Estimation of glomerular filtration rate to adjust vancomycin dosage in critically ill patients: superiority of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation?

The purpose of this study was to determine the best estimate of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) to adjust vancomycin (VAN) dosage in critically ill patients. Seventy-eight adult intensive care unit patients received a 15 mg/kg loading dose of VAN plus a 30 mg/kg/day continuous infusion. Steady-state concentration was measured 48 hours later and the dose was adjusted to obtain a target concentration ranging from 20 to 25 mg/l. GFR was estimated by measured creatinine clearance (CLCR), Cockcroft, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations. The required dose providing the target concentration was 36±17 mg/kg/day. The first dosage had to be increased in 51% of all patients and in 84% of trauma patients (highest GFR), but had to be decreased in 17% of patients. The closest relationship between clearances of vancomycin was observed with CKD-EPI to GFR. The correlation between clearances of vancomycin and measured CLCR was significant but was rather poor with Cockcroft and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. On the Bland and Altman plots, measured CLCR provided a lower bias but a larger confidence interval and a weaker precision than CKD-EPI. For VAN dose adjustments in intensive care unit patients, Cockcroft formula and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease should be used with caution. In clinical practice, the physician does not have at their disposal the patient's measured CLCR when prescribing. The CKD-EPI appears to be the best predictor of clearances of vancomycin for calculation of a therapeutic VAN regimen.

Short communication: Toxicokinetics of ochratoxin A in dairy ewes and carryover to milk following a single or long-term ingestion of contaminated feed.

Ruminal microbes have the capacity to inactivate ochratoxins, rendering ruminants less sensitive to this fungal contaminant found in cereal feeds. However, ochratoxin A has been reported in milk surveys. The objective of this study was to assess the toxicokinetics, excretion, and transmission into milk of ochratoxin A using doses similar to those of naturally occurring field contaminations. Six Lacaune dairy ewes in late lactation were separated into 2 groups that received a single dose of contaminated wheat containing 5 or 30 µg of ochratoxin A/kg of body weight. After administration, toxicokinetics and excretion were monitored for 48 h. Subsequently, ewes were administered the corresponding toxin dose daily for 24 d followed by a second toxicokinetics and excretion monitoring period for this long-term exposure. The doses used did not affect production or health of ewes. After a single dose, ochratoxin A and its main metabolite, ochratoxin α, were found in blood 1h postexposure. The maximum blood concentrations of ochratoxin A and α, respectively, were dose dependent and were observed, on average, 6 and 8h after exposure. Long-term exposure increased the maximum concentration of ochratoxin A detected in blood, whereas ochratoxin α was not affected. In contrast, the time to reach the maximum concentration was reduced to 3h for both molecules. Ochratoxins, essentially ochratoxin α, were mainly excreted in feces. Ochratoxin A and α were detected in milk at concentrations that were dose dependent but with a low carryover rate (<0.02%). Chronic administration did not increase the concentration of toxin in milk. Even though ochratoxin A can escape ruminal degradation and traces were found in milk of experimentally exposed ewes, the low carryover of ochratoxin A in milk minimizes the risk to consumers.

Feasibility of, and critical paths for mycophenolate mofetil Bayesian dose adjustment: pharmacological re-appraisal of a concentration-controlled versus fixed-dose trial in renal transplant recipients.

The aim of this study was to analyze retrospectively and critically the different steps of the individual dose adjustment procedure employed in the concentration-controlled (CC) versus fixed-dose trial Apomygre, which showed that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) dose adjustment using a limited sampling strategy significantly reduced the risk of treatment failures and acute rejection in renal transplants at one year posttransplantation. The number of AUCs performed during the study and circumstances of collection, time of blood sampling, Bayesian mycophenolic acid (MPA) area-under-the-curve (AUC) estimation procedures and physicians' compliance with MMF dose recommendations were retrospectively analyzed. 92% of AUCs scheduled over the study were actually performed. Sampling times were very well respected. Bayesian estimation of MPA exposure was done by the pharmacologists locally in accordance with the protocol instructions and the AUC estimates obtained were virtually all confirmed a posteriori. On the other hand, a second AUC estimated by multiple linear regression could only be provided for 84% of the profiles and showed a large overestimation with respect to Bayesian estimates for AUC values between 10 and 55mgh/L. In the CC arm, a very good physicians' compliance was observed (85%) and application of the dose recommendations led to higher values of AUCs (42.1+/-14.6mgh/L versus 36.7+/-16.3mgh/L, p=0.0035) and to more AUCs in the target range (69% versus 56%, p=0.0343) than when dose recommendations were not applied. By analyzing in detail the feasibility criteria of MMF Bayesian dose adjustment, this study highlighted the requirements for successful extrapolation of the Apomygre trial results to routine practice: (i) respect of the PK sampling time-windows; (ii) use of relevant tools for accurate drug exposure estimation and dose adjustment calculation; and (iii) good compliance of the physicians with regard to the recommended doses.

