chronic rhinosinusitis and bronchial asthma has been studied in detail in the past. In recent years, a limited number of authors have also studied involvement of the nose and paranasal sinuses in patients with COPD. METHODS: This was an observational cross-sectional study with subsequent prospective assessment; 42 patients with COPD were included. The control group consisted of 12 healthy subjects. All patients with a history of rhinitis or rhinosinusitis and patients with previous surgery of the nose and sinuses were excluded from the study. Clinical variables evaluated were nasal symptoms (SNAQ-11 questionnaire), nasal endoscopy, nasal patency (active rhinomanometry), and computed tomography of paranasal sinuses. RESULTS: In the COPD group, there was a higher occurrence of nasal symptoms and pathological findings on nasal endoscopy compared with the control group. The overall nasal airflow was higher in the control group (compared with COPD patients) and the overall nasal resistance was higher in the COPD group (compared with controls). Pathological opacity of one or more sinuses was confirmed in 38% of COPD patients.

Real-life GOLD 2011 implementation: the management of COPD lacks correct classification and adequate treatment.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a serious, yet preventable and treatable, disease. The success of its treatment relies largely on the proper implementation of recommendations, such as the recently released Global Strategy for Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of COPD (GOLD 2011, of late December 2011). The primary objective of this study was to examine the extent to which GOLD 2011 is being used correctly among Czech respiratory specialists, in particular with regard to the correct classification of patients. The secondary objective was to explore what effect an erroneous classification has on inadequate use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). In order to achieve these goals, a multi-center, cross-sectional study was conducted, consisting of a general questionnaire and patient-specific forms. A subjective classification into the GOLD 2011 categories was examined, and then compared with the objectively computed one. Based on 1,355 patient forms, a discrepancy between the subjective and objective classifications was found in 32.8% of cases. The most common reason for incorrect classification was an error in the assessment of symptoms, which resulted in underestimation in 23.9% of cases, and overestimation in 8.9% of the patients' records examined. The specialists seeing more than 120 patients per month were most likely to misclassify their condition, and were found to have done so in 36.7% of all patients seen. While examining the subjectively driven ICS prescription, it was found that 19.5% of patients received ICS not according to guideline recommendations, while in 12.2% of cases the ICS were omitted, contrary to guideline recommendations. Furthermore, with consideration to the objectively-computed classification, it was discovered that 15.4% of patients received ICS unnecessarily, whereas in 15.8% of cases, ICS were erroneously omitted. It was therefore concluded that Czech specialists tend either to under-prescribe or overuse inhaled corticosteroids.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: official diagnosis and treatment guidelines of the Czech Pneumological and Phthisiological Society; a novel phenotypic approach to COPD with patient-oriented care.

BACKGROUND: COPD is a global concern. Currently, several sets of guidelines, statements and strategies to managing COPD exist around the world. METHODS: The Czech Pneumological and Phthisiological Society (CPPS) has commissioned an Expert group to draft recommended guidelines for the management of stable COPD. Subsequent revisions were further discussed at the National Consensus Conference (NCC). Reviewers' comments contributed to the establishment of the document's final version. DIAGNOSIS: The hallmark of the novel approach to COPD is the integrated evaluation of the patient's lung functions, symptoms, exacerbations and identifications of clinical phenotype(s). The CPPS defines 6 clinically relevant phenotypes: frequent exacerbator, COPD-asthma overlap, COPD-bronchiectasis overlap, emphysematic phenotype, bronchitic phenotype and pulmonary cachexia phenotype. TREATMENT: Treatment recommendations can be divided into four steps. 1(st) step = Risk exposure elimination: reduction of smoking and environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), decrease of home and occupational exposure risks. 2(nd) step = Standard treatment: inhaled bronchodilators, regular physical activity, pulmonary rehabilitation, education, inhalation training, comorbidity treatment, vaccination. 3(rd) step = Phenotype-specific therapy: PDE4i, ICS+LABA, LVRS, BVR, AAT augmentation, physiotherapy, mucolytic, ABT. 4(th) step = Care for respiratory insufficiency and terminal COPD: LTOT, lung transplantation, high intensity-NIV and palliative care. CONCLUSION: Optimal treatment of COPD patients requires an individualised, multidisciplinary approach to the patient's symptoms, clinical phenotypes, needs and wishes. The new Czech COPD guideline reflects and covers these requirements.