Voice Pathologies and the General Population's Perception.

OBJECTIVES: To examine how the general population perceives voice pathology based on subjective qualities. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive, cross-sectional, survey-based study. METHODS: This is an IRB-approved Qualtrics survey on Amazon MTurk for respondents ages 18 and older. Ten subjects with voice pathologies supplied voice recordings of the Rainbow Passage to be assessed by the respondents. Respondents then assessed the voice conditions on perceived qualities of intelligence, leadership ability, and employability. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dunnett's multiple comparison test with Sidak correction compared the mean scores of the samples (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: A total of 1754 responses were included in the final dataset. The female control voice was scored as more likely to be a Fortune 500 leader as well as more intelligent, friendly, attractive, and employable when compared to the female vocal fry and muscle tension dysphonia (MTD) recordings (P < 0.0001). Conversely, the male MTD was the only male pathology that received a significantly lower score on friendliness, attractiveness, Fortune 500 leader status and employability than the male control (P = 0.0102, P = 0.0007, P = 0.0338, and P = 0.0039, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the more critical appraisal of voice pathologies of female patients compared to their male counterparts. People with voice disorders are perceived as being less successful, a disadvantage to potential leadership and career opportunities.

Medical student otolaryngology research: Involvement, perceptions, motivations.

OBJECTIVE: Otolaryngology is a competitive specialty that emphasizes research. This study explored medical student involvement in otolaryngology research including training, productivity, perceptions and career goals. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: A 27 question multiple choice survey was generated using Qualtrics and posted on an otolaryngology forum (Otomatch) from 10/09/2022 to 12/11/2022. RESULTS: Thirty fourth year medical students (MS4) applying to U.S. otolaryngology residency programs responded. Nearly all (26/30 = 86.7 %) believe there should be dedicated time to research in medical school. MS4 produced an average of 3.23 otolaryngology papers (± 3.13), 5.23 poster presentations (± 9.22) and 2.50 oral presentations (± 5.06). MS4 feel it is more important for physicians to read (mean 4.47 on a 5-point scale; ± 0.76) than to conduct research (3.03 ± 0.87) or to emphasize it in evaluating residency applicants (2.79 ± 0.96). Seventeen respondents (17/30 = 56.7 %) lack interest in continuing research after medical school. Twenty-eight MS4 were evenly split (14/30 = 46.7 %) between a research-heavy or traditional residency. Students felt pressure to publish in low-impact journals (3.93 ± 0.94) for career advancement. CONCLUSION: All respondents were involved in research yet the majority (16/30 = 53.3 %) eschew a research-heavy residency. Using research to evaluate success entices involvement for some who may not be interested. Pressure to publish may exacerbate ethical issues like inaccurately assigned authorship and deceptive reporting of publications. A decreased emphasis on research will enable students truly interested to continue without pressure to publish, leading to a potential increase in generalizable studies.

Predictors of voice therapy efficacy in vocal cord dysfunction at a tertiary care center.

OBJECTIVE: Vocal cord dysfunction is inappropriate adduction of vocal cords during inspiration that causes dyspnea and is commonly mistaken for exercise-induced asthma. To improve diagnostic accuracy, this study aims to identify demographics associated with vocal cord dysfunction and to determine their impact on the efficacy of voice therapy in improving vocal cord function. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Single tertiary care institution between January 2015 and December 2021. METHODS: 184 patients who underwent voice therapy for vocal cord dysfunction were included. The primary outcome was patient self-reported percent improvement of symptoms. The secondary outcome was number of voice therapy treatments. RESULTS: The mean duration of symptoms was 2 ± 3 years. The mean number of voice therapy treatments was 2.2 ± 1.5. Of the 107 (58.2 %) patients with documented perceived breathing improvement percentages recorded, the mean maximal percent improvement was 72.5 ± 21.5 %. Mean maximal percent improvement of symptoms increased with each voice therapy treatment (p = 0.01). This association remained significant when controlling for comorbid conditions such as allergic rhinitis with postnasal drip, anxiety, asthma, and gastroesophageal reflux disease in multivariate analysis (p = 0.005). Patients with asthma had significantly higher maximum percent breathing improvement compared to those without asthma (p = 0.026). Similarly, patients who played sports had significantly higher maximum percent breathing improvement compared to those who did not (p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Patient perceived breathing improvement with voice therapy is higher among those with concomitant asthma and those who play sports. Voice therapy is a safe and effective first line treatment of vocal cord dysfunction even when controlling for comorbid conditions.

The novel corona virus and rhinology: Impact on practice patterns and future directions.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of the novel coronavirus pandemic on practice patterns, clinical behavior, personal health, and emotional/psychological concerns of rhinologists. METHODS: A 15-question survey was sent out to the American Rhinologic Society's (ARS) membership to determine the impact of COVID-19 during the crisis. Demographic factors and practice patterns were collected and evaluated. RESULTS: There were 224 total respondents out of 835 ARS members queried (26.8% response rate). Study queries were sent in April 2020. Notably, 17.8% reported illness in themselves or their staff and 74.4% noted a psychological/emotional impact. A plurality of rhinologists noted their practice volume and in-office procedure volume has become 20.0% and 0.0% of their prior volumes, respectively. In addition, 96.2% were noted to be using telemedicine in our subspecialty. CONCLUSION: In addition to severely impacting volume and the perception of future decreases in patients and revenue, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a physical and emotional impact on rhinologists in ways that need to be further studied. These data include significantly novel and objective information. The COVID-19 crisis also reveals the important role of telemedicine in rhinology. Guidelines regarding personal protective equipment for in-office visits, nasal endoscopy, and other in-office and operating room procedures would be particularly helpful as future waves are expected.

The Dangers of Sneezing: A Review of Injuries.

BACKGROUND: Sneezing is an almost universal daily phenomenon as a reflex to evacuate irritants from the nasal cavities. An autonomic-controlled buildup of intrathoracic pressure against a closed glottis followed by sudden release results in a burst of 1 kPa of air through the upper airway. Active intervention to limit a sneeze can be deleterious. Closure of the airway during a sneeze can result in over 20 times the airway pressures resulting in a variety of untoward events. This review summarizes all reported injuries that occurred as the result of a sneeze. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to summarize the risks of closed-airway sneezing and determine if there are any trends which can help understand such injuries. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was performed from 1948 to 2018 to identify all reports of sneeze-related injuries. Information was compiled from reports to gain insights into comorbidities and risk factors for sneeze injuries. RESULTS: There were 52 unique reports of sneeze-related injuries in the literature that were categorized into 6 areas of injury: intrathoracic, laryngeal/pharyngeal, ocular/orbital, intracranial/neurological, otologic, and other. The mean age of subjects who suffered a sneeze injury was 40 years old (range: 15-84 years), with 81% being male gender. Thirty percent had a risk factor for injury of prior trauma (5) or respiratory compromise (5). CONCLUSION: A variety of injuries can occur during a sneeze, especially when a closed-airway sneeze is attempted, and high Valsalva pressure is transmitted to the other systems. Men are more at risk for these injuries with the majority occurring in patients with no known risk factor. When triggered, a sneeze should be allowed to proceed without intervention to prevent associated injuries.