Cefepime in intensive care unit patients: validation of a population pharmacokinetic approach and influence of covariables.

AIM: The purpose of our study was to define and validate a population-pharmacokinetic model including the influence of patients' characteristics on the pharmacokinetics of cefepime. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 55 patients were randomized in Group 1 (34 patients, 320 cefepime concentrations) for the model building and Group 2 (21 patients, 196 cefepime concentrations) for the validation group. They received cefepime as 2 g A 2 or as 4 g continuously. The population pharmacokinetic analysis was carried out using NONMEM and a baseline model was constructed for studying the influence of demographic and biological variables. The model was then validated by a comparison of the predicted and observed concentrations in Group 2. A final model was elaborated from the whole population. RESULTS: Total clearance (CL) was significantly correlated with the serum creatinine (CREA) and the central volume of distribution (V1) was correlated with the body weight (WT). The final model was: CL = 7.14 + (-0.0133 A CREA). V1 = (-16.8) + (0.475 A WT). Q (intercompartmental clearance) = 10.5. V2 = 18.1. The mean pharmacokinetic parameters and their individual variability were: CL (8.24 l/h, 45%), V1 (20.89 l, 60%), V2 (17.95 l, 49%), total volume (38.85 l, 42%) and Q (10.56 l/h, 9%). The bias (1.07 mg/l, IC 95% = -40.46 -+42.60), precision (21.19%) and AFE (1.15) demonstrated the performance of the model. CONCLUSION: We have developed and validated a pharmacokinetic model to estimate cefepime concentrations. We showed that serum creatinine and body weight are factors that may influence the standard dose of cefepime. Our model enabled us to predict cefepime concentrations in other patients.

Pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime and cefepime in burn patients: the importance of age and creatinine clearance.

AIM: The standard dosage recommendations for beta-lactam antibiotics can result in very low drug levels in intensive care (IC) patients and burn patients in the absence of renal dysfunction. We studied the pharmacokinetic parameters and serum concentrations of ceftazidime (CF) and cefepime (CE) in burn patients and analyzed the modifications according to clinical and biological parameters and in particular age and creatinine clearance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two pharmacokinetic studies were carried out with daily doses of 1 g x 6 for CF (n = 17) and 2 g x 3 for CE (n = 13). Creatinine clearance (CL(CR)) was both estimated and measured. Blood was sampled at steady state after an initial and a subsequent antibiotic dose. C(max) (maximal) and C(min) (minimal) concentrations were measured by HPLC. The influence of clinical and biological data was analyzed using ANOVA, ANCOVA and stepwise multiple linear regression. RESULTS: The ratio of C(min) to the low MIC break point (4 mg/l) was lower than 4 in 52% of subjects receiving CF and in 80% of subjects receiving CE. The C(min) of CF was correlated with measured CL(CR) and was higher in mechanically ventilated patients than in non-ventilated patients. The clearance of CF was correlated with age. The C(min) of CE was correlated with age and drug clearance with measured CL(CR). Therefore dosage adjustment of these drugs in burn patients needs to take into account age, measured creatinine clearance and the danger of low concentrations occurring when the creatinine clearance is greater than 120 ml x min(-1). CONCLUSION: In burn patients, the pharmacokinetic disposition of CF and CE was much more variable than in healthy subjects. Age and CL(CR) were predictors of the disposition of these antibiotics. Shortening the dosage interval or using continuous infusions will prevent low serum levels and keep trough levels above the MIC for longer periods of time. In view of the lack of a bedside measurement technique for ceftazidime and cefepime levels, we suggest a more frequent use of measured CL(CR) in order to attain efficacious clinical concentrations.

