Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 153(6): 1634-1646, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38460680

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Systemic allergic reactions (sARs) following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccines were initially reported at a higher rate than after traditional vaccines. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the safety of revaccination in these individuals and to interrogate mechanisms underlying these reactions. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blinded, phase 2 trial, participants aged 16 to 69 years who previously reported a convincing sAR to their first dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine were randomly assigned to receive a second dose of BNT162b2 (Comirnaty) vaccine and placebo on consecutive days in a blinded, 1:1 crossover fashion at the National Institutes of Health. An open-label BNT162b2 booster was offered 5 months later if the second dose did not result in severe sAR. None of the participants received the mRNA-1273 (Spikevax) vaccine during the study. The primary end point was recurrence of sAR following second dose and booster vaccination; exploratory end points included biomarker measurements. RESULTS: Of 111 screened participants, 18 were randomly assigned to receive study interventions. Eight received BNT162b2 second dose followed by placebo; 8 received placebo followed by BNT162b2 second dose; 2 withdrew before receiving any study intervention. All 16 participants received the booster dose. Following second dose and booster vaccination, sARs recurred in 2 participants (12.5%; 95% CI, 1.6 to 38.3). No sAR occurred after placebo. An anaphylaxis mimic, immunization stress-related response (ISRR), occurred more commonly than sARs following both vaccine and placebo and was associated with higher predose anxiety scores, paresthesias, and distinct vital sign and biomarker changes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support revaccination of individuals who report sARs to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Distinct clinical and laboratory features may distinguish sARs from ISRRs.


Subject(s)
BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunization, Secondary , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Middle Aged , Male , Adult , Female , Double-Blind Method , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Aged , Adolescent , Young Adult , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Recurrence , Vaccination , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 , Cross-Over Studies
2.
medRxiv ; 2024 Jan 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38313285

ABSTRACT

Trauma and stressor-related symptoms have been frequently reported during the COVID-19 pandemic. Few studies compare post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) between patients and non-infected controls. Using data from an ongoing natural history study of COVID-19, this study compared PTSS between patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 during the first year of the pandemic and controls. Within the COVID-19 patient cohort, we also compared PTSS between patients with and without post-COVID conditions, also known as post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC). This study also examined the association of PTSS with trait resilience and prior trauma exposure. PTSS were assessed using the Impact of Event Scaled-Revised (IES-R), which has a validated probable PTSD cutoff (score ≥33). The results showed that patients (n=131) reported significantly higher IES-R scores than controls (n=82) and had significantly higher odds of having scores indicative of PTSD [AOR: 4.17 p: 0.029]. IES-R scores among PASC patients (n=68) were significantly elevated compared to patients without PASC (n=63) and PASC patients did not have higher odds for probable PTSD [AOR: 2.60; p: 0.14]. Trait resilience was associated with lower PTSS. These findings help characterize the mental health impact of the COVID-19 illness experience and highlight elevated PTSS in patients with persistent post-COVID conditions.

3.
J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry ; 65(3): 261-270, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38220143

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery affects the absorption of medications including antidepressants, but data regarding these effects are limited. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to review publicly available data regarding changes in antidepressant serum concentration following bariatric surgery in order to develop medication dosing recommendations in this patient population. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was performed utilizing key search terms in Pubmed. Additional data were retrieved from the Food and Drug Administration and DrugBank Online resources. RESULTS: A total of twelve published articles were included in addition to the publicly available data from the Food and Drug Administration and DrugBank. The serum concentration of antidepressants following bariatric surgery demonstrated considerable variability between and within drug classes due to unique pharmacokinetic features, drug preparation, and formulation. Recommendations were developed from published data regarding changes in serum concentration and drug-specific pharmacokinetic data. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study to propose medication dose-adjustment recommendations for patients on antidepressants undergoing bariatric surgery. We were limited by the relatively small amount of data available and recommend monitoring patients and use of clinical judgment along with this guidance.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents , Bariatric Surgery , Humans , Antidepressive Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL