Meta-analysis: Risk of lymphoma in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in population-based cohort studies.

BACKGROUND: There are inconsistencies in the results of the studies investigating the association between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and lymphoma. AIMS: The aim of this study is to systematically appraise the risk of lymphoma development in patients with IBD. METHODS: We searched Embase, PubMed and Scopus from inception to 30 April 2024 to identify population-based cohort studies that evaluated the risk of lymphoma in patients with IBD in comparison with those without IBD. We carried out random-effects meta-analyses and estimated pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We identified 23 eligible studies reporting 2078 lymphoma events in 656,731 patients with IBD. Patients with IBD had 30% higher odds of lymphoma (RR = 1.30 [95% CI: 1.21-1.40]). The risk of developing both Hodgkin's lymphoma (nine studies, RR = 1.29 [95% CI: 1.06-1.53]) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (16 studies, RR = 1.31 [95% CI: 1.20-1.42]) was increased in patients with IBD (p for interaction = 0.881). The increased risk of lymphoma was observed in both Crohn's disease (17 studies, RR = 1.54 [95% CI: 1.27-1.80]) and ulcerative colitis (20 studies, RR = 1.22 [95% CI: 1.09-1.35]) (p for interaction = 0.026). Meta-regression demonstrated that mean age of patients, study year, mean study follow-up duration, and percentages of immunomodulators and biologics use did not influence study outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of lymphoma is only modestly increased in patients with IBD, with Crohn's disease having a slightly higher risk than ulcerative colitis. In IBD, there appears to be no difference between the risks of Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Management of complications in patients with an ileostomy: an umbrella review of systematic reviews for the EndOTrial Consortium.

BACKGROUND: Standardized clinical care processes for patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and a permanent ileostomy (PI) are lacking. The EndOTrial consortium aims to address this gap by developing pathways for care. METHODS: In this umbrella review, we searched major databases for relevant systematic reviews (SRs) or scoping reviews (ScR) published until January 5, 2024. Screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal (AMSTAR 2) were performed by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: Of 1349 screened papers, 22 reviews met our inclusion criteria, including 20 SRs (eight with meta-analysis) and 2 ScRs. None exclusively focused on PI. Furthermore, nine reviews did not mention patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and only two reviews included patients with high-output ileostomy, highlighting a large evidence gap. The identified reviews covered six categories with nine types of interventions, including ostomy care pathways, peristomal skin care, patient education, clinical management of high-output stoma, management and prevention of postoperative ileus, dietary and nutritional support, nursing and supporting care, telemedicine, and self-management interventions. Most SRs including nursing interventions for stoma care highlighted nurses' role in a variety of standard and specialized treatments. Notably, none of the reviews exclusively examined disease recurrence, stoma pouching systems or adhesives, behavioral interventions, or mental health in patients living with ileostomy. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence for best practice interventions to treat complications and improve quality of life in patients living with an ileostomy for CD is limited and heterogeneous. These results outline the need for standardized clinical care processes and pathways tailored to the unique needs of this patient population.

Berberine HCl and diacerein loaded dual delivery transferosomes: Formulation and optimization using Box-Behnken design.

Introduction: Berberine is a poorly water-soluble alkaloid compound showing significant anti-inflammatory characteristics. It reduces the levels of pro-inflammatory and inflammatory cytokines, including tumour necrosis factor (TNF-α, IFN-γ) and interleukin (IL-23, IL-12, and IL-23). Diacerein significantly reduces the splenomegaly associated with psoriasis. It downregulates the production of TNF-α and IL-12. Method: This study reported the development of transferosomes containing berberine HCl and diacerein using a film hydration method followed by optimization using a Box-Behnken design. Sodium deoxycholate was used as an edge activator. The impact of independent variables (amount of phosphatidylcholine, amount of edge activator, and sonication cycles) on dependent variables (particle size and entrapment efficiency) was examined. The optimized formulation was characterized for polydispersity index, vesicle size, entrapment efficiency, ζ potential, spectral analysis like Fourier transform infrared, thermal analysis, X-ray diffraction, deformability, transmission electron microscopy, antioxidant assay, in-vitro release, and ex-vivo skin permeation studies. Results: The optimized formulation had a particle size of 110.90±2.8 nm with high entrapment efficiency (89.50±1.5 of berberine HCl and 91.23±1.8 of diacerein). Deformability, polydispersity index, ζ potential, and antioxidant activity of the optimized formulation were 2.44, 0.296, -13.3, and 38.36 %, respectively. Optimized transferosomes exhibited 82.093±0.81 % and 85.02±3.81 % release of berberine HCl and diacerein after 24 h of dissolution study. The transdermal flux of optimized formulation was 0.0224 µg cm-2 h-1 (2.24 cm h-1 permeation coefficient) and 0.0462 µg cm-2 h-1 (4.62 cm h-1 permeation coefficient), respectively, for berberine HCl and diacerein. Raman analysis of treated pig skin confirmed that the transferosomes can permeate the skin. No change in the skin condition or irritation was observed in BALB/c mice. Formulation stored at 4 and 25±2 °C / 60±5 % relative humidity was stable for 3 months. Conclusions: Thus, the results demonstrated successful optimization of the transferosomes for the efficient topical delivery of berberine HCl and diacerein in the effective management of psoriasis.

Global Prevalence of Advanced Liver Fibrosis and Cirrhosis in the General Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Limited data exist regarding the estimate of the prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in the general population. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the global prevalence and risk factors of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. METHODS: We searched Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to April 30 2024, with no language restriction. We included cross-sectional studies reporting the prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis and/or cirrhosis in a sample of at least 100 individuals aged ≥18 years from the general population. Subjects with cirrhosis were included in the advanced fibrosis group. The pooled prevalence proportions utilizing a random-effects model and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using global data. RESULTS: A total of 46 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria, comprising approximately 8 million participants from 21 countries. The pooled prevalence rates of advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in the general population were 3.3% (95% CI, 2.4%-4.2%) and 1.3% (95% CI, 0.9%-1.7%) worldwide, respectively. A trend was observed for an increase in the prevalence of advanced fibrosis (P = .004) and cirrhosis (P = .034) after 2016. There were significant geographic variations in the advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis prevalence at continental and national levels (P < .0001). Potential risk factors for cirrhosis were viral hepatitis, diabetes, excessive alcohol intake, obesity, and male sex. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis is considerable and increasing worldwide with significant geographic variation. Further research is needed to better understand the risk factors and how to mitigate them worldwide to address the growing global burden of cirrhosis.

Comparative Efficacy of Biologics and Small Molecule Therapies in Improving Patient-Reported Outcomes in Ulcerative Colitis: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic disorder with a considerable negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), which has been recently recognized as an important treatment target. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of different biologics and small molecule therapies in achieving better patient-reported outcomes and HRQoL in patients with UC. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central databases from inception until February 1, 2024. The primary endpoint was clinical remission in the patient-reported outcome (PRO-2) score in UC patients who were treated with different biologics or small molecules during induction and maintenance phases. PRO-2 score is the sum of both stool frequency and rectal bleeding subscores. The secondary outcome was improvement of HRQoL defined as an increase in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score of ≥16 points from baseline or any change in total score from baseline. A random effects model was used, and outcomes were reported as odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. Interventions were ranked per the SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve) score. RESULTS: A total of 54 studies were included in the primary outcome analysis and 15 studies were included in the secondary outcome analysis. The primary analysis showed that during the induction phase all of included drugs were better than placebo in improving the PRO-2 score. Interestingly, upadacitinib was found to be superior to most medications in improving PRO-2 scores. The secondary analysis showed that guselkumab ranked first in the improvement of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score, followed by upadacitinib during the induction phase. CONCLUSION: Upadacitinib ranked first in PRO-2 clinical remission during the induction and maintenance phases. Guselkumab, mirikizumab, tofacitinib, and upadacitinib were the only novel medications that were superior to placebo in improving HRQoL in UC, with guselkumab ranking the highest, followed by tofacitinib and upadacitinib. During maintenance of remission, tofacitinib ranked highest in improving HRQoL.

Patient-reported outcome (PRO-2) and disease impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) have been recognized as important treatment targets in ulcerative colitis. In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we compared different biologics and small molecules in achieving these outcomes. We found that upadacitinib ranked first in PRO-2 clinical remission during induction and maintenance phases. Guselkumab, tofacitinib, and upadacitinib were the only novel medications that were superior to placebo in improving HRQoL during induction in ulcerative colitis, with guselkumab ranking the highest, followed by tofacitinib and upadacitinib. During maintenance of remission, tofacitinib ranked highest in improving HRQoL.

Modern Advanced Therapies for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Practical Considerations and Positioning.

The therapeutic armamentarium for management of inflammatory bowel diseases has expanded dramatically in the last 5 years, with the introduction of several medications with different mechanisms of action. These include the oral small molecule drugs Janus kinase inhibitors (including upadacitinib approved for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis [UC], and tofacitinib, approved for UC) and sphingosphine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (ozanimod and etrasimod, both approved for UC), and biologic agents, such as selective interleukin-23 antagonists (risankizumab approved for Crohn's disease, and mirikizumab approved for UC). The efficacy and safety of these therapies vary. In this review, we discuss practical use of these newer advanced therapies focusing on real-world effectiveness and safety data, dosing and monitoring considerations, and special situations for their use, such as pregnancy, comorbid immune-mediated disease, use in hospitalized patients with acute severe UC, and in the perioperative setting. We also propose our approach to positioning these therapies in clinical practice, relying on careful integration of the medication's comparative effectiveness and safety in the context of an individual patient's risk of disease- and treatment-related complications and preferences.

Comparative Efficacy of Biologics and Small Molecule in Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Treatment options for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) are increasing rapidly, but the lack of comparative efficacy trials makes treatment choices a clinical challenge. This network-meta-analysis aimed to compare the relative efficacy of biologics and small molecules in achieving remission in patients with moderate to severe UC. METHODS: The literature was searched up to May 2024. Phase 3 placebo or active comparator randomized controlled trials were included. The primary outcome was induction and maintenance of endoscopic improvement (Mayo Endoscopic Score [MES] ≤1). Secondary outcomes were the induction and maintenance of clinical remission, endoscopic (MES = 0) and histological remission. A sub-analysis was performed based on the randomized controlled trial design and previous exposure to biologic therapy. RESULTS: We identified 36 studies that met our inclusion criteria, with 14,270 patients with UC. Upadacitinib ranked highest in inducing clinical remission (99.6%), and endoscopic improvement (99.2%), followed by risankizumab (91.4%) and (82.3%), respectively. In maintenance of endoscopic improvement, upadacitinib ranked first (98.6%) followed by filgotinib 200 mg (79.2%). Risankizumab ranked first in the induction of histological remission (89.4%), followed by guselkumab (88.3%). Upadacitinib ranked first (93.1%) in maintaining histological remission, followed by guselkumab (89.5%). CONCLUSION: Upadacitinib appears to be superior to other therapies in achieving clinical remission, endoscopic improvement and remission, and histological remission. Furthermore, novel biologics such as risankizumab and guselkumab ranked high in achieving these outcomes. This study highlights the efficacy of small molecule drugs and novel selective interleukin-23s as alternatives to other biologics.

Epidemiology of Elderly Onset IBD: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We examined the incidence and natural history of patients with very elderly onset (herein referred to as very late-onset) inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) (≥ 70 years of age at diagnosis), compared with patients diagnosed between 60 and 69 years of age in Denmark. METHODS: In the Danish National Patient Register, between 1980 and 2018, we identified all individuals ≥ 60 years of age with newly diagnosed Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) and examined trends in incidence, cumulative risk of hospitalization, treatment patterns, IBD-related surgery, serious infection, cancer and cardiovascular and venous thromboembolic risks among very late-onset (70-79 years of age or 80+ years) vs late-onset (60-69 years of age) IBD, using nonparametric competing risk analysis treating death as competing risk. RESULTS: We identified 3459 patients with onset of CD at ≥60 years of age (47% ≥ 70 years of age) and 10,774 patients with onset of UC ≥60 years of age (51% ≥ 70 years of age). Over the last 3 decades, incidence changes for very late-onset and late-onset IBD have followed the same patterns. Also, both for CD and UC, cumulative incidence of IBD-related hospitalization and corticosteroid use was comparable in very late-onset vs late-onset patients. However, the burden of disease-modifying therapy, either immunomodulator or tumor necrosis factor antagonist use, and major IBD-related surgery was significantly lower in patients with very late-onset than in late-onset IBD. On the other hand, the 5-year risk of serious infections and cardiovascular events was higher in patients with very late-onset IBD. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide cohort study shows that patients diagnosed with very late-onset (≥ 70 years of age) IBD have a higher relative burden of disease- and aging-related complications, with limited use of steroid-sparing strategies and surgery, compared with late-onset IBD.

FORWARD: A Learning Framework for Logical Network Perturbations to Prioritize Targets for Drug Development.

Despite advances in artificial intelligence (AI), target-based drug development remains a costly, complex and imprecise process. We introduce F.O.R.W.A.R.D [ Framework for Outcome-based Research and Drug Development ], a network-based target prioritization approach and test its utility in the challenging therapeutic area of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD), which is a chronic condition of multifactorial origin. F.O.R.W.A.R.D leverages real-world outcomes, using a machine-learning classifier trained on transcriptomic data from seven prospective randomized clinical trials involving four drugs. It establishes a molecular signature of remission as the therapeutic goal and computes, by integrating principles of network connectivity, the likelihood that a drug's action on its target(s) will induce the remission-associated genes. Benchmarking F.O.R.W.A.R.D against 210 completed clinical trials on 52 targets showed a perfect predictive accuracy of 100%. The success of F.O.R.W.A.R.D was achieved despite differences in targets, mechanisms, and trial designs. F.O.R.W.A.R.D-driven in-silico phase '0' trials revealed its potential to inform trial design, justify re-trialing failed drugs, and guide early terminations. With its extendable applications to other therapeutic areas and its iterative refinement with emerging trials, F.O.R.W.A.R.D holds the promise to transform drug discovery by generating foresight from hindsight and impacting research and development as well as human-in-the-loop clinical decision-making.

Association Between Frailty Status and Readmissions in Hospitalized Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between frailty status and risk of readmissions, inpatient death, and cost of admission among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Readmissions Database. Using International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes, we identified individuals >18 years of age who had a primary or secondary diagnosis of SLE and were hospitalized between January and June 2018. Using the validated claims-based Hospital Frailty Risk Score, we categorized individuals as frail (score ≥ 5) or nonfrail (score < 5) at the time of index hospitalization. Our primary outcome was readmission rates post discharge from index hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were rates of inpatient mortality and the total cost of hospitalizations. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association between frailty and risk of readmissions, with adjustment for age, sex, insurance type, household income, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score. RESULTS: A total of 39,738 patients with SLE met eligibility criteria. Over a median follow-up of eight months, frail patients with SLE (n = 18,385) had higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index scores and longer length of stay compared to nonfrail patients with SLE (n = 21,353). Frail patients with SLE had higher readmission rates, a higher proportion of prolonged hospitalizations, and higher costs per hospitalization. Frailty was independently associated with a 10% higher risk of readmission after adjustment for covariates. CONCLUSION: Among hospitalized adults with SLE, presence of frailty was associated with higher readmission and inpatient mortality rates. Our results highlight that frailty status can help risk stratify patients with SLE at increased risk for readmissions and other adverse health outcomes.