Intermittent administration of ceftazidime to burns patients: influence of glomerular filtration.

OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime, the antibiotic of choice for treating acute P. aeruginosa infections, may be modified in burns patients. The aim of this study was to identify the factors causing variations in the serum antibiotic concentrations in bums patients. METHODS: 30 patients with serious burns were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 received a dose of ceftazidime of 2 x 3 g/24 hours. The second group received the same dose but divided into 6 administrations. Blood samples were taken at 24 (M1) and 48 hours (M2) after the start of treatment and the peak and trough serum concentrations of ceftazidime measured by HPLC. Depending on the results, frequency and/or dose was modified to obtain trough concentrations (Cmin) equal to 16 mg/l, i.e. 4 times the MIC. Either the same dose was maintained, but mostly divided up, or it was increased to 1 g x 8 administrations or it was decreased to 1 g x 4 or 1 g x 3. The serum concentrations of ceftazidime obtained were analyzed taking into account the characteristics of the burns patients (multivariate correlation). RESULTS: From the first sample (M1) Cmin was lower than the target concentration in 50% of the patients in Group 1 and 20% in Group 2. The modification of the dosing regimen put into place after the first analysis, led to the patients being further divided into four groups before the second blood sampling. Finally, 5 patients ended up in Group 1. In all patients and for all administration times, a negative correlation was found between Cmin and the creatinine clearance, calculated by using Cockcroft's formula. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the peculiarities of ceftazidime pharmacokinetics seen in burns patients with high interindividual variability. Based on Cmin monitoring and a predefined therapeutic range, dose adjustment was often required. Ceftazidime clearance is correlated with creatinine clearance (Cockcroft's formula), suggesting that this parameter could be used for a priori or a posteriori dose individualization. To respect the summary of the product characteristics (SPC) and reduce the variability in trough concentrations, the dose should be fractionated (1 g x 6) over a 24-hour period or even given as a continuous infusion. Trough concentrations must be evaluated to adapt the dosage regimen to attain target concentrations of 4 x the MIC.

Assessment of renal function in clinical practice at the bedside of burn patients.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: * In burn patients it has been shown ([2]), that there is a correlation between the creatinine clearance (CL(CR)) and the clearance of inulin. * The CL(CR) has never been studied in burn patients who have normal serum creatinine. * The Robert, Kirkpatrick and sMDRD formulae have never been evaluated in burn patients. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: * Despite burn patients having normal serum creatinine concentrations, the study showed that there are large variations in CL(CR) which cannot be detected by single serum creatinine measurements, and which have important implications for drug therapy. * It showed that the formulae currently used to calculate creatinine clearance on the basis of serum creatinine are inadequate for use in burn patients, and they should be abandoned in favour of direct measurement from a 24 h urine collection. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the renal function of burn patients could be correctly assessed using a single serum creatinine measurement, within normal limits, and three prediction equations of glomerular filtration taking into account, serum creatinine, age, weight and sex. METHODS: This was a prospective study comprising 36 adult burn patients with a serum creatinine <120 micromol l(-1), within the second or third week following the burn injury. Renal function was assessed using serum creatinine, 24 h urinary CL(CR), and the Cockcroft-Gault, Robert, Kirkpatrick and simplified MDRD equations. RESULTS: Despite normal serum creatinine concentrations in all patients, a significant number had a decreased CL(CR). The urinary CL(CR) was <80 ml(-1) min(-1) 1.73 m(-2) in nine patients (25%), and <60 ml(-1) min(-1) 1.73 m(-2) in five patients (14%). Between the groups having a CL(CR) lower or greater than 80 ml(-1) min(-1) 1.73 m(-2) there were no differences in gender, burn indices, percentage of mechanically ventilated patients or length of hospital stay, but a difference in age. The highest CL(CR) (>140 ml(-1) min(-1) 1.73 m(-2)) was found in 13 patients younger than 40 years. Regression analysis, residual and Bland-Altman plots revealed that neither the Cockcroft-Gault, Robert, Kirkpatrick nor sMDRD equations were specific enough for the assessment of renal function. CONCLUSIONS: In burn patients with normal serum creatinine during the hypermetabolic phase, serum creatinine and creatine based predictive equations are imprecise in assessing renal function.

Increased amikacin dosage requirements in burn patients receiving a once-daily regimen.

Altered pharmacokinetics in burn patients may affect antibiotic plasma concentrations. Typical once-daily dosing (ODD) of 15 mg/kg amikacin (AMK) in burn patients does not always produce peak concentrations (C(max)) reaching the therapeutic objective of six to eight times the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC). We recorded plasma concentrations following administration of 20 mg/kg AMK in burn patients and studied factors affecting pharmacokinetics. Mean C(max) was 48.3+/-10.8 mg/L and the C(max)/MIC ratio was 6+/-1.35. Statistical analysis demonstrated a relationship between C(max) and the area of the burn and Unit Burn Standard, and between AMK clearance and creatinine clearance (Cl(CR)). We conclude that ODD regimens of AMK in patients with burns >15% body surface area and/or with Cl(CR) >120 mL/min could require doses >20 mg/kg to reach adequate C(max). In all cases, patient therapeutic drug monitoring is essential to ensure the safe usage of these dosing recommendations.

Cefepime in critically ill patients: continuous infusion vs. an intermittent dosing regimen.

The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of a continuous infusion of cefepime vs. an intermittent regimen in critically ill adult patients with Gram-negative bacilli infection. The prospective randomized parallel study was carried out in 50 patients with severe pneumonia (n = 41) or bacteremia (n = 9). They received cefepime 4 g/d either as a continuous infusion or intermittent administration 2 x 2 g in combination with amikacin. Patient characteristics and the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the isolated bacteria were comparable. Clinical outcomes were assessed along with pharmacodynamic indices and compared in both groups (chi2 and Mann-Whitney U-tests). Mechanical ventilation, clinical outcome and bacteriological eradication did not significantly differ between the two groups. Also, the area under the plasma cefepime concentration curve at steady state (AUCss: 612 +/- 369 vs. 623 +/- 319 mg x 1(-1) x h), AUCss > MIC (595 +/- 364 vs. 606 +/- 316 mg x 1(-1) x h) and the area under the inhibitory concentration curve (AUICss: 4258 +/- 5819 vs. 5194 +/- 7465 mg x 1(-1) x h) were similar. If the time above MIC (t > MIC) was not significantly higher in Group 1 (100 +/- 0%) than in Group 2 (90 +/- 11%), t > five-fold MIC in Group 1 (100 +/- 0%) was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than in Group 2 (82 +/- 25%). The mean time over the French breakpoint (4 mg/l) was 100 +/- 0% and 72 +/- 27% in Group 1 and 2 (p < 0.001), respectively. In contrast to intermittent cefepime administration, continuous infusion of cefepime consistently maintained a serum concentration > 5 x the MIC of typical Gram-negative nosocomial pathogens. This results in greater bactericidal activity against organisms with a higher (2 mg/l) cefepime breakpoint even if the clinical outcome is not significantly modified.

[Importance of a cefpirome-vancomycin combination on bactericidal kinetics in severe MRSA infections in intensive care]. / Intérêt de l'association cefpirome-vancomycine sur la cinétique de bactéricidie dans les infections sévères à SAMR en réanimation.

UNLABELLED: Vancomycin is always the drug of choice for treatment of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in spite of his bactericidal kinetic. BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate in vivo the improvement of bactericidal kinetic of vancomycin associated with cefpirome against MRSA infection in critically ill patients. METHODS: The prospective cross-over study was carried out in 20 patients with severe pneumonia or bacteremia. There were randomized to receive vancomycin 2 g per day (Group 1, n = 10) or vancomycin with cefpirome 2 g x 2 (Group 2, n = 10). Clinical recovery, bacteriologic parameters (bactericidal kinetic and bactericidal power in vivo at the peak and the valley), duration of ventilation and stay in ICU were comparatively explored in both groups. RESULTS: Clinical outcome did not significantly differ between Group 1 and 2. Bactericidal kinetics were better in the Group 2 (40% vs 60% after 6 hours to the dilution for 1/8e) but the difference was not significant. However, bactericidal power in sera was also better in the Group 2 with more bactericidal dilution at 1/16e (68% vs 88.8%: NS) and overall at 1/32e (10.5% vs 50%: p < 0.05) and CRP, an inflammatory marker, was significantly lower in the Group 2 than in the Group 1 (119.5 +/- 24 mg/l vs 198.6 +/- 78 mg/l: p < 0.05) on the third day.

