ABSTRACT
Erythromelalgia is a rare condition with no published estimates of prevalence from a diverse, nationwide cohort of American patients. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the All of Us database to estimate the prevalence of erythromelalgia overall and by age groups. Of 410,361 participants, 47 were diagnosed with erythromelalgia, representing an overall age-adjusted prevalence of 10.3 (95% CI 7.4-13.3) per 100,000 people. The prevalence was higher in the 65 + age group (16, 95% CI 9.5-23, per 100,000 people) than the less than 65 age group (9.1, 95% CI 5.5-13, per 100,000 people). Further studies are needed to determine the burden of erythromelalgia in specific subgroups, such as race, within the United States.
Subject(s)
Databases, Factual , Erythromelalgia , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , United States/epidemiology , Erythromelalgia/epidemiology , Erythromelalgia/diagnosis , Prevalence , Middle Aged , Male , Female , Aged , Adult , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Adolescent , Aged, 80 and overSubject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome , Herpesvirus 6, Human , Roseolovirus Infections , Virus Activation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Drug Eruptions/etiology , Drug Eruptions/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/etiology , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/virology , Eosinophilia/chemically induced , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Eosinophilia/virology , Herpesvirus 6, Human/isolation & purification , Latent Infection , Roseolovirus Infections/diagnosis , Roseolovirus Infections/complicationsABSTRACT
Sarcoidosis, a multifaceted systemic disorder characterized histologically by the presence of non-caseating granulomas, has a wide array of cutaneous manifestations. We describe a case of a 74-year-old woman with a complex medical history, who presented with asymptomatic hyperpigmented papules on her lower extremities. Histological examination of a punch biopsy specimen showed nodular and angiocentric patterns of granulomatous inflammation consistent with sarcoidosis, and chest radiography demonstrated bilateral hilar opacities, supporting the diagnosis. To our knowledge, this specific cutaneous presentation of sarcoidosis has not been described before, and it can easily be mistaken for other conditions. Therefore, this case underscores the importance of recognizing atypical cutaneous morphologies of sarcoidosis, particularly in patients with complex medical histories, to facilitate accurate diagnosis and timely intervention. We aim to increase awareness among clinicians regarding the diverse manifestations of sarcoidosis, thereby enhancing diagnostic acumen and patient care.
Subject(s)
Erythema , Thigh , Humans , Erythema/diagnosis , Erythema/etiology , Blister , Edema , Lower ExtremitySubject(s)
Erythema , Thigh , Humans , Erythema/diagnosis , Erythema/etiology , Blister , Edema , Lower ExtremitySubject(s)
Pemphigoid, Bullous , Humans , Pemphigoid, Bullous/diagnosis , Immunoglobulin G , AutoantibodiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) is a ubiquitous lymphotropic betaherpesvirus that can reactivate in drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). Despite recent publications advancing our understanding of HHV-6 in DRESS, the exact role of HHV-6 in disease pathogenesis remains unclear. METHODS: A scoping review with the PubMed query "(HHV 6 AND (drug OR DRESS OR DIHS)) OR (HHV6 AND (drug OR DRESS OR DIHS))" was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Articles containing original data on at least one DRESS patient with HHV-6 testing were included. RESULTS: Our search returned a total of 373 publications, of which 89 met eligibility criteria. HHV-6 reactivation occurred in 63% of DRESS patients (n = 748), which was significantly more often than other herpesviruses. HHV-6 reactivation was associated with worse outcomes and greater severity in controlled studies. Case reports have demonstrated sometimes fatal HHV-6-related multi-organ involvement. Temporally, HHV-6 reactivation typically occurs 2 to 4 weeks after DRESS onset and has been linked to markers of immunologic signaling, such as OX40 (CD134), an HHV-6 entry receptor. Efficacy of antiviral or immunoglobulin treatment has only been demonstrated anecdotally, and steroid use may affect HHV-6 reactivation. CONCLUSION: HHV-6 is implicated in DRESS more than in any other dermatologic condition. It is still unclear whether HHV-6 reactivation is cause or consequence of DRESS dysregulation. Similar pathogenic mechanisms precipitated by HHV-6 in other contexts may be relevant in DRESS. Future randomized controlled studies to assess effects of viral suppression on clinical outcomes is needed.