Simple Prediction Score for Developing Surgical Site Infection after Clean Neck Operation.

Background: Clean neck operations (thyroidectomies, parathyroidectomies, and lymph node resection) are among the most common procedures performed in the United States. Surgical site infections (SSIs) after clean neck operations are rare, but the consequences are devastating and often life-threatening. The aim of this study was to develop a score that will identify patients at high risk for developing a SSI after a clean neck procedure. Materials and Methods: Patients with either thyroidectomies, parathyroidectomies, or lymph node resection of the neck were identified from the 2016 and 2017 databases of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and were used for this analysis. Our primary goal was to build a scoring system with which we will be able to identify patients at high risk for SSI after a clean neck operation. Results: Of a total of 99,877 patients, 72,719 patients had a thyroidectomy, 22,043 patients had parathyroidectomy, and 5,115 patients had lymph node resection of the neck. Multivariable logistic regression identified the following independent risk factors associated with post-operative SSI: male gender (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.51), diabetes mellitus (aOR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.07-1.67), smoking (aOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.36-2.04), pre-operative steroid use (aOR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.21-2.53), cancer diagnosis (aOR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.17-1.77), radical lymphadenectomies (aOR, 2.94; 95% CI, 2.16-4), and total operative time ≥198 minutes (aOR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.82-2.78). Afterward, we developed a prognostic score for calculating the odds of having post-operative SSI. One point was allotted for each of the aforementioned factors, except lymphadenectomies where two points were allotted, and operative time was excluded. Our score was associated with a stepwise higher risk of post-operative SSI after a clean neck operation. Conclusions: Pre-operative and intra-operative factors can predict which patients undergoing a clean neck surgery may develop SSI. Our prognostic score may help guide surgeons identify patients at high-risk for SSI after clean neck surgery and these patients might benefit from prophylactic use of antibiotic agents.

Laparoscopic vs open partial colectomy in elderly patients: Insights from the American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

AIM: To compare the outcomes between the laparoscopic and open approaches for partial colectomy in elderly patients aged 65 years and over using the American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. METHODS: The ACS NSQIP database for the years 2005-2011 was queried for all patients 65 years and above who underwent partial colectomy. 1:1 propensity score matching using the nearest- neighbor method was performed to ensure both groups had similar pre-operative comorbidities. Outcomes including post-operative complications, length of stay and mortality were compared between the laparoscopic and open groups. χ(2) and Fisher's exact test were used for discrete variables and Student's t-test for continuous variables. P < 0.05 was considered significant and odds ratios with 95%CI were reported when applicable. RESULTS: The total number of patients in the ACS NSQIP database of the years 2005-2011 was 1777035. We identified 27604 elderly patients who underwent partial colectomy with complete data sets. 12009 (43%) of the cases were done laparoscopically and 15595 (57%) were done with open. After propensity score matching, there were 11008 patients each in the laparoscopic (LC) and open colectomy (OC) cohorts. The laparoscopic approach had lower post-operative complications (LC 15.2%, OC 23.8%, P < 0.001), shorter length of stay (LC 6.61 d, OC 9.62 d, P < 0.001) and lower mortality (LC 1.6%, OC 2.9%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Even after propensity score matching, elderly patients in the ACS NSQIP database having a laparoscopic partial colectomy had better outcomes than those having open colectomies. In the absence of specific contraindications, elderly patients requiring a partial colectomy should be offered the laparoscopic approach.

Jejunal Intussusception: A Rare Presentation of Carcinoid Tumor.

A 55-year-old male presented to the emergency department with sudden onset of diffuse abdominal pain for one day. Physical examination was remarkable for tenderness in the umbilical region. A CT scan of the abdomen showed intussusception involving the jejunum without any mass. The patient then underwent an exploratory laparotomy. During surgery, the distal jejunum was intussuscepted with mesenteric lymphadenopathy. Liver showed nodular deposits in both lobes of the liver. The involved small bowel segment was resected with primary anastomosis and liver was biopsied. Pathological examination showed multifocal deposits of well-differentiated carcinoids in the jejunum. The liver and mesenteric deposits were positive for metastatic carcinoid. Patient recovered well without any complications.

Medical student perception of night call in a night float system.

BACKGROUND: Because of work hour regulations, many surgical residency programs have moved to a night float system. Previously, our medical students took call for 24 hours, whereas currently they also follow a night float system. This study looked at their evaluations of these 2 systems. METHODS: Students were anonymously surveyed to evaluate the rotation (on a 5-point scale) as well as various components including night call. Responses from each group were compared. RESULTS: There were 104 students included: 46 in the traditional 24-hour call group and 58 in the night float group. Students rated night call significantly higher in the night float system (4.62 ± .64 vs 3.52 ± 1.00, P < .001). There was no difference in the other components or the overall evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: After switching to a night float system, students had a much more positive perception of their night call experience. We believe more clerkships should switch to a night float system.

The use of a surgery-specific written examination in the selection process of surgical residents.

OBJECTIVE: Selection of surgical residents is a difficult task, and program directors are interested in identifying the best candidates. Among the qualities being sought after is the ability to acquire surgical knowledge, and eventually do well on their board examinations. During the interview process, many programs use results from the United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) to identify residents they think will do well academically. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a different method of identifying such residents, through the use of a surgery-specific written exam (SSWE). DESIGN: A retrospective review of residents in our program between 2004 and 2012 was done. A 50-question SSWE was designed and administered to candidates on the day of their interview. Scores on the SSWE and the USMLE were compared with results on the American Board of Surgery In-Training Exam (ABSITE). Correlation coefficients were calculated and compared. SETTING: Community based General Surgery residency program. PARTICIPANTS: Resident applicants. RESULTS: Forty-three residents had scores available from the SSWE, USMLE Part 1 (USMLE-1), and Part 2 (USMLE-2). There were ABSITE scores available for 38 in postgraduate year (PGY) 1. USMLE-1 had a statistically significant correlation (r = 0.327, p = 0.045) with the ABSITE score in PGY-1 (ABSITE-1), while with USMLE-2 had slightly less correlation (r = 0.314, p = 0.055) with ABSITE-1. However, the SSWE had a much stronger correlation (r = 0.656, p < 0.001) than either of them. CONCLUSIONS: An SSWE is a good method to identify residents who will later do well on the ABSITE. It is a better method than using the more general USMLE. Since the ABSITE has been shown to correlate with performance on board examinations, residency programs interested in identifying candidates that will do well on their board examinations, should consider incorporating an SSWE into their application process.

Intraoperative breast problem--focused sonography a valuable tool in the training of surgical residents.

INTRODUCTION: In surgical residency education, "hands-on" learning is important in the operating room. Mastering the interpretation of preoperative data is a must for intraoperative decisions. Because preoperative evaluations of breast masses by ultrasound are performed and interpreted in the Department of Radiology, our study aimed to assess and improve surgical residents' ability to perform ultrasound and to interpret their results before performing breast mass biopsies. METHODS: Between January 2000 and May 2007, 128 female patients found to have palpable breast masses were scheduled for biopsy. An on-table ultrasound was performed by a surgical resident under the supervision of an attending surgeon. The resident was unaware of the result reported by the Department of Radiology. The parameters used to evaluate on-table ultrasound were the echogenicity, diameter (transverse vs vertical), and margins (regular vs irregular) of patients' lesions. Based on these criteria, residents classified lesions as benign, malignant, or indeterminate. The results were compared with the preoperative ultrasound evaluations provided by the Department of Radiology and pathology reports. RESULTS: Eliminating the 10 indeterminate lesions on ultrasound, the residents found that 87 lesions were benign and 31 lesions were malignant. The residents' assessment of the breast lumps had a sensitivity of 90.32% and a specificity of 96.55%, with a positive predictive value of 90.32% and a negative predictive value of 96.55%. CONCLUSIONS: The residents' overall accuracy of 94.91% approximates that of the radiologists in differentiating between benign and malignant lesions. The study allowed us to assess the knowledge and skills of residents who responded as required by Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies.

Electronic submission of resident work hours: a convenient way of exchange of information.

The purpose of this protocol is to assess how residents can document their work hours in a convenient and objective way; to find an efficient, secure, quick, and reproducible way of communication between house staff and residency administrators regarding work hours data; and to fulfill the requirements of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and other monitoring bodies regarding work hours documentation. This electronic work hours submission protocol is based on the Microsoft Excel system. The data is submitted via e-mail to the residency coordinators. The work hours sheet recognizes the time spent by the residents in various categories such as patient care, off hours, off days, vacations, outpatient clinic time, on-site rest time, and education time. Calculations are done automatically in the work sheet and results are shown graphically. We found electronic submission of work hours as a more convenient, secure, objective, efficient, and reproducible way of communication than the paper submission forms. Each resident can now easily be tracked for the time he/she spends in various categories. The data will be used to assess how more efficiently residents can spend their time. It also fulfills the documentation requirements of different monitoring bodies.

Abdominal wall endometriomas.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of abdominal wall endometriomas is often confused with other surgical conditions. METHODS: A retrospective study was made of 12 patients presenting with an abdominal wall mass, which proved to be endometrioma. RESULTS: Of a total of 297 patients of endometriosis treated in our hospital over a 7-year period, 12 (4%) had isolated abdominal wall endometriomas. Their mean age was 29.4 years. The presenting symptoms were abdominal mass (n = 12), cyclical (n = 5) or noncyclic pain (n = 7), dyspareunia and dysmenorrhea (n = 1). All patients had a history of gynecologic operations and presented, after an average of 1.9 years, with a tender mass (average 4 cm) at the previous incision site. Preoperative diagnosis was correct in 4 patients (33%) who presented with a cyclically painful abdominal mass. The others were diagnosed as incisional hernia (n = 4), "abdominal wall tumor" (n = 2), and inguinal hernia (n = 2). All patients underwent wide excision of their endometrioma; 2 required polytetrafluoroethylene patch grafting for the resulting fascial defect. The diagnosis was confirmed at frozen section or conventional histological examination in all patients. At follow-up, ranging from 4 months to 3 years, there was no recurrence of endometrioma. CONCLUSIONS: Scar endometrioma commonly presents as an abdominal mass with noncyclical symptoms. Imaging techniques are nonspecific and needle biopsy may confirm the diagnosis. Wide excision is the treatment of choice for abdominal wall endometrioma as well as for recurrent lesions.

Cystic Hypersecretory Duct Carcinoma of the Breast.

We present two cases of a rare form of intraductal carcinoma of the breast, "cystic hypersecretory carcinoma of the breast." The clinical and pathologic characteristics of the lesion are discussed, along with a review of the literature.