Dental rehabilitation in irradiated oral cancer patients using patient-specific dental implants - Clinical outcome and oral health-related quality of life.

INTRODUCTION: Dental rehabilitation in oral cancer patients is essential for good oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). Patient-specific dental implants are suitable for treating tumor-related bony defects, resulting in satisfactory OHRQoL. However, knowledge concerning the clinical outcome and OHRQoL following tumor irradiation is lacking. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out to evaluate clinical outcomes and OHRQoL in eight patients who received patient-specific dental implants and implant-supported dentures after surgical treatment for oral cancer with additional irradiation. OHRQoL assessment was performed using the German long version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP) questionnaire (OHIP-G53). RESULTS: Clinical examination revealed successful dental rehabilitation in all the patients with only minor impairments. Restricted stability and function of implants were not observed. OHIP sum-scores of all the patients indicated acceptable OHRQoL, but this varied between patients treated in the upper or lower jaw. Single-item sum-scores concerning the adverse events "difficulty in chewing," "food catching," "sore jaw," "sore spots," and "unclear speech" were detected to be the worst, and pain-related OHIP dimensions demonstrated the highest scores (followed by functional limitation, physical disability, and psychosocial impact) with a worse OHRQoL following lower jaw treatment. Other dimension sum-scores were overall lower and nearly equally distributed in patients. CONCLUSIONS: Dental rehabilitation of irradiated oral cancer patients using patient-specific dental implants may be suitable, leading to acceptable OHRQoL. However, implant insertion in the upper jaw seems to be more favorable. Further studies on patient-specific dental implants are warranted to validate the current results.

Comparison of temperature changes in different irrigation methods used in guided piezosurgery: in vitro study.

PURPOSE: The study aimed to investigate the cooling performance of three different surgical methods for bone splitting during implant dentistry procedures. METHODS: An in vitro study was conducted on bovine ribs to test the cooling performance of three osteotomy methods: conventional osteotomy with standard cooling irrigation, template-assisted osteotomy with standard cooling irrigation, and modified template-assisted osteotomy with additional cooling fluid through internal irrigation channels in the surgical guide. A negative control group without cooling was also included. Temperature measurements were taken during the procedures using a contactless infrared thermometer. RESULTS: The results showed that the conventional osteotomy without cooling resulted in the highest mean of the peak temperatures (114.7 °C ± 45.4), while the modified template-assisted osteotomy with additional cooling achieved the lowest mean of the peak temperatures (29.4 °C ± 7). Statistically significant differences in temperature were observed among the groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The study rejected the null hypothesis and demonstrated that the cooling method used during bone splitting procedures significantly affected the temperature development at the surgical site. The modified template-assisted osteotomy with additional cooling provided the best cooling performance. However, caution should be exercised in interpreting the results due to the limitations of the in vitro study. Further research with stronger external validity is needed to confirm these findings and explore their applicability in clinical settings to benefit patients.

Comparing Original and Universal Screwdrivers and How They Affect Friction in the Screw.

The present study focused on investigating whether universal screwdriver kits cause less friction between the screwdriver and the abutment screw than original screwdrivers. For this purpose, 2 original screwdrivers (Straumann and BEGO) and a universal screwdriver kit (bredent) were investigated. On 1 implant per screwdriver, 26 abutments were properly attached one after the other with the corresponding abutment screws. After tightening the abutment screw, the force required to pull the screwdriver off the screw head was determined with a spring balance. For both manufacturers, greater pull-off forces were measured when using the original screwdrivers than when using the universal screwdriver. The pull-off force (mean ± SD) required for the Straumann original screwdriver was 3.7 ± 1.4 N, while that required for the universal screwdriver was 0.1 ± 0.1 N (P < .001). The pull-off force was 1.5 ± 1.5 N for the BEGO original screwdriver and 0.7 ± 0.9 N for the universal screwdriver (P = .19). Using original manufacturer-supplied screwdrivers could thus minimize the risk of the screwdriver slipping out of the screw head during dental treatment and being swallowed or aspirated by the patient.

Comparison of original and universal screwdrivers: Damage to the surface of the socket within the screw head of the abutment screw / Original- und Universalschraubendreher im Vergleich. Beschädigungen der Oberfläche der Fassung innerhalb des Schraubenkopfes der Abutmentschraube

The aim of the study was to investigate the potential damage the usage of universal screwdrivers could cause to the abutment screw. In this study the original versus the universal screwdriver have been compared. 26 original abutment screws, 13 from Straumann and 13 from BEGO, were screwed in with the original and the universal screwdriver. For optical evaluation, the potential damage to the screw head was documented in two different areas. For this purpose, photos were taken with a scanning electron microscope. At Straumann, surface damage was only seen in area 1 (top of the screw head) when using the universal screwdriver. BEGO showed surface damage in area 1 regardless of which screwdriver was used and in area 2 (bottom of the screw head) when using the universal screwdriver. It can be assumed that the use of the original screwdriver might cause little or no damage to the screw heads. In contrast, based on the SEM images, it can be assumed that the surface can be damaged when using the universal screwdriver.

Ridge augmentation-The new field of computerized guided surgery: A technical note for minimal-invasive bone splitting.

Different instrumentation procedures of the alveolar ridge expansion technique (ARST) with or without Guided Bone Regeneration have proven to be effective for successful implant placement in cases of alveolar bone width between 3mm and 6mm. Conventional bone splitting techniques require flap arising. This technical note demonstrates a method for flapless guided bone splitting. For this purpose, a newly developed surgical guide with internal irrigation channels was used. Using CAD-CAM additive technology, a narrow slot along the field of interest and a pin of a cooling pipe was designed and implemented in a surgical guide template. The bone split was performed flapless through the surgical guide while the cooling pipe was connected to it. During surgery, the piezo-driven instrument was moved within that slot, and the irrigation solution was directly rinsing it at point of entry through the irrigation channel. This procedure was performed on a 3.3 mm wide alveolar ridge achieving over 3 mm of bone gain. The described method combines several positive aspects. The micro-invasive flapless surgical procedure might improve postoperative healing. Additionally, sufficient cooling of the bone might lead to less thermal affection of bone cells and less resorption of the cortical bone. However, systematic studies are needed to confirm the observations of the presented case report.

Management of pandemic or large-scale emergencies in Germany with a focus on the current and potential role of university schools of dentistry: Can it help in COVID-19 time?

BACKGROUND: The study presented here systematically examines the potential involvement of dental, oral and maxillofacial centres (ZMK) in the management of pandemia or in large-scale emergencies. It looks at available material and infrastructural resources and how they can be brought to bear in such incidents or situations. The aim was to gain an initial scientific overview of how ZMK can potentially contribute to the handling of a pandemia or mass casualty (MASCAL) situation in terms of available resources as well as their location within the hospital as a whole and their integration into the existing infrastructure. The study was conducted on the basis of a questionnaire consisting of 70 individual questions, which was sent to all universities in Germany that offer a course of study in dental medicine. The responses were then statistically evaluated. RESULTS: The study outlines the current status of ZMK and discusses what could be an important component of emergency medical care in the overall hospital context. CONCLUSION: The involvement of ZMK-with their own resources and existing infrastructural links to the hospital as a whole-could lead to faster and more effective patient treatment in the event of a pandemic or MASCAL situation.