Pharmacokinetics of Nasal Esketamine in Patients with Allergic Rhinitis with and Without Nasal Decongestant Pretreatment and in Healthy Subjects with and Without Nasal Corticosteroid Pretreatment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Nasal esketamine is indicated for the treatment of adults with treatment-resistant depression and depressive symptoms in adults with major depressive disorder with acute suicidal ideation or behavior. Primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of nasal decongestant pretreatment in patients with allergic rhinitis and the impact of daily nasal corticosteroid administration by healthy subjects on nasal esketamine pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Patients with allergic rhinitis self-administered 56 mg of nasal esketamine after pretreatment with nasal oxymetazoline (0.05%) at 1 h before esketamine and without oxymetazoline pretreatment. They were exposed to grass pollen in an allergen challenge chamber to induce allergic rhinitis symptoms at approximately 2 h before each esketamine administration until 1 h after. Healthy subjects self-administered esketamine (56 mg) before and after administration for 16 consecutive days of mometasone (200 µg), with the second esketamine dose administered 1 h after the last mometasone dose. The plasma pharmacokinetics of esketamine and noresketamine were assessed after each esketamine administration. The tolerability of esketamine, including effects on dissociative and potential psychotomimetic symptoms and level of sedation and suicidal ideation and behavior, was evaluated. RESULTS: The rate of esketamine absorption was slightly greater in patients exhibiting symptoms of allergic rhinitis (decrease in median tmax from 32 min to 22 min). Increases in esketamine Cmax and AUC were also small (mean, ≤ 21%). The pharmacokinetics of esketamine was not affected by oxymetazoline or mometasone pretreatment. Esketamine was well tolerated when it was administered with or without pretreatment of oxymetazoline or mometasone. CONCLUSIONS: Patients exhibiting symptoms of rhinitis may receive nasal esketamine spray without dose adjustment. In addition, esketamine may be administered 1 h after using a nasal decongestant or corticosteroid. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the Clinical Trials (NCT02154334) and EudraCT (2014-000534-38) registries.

The effects of intranasal esketamine on on-road driving performance in patients with major depressive disorder or persistent depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Intranasal esketamine demonstrates rapid improvement of depressive symptoms. However, transient adverse effects (dissociation, sedation and dizziness) may occur, which could impact driving performance. AIMS: To evaluate the effects of 84 mg intranasal esketamine on driving performance in unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD) or persistent depressive disorder (PDD) patients. METHODS: The study consisted of two parts. Part A was a single-blind, double-dummy, randomized three-period, cross-over study to compare effects of esketamine versus placebo on next morning driving, 18 ± 2 h post-treatment. Alcohol was administered to demonstrate assay sensitivity. In Part B, same-day driving, 6 ± 0.5 hours post-treatment, was assessed during twice weekly esketamine administration for 3 weeks. Twenty-seven patients with mild-to-moderate MDD or PDD without psychotic features completed a 100 km on-the-road driving test on a public highway in normal traffic. The primary outcome was standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP; cm; weaving of car). RESULTS: In Part A, alcohol impaired driving performance compared to placebo: Least-square means (95% CI), p-value for delta SDLP (cm) compared with placebo: (ΔSDLP = + 1.83 (1.03; 2.62), p < 0.001), whereas esketamine did not: (ΔSDLP = -0.23 (-1.04; 0.58), p = 0.572). In Part B, weekly driving tests showed no differences between placebo baseline SDLP and after esketamine administration over 3 weeks: Day 11: (ΔSDLP = -0.96 (-3.72; 1.81), p = 0.493), Day 18: (ΔSDLP = -0.56 (-3.33; 2.20), p = 0.686) and Day 25: (ΔSDLP = -1.05 (-3.82; 1.71), p = 0.451). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, esketamine did not impair on-road driving performance the next morning following a single dose, or on same day after repeated administration.

Evaluating Potential QT Effects of JNJ-54861911, a BACE Inhibitor in Single- and Multiple-Ascending Dose Studies, and a Thorough QT Trial With Additional Retrospective Confirmation, Using Concentration-QTc Analysis.

Nonclinical assays with JNJ-54861911, a ß-secretase 1 inhibitor have indicated that at high concentrations, it may delay cardiac repolarization. A 4-way crossover thorough QT (TQT) study was performed in 64 healthy subjects with 50 and 150 mg JNJ-54861911 once daily for 7 days, placebo, and 400 mg moxifloxacin. Retrospective high-precision QT (HPQT) analysis was performed on serial elecrocardiograms extracted from first-in-human single-ascending dose (SAD) and multiple-ascending dose (MAD) studies to evaluate if early studies could detect and predict QT effect. In the TQT study, a high therapeutic 50 mg dose did not cause QT prolongation, and an effect >10 milliseconds could be excluded at all postdose timepoints. QT prolongation with peak effect on placebo-corrected change from baseline QTcF of 15.5 milliseconds (90%CI, 12.9-18.1 milliseconds) was observed following a supratherapeutic dose (150 mg). No clinically relevant QT changes were observed in earlier studies. However, with SAD/MAD findings by HPQT, the slope of the exposure-response (ER) relationship in the SAD study (doses up to 150 mg) was similar to the TQT study slope, and the estimated QT effect was comparable at high plasma levels. In the MAD study, doses up to 90 mg once daily for 7 days resulted in JNJ-54861911 peak plasma concentrations (Cmax ) comparable to those in the SAD study (∼750 ng/mL), but ER by HPQT failed to detect a QT effect and resulted in negative estimations. Adding a higher dose cohort (150 mg; Cmax , 1125 ng/mL) demonstrated a QT effect, with a slightly lower ER slope than the TQT study. JNJ-54861911 (up to 50 mg) did not cause QT prolongation at clinically relevant plasma concentrations in any studies. Provided sufficiently high plasma concentrations were captured, mild QT prolongation observed postdose with a supratherapeutic dose could be detected (TQT study) and estimated in SAD/MAD studies. Based on population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation, 5 and 25 mg doses are currently considered for further phase 3 studies and are expected not to cause any relevant QT prolongation.

Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetics of TRPV1 Antagonist Mavatrep (JNJ-39439335) Tablet and Capsule Formulations in Healthy Men: Two Open-Label, Crossover, Single-Dose Phase 1 Studies.

To improve room temperature stability and oral bioavailability of mavatrep (JNJ-39439335, a transient receptor potential vanilloid subtype-1 antagonist), various formulations were initially developed and evaluated in 2 phase 1 open-label, randomized, 3-way crossover studies in healthy participants. Study 1 evaluated 2 new overencapsulated tablet formulations (formulations B and C) relative to an overencapsulated early tablet formulation (formulation A), using mavatrep HCl salt form. Because these tablets were still not room-temperature stable, in study 2: two free-base solid dispersion amorphous formulations (formulations D and E) were evaluated relative to the best encapsulated formulation from study 1 (formulation C) and also food effect. Both studies had screening (∼4 weeks), treatment (study 1: n = 18, 6-sequenced; formulations B and C [2 × 25 mg] versus A [2 × 25 mg]; study 2, part 1: n = 24, formulations D and E [2 × 12.5 mg] versus C [1 × 25 mg]; study 2, part 2: n = 16, best formulation from part 1 fed versus fasted, 2 × 12.5 mg) with a 21-day washout period and a follow-up. Mavatrep exhibited consistent pharmacokinetics across formulations. Following rapid absorption (median tmax , 1.5-6.5 hours), plasma concentrations declined multiexponentially (mean t1/2 , 67-104 hours). The new encapsulated tablet formulation (formulation C, capsule filler: poloxamer 407) was the best formulation (Cmax and AUC values 2-3-fold > than the other 2) from study 1. Using this as a reference in study 2, part 1, only small (<20%) differences in mean Cmax and AUC were observed between the 3 formulations (C, D, and E). Formulation E (gelatin capsule with amorphous solid dispersion [12.5 mg free base], hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, vitamin E polyethylene glycol succinate, silicified microcrystalline cellulose, magnesium stearate, colloidal silicon dioxide) showed improved room-temperature stability and provided the best overall bioavailability with small variability. Small effects of a high-fat meal on oral bioavailability were observed for formulation E, but were not clinically meaningful. Mavatrep safety profiles were similar across formulations and under fasted and fed conditions. No new safety concerns were reported.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Mavatrep (JNJ-39439335), a TRPV1 Antagonist in Healthy Japanese and Caucasian Men: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Sequential-Group Phase 1 Study.

This single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential-group phase 1 study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of mavatrep (JNJ-39439335), a transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 antagonist, in healthy Japanese and caucasian subjects. In part 1, a single-ascending-dose study, 50 subjects (25 each healthy Japanese and caucasians) were enrolled and received a single oral dose of 10, 25, or 50 mg mavatrep. Caucasian subjects were matched to Japanese subjects with respect to age (±5 years) and body mass index (±5 kg/m2 ). In part 2, a multiple-ascending-dose study, 36 Japanese subjects were enrolled and received once-daily oral doses of 10, 25, or 50 mg of mavatrep for 21 days. The single-dose PK of mavatrep and its metabolites was similar in the Japanese and caucasian subjects after adjustment of body weight. Following multiple dosing in Japanese subjects, a steady-state condition was reached in approximately 14 days. M2 and M3 are major circulating metabolites with mean exposure > 10% of mavatrep. Nonrenal clearance was the major route of elimination for mavatrep, M2, and M3. Mavatrep exhibited a long half-life, ranging from 68 to 101 and 82-130 hours for Japanese and caucasian subjects, respectively. After single and multiple dosing, mavatrep was well tolerated. The most common adverse events observed were thermohypoesthesia, feeling cold, chills, and feeling hot. Mavatrep and its metabolites exhibited similar PK profiles after single ascending doses in healthy Japanese and caucasian men.

Absence of QTc Prolongation with Domperidone: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Positive-Controlled Thorough QT/QTc Study in Healthy Volunteers.

Domperidone effects on QTc duration were assessed in a single-center, double-blind, four-way crossover study of 44 healthy participants randomized to one of four treatment sequences consisting of four treatment periods separated by 4-9 days washout. On Day 1 of each 4-day period, participants began oral domperidone 10 or 20 mg q.i.d., matching placebo q.i.d., or single-dose moxifloxacin 400 mg (positive control)/placebo q.i.d. In each period, triplicate 12-lead electrocardiograms were recorded at baseline (30, 20, and 10 minutes predose), 8 timepoints after dosing on Days 1 and 4, and predose on Day 4. In mixed effects models, the largest difference for domperidone in least squares means for change from baseline QTcP versus placebo was 3.4 milliseconds (20 mg q.i.d., Day 4), 90% CI: 1.0-5.9, and <10 milliseconds at all timepoints for both domperidone dosages. Moxifloxacin response confirmed assay sensitivity. Participants achieved expected domperidone plasma exposures. No significant exposure-response relationship was found for QTc increase per ng/mL domperidone (90% CI of the slope estimate included zero at mean Cmax on Day 1 or Day 4). In summary, domperidone at doses up to 80 mg/day did not cause clinically relevant QTc interval prolongation.

In vitro metabolism of canagliflozin in human liver, kidney, intestine microsomes, and recombinant uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases (UGT) and the effect of genetic variability of UGT enzymes on the pharmacokinetics of canagliflozin in humans.

O-glucuronidation is the major metabolic elimination pathway for canagliflozin. The objective was to identify enzymes and tissues involved in the formation of 2 major glucuronidated metabolites (M7 and M5) of canagliflozin and subsequently to assess the impact of genetic variations in these uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) on in vivo pharmacokinetics in humans. In vitro incubations with recombinant UGTs revealed involvement of UGT1A9 and UGT2B4 in the formation of M7 and M5, respectively. Although M7 and M5 were formed in liver microsomes, only M7 was formed in kidney microsomes. Participants from 7 phase 1 studies were pooled for pharmacogenomic analyses. A total of 134 participants (mean age, 41 years; men, 63%; white, 84%) were included in the analysis. In UGT1A9*3 carriers, exposure of plasma canagliflozin (Cmax,ss , 11%; AUCτ,ss , 45%) increased relative to the wild type. An increase in exposure of plasma canagliflozin (Cmax,ss , 21%; AUCt,ss , 18%) was observed in participants with UGT2B4*2 genotype compared with UGT2B4*2 noncarriers. Metabolites further delineate the role of both enzymes. The pharmacokinetic findings in participants carrying the UGT1A9*3 and UGT2B4*2 allele implicate that UGT1A9 and UGT2B4 are involved in the metabolism of canagliflozin to M7 and M5, respectively.

Pharmacokinetics of rabeprazole granules versus tablets, and the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of rabeprazole granules in healthy adults-cross-study comparison.

The primary objective was to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of rabeprazole granules versus rabeprazole tablets, and assess the effect of food on the PK of rabeprazole granules. Data from three phase 1, open-label, single-dose, randomized, crossover studies in healthy adult participants are presented separately and as a cross-study comparison; study 1: PK of phase 1 rabeprazole granules versus rabeprazole tablets under fasting conditions; study 2: PK of phase 3 rabeprazole granules versus phase 1 rabeprazole granules; study 3: bioequivalence of to-be-marketed rabeprazole granules (sprinkle capsules) versus phase 3 rabeprazole granules; and assessment of the food effect for the to-be-marketed rabeprazole granules. Overall, 123 of 130 participants enrolled completed the studies. The overall plasma exposure as measured by area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was comparable between rabeprazole granules and tablets; mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax ) was lower for the granules compared with tablets. The plasma elimination half-life was short and independent of formulation. Food intake prior to administration of the to-be-marketed granules delayed the absorption and reduced the estimated parameters for bioavailability by 55% (Cmax ) and 28% (AUCinf ). Rabeprazole was well-tolerated.

Method development for Lawsone estimation in Trichup herbal hair powder by high-performance thin layer chromatography.

A simple, specific, accurate, precise and robust high-performance thin-layer chromatographic method has been developed and validated for estimation of Lawsone in Trichup herbal hair powder (coded as a THHP), polyherbal formulation. The chromatographic development was carried out on aluminum plates pre-coated with silica gel 60F254 and good resolution was achieved with Toluene: Ethyl acetate: Glacial acetic acid (8:1:1 v/v/v) as mobile phase. Lawsone detection was carried out densitometrically at 277 nm and obtained retardation factor value was 0.46 ± 0.02. The method was validated with respect to specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision and robustness. The calibration curve was achieved to be linear over a range of 5-60 µg/ml and regression coefficient was obtained 0.998. Accuracy of chromatographic method was evaluated by standard addition method; recovery was obtained 99.25 ± 0.61%. The peak purity of Lawsone was achieved 0.999 r. Relative standard deviation for intraday and inter-day precision was 0.37-0.56% and 0.42-0.55%, respectively. The limit of detection and limit of quantification of the Lawsone were found to be 1.08 µg/m land 3.28 µg/ml, respectively. This result shows that the method was well validated. In the present study, the Lawsone content was found 0.322 ± 0.014% in THHP. This study reveals that the proposed high performance thin layer chromatography method is accurate, fast and cost- effective for routine estimation of Lawsone in polyherbal formulation.

