Evolution of Cardiovascular Findings in Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) Across COVID-19 Variants: Common Trends and Unusual Presentations.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a rare condition following COVID-19 infection. Cardiac involvement is common and includes left ventricular systolic dysfunction, cardiac marker elevation, electrocardiogram (ECG) changes, and coronary artery dilation. This single-center retrospective cohort study compares cardiovascular disease between three major SARS-CoV-2 variants and describes the evolution of findings in medium-term follow-up. Of 69 total children (mean age 9.2 years, 58% male), 60 (87%) had cardiovascular involvement with the most common features being troponin elevation in 33 (47%) and left ventricular dysfunction in 22 (32%). Based on presumed infection timing, 61 patients were sorted into variant cohorts of Alpha, Delta, and Omicron. Hospitalization was longer for the Delta group (7.7 days) vs Alpha (5.1 days, p = 0.0065) and Omicron (4.9 days, p = 0.012). Troponin elevation was more common in Delta compared to Alpha (13/20 vs 7/25, p = 0.18), and cumulative evidence of cardiac injury (echocardiographic abnormality and/or troponin elevation) was more common in Delta (17/20) compared with Alpha (12/25, p = 0.013) or Omicron (8/16, p = 0.034). Forty-nine (77%) of the original cohort (n = 69) had no cardiac symptoms or findings beyond 3 months post-hospitalization. Cardiac MRI was performed in 28 patients (between 3 and 6 months post-hospitalization) and was normal in 25 patients (89%). The differences in the variant cohorts may be due to alteration of the immune landscape with higher severity of COVID-19 infection. Despite overall reassuring cardiac outcomes, it is important to note the variability of presentation and remain vigilant with future variants.

Thromboprophylaxis for children hospitalized with COVID-19 and MIS-C.

Background: Limited data exist about effective regimens for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in children with acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). Objectives: Study the outcomes of institutional thromboprophylaxis protocol for primary venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention in children hospitalized with acute COVID-19/MIS-C. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included consecutive children (aged less than 21 years) with COVID-19/MIS-C who received tailored intensity thromboprophylaxis, primarily with low-molecular-weight heparin, from April 2020 through October 2021. Thromboprophylaxis was given to those with moderate to severe disease based on the World Health Organization scale and exposure to two or more VTE risk factors. Therapeutic intensity was considered for severe illness. Clinical recovery along with D-dimer improvement determined thromboprophylaxis duration. Outcomes were incident VTEs, bleeding, and mortality. Results: Among 211 hospitalizations, 45 (21.3%) received thromboprophylaxis (COVID-19, 16; MIS-C, 29). Median age was 14.8 years (interquartile range [IQR], 8.9-16.1). Among 35 (77.8%) with severe illness, 27 (60.0%) required respiratory support, and 19 (42.2%) required an intensive care unit stay. Median hospitalization was 6 days (IQR, 5.0-10.5). Median thromboprophylaxis duration was 19 days (IQR, 6.0-31.0) with therapeutic intensity in 24 (53.3%) and prophylactic in 21 (46.7%). Outcomes were as follows: VTE, 1 (2.2%); death, 1 (2.2%, unrelated to bleeding/thrombosis); major/clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, 0; and minor bleeding, 7 (15.5%). D-dimer was elevated in a majority at diagnosis (median, 2.3; IQR, 1.2-3.3 mg/ml fibrinogen-equivalent units) and was noninformative in assessing disease severity. D-dimer normalized at thromboprophylaxis discontinuation. Conclusions: Our experience of using clinically directed thromboprophylaxis with tailored intensity approach for children hospitalized with COVID-19 and MIS-C favors its inclusion in current standard of care. The role of D-dimer in directing thromboprophylaxis management deserves further evaluation.

Improving Standardization of Paging Communication Using Quality Improvement Methodology.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Paging is a primary mode of communication in hospitals, but message quality varies. With this project, we aimed to standardize paging, thus improving end user (EU) satisfaction, patient safety, and efficiency. Objectives were to increase the percent of pages containing 6 critical elements (CEs) (ie, the sender's first and last name, a 7-digit callback number, patient name, room number, and urgency indicator [information only, call, or come] to 90%); improve EU satisfaction to 80% rating paging communication as good or excellent; and decrease the frequency of safety events related to paging. METHODS: This multidisciplinary, system-wide quality improvement study was conducted at our stand-alone academic children's hospital. CEs were determined by EU consensus. Outcome measures were inclusion of all 6 CEs, provider satisfaction, and frequency of safety events. Process measures were inclusion of individual CEs and appropriateness and timeliness of response to pages. Balancing measures included number of work-arounds (WAs). Interventions included education, engineering a platform with required fields, and optimization enhancements. Statistical process control charts (p-charts; XmR) were used to track the impact of interventions. RESULTS: Special-cause improvement was noted in use of all 6 CEs (4.4%-79.7%) and individual CEs. EU satisfaction improved from 50% to 85% rating paging communication as good or excellent. Safety events related to paging remain infrequent. Specific WA use decreased by 60%. CONCLUSIONS: System-wide use of required fields produced significant improvement in inclusion of all 6 CEs and EU satisfaction. WAs were curbed by improving the ease of CE incorporation. Required fields should be considered at institutions seeking improved paging communication.