INTRODUCTION: Combination of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and High Dose Rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) with concurrent chemotherapy (Cisplatin 40mg/m2/weekly) is the standard treatment of approach for the carcinoma of uterine cervix. In this study for image based HDR brachytherapy of intracavitary both 192Ir and 60Co sources were used for dosimetry and the dose distribution compared between point doses and volume doses as per the recommendation of ICRU89 and GEC-ESTRO on 3D image based planning. The dosimetry and clinical outcome will decide decisionmaking on choice of radionuclide for HDR brachytherapy of cervix in addition to economic reason. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Study conducted for 27 patients of cancer cervix stage IIB or IIIB with vaginal involvement limited to the upper third of vagina. All patients underwent concurrent chemoradiation Cisplatin 40mg/m2 weekly throughout EBRT by 3D conformal therapy 46Gy in 23# followed by two fractions of HDR brachytherapy with 9Gy/1Fr. Post implants 3mm slice selection of pelvic CT scans performed with ring applicator in place followed by T2 weighted paracorpal or paracoronal section of MRI imaging. The solid ring applicator (AL13017000) from library used for applicator reconstruction. Initially all plan calculated with TG-43 formalism using 192Ir radionuclide (Varian, GammaMed HDR Plus source) and then modelled 60Co radionuclide (Eckert < Ziegler BEBIG GmbH, Co0. A86) used for dose computation. ICRU89 recommended points and volumes of targets and OARs evaluated and compared. RESULTS: The study concludes that 60Co based point-A, BICRU and RICRU doses showed a comparable result with that of 192Ir HDR source based dosimetry. The volume based criterion for the target such as GTV, CTVHR, CTVIR for D90, D98, V150%and V200% are all within 5% dose level comparing two sources. CONCLUSION: 60Co a viable alternate to 192Ir by taking into consideration frequency of source exchange and cost reserve with comparable dosimetry.
Brachytherapy , Carcinoma , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Cobalt Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Iridium Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Radiotherapy Dosage , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/radiotherapy
PURPOSE: Post-mastectomy radiation therapy significantly reduces locoregional recurrence rates, which can be achieved with external beam radiotherapy delivered to chest wall, followed by scar irradiation either by electron or high-dose-rate (HDR) mould brachytherapy. The present study evaluates dosimetric advantage of Acuros® BV, a TG-186 MBDCA, over TG-43 formalism using 192Ir source for HDR brachytherapy in chest wall scar boost using catheter flap. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 25 patients, free of cardiac and pulmonary co-morbidities, who met the inclusion criteria were involved in the study. Catheter flap made of silicon with 20 channels was used to deliver a total dose of 7.5 Gy/3 fx by HDR surface mould brachytherapy to delineated scar volume. Plan was optimized with iterative method to obtain desired results with TG-43 formalism, followed by Acuros® BV (GBBS algorithm) without altering dwell positions or time. The two algorithm plans were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively with dose-volume histograms. RESULTS: The mean D98% CTV-HDR_evl coverage decreased by 1.16% compared to TG-43, and near-maximum dose decreased by 8.18% (p = 0.000), mean Dmax dose to CTV-HDR_evl, and mean Dmean dose was lesser by 6.25% (p = 0.000) and 10.82% (p = 0.000), respectively, compared to TG-43. Heart D2% showed significant results, whereas Dmedian (cGy) revealed very significant difference. A 5 mm thick skin contour showed statistically significant results (p = 0.000) for V150% and V200%. CONCLUSIONS: The presented data showed how Acuros® BV, algorithm-based calculation in scar boost irradiation of breast, accounting for a mass density of the medium and scatter condition, considered actual dose prediction in a medium.
BACKGROUND: The study aimed to assess the effect of High Dose Rate (HDR) Interstitial Brachytherapy when used alone or in combination with External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT), in early and locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of buccal mucosa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty three patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa received high dose rate interstitial brachytherapy either as primary treatment or as a boost from November 2008 to April 2013. Stage I patients received interstitial brachytherapy alone to a dose of 38.50 Gy, 3.5 Gy per fraction, twice daily at six hours apart for 11 fractions. Stage II patients received EBRT to a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions of two Gy each followed by brachytherapy boost to 21 Gy, 3.5 Gy per fraction, twice daily at six hours apart for six fractions. Stage III patients received the same radiotherapy schedule (i.e., same EBRT & Brachytherapy schedule) and with addition of Injection Cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) in three divided doses every three weeks along with EBRT. RESULTS: Follow up ranged from 12 to 60 months, median follow up was 26 months. Complete response was observed in 28 patients. Five patients had residual disease and were referred for surgical salvage. One patient died of disease progression. Stage I patients had 100% local control, whereas Stage II and Stage III patients had 84.6% and 80% local control respectively. CONCLUSION: HDR Interstitial Brachytherapy used either as a primary treatment modality or as a boost in buccal mucosal cancers provides results comparable to that of surgery, with the advantages of organ preservation, better cosmetic and functional outcomes.
