How to target estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer?

Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers generally have a better prognosis and are often responsive to anti-estrogen therapy, which is the first example of a successful therapy targeted on a specific protein, the ER. Unfortunately ER-negative breast cancers are more aggressive and unresponsive to anti-estrogens. Other targeted therapies are thus urgently needed, based on breast cancer oncogene inhibition or suppressor gene activation as far as molecular studies have demonstrated the alteration of expression, or structure of these genes in human breast cancer. Using the MDA-MB.231 human breast cancer cell line as a model of ER-negative breast cancers, we are investigating two of these approaches in our laboratory. Our first approach was to transfect the ER or various ER-deleted variants into an ER-negative cell line in an attempt to recover anti-estrogen responsiveness. The unliganded receptor, and surprisingly estradiol, were both found to inhibit tumor growth and invasiveness in vitro and in vivo. The mechanisms of these inhibitions in ER-negative cancer cells are being studied, in an attempt to target the ER sequence responsible for such inhibition in these cancer cells. Another strategy is trying to inhibit the activity or expression of an oncogene specifically overexpressed in most breast cancers. This approach was recently shown by others to be efficient in breast cancer therapy with HER2-Neu oncogene amplification using Herceptin. Without excluding other molecular putative targets, we have focused our research on cathepsin D as a potential target, since it is often overexpressed in aggressive human breast cancers, including ER-negative tumors, and rarely associated with HER2-Neu amplification. Our first results obtained in vitro on cell lines and in vivo in tumor xenografts in nude mice, illustrate that the mode of action of cathepsin D in breast cancer is useful to guide the development of these therapies. In the past 20 years we have learned that the action of cathepsin D is complex and involves both intracellular and extracellular activities due to its proteolytic activity and to interactions with membrane components without catalytic activity. Each of these mechanisms could be potentially inhibited in an attempt to prevent tumor growth. Breast cancer is a very heterogeneous and multigenic disease and different targeted therapies adapted to each category of breast cancer are therefore required. Validated assays in the primary tumor of molecular markers such as ER, HER2-Neu and cathepsin D should help to predict which targeted therapy should be applied to cure breast cancer patients.

Decreased expression of estrogen receptor beta protein in proliferative preinvasive mammary tumors.

To understand the significance of estrogen receptor beta (ERbeta) in mammary carcinogenesis, we evaluated the expression of ERbeta in preinvasive mammary tumors. The percentage of ERbeta-positive epithelial or tumoral cells was assayed by quantitative immunohistochemistry using an image analyzer in 130 lesions of varying histological risk from 118 patients [71 with benign breast disease (BBD) and 59 with carcinoma in situ (CIS)] and compared with 118 adjacent histologically normal glands. Five groups of lesions with an increasing risk of invasive cancer, from BBD without hyperplasia to high-grade CIS, were studied. Results were compared with ERalpha and Ki67 immunostaining. The percentage of ERbeta-positive cells was high (median, 85%) in "normal" mammary glands and in nonproliferative BBD and decreased significantly (P < 0.0001) in proliferative BBD without atypia and in CIS, contrasting with an inverse progression for the ERalpha level. In normal mammary glands, the ERbeta level did not vary according to the nature of the lesion at the periphery and was significantly higher (P < 0.007) than in adjacent preinvasive lesions, except in nonproliferative BBD. The ERbeta level decreased in proliferative BBD, anticipating the ERalpha increase, which was significant in BBD with atypia. In high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ, both ER levels were low. The ratio between ERbeta and ERalpha was high in normal glands, and decreased significantly in proliferative lesions. ERbeta staining was inversely correlated with Ki67 (r = -0.333; P < 0.001), more particularly in high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (r = -0.57; P < 0.02). The marked and early decreased level of ERbeta protein associated with other criteria of cell proliferation suggests a protective effect of ERbeta against the mitogenic activity of estrogens in mammary premalignant lesions. Knowledge of the ERbeta and ERalpha content in each preinvasive lesion should help to rationalize antiestrogen preventive therapy adapted to each individual patient.