Randomized, open-label, single-dose, crossover, relative bioavailability study in healthy adults, comparing the pharmacokinetics of rabeprazole granules administered using soft food or infant formula as dosing vehicle versus suspension.

BACKGROUND: A sprinkle capsule formulation containing enteric-coated, delayed-release rabeprazole granules is being developed for the treatment of children with gastrointestinal reflux disease. The granules are designed to be mixed with vehicles that facilitate delivery to children, who may be unable to swallow solid formulations. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study-conducted on the sponsor's initiative-was to compare the bioavailability of rabeprazole granules when mixed with various dosing vehicles (small amount of soft food or infant formula) with that of a rabeprazole suspension with inactive vehicle granules (reference), to determine which dosing vehicle can be used to deliver rabeprazole in children. Tolerability was also assessed. METHODS: This single-center, single-dose, randomized, open-label, 5-period crossover study was conducted in 35 healthy adult subjects. In a randomized sequence, fasting subjects received a single dose of 10-mg rabeprazole granules per treatment period, mixed with small amounts of 1 of 5 dosing vehicles (a strawberry-flavored suspension of rabeprazole granules with inactive vehicle granules reconstituted with water, yogurt [1 tablespoon], applesauce [1 tablespoon], or infant formula [5 mL], or a suspension of rabeprazole granules with inactive vehicle tablet reconstituted with water). Full plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of rabeprazole and its thioether metabolite were collected; concentrations were estimated via LC-MS/MS. PK properties were estimated using noncompartmental methods; 90% CIs around least squares mean test-to-reference ratios were calculated for C(max) and AUC values. All treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded and assessed for severity (mild, moderate, or severe) and relationship to study drug. RESULTS: A total of 35 subjects were enrolled (mean age, 38 years; 54.3% female; 100% white; mean weight, 71.4 kg). Thirty-four subjects completed the study. Rabeprazole and rabeprazole thioether plasma PK properties were comparable between all of the dosing vehicles tested. Median T(max) was 2.5 to 3.0 hours, and mean elimination half-life was 1.27 to 1.43 hours. The 90%CIs for the least squares mean ratios for rabeprazole and rabeprazole thioether exposure were within the 80% to 125% bioequivalence limits for all relevant comparisons. All TEAEs were of mild or moderate intensity, with headache being the most commonly reported; 21 subjects (60%) experienced TEAEs during the study. No deaths or serious AEs were reported during the study; 1 subject experienced a TEAE (urinary tract infection) that led to the discontinuation of treatment. CONCLUSION: In these healthy adult subjects, the bioavailability of rabeprazole granules was comparable between all of the dosing vehicles tested, and rabeprazole was well tolerated. Soft food suitable for young children or infant formula may be appropriate for use as dosing vehicles for rabeprazole granules.

Effect of mild and moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and safety of carisbamate.

