ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Inappropriate testing for Clostridiodes difficile infection (CDI) increases health care onset cases and contributes to overdiagnosis and overtreatment of patients in a community health care system. METHODS: An electronic smart order set for the testing of CDI was created and implemented to improve the appropriateness of testing. A retrospective review of patients who were tested for CDI, pre and post, was conducted to determine if inappropriate stool testing for CDI decreased post-implementation of the order set. RESULTS: 224 patients were tested for CDI during the study period with the post-implementation period having a higher proportion of patients who met appropriate testing criteria defined by presence of diarrhea (80.5% vs 61.3%; P = .002). The rate of inappropriate CDI stool testing decreased from 31.1% to 11.0% after implementation (P < .001). A higher proportion of CDI patients were readmitted within 30 days of discharge (54.2% vs 33.0%; P = 0.001) during the post-implementation period. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant reduction in inappropriate CDI testing following the implementation of the order set. There was an observed increase in the proportion of patients who underwent recent gastrointestinal surgery which may have contributed to the increase in 30-day readmission rates during the post-implementation period.
Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections , Humans , Florida , Clostridium Infections/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Diagnostic Tests, Routine , Community Health ServicesABSTRACT
Objective: Unlike randomized controlled trials, practical real-world studies can offer important information about implementation of prehospital interventions, particularly in community settings where there may be reluctance to adopt new practices. We present the results of a natural experiment that was driven by mandated COVID-19 pandemic-driven shift from endotracheal intubation (ETI) to the i-gel® supraglottic airway (SGA) as a primary advanced airway management device in the prehospital setting to reduce emergency medical services (EMS) personnel exposure to potentially infectious secretions. The objective was to compare first-pass success and timing to successful airway placement between ETI and the i-gel® SGA under extenuating circumstances. Methods: This pre/post study compared airway placement metrics in prehospital patients requiring advance airway management for non-trauma-related conditions. Data from EMS records were extracted over 2 years, 12 months pre-pandemic, and 12 months post-pandemic. During the pre-COVID-19 year, the EMS protocols utilized ETI as the primary advanced airway device (ETI group). Post-pandemic paramedics were mandated to utilize i-gel® SGA as the primary advanced airway device to reduce exposure to secretions (SGA group). Results: There were 199 adult patients, 83 (42%) in the ETI group and 116 (58%) in the SGA group. First-pass success was significantly higher with SGA 96% (92%-99%) than ETI 68% (57%-78%) with paramedics citing the inability to visualize the airway in 52% of ETI cases. Time to first-pass success was significantly shorter in the SGA group (5.9 min [5.1-6.7 min]) than in the ETI group (8.3 min [6.9-9.6 min]), as was time to overall successful placement at 6.0 min (5.1-6.8 min) versus 9.6 min (8.2-11.1 min), respectively. Multiple placement attempts were required in 26% of ETI cases and 1% of the SGA cases. There were no statistically significant differences in the number and types of complications between the cohorts. Return of spontaneous circulation (on/before emergency department [ED] arrival), mortality at 28 days, intensive care unit length of stay, or ventilator-free days between the groups were not statistically different between the groups. Conclusion: In this natural experiment, the SGA performed significantly better than ETI in first-pass airway device placement success and was significantly faster in achieving first-pass success, and overall airway placement, thus potentially reducing exposure to respiratory pathogens. Practical real-world studies can offer important information about implementation of prehospital interventions, particularly in community settings and in systems with a low frequency of tracheal intubations.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Textbook oncologic outcome (TOO) is attained when all desired short-term quality metrics are met following an oncologic operation. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of race on TOO attainment following colectomy for colon cancer. METHODS: The 2004-2017 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with non-metastatic colon cancer who underwent colectomy. TOO was defined as: negative margins (R0), adequate lymphadenectomy (LAD) (n ≥ 12), no prolonged length of stay (LOS), no 30-day readmission or mortality, and initiation of systemic therapy in ≤ 12 weeks. Racial groups were defined as White, Black, or Hispanic. RESULTS: 508,312 patients were identified of which 34% achieved TOO. Blacks attained the least TOO (31.4%) as well as the TOO criteria of adequate LAD (81.1%), no prolonged LOS (52.3%), and no 30-day readmission (89.7%). Hispanics were least likely to have met the criteria of R0 resection (94.3%), no 30-day mortality (87.3%), and initiation of systemic therapy in ≤ 12 weeks (81.8%). Patients who attained TOO had a higher median overall survival (OS) than those without TOO (148.2 vs. 84.2 months; P < 0.001). Hispanic TOO patients had the highest median OS (181.2 months), while White non-TOO patients experienced the lowest (80.2 months, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression models suggest that Black and Hispanic patients are less likely to achieve TOO than their White counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Racial disparities exist in the achievement of TOO, with Blacks and Hispanics being less likely to attain TOO compared to their White counterparts.
Subject(s)
Colectomy , Colonic Neoplasms , Databases, Factual , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Cohort Studies , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Colonic Neoplasms/mortality , Colonic Neoplasms/ethnology , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , United States , White People/statistics & numerical data , White , Black or African AmericanABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Adnexal torsion requires treatment to limit ischemic injury and tissue loss. Optimal time to surgical intervention has not been established. We compared outcomes of ovarian loss amongst pediatric patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 88 patients with adnexal torsion from March 2014 through April 2021. Rates of ovarian loss were compared for patients who underwent surgery within and beyond 60 minutes from diagnosis. RESULTS: Most patients underwent surgery more than 60 minutes from the time of diagnosis (83%; median time 116 minutes). Comparing patients with and without ovarian loss, there was no statistically significant difference in time to surgery from time of diagnosis (P = .618). Patients with ovarian loss had a longer duration of symptoms (24 vs 96 hours; P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: While surgical repair of adnexal torsion may be urgent, this study suggests that duration of symptoms should be considered when assessing a patient's likelihood of ovarian loss.
Subject(s)
Ovarian Torsion , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , Ovarian Torsion/surgery , Child , Adolescent , Ovary/surgery , Time-to-Treatment , Adnexal Diseases/surgery , Time Factors , Child, PreschoolABSTRACT
Currently, there is no universally accepted, standardized protocol for pre-operative antibiotic administration in the setting of appendectomy for complicated appendicitis among pediatric patients. Strategies to mitigate surgical site infections (SSIs) must be balanced with optimal antibiotic use and exposure. We conducted a retrospective chart review to compare outcomes between patients treated pre-operatively with a single pre-operative dose of antibiotics with those who received additional antibiotics prior to laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis between 2020 and 2022. Of 124 pediatric patients, 18% received an additional dose of pre-operative antibiotics after initial treatment dose. Surgical site infection rates between the two groups were not statistically significant (P-value = .352), thereby suggesting that redosing antibiotics closer to the time of incision may not impact SSI rates. Additional studies are necessary to make clinical recommendations.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Appendectomy , Appendicitis , Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , Appendicitis/surgery , Appendicitis/complications , Retrospective Studies , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Female , Male , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Adolescent , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Laparoscopy , Child, PreschoolABSTRACT
Inadequate health literacy poses a significant public health challenge, influencing patient treatment adherence and outcomes. This study explores outcomes in the setting of language congruence at the time of discharge for pediatric patients following laparoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion. We conducted a retrospective chart review from 2019 to 2022 at a community children's hospital, including 168 patients categorized based on language congruence. Although trends did suggest increased ER visits among Spanish-speaking patients, there were no statistically significant differences in health care utilization or patient outcomes identified. Further larger studies are needed for a comprehensive analysis of the relationship of language congruence at discharge on outcomes following surgical procedures as this may enable delivery of culturally competent medical care.
Subject(s)
Gastrostomy , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Child , Child, Preschool , Language , Health Literacy , Infant , Adolescent , Laparoscopy , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Patient Discharge , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Optimizing perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal surgery remains a challenge given the side effects of narcotics and the potential for abuse. While transversus abdominis plane block has been shown to improve clinical outcomes, such as decreased opioid consumption and pain scores among adult patients, there is limited data regarding its efficacy for pediatric patients. This study evaluates efficacy amongst pediatric patients undergoing landmark-guided transversus abdominis plane (LTAP) during laparoscopic appendectomy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients, ages 0-18 years old, who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis at a single institution from January 2021 to December 2022 was conducted. Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test and Welch's t test were used to assess differences between the two cohorts for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Results are statistically significant at P < .05. RESULTS: Of the 90 patients who met inclusion criteria, 40% (n = 36) underwent LTAP block. Those with LTAP block had a shorter average operative time than those without LTAP block (.6 vs .7 hours; P = .009). Similarly, patients with LTAP block had a shorter average time to discharge (4.1 vs 11.0 h; P = .039). There were no other statistically significant differences in postoperative outcomes including narcotic use between both cohorts. DISCUSSION: Landmark-guided transversus abdominis plane blocks did not increase operative times yet reduced time to discharge for pediatric patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy at our institution. Larger studies are needed to evaluate the relationship between LTAP administration and postoperative narcotic consumption to make clinical recommendations.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Muscles , Appendectomy , Laparoscopy , Nerve Block , Pain, Postoperative , Humans , Appendectomy/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Child , Male , Nerve Block/methods , Female , Adolescent , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Child, Preschool , Abdominal Muscles/innervation , Appendicitis/surgery , Infant , Treatment Outcome , Anatomic Landmarks , Operative TimeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Triage accuracy is essential for delivering effective trauma care, especially in the pediatric population where unique challenges exist. The purpose of this study was to investigate risk factors contributing to under-triage and over-triage in an urban pediatric trauma center. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all trauma activations at an urban level 1 trauma center between January 1, 2021, and July 31, 2023 (patients <18 years old.) Patients who were under- or over-triaged were identified based on the level of trauma activation and injury severity score. RESULTS: There were 1094 trauma activations included in this study. The rate of under-triage was 3.8% (n = 42) and over-triage was 13.6% (n = 149). Infants aged 0-1 years had the highest rate of under-triage (10.9%, n = 19, P < .001), while those aged 11-17 had the highest rate of over-triage (17.0%, n = 82, P = .003). Non-accidental trauma was the strongest risk factor for under-triage (OR 30.2 [6.4-142.8] P < .001). Penetrating mechanism was the strongest risk factor for over-triage (OR 12.2 [5.6-26.2] P < .001). DISCUSSION: This study reveals the complexity of trauma triage in the pediatric population. We identified key predictive factors, such as age, comorbidities, and mechanism of injury, that can be used to refine triage practices and improve the care of pediatric trauma patients.
Subject(s)
Injury Severity Score , Trauma Centers , Triage , Wounds and Injuries , Humans , Triage/standards , Retrospective Studies , Infant , Child , Child, Preschool , Risk Factors , Female , Male , Adolescent , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Wounds and Injuries/diagnosis , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Infant, NewbornABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of textbook oncologic outcome (TOO) and its impact on overall survival (OS) among patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) following modified radical mastectomy (MRM) versus MRM with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (MRM â+ âCPM). METHODS: The 2004-2017 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with IDC who underwent MRM and MRM â+ âCPM. TOO was defined as: resection with negative margins, adequate lymphadenectomy, length of stay ≤50th percentile, and no 30-day readmission or mortality. RESULTS: 87,573 patients were identified, of which 14.3% underwent MRM â+ âCPM. Logistic regression models revealed that MRM â+ âCPM is independently associated with a reduced likelihood of achieving TOO (AOR â= â0.71; P â< â0.001). MRM patients who achieved TOO had a higher median OS compared to those who did not (164.6 vs.142.2 months, P â< â0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MRM â+ âCPM is associated with a lower incidence of TOO attainment compared to MRM.