Pharmacodynamic study of low molecular weight dermatan sulphate (Desmin) after a single subcutaneous administration in patients with renal insufficiency.

The pharmacodynamic pattern of low molecular weight dermatan sulphate (CAS 24967-94-0, Desmin-LMWDS) was studied in patients presenting chronic renal insufficiency. Three groups of six patients were defined according to their creatinine clearance: group 1, more than 50 ml/min, group 2 between 10 and 50 ml/min and group 3 lower than 10 ml/min (haemodialized patients). Desmin-LMWDS concentrations were determined with the Heptest assay and the chromogenic specific heparin cofactor II dependent anti IIa assay. In patients of group 1 affected by moderate renal insufficiency, the pharmacodynamic profiles were roughly comparable to those obtained in normal subjects. In the two other groups, the profiles were markedly modified by the renal insufficiency. The maximal concentrations were doubled and the areas under the time-activity curve were 4-fold higher in haemodialyzed (group 3) and severe renal insufficient patients (group 2) than in patients of group 1. The clearance of the anti IIa activity were 13.98 +/- 6.25 l/h; 4.12 +/- 2.64 l/h and 2.94 +/- 1.53 l/h and the half-lives were 2.79 +/- 2.60 h, 6.15 +/- 4.02 h and 11.51 +/- 6.54 h in groups 1 to 3, respectively (p < 0.05). The Desmin-LMWDS clearance was directly correlated to the creatinine clearance (r = 0.8244, n = 18, p < 0.001). Thus, as for low molecular weight heparin, renal function plays a major role in the elimination of low molecular weight dermatan sulphate.

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of two trimebutine formulations in healthy volunteers using desmethyl-trimebutine levels.

Trimebutine tablets (dimethylamino-2-phenyl-2-n-butyl-3,4,5- trimethoxybenzoate maleate, CAS 34140-59-5, reference) and a new tablet formulation (Eurogalena, test) were administered in 24 healthy volunteers of both sexes according to a cross-over design, in a single dose of one 100 mg tablet of each formulation. Blood samples were drawn off over a 24-h period, before (time 0) and after each administration at specific intervals. Trimebutine and its main active metabolite, desmethyl-trimebutine, were measured in plasma using a validated HPLC method with UV detection. For both compounds, the sensitivity was 20 ng.ml-1 and the analytical method was proved to be linear for concentrations between 20 ng.ml-1 and 5000 ng.ml-1, with a variability less than 11%. The non-compartmental method was used for pharmacokinetic analysis. The confidence interval approach was used for comparison of the formulations according to the EU guidance note on bioavailability and bioequivalence on Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-infinity, log transformed. Tmax values were statistically compared using the Friedman non-parametric test. No trimebutine concentration was measured in the plasma samples. The obtained data with desmethyl-trimebutine proved the bioequivalence of the two tested formulations.

Synthesis of methylamino-2-phenyl-2-butyl-3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoate, the main bioactive metabolite of trimebutine maleate.

The first synthesis of the methylamino-2-phenyl-2-butyl-3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoate (desmethyltrimebutine) I is described. This compound is the main bioactive metabolite of trimebutine II (Debridat, CAS 39133-31-8), an antispasmodic widely used for intestinal diseases since 1969. It was used for pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence studies.

Effect of polyoxyl 35 castor oil and Polysorbate 80 on the intestinal absorption of digoxin in vitro.

Surfactants are classically used to improve the solubilization of lipophilic drugs such as digoxin. Polysorbate 80 and Cremophor EL (polyoxyl 35 castor oil) are such surfactants but they may also modulate the action of P-glycoprotein, an energy-dependent "counter-transport" system implicated in the phenomenon of multidrug resistance in cancer cells. P-glycoprotein is also present in the intestine on the apical membrane of mature enterocytes and can potentially reduce the absorption of a wide range of drugs. In this study, using the improved everted gut sac method, the effects of Polysorbate 80, Cremophor EL and cyclosporin on the absorption of digoxin were studied. An increase in the uptake of digoxin in the presence of these three products could be shown with our in vitro model. Cremophor EL and Polysorbate 80 had no toxic effects at the concentrations used. These results suggest that surfactants such as Cremophor EL and Polysorbate 80 should not only support solubilization but can also modulate the P-glycoprotein system to improve the bioavailability of poorly absorbed drugs.

