The current possibilities of diagnosing and therapies for olfactory disorders.

INTRODUCTION: Olfactory disorders significantly affect individuals, diminishing their capacity to detect dangers, appreciate flavors, and engage socially. Despite their considerable impact on quality of life, these disorders often receive less attention compared to other sensory impairments. This review emphasizes the importance of olfactory function and explores both traditional and innovative diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. AREAS COVERED: This review comprehensively covers the pathophysiology, diagnostic challenges, and treatment options for olfactory disorders. It delves into the nuances of different disorders, such as anosmia and parosmia, and discusses the array of diagnostic tools from traditional sniff tests to advanced imaging techniques. The review also evaluates therapeutic strategies, from pharmacological treatments to emerging therapies like electrical stimulation and regenerative medicine, highlighting recent advances in the field. EXPERT OPINION: Current insights suggest a growing recognition of the significance of olfactory disorders, driven by recent pandemics and advances in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies. Future perspectives indicate a promising direction toward more personalized medicine approaches and enhanced regenerative therapies. Continuous research and improved clinical awareness are critical for evolving the management strategies of olfactory impairments, potentially leading to better patient outcomes and quality of life enhancements.

Surgery or No Surgery? Exploring the Dilemma of Epistaxis Management in Patients with HHT.

Background: Epistaxis, particularly in Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT) patients, is a common otolaryngological emergency, often requiring complex management. A hierarchy of increasingly invasive interventions, from external compression of the nasal pyramid to nostril closure, is typically proposed and applied. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on HHT patients to assess the effectiveness and longevity of invasive procedures postoperatively. Data were collected using the Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS) questionnaire. The primary focus was on changes in the frequency and intensity of epistaxis, while the secondary focus was on the overall quality of life. Results: This study found that invasive procedures initially improved the frequency and intensity of epistaxis in HHT patients. However, within 1 to 9 months postoperatively, these benefits often diminished, with hemorrhagic symptoms recurring at similar or worsened levels. Conclusions: The findings suggest a need for a cautious and restrained approach to using invasive treatments in managing epistaxis in HHT patients. Highly invasive procedures should be reserved for cases where less invasive methods fail, due to their temporary effectiveness and the risk of causing anatomical-functional changes in the rhino-sinus area, complicating future management of severe epistaxis.

Beneficial Effects of Remote Medical Care for Patients with Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) needs high-quality care and multidisciplinary management. During the COVID-19 pandemic, most non-urgent clinical activities for HHT outpatients were suspended. We conducted an analytical observational cohort study to evaluate whether medical and psychological support, provided through remote consultation during the COVID-19 pandemic, could reduce the complications of HHT. METHODS: A structured regimen of remote consultations, conducted by either video-calls, telephone calls, or e-mails, was provided by a multidisciplinary group of physicians to a set of patients of our HHT center. The outcomes considered were: number of emergency room visits/hospitalizations, need of blood transfusions, need of iron supplementation, worsening of epistaxis, and psychological status. RESULTS: The study included 45 patients who received remote assistance for a total of eight months. During this period, 9 patients required emergency room visits, 6 needed blood transfusions, and 24 needed iron supplementation. This was not different from what was registered among the same 45 patients in the same period of the previous year. Remote care also resulted in better management of epistaxis and improved quality of life, with the mean epistaxis severity score and the Euro-Quality of Life-Visual Analogue Scale that were significantly better at the end than at the beginning of the study. DISCUSSION: Remote medical care might be a valid support for HHT subjects during periods of suspended outpatient surveillance, like the COVID-19 pandemic.

Do antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs modify outcome of patients treated for chronic subdural hematoma? Still a controversial issue.

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulants (ACs) and antiplatelet aggregation agents (AAAs) seem to be correlated to a higher incidence of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) but whether or not they contribute to its recurrence is debated. Few data are available on clinical outcomes and indications for the management of this therapy are not so well defined. We investigated the role of ACs and AAAs in modifying patients' clinical outcomes treated for CSDH, especially for re-bleedings. METHODS: This retrospective study, enrolled patients treated for CSDH. Patients characteristics were recorded including drugs used (antiplatelet/anticoagulant) and clinical conditions (Modified Rankin Scale [mRS]) upon admission. Patients underwent surgery (burrhole vs. minicraniectomy) with subdural drainage positioning. Clinical/radiological follow-ups were performed at one and six months. Chi-square/Fisher's Exact test were used to compare variables and stepwise backward logistic regression analysis was used for defining their impact on complications, risk of re-bleeding and reoperation. RESULTS: Overall, 230 patients (45 on ACs, 76 on AAAs and nine on both) were enrolled. Higher mRS scores were significantly associated with a higher risk of general complications (OR=3.78, 95% CI: 1.66-8.62, P=0.002), higher risk of rebleeding (OR =15.82, 95% CI: 4.33-57.90, P<0.001) and re-operation (OR=11.39, 95% CI: 3.35-37.56, P<0.0001). No statistically significant association was found between AAAs or ACs and complications or re-bleedings or risk of reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: AAAs and ACs alone do not seem to worsen the clinical outcome or increase re-bleedings. mRS may be a predicting factor, since patients with higher scores showed a worse outcome and an increased risk of re-bleeding, general complications and reoperation.

Chronic subdural hematoma in patients aged 80 years and older: A two-centre study.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common condition in the elderly, and the ageing of population will increase the number of "superaged" patients presenting this pathology for the years to come. Few studies investigating the outcome of superaged patients surgically treated for CSDH are available, and study populations are generally small. The outcome of surgically treated patients and risk factors are not completely clear. Aim of the work is to identify the risk factors which may influence the outcome of patients aged 80 years and older surgically treated for CSDH. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective two-centre study including 151 surgically treated patients. A univariate (Fisher exact test) and multivariate (logistic regression) analysis of possible risk factors influencing outcome was performed. Outcome was expressed as: 6-month clinical outcome, 6-month mortality, complications and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed an association between Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and 6-month clinical outcome (p = 0,048), complications (p = 0,034) and 6-month mortality (p = 0,007). Antithrombotic drugs were associated with longer hospital stay (p < 0,001). Logistic regression analysis showed an association between CCI and complications (p = 0,016, HR = 3,18) and 6-month mortality (p = 0,034, HR = 11,71), and between antithrombotic drugs and longer hospital stay (p = 0,002, HR = 3,07). CONCLUSIONS: Age alone is not a predictor of bad outcome for patients aged 80 years and older surgically treated for CSDH. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) may prove a valuable outcome predicting tool in these patients, and a longer hospital stay may be anticipated for patients under antithrombotic agents.