Lung Recruitment Before Surfactant Administration in Extremely Preterm Neonates: 2-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: A multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) showed a lung recruitment maneuver using high-frequency oscillatory ventilation just before surfactant administration (ie, intubate-recruit-surfactant-extubate [IN-REC-SUR-E]) improved the efficacy of treatment compared with the standard intubate-surfactant-extubate (IN-SUR-E) technique without increasing the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. Objective: To examine follow-up outcomes at corrected postnatal age (cPNA) 2 years of preterm infants previously enrolled in an RCT and treated with IN-REC-SUR-E or IN-SUR-E in 35 tertiary neonatal intensive care units. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a follow-up study of infants recruited into the primary RCT from 2015 to 2018 at 35 tertiary neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Italy. Follow-up examinations included neurodevelopmental, growth, and respiratory outcomes of these children at cPNA 2 years. Participants included spontaneously breathing extremely preterm neonates (24 0/7 to 27 6/7 weeks' gestation) reaching failure criteria for continuous positive airway pressure within the first 24 hours of life. Data were analyzed from April 2023 to January 2024. Intervention: Infants were randomly assigned (1:1) to IN-REC-SUR-E or IN-SUR-E and then followed up. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the occurrence of death after discharge or major disability at cPNA 2 years. Secondary outcomes were neurodevelopmental outcomes (major disability, cerebral palsy, cognitive impairment, visual deficit, or auditory deficit), anthropometric measurements (weight, length, and head circumference), and recurrent respiratory infections and hospitalizations because of respiratory causes at 2y cPNA. Results: A total of 137 extremely preterm infants (median [IQR] gestational age, 26.5 [25.3-27.5] weeks and 75 [54.7%] female), initially enrolled in the original RCT, were followed up at cPNA 2 years, including 64 infants in the IN-SUR-E group and 73 infants in the IN-REC-SUR-E group. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of death after discharge or major disability at cPNA 2 years (IN-SUR-E: 13 children [20.3%] vs IN-REC-SUR-E: 10 children [13.7%]; P = .36). There were no significant differences in incidence of disability, cerebral palsy, or cognitive impairment in the IN-REC-SUR-E group compared with the IN-SUR-E group. There were no significant differences in anthropometric measurements (weight, length, and head circumference) between groups. There were no significant differences in the incidence of recurrent respiratory infections or in hospitalizations because of respiratory causes between groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this RCT of lung recruitment before surfactant vs standard care there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in death, neurodevelopmental outcomes, anthropometric measurements, or recurrent respiratory infections at the 2-year follow-up. These findings can aid clinicians in decision-making for the best strategy to administer surfactant, considering long-term outcomes.

Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation during less invasive surfactant administration in preterm infants: An open-label randomized controlled study.

INTRODUCTION: Approximately half of very preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) fail treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and need mechanical ventilation (MV). OBJECTIVES: Our aim with this study was to evaluate if nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) during less invasive surfactant treatment (LISA) can improve respiratory outcome compared with NCPAP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out an open-label randomized controlled trial at tertiary neonatal intensive care units in which infants with RDS born at 25+0-31+6 weeks of gestation between December 1, 2020 and October 31, 2022 were supported with NCPAP before and after surfactant administration and received NIPPV or NCPAP during LISA. The primary endpoint was the need for a second dose of surfactant or MV in the first 72 h of life. Other endpoints were need and duration of invasive and noninvasive respiratory supports, changes in SpO2/FiO2 ratio after LISA, and adverse effect rate. RESULTS: We enrolled 101 infants in the NIPPV group and 99 in the NCPAP group. The unadjusted odds ratio for the composite primary outcome was 0.873 (95% confidence interval: 0.456-1.671; p = .681). We found that the SpO2/FiO2 ratio was transiently higher in the LISA plus NIPPV than in the LISA plus NCPAP group, while adverse effects of LISA had similar occurrence in the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: The application of NIPPV or NCPAP during LISA in very preterm infants supported with NCPAP before and after surfactant administration had similar effects on the short-term respiratory outcome and are both safe. Our study does not support the use of NIPPV during LISA.