Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 151(2): 203-208, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32799318

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess clinical impact, psychological effects, and knowledge of pregnant women during the COVID-19 outbreak in seven cities in Colombia. Currently, there are uncertainty and concerns about the maternal and fetal consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy. METHODS: A cross-sectional web survey was carried out including pregnant women in seven cities in Colombia. Women were evaluated during the mitigation phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic between April 13 and May 18, 2020. The questions evaluated demographic, knowledge, psychological symptoms, and attitudes data regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: A total of 1021 patients were invited to participate, obtaining 946 valid surveys for analysis. The rate of psychological consequences of the pandemic was much larger than the number of patients clinically affected by the virus, with 50.4% of the entire cohort reporting symptoms of anxiety, 49.1% insomnia, and 25% reporting depressive symptoms. Poorly informed women were more likely to be younger, affiliated to the subsidized regime, and with lower levels of education. CONCLUSION: The knowledge of pregnant women about SARS-CoV-2 infection is far from reality and this seems to be associated with an indirect effect on the concern and psychological stress of pregnant women in Colombia.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , Coronavirus Infections , Depression , Mental Health/trends , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Pregnant Women/psychology , Stress, Psychological , Adult , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/etiology , Attitude to Health , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Colombia/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/etiology , Female , Humans , Needs Assessment , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/psychology , Pregnancy , SARS-CoV-2 , Social Perception , Stress, Psychological/diagnosis , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 218(4): 440.e1-440.e36, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29353032

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Congenital Zika virus (ZIKV) infection can be detected in both the presence and absence of microcephaly and manifests as a number of signs and symptoms that are detected clinically and by neuroimaging. However, to date, qualitative and quantitative measures for the purpose of diagnosis and prognosis are limited. OBJECTIVES: Main objectives of this study conducted on fetuses and infants with confirmed congenital Zika virus infection and detected brain abnormalities were (1) to assess the prevalence of microcephaly and the frequency of the anomalies that include a detailed description based on ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses and ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography imaging postnatally, (2) to provide quantitative measures of fetal and infant brain findings by magnetic resonance imaging with the use of volumetric analyses and diffusion-weighted imaging, and (3) to obtain additional information from placental and fetal histopathologic assessments and postnatal clinical evaluations. STUDY DESIGN: This is a longitudinal cohort study of Zika virus-infected pregnancies from a single institution in Colombia. Clinical and imaging findings of patients with laboratory-confirmed Zika virus infection and fetal brain anomalies were the focus of this study. Patients underwent monthly fetal ultrasound scans, neurosonography, and a fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Postnatally, infant brain assessment was offered by the use of ultrasound imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, and/or computed tomography. Fetal head circumference measurements were compared with different reference ranges with <2 or <3 standard deviations below the mean for the diagnosis of microcephaly. Fetal and infant magnetic resonance imaging images were processed to obtain a quantitative brain volumetric assessment. Diffusion weighted imaging sequences were processed to assess brain microstructure. Anthropometric, neurologic, auditory, and visual assessments were performed postnatally. Histopathologic assessment was included if patients opted for pregnancy termination. RESULTS: All women (n=214) had been referred for Zika virus symptoms during pregnancy that affected themselves or their partners or if fetal anomalies that are compatible with congenital Zika virus syndrome were detected. A total of 12 pregnant patients with laboratory confirmation of Zika virus infection were diagnosed with fetal brain malformations. Most common findings that were assessed by prenatal and postnatal imaging were brain volume loss (92%), calcifications (92%), callosal anomalies (100%), cortical malformations (89%), and ventriculomegaly (92%). Results from fetal brain volumetric assessment by magnetic resonance imaging showed that 1 of the most common findings associated with microcephaly was reduced supratentorial brain parenchyma and increased subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid. Diffusion weighted imaging analyses of apparent diffusion coefficient values showed microstructural changes. Microcephaly was present in 33.3-58.3% of the cases at referral and was present at delivery in 55.6-77.8% of cases. At birth, most of the affected neonates (55.6-77.8%) had head circumference measurements >3 standard deviations below the mean. Postnatal imaging studies confirmed brain malformations that were detected prenatally. Auditory screening results were normal in 2 cases that were assessed. Visual screening showed different anomalies in 2 of the 3 cases that were examined. Pathologic results that were obtained from 2 of the 3 cases who opted for termination showed similar signs of abnormalities in the central nervous system and placental analyses, including brain microcalcifications. CONCLUSION: Congenital microcephaly is not an optimal screening method for congenital Zika virus syndrome, because it may not accompany other evident and preceding brain findings; microcephaly could be an endpoint of the disease that results from progressive changes that are related to brain volume loss. Long-term studies are needed to understand the clinical and developmental relevance of these findings.


Subject(s)
Brain/abnormalities , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Zika Virus Infection/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Calcinosis/diagnostic imaging , Cerebrospinal Fluid/physiology , Cohort Studies , Colombia/epidemiology , Diagnostic Imaging , Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Evoked Potentials, Visual , Female , Humans , Hydrocephalus/diagnostic imaging , Infant, Newborn , Longitudinal Studies , Microcephaly/virology , Pregnancy , Subarachnoid Space/physiology , Young Adult , Zika Virus Infection/congenital
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL