Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Telemed J E Health ; 2022 Apr 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35377241

ABSTRACT

Introduction: This article describes the experience of the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) implementing telemedicine consultations for COVID-19-positive patients recovering within community recovery facilities (CRFs) in a semi-inpatient setting. Materials and Methods: The SAF adopted a systematic approach to telemedicine implementation and scaling up, with Phase 1 being the deployment of medical teams operating on-site clinics daily at six CRFs and telemedicine only provided for after-hours medical consultations on an ad hoc basis. Subsequently in Phase 2, most clinical consultations in the CRFs were conducted virtually. Results: Phases 1 and 2 recorded 1,902 and 449 clinical consultations, respectively. The mean number of clinical encounters was 33 per 1,000 occupants per day in Phase 1, and 12 per 1,000 occupants per day in Phase 2 (p < 0.001). Acute respiratory illness (52.3% in Phase 1 and 46.7% in Phase 2) was the most common reason for consultations. With full telemedicine in Phase 2, there was reduction in the mean number of clinical encounters per 1,000 occupants per day (p = 0.001), lower man-hours in personal protective equipment (PPE) (p < 0.001), and rise in escalation of care (p < 0.001) but without adverse events reported. Conclusions: Telemedicine for patients was safe, improved medical manpower efficiency, and reduced man-hours in PPE. The increased escalation of care in Phase 2 due to the lack of physical examination capabilities was to be expected to ensure patients' safety. Overall, it is recommended that for stable and mild medical conditions, telemedicine is a viable, safe, and efficient health care delivery tool in crisis situations similar to COVID-19.

2.
Cureus ; 13(12): e20448, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35047284

ABSTRACT

Background Mid-pole patellar fractures are typically fixed with metal implants in the conventional "11-8" tension band construct. However, this technique is fraught with numerous implant-related complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the union rate following "all-suture" fixation of mid-pole patellar fractures. Methods We retrospectively evaluated a consecutive case series of patients with displaced mid-pole patella fractures treated with "all-suture" fixation in our institution. Fifteen cases were available for this study. The average age was 61.5 years. Clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated. Union time, complications, and revision rate were recorded. The minimum follow-up was one year. Results There were eight males and seven females, with a mean age of 61.5 ± 13.3 years. Fourteen out of 15 cases (93.3%) achieved radiographic union at 12 weeks postoperatively. The average time to radiographic union was 8.0 ± 2.7 weeks. Five cases (33.3%) had an increase in the fracture gap (>2 mm) at around four to six weeks postoperatively. Four of these cases had an eventual union, whereas one patient had fibrous non-union. There was one case of superficial surgical site infection and one case of infected hematoma. None of the patients required revision surgery. Conclusion "All-suture" fixation of mid-pole transverse patellar fractures is a safe and viable alternative to the conventional "11-8" tension band constructs with metal implants, with good union time, rates, and added benefits of not requiring additional surgery for implant removal.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL