Global series: Complex regional pain syndrome: abstracts from the International Association for the Study of Pain complex regional pain syndrome SIG virtual symposia 2021.

The aim of this IASP complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) SIG Global Series 2021 was to bring together clinicians including those from developing countries to better understand the clinical presentation of complex regional pain syndrome in countries with less well-published patient populations. The purpose was to learn from each other about the range of treatments, successful outcomes, and challenges experienced. These meeting proceedings comprise abstracts from nine countries that span 4 continents and are summaries of online presentations delivered by speakers representing these countries over the course of 2 symposia. The symposia were attended by a global audience of approximately 360 people. Patients with CRPS were described and treated by clinicians from countries across Asia (Pakistan, Jordan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore), South America (Brazil and Peru), Africa (South Africa), and Europe (Norway). This reflects that CRPS exists across borders, ethnicities, and cultures. These proceedings provide a broader perspective within the international pain community about how we can better understand and treat CRPS across the globe.

Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension Presenting As Cervicogenic Headache: Case Report and Review of Literature.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous intracranial hypotension is uncommon. There is a lack of understanding of its exact pathophysiology along with significant variability in its clinical management. CASE DESCRIPTION: The authors report the case of a previously well man with cervicogenic headache associated with magnetic resonance imaging features of intracranial hypotension. The salient features of this case include the details of various treatments prescribed for his condition and the therapeutic difficulties encountered. CONCLUSION: Owing to the infrequency of the diagnosis, the challenges of clinical management for this patient are discussed in relationship to current literature. Next, the highlights of this unusual case in an individual add to the growing body of literature reports for better understanding of this disease.

Early outcome following emergency gastrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Emergency gastrectomy has been shown to be associated with poor morbidity and mortality rates. The aims of this study were to review the outcomes of emergency gastrectomy in our institution and to determine any factors that were associated with worse perioperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent emergency gastrectomy for various indications from October 2003 to April 2009 was performed. All the complications were graded according to the classification proposed by Clavien and group. RESULTS: Eighty-fi ve patients, median age 70 (range, 27 to 90 years), underwent emergency gastrectomy. The indications for the surgery included perforation, bleeding and obstruction in 45 (52.9%), 32 (37.6%) and 8 (9.4%) patients, respectively. The majority of the patients (n = 46, 54.1%) had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 3. Partial or subtotal, and total gastrectomy were performed in 75 (88.2%) and 10 (11.8%) patients, respectively. Malignancy was the underlying pathology in 33 (38.8%) patients. The perioperative mortality rate was 21.2% (n = 18) with another 27 (31.8%) patients having severe complications. Twelve (14.1%) patients had a duodenal stump leak. The independent factors predicting worse perioperative complications included high ASA score and in perforation cases. Other factors such as malignancy, age and extent of surgery were not signifi cantly related. The presence of a duodenal stump leak was the only independent factor predicting mortality. CONCLUSION: Emergency gastrectomy is associated with dismal morbidity and mortality rates. Patients with high ASA scores and perforations fared worse, and duodenal stump leak increases the risk of mortality.

Emergency surgery for perforated gastric malignancy: An institution's experience and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate the outcome of patients who underwent surgery for perforated gastric malignancies. METHODS: A review of all patients who underwent surgery for perforated gastric malignancy was performed. RESULTS: Twelve patients (nine gastric adenocarcinoma and three B-cell lymphoma) formed the study group. Ten (83.3%) had subtotal gastrectomy performed, while two (16.7%) underwent total gastrectomy. All eight patients with adenocarcinoma who survived the initial operation fared poorly. The two patients with lymphoma who survived the surgery underwent subsequent chemotherapy has no disease recurrence currently. CONCLUSION: Surgery in perforated gastric malignancy is fraught with numerous challenges.