Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 93
Filter
1.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 128(2): 169-79, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17611199

ABSTRACT

Radon is known to cause lung cancer in humans; however, there remain uncertainties about the effects associated with residential exposures. This case-control study of residential radon and lung cancer was conducted in five counties in New Jersey and involved 561 cases and 740 controls. A year long alpha-track detector measurement of radon was completed for approximately 93% of all residences lived in at the time of interview (a total of 2,063). While the odds ratios (ORs) for whole data were suggestive of an increased risk for exposures >75 Bq m(-3), these associations were not statistically significant. The adjusted excess OR (EOR) per 100 Bq m(-3) was -0.13 (95% CI: -0.30 to 0.44) for males, 0.29 (95% CI: -0.12 to 1.70) for females and 0.05 (95% CI: -0.14 to 0.56) for all subjects combined. An analysis of radon effects by histological type of lung cancer showed that the OR was strongest for small/oat cell carcinomas in both males and females. There was no statistical heterogeneity of radon effects by demographic factors (age at disease occurrence, education level and type of respondent). Analysis by categories of smoking status, frequency or duration did not modify the risk estimates of radon on lung cancer. The findings of this study are consistent with an earlier population-based study of radon and lung cancer among New Jersey women, and with the North American pooling of case control radon seven studies, including the previous New Jersey study. Several uncertainties regarding radon measurements and assumptions of exposure history may have resulted in underestimation of a true exposure-response relationship.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Radioactive/adverse effects , Air Pollution, Indoor/adverse effects , Carcinogens, Environmental/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Radon/adverse effects , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Female , Housing , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , New Jersey/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors
2.
Br J Cancer ; 88(1): 50-7, 2003 Jan 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12556959

ABSTRACT

Recent use of oral contraceptive pills is associated with a modest risk of breast cancer among very young women. In this US population-based case-control study, we evaluated whether the excess risk associated with recent oral contraceptive use is ubiquitous for all pill types or attributable to specific oral contraceptive preparations. Hormonal content and potency of combination oral contraceptives used for the longest duration within 5 years of interview for breast cancer cases aged 20-44 years (N=1640) were compared with age-matched community controls (N=1492). Women who recently used oral contraceptives containing more than 35 microg of ethinyl oestradiol per pill were at higher risk of breast cancer than users of lower dose preparations when compared to never users (respective relative risks of 1.99 and 1.27, P(trend)<0.01). This relationship was more marked among women <35 years of age, where risks associated with high- and low-dose ethinyl oestradiol use were 3.62 and 1.91 (P(trend)<0.01), respectively. We also found significant trends of increasing breast cancer risk for pills with higher progestin and oestrogen potencies (P(trend)<0.05), which were most pronounced among women aged <35 years of age (P(trend)<0.01). Risk was similar across recently used progestin types. Our findings suggest that newer low-potency/low oestrogen dose oral contraceptives may impart a lower risk of breast cancer than that associated with earlier high-potency/high-dose preparations.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Contraceptives, Oral/adverse effects , Hormones/metabolism , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Hormones/adverse effects , Humans , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Statistics as Topic
3.
Am J Epidemiol ; 155(11): 1023-32, 2002 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12034581

ABSTRACT

Epidemiologic studies investigating the relation between individual carotenoids and risk of prostate cancer have produced inconsistent results. To further explore these associations and to search for reasons prostate cancer incidence is over 50% higher in US Blacks than Whites, the authors analyzed the serum levels of individual carotenoids in 209 cases and 228 controls in a US multicenter, population-based case-control study (1986-1989) that included comparable numbers of Black men and White men aged 40-79 years. Lycopene was inversely associated with prostate cancer risk (comparing highest with lowest quartiles, odds ratio (OR) = 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36, 1.15; test for trend, p = 0.09), particularly for aggressive disease (comparing extreme quartiles, OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.94; test for trend, p = 0.04). Other carotenoids were positively associated with risk. For all carotenoids, patterns were similar for Blacks and Whites. However, in both the controls and the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, serum lycopene concentrations were significantly lower in Blacks than in Whites, raising the possibility that differences in lycopene exposure may contribute to the racial disparity in incidence. In conclusion, the results, though not statistically significant, suggest that serum lycopene is inversely related to prostate cancer risk in US Blacks and Whites.


Subject(s)
Carotenoids/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Adult , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Chi-Square Distribution , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Lycopene , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Statistics, Nonparametric , United States/epidemiology , White People/statistics & numerical data
4.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 10(10): 1055-62, 2001 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11588131

ABSTRACT

Incidence rates for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia have been rising rapidly. We examined nutrient intake as a risk factor for esophageal and gastric cancers in a population-based case-control study in Connecticut, New Jersey, and western Washington state. Interviews were completed for cases with histologically confirmed esophageal adenocarcinoma (n = 282), adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia (n = 255), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (n = 206), and noncardia gastric adenocarcinoma (n = 352), along with population controls (n = 687). Associations between nutrient intake and risk of cancer were estimated by adjusted odds ratios (ORs), comparing the 75th versus the 25th percentile of intake. The following nutrients were significantly inversely associated with risk of all four tumor types: fiber, beta-carotene, folate, and vitamins C and B6. In contrast, dietary cholesterol, animal protein, and vitamin B12 were significantly positively associated with risk of all four tumor types. Dietary fat [OR, 2.18; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.27-3.76] was significantly associated with risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma only. Dietary nitrite (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.26-2.16) was associated with noncardia gastric cancer only. Vitamin C supplement use was associated with a significantly lower risk for noncardia gastric cancer (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41-0.88). Higher intake of nutrients found primarily in plant-based foods was associated with a reduced risk of adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastric cardia, whereas higher intake of nutrients found primarily in foods of animal origin was associated with an increased risk.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Diet/adverse effects , Esophageal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Stomach Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma/etiology , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Case-Control Studies , Confidence Intervals , Connecticut/epidemiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/etiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , New Jersey/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Population Surveillance , Reference Values , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Stomach Neoplasms/etiology , Washington/epidemiology
5.
Cancer Causes Control ; 12(8): 755-61, 2001 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11562116

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between cumulative lifetime exposure to diagnostic radiation and the risk of multiple myeloma using data from a large, multi-center, population-based case-control study. METHODS: Study subjects included a total of 540 cases with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and 1998 frequency-matched population controls living in three areas of the United States (Georgia, Michigan, New Jersey). Information on exposure to diagnostic X-rays was obtained by personal interview. RESULTS: No association was found between case-control status and the total number of reported diagnostic X-rays of any type (odds ratio (OR) for 20 or more compared to less than 5 X-rays = 0.9, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.7-1.2). There was no evidence of an excess risk of multiple myeloma among individuals who reported exposure to 10 or more diagnostic X-rays that impart a relatively high radiation dose to the bone marrow, as compared to individuals reporting no such exposures (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.4-1.3). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that exposure to diagnostic X-rays has a negligible impact, if any, on risk of developing multiple myeloma.


Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma/etiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Confidence Intervals , Georgia/epidemiology , Humans , Michigan/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , New Jersey/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors
6.
Int J Cancer ; 93(1): 148-52, 2001 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11391635

ABSTRACT

The worldwide rates for histology- and subsite-specific types of esophageal and gastric cancer reveal strikingly divergent patterns. The contribution of environmental and genetic factors has been explored in several high-incidence areas, but data on genetic influences are scarce for Western countries. Using data from a multicenter, population-based, case-control study on 1,143 cases and 695 controls in the United States, we evaluated whether a family history of digestive or other cancers was associated with an increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (n = 293), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (n = 221), gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (n = 261) or non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma (n = 368). After adjusting for other risk factors, individuals reporting a family history of digestive cancers experienced no increased risk of either type of esophageal cancer but they were prone to adenocarcinomas of the gastric cardia [odds ratio (OR) = 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91-1.97] and non-cardia segments (OR =1.46, 95% CI 1.03-2.08). This familial tendency, particularly for non-cardia gastric tumors, was largely explained by an association with family history of stomach cancer (OR = 2.52, 95% CI 1.50-4.23). In addition, family history of breast cancer was associated with increased risks of esophageal adenocarcinoma (OR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.07-2.83) and non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma (OR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.09-2.82). Also seen were non-significant familial associations of esophageal squamous-cell cancer with prostate cancer as well as non-cardia gastric cancer with leukemia and brain tumors, though these relationships must be interpreted with caution. Our data point to the role of familial susceptibility to gastric cancer, but not to any form of esophageal cancer, in the United States.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/epidemiology , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Alcohol Drinking , Case-Control Studies , Confidence Intervals , Demography , Family , Family Characteristics , Female , Humans , Income , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Racial Groups , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Smoking , United States/epidemiology
7.
Cancer Causes Control ; 12(2): 117-25, 2001 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11246840

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To explore whether dietary factors contribute to the risk of multiple myeloma and the two-fold higher incidence among blacks compared to whites in the United States. METHODS: Data from a food-frequency questionnaire were analyzed for 346 white and 193 black subjects with multiple myeloma, and 1086 white and 903 black controls who participated in a population-based case-control study of multiple myeloma in three areas of the United States. RESULTS: Elevated risks were associated with obese vs. normal weight (OR = 1.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-3.1 for whites and OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 0.9-2.4 for blacks), while the frequency of obesity was greater for black than white controls. Reduced risks were related to frequent intake of cruciferous vegetables (OR = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.6-0.99) and fish (OR = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.5-0.9) in both races combined, and to vitamin C supplements in whites (OR = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.5-0.9) and blacks (OR = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.5-1.4), with the frequency of vitamin supplement use being greater for white than black controls. However, frequent intake of vitamin C from food and supplements combined was associated with a protective effect in whites (OR = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.4-0.9), but not blacks (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 0.8-2.1). CONCLUSIONS: The greater use of vitamin C supplements by whites and the higher frequency of obesity among blacks may explain part of the higher incidence of multiple myeloma among blacks compared to whites in the United States. In addition, the increasing prevalence of obesity may have contributed to the upward trend in the incidence of multiple myeloma during recent decades.


Subject(s)
Black People , Diet/adverse effects , Multiple Myeloma/ethnology , Nutritional Status , Obesity/epidemiology , White People , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Body Mass Index , Case-Control Studies , Comorbidity , Confidence Intervals , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/etiology , Population Surveillance , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , United States/epidemiology
8.
Am J Ind Med ; 39(1): 92-9, 2001 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11148019

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An increased risk of exposure to pesticides for pancreatic cancer has been suggested in a number of epidemiologic studies. METHODS: Cases (N = 484), aged 30-79 years, were diagnosed in 1986-1989. Controls (N = 2,095) were a random sample of the general population. Information on usual occupation and potential confounding factors was obtained. A job-exposure matrix (JEM) approach was used to estimate the level of occupational exposure to pesticides. RESULTS: A significant trend in risk with increasing exposure level of pesticides was observed, with ORs of 1.3 and 1.4 for low and moderate/high exposure levels, respectively. Excess risks were found for occupational exposure to fungicides (OR = 1.5) and herbicides (OR = 1.6) in the moderate/high level after adjustment for potential confounding factors. An increased risk for insecticide exposure was disappeared after adjustment for fungicide and herbicide exposures. Results of our occupation-based analysis were consistent with those from the JEM-based analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that pesticides may increase risk of pancreatic cancer, and indicate the need for investigations that can evaluate risk by specific chemical exposures. Published 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.


Subject(s)
Occupational Diseases/chemically induced , Occupational Exposure , Pancreatic Neoplasms/chemically induced , Pesticides/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Black People , Case-Control Studies , Confidence Intervals , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Female , Fungicides, Industrial/adverse effects , Herbicides/adverse effects , Humans , Insecticides/adverse effects , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Population Surveillance , Risk Factors , White People
9.
Am J Public Health ; 90(8): 1277-81, 2000 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10937009

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relation between socioeconomic status (SES) and risk of multiple myeloma among Blacks and Whites in the United States. METHODS: This population-based case-control study included 573 cases (206 Blacks and 367 Whites) with new diagnoses of multiple myeloma identified between August 1, 1986, and April 30, 1989, and 2131 controls (967 Blacks and 1164 Whites) from 3 US geographic areas. Information on occupation, income, and education was obtained by personal interview. RESULTS: Inverse gradients in risk were associated with occupation-based SES, income, and education. Risks were significantly elevated for subjects in the lowest categories of occupation-based SES (odds ratio [OR] = 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16, 2.53), education (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.06, 1.75), and income (OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.05, 1.93). Occupation-based low SES accounted for 37% of multiple myeloma in Blacks and 17% in Whites, as well as 49% of the excess incidence in Blacks. Low education and low income accounted for 17% and 28% of the excess incidence in Blacks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the measured SES-related factors account for a substantial amount of the Black-White differential in multiple myeloma incidence.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Multiple Myeloma/epidemiology , Social Class , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Interviews as Topic , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
10.
Cancer Lett ; 154(2): 143-9, 2000 Jun 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10806302

ABSTRACT

Environmental carcinogens may play a role in the etiology of breast cancer, but the extent of their contribution is not yet defined. The aims of this study were to determine whether polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-DNA adducts could be detected in stored paraffin blocks of breast tumor tissue (n=147) with an immunoperoxidase technique and whether they correlated with smoking history and/or mutant p53 protein expression. There was no significant difference in mean relative nuclear staining intensity in non-smokers (444+/-90, n=75), ever smokers (435+/-91, n=72), and current smokers (456+/-98, n=35). In either current or ever smokers, PAH-DNA adducts were non-significantly elevated in those with greater compared with lower exposure in relation to age at started smoking, years of smoking, cigarettes per day, and pack years. DNA damage levels were not elevated in tissues with compared with those without mutant p53 protein expression. These data demonstrate that immunohistochemical methods can be used to monitor DNA damage levels in archived breast tissues.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , DNA Adducts/metabolism , Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons/metabolism , Smoking , Adult , Age Factors , Analysis of Variance , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Carcinogens/metabolism , DNA Adducts/biosynthesis , DNA Damage , Female , Genes, p53/genetics , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Mutation , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/metabolism
11.
Cancer Causes Control ; 11(3): 231-8, 2000 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10782657

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma has risen rapidly in the past two decades, for unknown reasons. The goal of this analysis was to determine whether gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or the medications used to treat it are associated with an increased risk of esophageal or gastric cancer, using data from a large population-based case-control study. METHODS: Cases were aged 30-79 years, newly diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma (n = 293), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (n = 221), gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (n = 261), or non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma (n = 368) in three areas with population-based tumor registries. Controls (n = 695) were chosen by random digit dialing and from Health Care Financing Administration rosters. Data were collected using an in-person structured interview. RESULTS: History of gastric ulcer was associated with an increased risk of non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4-3.2). Risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma increased with frequency of GERD symptoms; the odds ratio in those reporting daily symptoms was 5.5 (95% CI 3.2-9.3). Ever having used H2 blockers was unassociated with esophageal adenocarcinoma risk (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.5-1.5). The odds ratio was 1.3 (95% CI 0.6-2.8) in long-term (4 or more years) users, but increased to 2.1 (95% CI 0.8-5.6) when use in the 5 years prior to the interview was disregarded. Risk was also modestly increased among users of antacids. Neither GERD symptoms nor use of H2 blockers or antacids was associated with risk of the other three tumor types. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with long-standing GERD are at increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma, whether or not the symptoms are treated with H2 blockers or antacids.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/epidemiology , Histamine H2 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Stomach Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma/etiology , Adult , Aged , Antacids/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/etiology , Case-Control Studies , Esophageal Neoplasms/etiology , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Stomach Neoplasms/etiology , Stomach Ulcer/complications , Washington/epidemiology
12.
Br J Cancer ; 82(3): 718-25, 2000 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10682688

ABSTRACT

A population-based case-control study was carried out among 981 men (479 black, 502 white) with pathologically confirmed prostate cancer and 1315 controls (594 black, 721 white). In-person interviews elicited information on sexual behaviour and other potential risk factors for prostate cancer. Blood was drawn for serologic studies in a subset of the cases (n = 276) and controls (n = 295). Prostate cancer risk was increased among men who reported a history of gonorrhoea or syphilis (odds ratio (OR) = 1.6; 95% confidence internal (CI) 1.2-2.1) or showed serological evidence of syphilis (MHA-TP) (OR = 1.8; 95% CI 1.0-3.5). Patterns of risk for gonorrhoea and syphilis were similar for blacks (OR = 1.7; 95% CI 1.2-2.2) and whites (OR = 1.6; 95% CI 0.8-3.2). Risks increased with increasing occurrences of gonorrhoea, rising to OR = 3.3 (95% CI 1.4-7.8) among subjects with three or more events (Ptrend = 0.0005). Frequent sexual encounters with prostitutes and failure to use condoms were also associated with increased risk. Syphilis, gonorrhoea, sex with prostitutes and unprotected sexual intercourse may be indicators of contact with a sexually transmissible factor that increases the risk of prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Sexual Behavior , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Adult , Black or African American , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatic Neoplasms/complications , Risk Factors , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/complications , White People
13.
Women Health ; 31(2-3): 81-96, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11289687

ABSTRACT

Data on 1,501 control women from a multi-center, population-based, case-control study of breast cancer were used to examine characteristics associated with recreational exercise during the year prior to the interview among women 20 to 44 years of age. In a univariate analysis, higher levels of recreational exercise were associated with: higher education; higher family income; white race; previous participation in recreational exercise above the median level at ages 12 to 13 and at age 20; being nulliparous; ever lactating; being a never or past smoker; having a low current Quetelet's index (QI: weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared); and living in Atlanta or Seattle (compared to New Jersey). In a multiple linear regression model, independent predictors of higher levels of recreational exercise were: participation in higher levels of exercise at 20 years of age; having a low current QI; and never having smoked. Though all women should be encouraged to participate in exercise, these findings identity subgroups of women that may need targeting when developing exercise intervention programs.


Subject(s)
Exercise , Health Behavior , Recreation , Women's Health , Adult , Age Distribution , Exercise/physiology , Female , Georgia/epidemiology , Humans , Models, Statistical , New Jersey/epidemiology , Recreation/physiology , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Washington/epidemiology
14.
Int J Epidemiol ; 28(5): 816-23, 1999 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10597976

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Several common medical conditions are associated with altered hormone levels, and may thus plausibly influence breast cancer risk. Few studies have examined such relationships, and we utilized a population-based case-control study of young women in the US to examine breast cancer risk following a history of various medical conditions. Relationships between breast cancer and each medical condition examined are biologically plausible, and relevant in terms of public health. METHODS: The study included 2173 breast cancer cases and 1990 population-based controls from three areas of the US, under 55 years, who were administered a questionnaire including details of physician-diagnosed medical conditions. RESULTS: No significantly increased or decreased breast cancer risk was associated with a history of thyroid disease, gallbladder disease, colorectal polyps, diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol or surgery for endometriosis. There was some evidence of an increased breast cancer risk associated with ovarian cysts among women who did not receive an oophorectomy (relative risk [RR] = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.0-3.9). Non-significant increases in breast cancer risk were observed following diagnoses of several other cancers, including thyroid cancer, basal cell carcinoma, Hodgkin's disease and malignant melanoma. CONCLUSIONS: To conclude, our generally null results from this large, population-based study support results from previous studies in providing reassurance that women with a history of several common medical conditions do not appear to be at an increased risk of breast cancer at a young age.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Genital Neoplasms, Female/epidemiology , Hypertension/epidemiology , Thyroid Diseases/epidemiology , Adult , Age Distribution , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Case-Control Studies , Comorbidity , Confidence Intervals , Female , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Population Surveillance , Reference Values , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis , United States/epidemiology
15.
Br J Cancer ; 81(1): 167-74, 1999 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10487629

ABSTRACT

Findings have been inconsistent on effects of adolescent body size and adult weight gain on risk of breast cancer in young women. These relations were examined in a population-based case control study of 1590 women less than 45 years of age newly diagnosed with breast cancer during 1990-1992 in three areas of the US and an age-matched control group of 1390 women. Height and weight were measured at interview and participants asked to recall information about earlier body size. Logistic regression was used to estimate the relative risk of breast cancer adjusted for other risk factors. Women who were either much heavier or lighter than average in adolescence or at age 20 were at reduced risk. Weight gain after age 20 resulted in reduced risk, but the effect was confined to early-stage and, more specifically, lower grade breast cancer. Neither the risk reduction nor the variation by breast cancer stage or grade was explained by the method of cancer detection or by prior mammography history. These findings suggest that relations between breast cancer risk in young women and body weight at different ages is complex and that the risk reduction with adult weight gain is confined to less aggressive cancers.


Subject(s)
Body Constitution , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/physiopathology , Weight Gain , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Body Mass Index , Case-Control Studies , Child , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Risk Factors
16.
Br J Cancer ; 80(11): 1830-7, 1999 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10468306

ABSTRACT

In a population-based case-control study of pancreatic cancer conducted in three areas of the USA, 484 cases and 2099 controls were interviewed to evaluate the aetiologic role of several medical conditions/interventions, including diabetes mellitus, cholecystectomy, ulcer/gastrectomy and allergic states. We also evaluated risk associated with family history of cancer. Our findings support previous studies indicating that diabetes is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer, as well as a possible complication of the tumour. A significant positive trend in risk with increasing years prior to diagnosis of pancreatic cancer was apparent (P-value for test of trend = 0.016), with diabetics diagnosed at least 10 years prior to diagnosis having a significant 50% increased risk. Those treated with insulin had risks similar to those not treated with insulin (odds ratio (OR) = 1.6 and 1.5 respectively), and no trend in risk was associated with increasing duration of insulin treatment. Cholecystectomy also appeared to be a risk factor, as well as a consequence of the malignancy. Subjects with a cholecystectomy at least 20 years prior to the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer experienced a 70% increased risk, which was marginally significant. In contrast, subjects with a history of duodenal or gastric ulcer had little or no elevated risk (OR = 1.2; confidence interval = 0.9-1.6). Those treated by gastrectomy had the same risk as those not receiving surgery, providing little support for the hypothesis that gastrectomy is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer. A significant 40% reduced risk was associated with hay fever, a non-significant 50% decreased risk with allergies to animals, and a non-significant 40% reduced risk with allergies to dust/moulds. These associations, however, may be due to chance since no risk reductions were apparent for asthma or several other types of allergies. In addition, we observed significantly increased risks for subjects reporting a first-degree relative with cancers of the pancreas (OR = 3.2), colon (OR = 1.7) or ovary (OR = 5.3) and non-significantly increased risks for cancers of the endometrium (OR = 1.5) or breast (OR = 1.3). The pattern is consistent with the familial predisposition reported for pancreatic cancer and with the array of tumours associated with hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Cholecystectomy/statistics & numerical data , Confidence Intervals , Female , Gastrectomy/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/etiology , Nuclear Family , Odds Ratio , Pancreatic Neoplasms/etiology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Reference Values , Registries , Risk Factors , Smoking , Stomach Ulcer/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
17.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 8(5): 413-9, 1999 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10350436

ABSTRACT

This study was undertaken to explore whether the incidence of breast tumors that overexpress HER-2/neu protein product (HER-2/neu+) is more strongly associated with oral contraceptives (OCs) and other factors than is the incidence of tumors that do not (HER-2/neu-). In a population-based sample of women <45 years, 42.9% (159 of 371) of in situ and invasive breast cancer cases were HER-2/neu+ as assessed by immunohistochemistry in archived tissue. Polytomous logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for HER-2/neu+ and HER-2/neu-breast cancer, as compared with 462 population-based controls, in relation to OCs and other factors. The ratio of the ORs (HER-2/neu+ versus HER-2/neu-tumors) was used as an indicator of heterogeneity in risk. There was little heterogeneity in risk for OC use of 6 months or more by HER-2/neu status (age-adjusted ratio of ORs, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.83-2.00). Among early pill users (< or =18 years of age) heterogeneity was apparent (2.39; 95% CI, 1.08-5.30), which was attenuated in a multivariate model (1.99; 95% CI, 0.87-4.54); among cases with estrogen receptor-negative tumors, heterogeneity increased to 5-fold. For other risk factors, there was no marked heterogeneity between + and - tumors for HER-2/neu. In summary, the incidence of breast cancer among younger women in relation to OC use at an early age varied with HER-2/neu status, with the odds ratio for +tumors twice that for -tumors.


PIP: This population-based study was undertaken to address the hypothesis that the incidence of breast tumor with a high HER-2/neu+ protein product was associated with oral contraceptive (OC) use and other risk factors compared with HER-2/neu- tumors. The study was conducted through the collection of archived paraffin-embedded tissue blocks, laboratory evaluation and combined laboratory results with risk factor information. About 159 of 371 (42.9%) in-situ and invasive breast cancer cases showed overexpression of HER-2/neu+ during immunohistochemistry of archived tissue. During the statistical analysis using a polytomous logistic regression, odds ratio (OR) was calculated and 95% confidence interval (CI) for HER-2/neu+ breast cancer and HER-2/neu- breast cancer compared with 401 controls regarding OC use and other risk factors. The OR (HER-2/neu+ vs. HER-2/neu- tumors) was used as an indicator of heterogeneity in risk. There was little heterogeneity in risk for OC use of 6 months or more by HER-2/neu status (age-adjusted OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.83-2.00). In early pill users, heterogeneity by HER-2/neu status was apparent (2.39; 95% CI, 1.08-5.30). A 5-fold increase in heterogeneity risk was noted among women with estrogen receptor (ER) negative tumors. In conclusion, the incidence of breast cancer among younger women in relation to OC use at an early age varied with HER-2/neu status, with the OR for positive tumors being twice that for negative tumors.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Contraceptives, Oral/adverse effects , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/etiology , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Adult , Age Distribution , Case-Control Studies , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , New Jersey/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Risk Factors
18.
Cancer ; 85(11): 2385-90, 1999 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10357409

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the U.S., the incidence rate of multiple myeloma is more than twice as high for blacks as for whites, but the etiology of this malignancy is not well understood. METHODS: A population-based case-control interview study of 565 subjects (361 white, 204 black) with multiple myeloma and 2104 controls (1150 white, 954 black) living in 3 areas of the U.S. offered the opportunity to explore whether family history, of cancer contributes to the risk of multiple myeloma and explains the racial disparity in risk. RESULTS: For both races combined, the risk of multiple myeloma was significantly elevated for subjects who reported that a first-degree relative had multiple myeloma (odds ratio [OR] = 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2-12.0). Increased risk was also associated with a family history of any hematolymphoproliferative (HLP) cancer (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.0-2.8), especially in a sibling (OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.1-4.5). The risk associated with familial occurrence of HLP cancer was higher for blacks than for whites, but the difference between the ORs was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: These data are consistent with previous studies that indicate a familial risk of multiple myeloma, but they explain little of the race-related difference in incidence rates.


Subject(s)
Black People , Family Health , Multiple Myeloma/epidemiology , White People , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/etiology , Regression Analysis , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
19.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 8(3): 255-63, 1999 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10090304

ABSTRACT

p53 mutations may be a fingerprint for cigarette smoking and other environmental carcinogens, including breast carcinogens. This study was undertaken to explore whether p53 mutations are associated with environmental or other suspected or established risk factors for breast cancer. p53 protein detection by immunohistochemistry (which is more easily quantified in large epidemiological studies than are mutations, and are highly correlated with them) was determined for 378 patients from a case-control study of breast cancer. In this population-based sample of women under the age of 45 years, 44.4% (168/378) of the cases had p53 protein detected by immunohistochemistry (p53+). Polytomous logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) for p53+ and p53- breast cancer, as compared with the controls, in relation to cigarette smoking and other factors. The ratio of the ORs was used as an indicator of heterogeneity in risk for p53+ versus p53- cancer. The ratio of the ORs in a multivariate model was substantially elevated among women with a greater than high school education [2.39; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.43-4.00], current cigarette smokers (1.96; 95% CI, 1.10-3.52), and users of electric blankets, water beds, or mattresses (1.78; 95% CI, 1.11-2.86). Nonsignificant heterogeneity was noted for family history of breast cancer and ethnicity but not for other known or suspected risk factors. Coupled with the strong biological plausibility of the association, our data support the hypothesis that in breast cancer, as with other tumors, p53 protein immunohistochemical detection may be associated with exposure to environmental carcinogens such as cigarette smoking.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Genes, p53/genetics , Smoking/adverse effects , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/genetics , Adult , Bedding and Linens , Beds , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Carcinogens/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Confidence Intervals , Educational Status , Epidemiologic Studies , Ethnicity , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Logistic Models , Multivariate Analysis , Mutation/genetics , Odds Ratio , Population Surveillance , Reproductive History , Risk Factors
20.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 8(1): 25-34, 1999 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9950236

ABSTRACT

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men in the United States, with substantially higher rates among American blacks than whites. We carried out a population-based case-control study in three geographic areas of the United States to evaluate the reasons for the racial disparity in incidence rates. A total of 932 men (449 black men and 483 white men) who had been newly diagnosed with pathologically confirmed prostate cancer and 1201 controls (543 black men and 658 white men) were interviewed in person to elicit information on potential risk factors. This report evaluates the impact of dietary factors, particularly the consumption of animal products and animal fat, on the risk of prostate cancer among blacks and whites in the United States. Increased consumption (grams/day) of foods high in animal fat was linked to prostate cancer (independent of intake of other calories) among American blacks [by quartile of intake, odds ratio (OR) = 1.0 (referent), 1.5, 2.1, and 2.0; Ptrend = 0.007], but not among American whites [by quartile of intake, OR = 1.0 (referent), 1.6, 1.5, and 1.1; Ptrend = 0.90]. However, risks for advanced prostate cancer were higher with greater intake of foods high in animal fat among blacks [by quartile of intake, OR = 1.0 (referent), 2.2, 4.2, and 3.1; Ptrend = 0.006] and whites [by quartile of intake, OR = 1.0 (referent), 2.2, 2.6, and 2.4; Ptrend = 0.02]. Increased intake of animal fat as a proportion of total caloric intake also showed positive but weaker associations with advanced prostate cancer among blacks (Ptrend = 0.13) and whites (Ptrend = 0.08). No clear associations were found with vitamin A, calcium, or specific lycopene-rich foods. The study linked greater consumption of fat from animal sources to increased risk for prostate cancer among American blacks and to advanced prostate cancer among American blacks and whites. A reduction of fat from animal sources in the diet could lead to decreased incidence and mortality rates for prostate cancer, particularly among American blacks.


Subject(s)
Black People , Feeding Behavior , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , White People , Adult , Black or African American , Aged , Animals , Antioxidants/administration & dosage , Calcium/administration & dosage , Carotenoids/administration & dosage , Case-Control Studies , Confidence Intervals , Dietary Fats/administration & dosage , Dietary Fats/adverse effects , Energy Intake , Humans , Incidence , Lycopene , Male , Meat , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , United States , Vitamin A/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...