Determination of trimebutine and desmethyl-trimebutine in human plasma by HPLC.

A simple and sensitive HPLC method has been developed to measure trimebutine (CAS 39133-31-8, maleate: CAS 34140-59-5) and its main metabolite desmethyl-trimebutine in human plasma. The method was validated according to the Washington Consensus Conference on the Validation of Analytical Methods. It involved extraction of the plasma with n-hexane containing 2-pentanol, followed by reversed-phase HPLC using a Partisil ODS2 10 microns column and UV detection at 265 nm. The retention times of the internal standard (procaine), desmethyl-trimebutine and trimebutine were 2.4, 4.3 and 6.5 min, respectively. The standard curves were linear from 20 ng.ml-1 (limit of quantitation) to 5000 ng.ml-1 for both compounds. The coefficient of variation for all the criteria of validation were less than 15%. The extraction recoveries obtained for trimebutine and desmethyl-trimebutine were about 90%. Both compounds were very stable upon storage in plasma. The method was tested by measuring the plasma concentrations following oral administration to humans during a bioequivalence study and was shown suitable for pharmacokinetic studies.

Microdialysis of melatonin in the confluens sinuum of the rat following quantification by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in the negative chemical ion mode.

In this study, an original surgical implantation technique in the confluens sinuum via the superior sagittal vein was developed to quantify melatonin secretion by the pineal gland. Melatonin (CAS 73-31-4) was determined using gas chromatography couples to negative ion chemical ionisation mass spectrometry following liquid extraction and derivatisation by penta-fluoropropionic acid anhydride (PFPA). The minimum detectable amount was 40 fg per injection, corresponding to 1 pg.ml-1 in dialysate. The assay was linear in the range 20-1000 pg.ml-1. This method was suitable for routine melatonin determination in dialysats of peripheral and central circulation with coefficients of variation of 11.2 and 24.6%, respectively for within and between analyses. Profiles of melatonin concentration were obtained (n = 3 rats) over a 2-day experimentation with a slowly diminution of the filtration capacity of the probe during the second day. The nocturnal concentrations of melatonin in the confluens sinuum dialysat ranged from 1003.9 to 2345 pg.ml-1 in the dialysat, indicating wide interindividual variations in the melatonin levels.

[Continuous versus intermittent cefepime infusion in critical care. Preliminary results]. / Perfusion continue versus administration discontinue de céfépime en réanimation. Résultats préliminaires.

The bactericidal activity of beta-lactams is time-dependent, and the time spent above the MIC (T > MIC) is the best predictor of efficacy. A prospective, randomized, open-label study was conducted in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with gram-negative rod infections to compare the efficacy of cefepime given as a continuous versus an intermittent infusion. Of the 18 patients included to date, 14 had severe pneumonia and four bacteremia. All patients received amikacin, 15 mg/kg/d, and cefepime, 4 g/d. Patients were randomized to cefepime administration as a continuous infusion (Group 1, n = 9) or as an intermittent infusion (Group 2, n = 9, 2 g every 12 h). No significant differences were found between the two groups for age, sex, initial infection, IGS II score (46 vs 48, NS) or the MIC of the gram-negative organism. Mechanical ventilation and hospital stay durations, recovery rates, and pharmacokinetic parameters (24-h AUIC, 12-h AUIC, T > MIC, and T > 5 x MIC) were compared in the two groups using the chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. There were no significant differences for mechanical ventilation duration, recovery rate, hospital stay duration (34 vs 36 days, NS), 24-h AUIC (624 vs 473, NS), or the 12-h AUIC (235 vs 238, NS). There were two interesting findings: T > MIC was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in Group 1 (23.84 +/- 0.2) than in Group 2 (20.7 +/- 3), and T > 5 x MIC was also significantly (P < 0.01) higher in Group 1 (23.61 +/- 0.6) than in Group 2 (16.6 +/- 6). Although clinical outcomes were similar in the two groups, it is reasonable to assume that the longer time spent with a cefepime level above the MIC in the continuous infusion group was associated with a more stable bactericidal effect.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of acamprosate.

