Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 11(4): 3286, 2010 Aug 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21081888

ABSTRACT

We detail, derive and correct the technical use of the solid angle variable identified in formal guidance that relates skyshine calculations to dose-equivalent rate. We further recommend it for use with all National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM) and similar reports documented. In general, for beams of identical width which have different resulting areas, within ± 1.0 % maximum deviation the analytical pyramidal solution is 1.27 times greater than a misapplied analytical conical solution through all field sizes up to 40 × 40 cm². Therefore, we recommend determining the exact results with the analytical pyramidal solution for square beams and the analytical conical solution for circular beams.


Subject(s)
Radiation Monitoring , Radiation Protection , Radiometry , Computer Simulation , Humans , Radiotherapy Dosage
2.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 11(3): 3032, 2010 May 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20717076

ABSTRACT

This study assesses the dose level from skyshine produced by a 6 MeV medical accelerator. The analysis of data collected on skyshine yields professional guidance for future investigators as they attempt to quantify and qualify radiation protection concerns in shielding therapy vaults. Survey measurements using various field sizes and at varying distances from a primary barrier have enabled us to identify unique skyshine behavior in comparison to other energies already seen in literature. In order to correctly quantify such measurements outside a shielded barrier, one must take into consideration the fact that a skyshine maximum may not be observed at the same distance for all field sizes. A physical attribute of the skyshine scatter component was shown to increase to a maximum value at 4.6 m from the barrier for the largest field size used. We recommend that the largest field sizes be used in the field for the determination of skyshine effect and that the peak value be further analyzed specifically when considering shielding designs.


Subject(s)
Particle Accelerators/instrumentation , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiotherapy/instrumentation , Computer Graphics , Humans , Radiation Dosage , Scattering, Radiation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...