Acamprosate is a new psychotropic drug used in the treatment of alcohol (ethanol)-dependence. Recent studies suggest that acamprosate inhibits neuronal hyperexcitability by antagonising excitatory amino acids. It is available as a 333 mg enteric-coated tablet, with a recommended dosage of 1.3 g/day for patients with a bodyweight < 60 kg and 2 g/day for patients with a bodyweight > or = 60 kg. Treatment with higher dose strength tablets 2 x 500 mg twice daily is bioequivalent to treatment with the 2 x 333 mg 3 times daily dosage regimen. Acamprosate is absorbed via the paracellular route in the gastrointestinal tract. Absorption is rapid but limited after oral administration. At steady-state, acamprosate has a moderate distribution volume of about 20L. Acamprosate is not protein bound or metabolised. Half of the elimination of acamprosate occurs as unchanged acetyl-homotaurine in urine, the other half might be eliminated by biliary excretion. The administration of the enteric-coated tablets showed a flip-flop mechanism with a terminal elimination half-life 10-fold higher than the 3-hour half-life reported after intravenous infusion. During repeated oral administration of 666 mg 3 times daily, steady-state is reached after 5 to 7 days and leads to plasma concentrations ranging from 370 to 650 micrograms/L. The pharmacokinetics of acamprosate administered as an enteric-coated tablets are time- and dose-independent, and its accumulation ratio is about 2.4 at steady-state. Acamprosate disposition does not differ between males and females. The pharmacokinetics of acamprosate are not modified in patients with hepatic insufficiency or chronic alcoholism. In contrast, renal insufficiency influences the elimination of acamprosate and it is, therefore, contraindicated under such circumstances. Interaction studies have confirmed that when acamprosate is concomitantly administered with food, the amount absorbed is decreased. When combined with diazepam, disulfiram or alcohol, the pharmacokinetic disposition of acamprosate is not modified. Acamprosate does not influence the kinetics of diazepam, alcohol or imipramine and its metabolite desipramine.

Blood and cerebral concentrations of the new potential analgesic UP 26-91 measured in vivo by microdialysis after toxic doses.

The concept of proportionality between the pharmacological effects of drugs and their dosage has been questioned since the discovery of saturable phenomenon for some drug dispositions, either during their absorption or their elimination. Such saturation may also occur during the distribution phase in the tissues. This phenomenon, however, is often difficult to demonstrate and microdialysis is a powerful technique to assess precise changes in drug concentrations in tissue. This technique has been used to compare brain and blood concentrations of a potential analgesic, UP 26-91 (3-¿[2-[4-(2,4-difluorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl]ethyl]thio¿ -1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-a]pyrioline, citrate salt, CAS 115762-17-9 for the base), at different intravenous doses. Microdialysis probes were surgically implanted in the cerebral cortex and the jugular vein of male Sprague-Dawley rats (about 350 g). A single dose of radiolabelled 14(C) UP 26-91 mixed with unlabelled drug was injected into the animal's tail vein. Three doses of drug (2.5, 12.5 and 22.5 mg.kg-1) were tested, with three rats for each dose. All the doses consisted of the same amount of radiolabelled product, used as a tracer, supplemented by the amount of non-radiolabelled UP 26-91 necessary to reach the desired concentration. The rats were conscious, freely moving and had free access to food and water. Microdialysis samples were collected at the rate of 1 microliter.min-1, and sampled every 15 min for 16-17 h. The two highest doses were in the range of those used for toxicological studies. Blood UP 26-91 radioactivity concentrations were superimposable independent of the dose. Thus, it can be concluded that there was a linear relationship between blood concentrations and administered doses. By contrast, the brain concentration for the highest administered dose was statistically higher than the two others (p < 0.05), which demonstrated that UP 26-91 exhibited a non-linear pharmacokinetics in the brain. It is therefore likely that a saturable transport mechanism occurs across the blood-brain barrier. This study demonstrates that blood toxicokinetics may not correctly reflect tissue exposure to a drug.