This open-label, parallel-group study was designed to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of carisbamate in participants with mild or moderate hepatic impairment versus those with normal hepatic function. Healthy (n = 10) and hepatic-impaired (n = 20) participants received a single 200-mg oral dose of carisbamate. Serial PK blood samples were collected up to 120 hours postdose. A modest increase in mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC(∞)) was observed for the mild impairment group compared with the normal group (ratio of geometric means ~116%), while mean maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) values were similar (ratio of geometric means ~94%). The AUC(∞) value for the moderate hepatic-impaired group was approximately 207% that of the normal group, while there was a smaller increase in C(max) (~118%) compared with the normal group. Mean half-life (t(1/2)) values were prolonged in the moderate impairment group (21 hours) relative to the normal group (11 hours). There was a decrease in apparent clearance (CL/F) and an increase in AUC(∞u) (AUC(∞) × % drug unbound). The percentage of carisbamate unbound to proteins did not change across the groups, suggesting the increases in AUC(∞) were due to decreased intrinsic hepatic clearance. Carisbamate 200 mg was well tolerated.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of rabeprazole in children 1 to 11 years old with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics of rabeprazole after a single oral dose and once-daily administration for 5 consecutive days was characterized in children 1 to 11 years old with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The initial 8 patients received rabeprazole sodium (hereafter referred to as rabeprazole) 0.14 mg/kg (part 1); the next 20 patients were randomized to receive 0.5 or 1 mg/kg (part 2) to target concentrations in plasma expected to be safe and effective. Pharmacokinetic parameters of rabeprazole and the thioether metabolite were calculated using noncompartmental methods. Subjective evaluations of GERD severity, rabeprazole short-term effectiveness, palatability, and safety were also characterized. RESULTS: Rabeprazole concentrations increased in a dose-dependent manner. Little or no accumulation was observed after repeated administration. The results suggest that formation of the thioether is an important metabolic pathway in young patients, which is consistent with adults. Plasma area under the concentration-time curve values of rabeprazole and the metabolite were poorly correlated with individual age and body weight. Furthermore, oral rabeprazole clearance values (not adjusted for weight) were similar to historical adult data. However, weight-adjusted values were higher for the pediatric patients, and approximately 2 to 3 times the milligram per kilogram dose of rabeprazole in these children was necessary to achieve comparable concentrations in adults. Subjective evaluations demonstrated an improvement of GERD symptoms in most patients after rabeprazole treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Palatability of the formulation was reported to be good or excellent. Rabeprazole was well tolerated, with no notable differences in safety among the dose groups.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of doripenem after 0.5-, 1-, and 4-hour infusions in healthy volunteers.

The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of doripenem in healthy subjects were evaluated in 2 studies. Study 1 was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled dose-escalation study in which doripenem was administered for 7 days by infusion over 30 minutes (500 mg) or 1 hour (1000 mg). Study 2 was an open-label, randomized, 3-way crossover study in which each subject received a single dose of each of the following doripenem treatments on separate occasions: 500 mg infused over 1 hour, 500 mg infused over 4 hours, and 1000 mg infused over 4 hours. Doripenem exhibited linear pharmacokinetics with concordance between the studies for pharmacokinetic parameters. Doripenem did not accumulate with repeated dosing over 7 days. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for doripenem 500 mg infused over 1 hour versus 4 hours was bioequivalent, and the AUC and Cmax increased proportionally with dose for the 500- and 1000-mg doses administered over 4 hours. These results, along with the stability profile of doripenem, support its use as a prolonged infusion. All regimens of doripenem were safe and well tolerated.

Pharmacokinetics of carisbamate (RWJ-333369) in healthy Japanese and Western subjects.

PURPOSE: To compare the pharmacokinetics of carisbamate (RWJ-333369) in healthy Japanese and Western adults, and to comparatively assess carisbamate safety and tolerability between the two populations. METHODS: An open-label study was conducted in 24 Japanese and 24 Caucasian healthy subjects. Subjects received a single oral dose of 250 mg carisbamate on day 1 followed by a 3-day washout period; twice-daily dosing of 250 mg carisbamate on days 5-8; subsequently, 500 mg on days 9-12 and a single dose of 500 mg on day 13. Plasma samples were collected for a pharmacokinetic analysis on days 1, 8, and 13. Plasma and urine samples were analyzed for carisbamate and its urinary metabolites by liquid-chromatography-mass-spectrometry. RESULTS: Following a single dose, carisbamate Cmax and area under the curve (AUC) geometric mean ratios were 16.4% and 28.8% higher in Japanese than in Caucasians, respectively; these differences were statistically significant and their 90% confidence intervals (CIs) fell outside of the 80-125% limits, which are considered not to be of clinical significance. With dose-body weight normalization, Cmax and AUC were similar in Japanese and Caucasian subjects and the 90% CIs were within the 80-125% boundaries. Carisbamate was well tolerated, and its mean oral clearance and half-life were similar in both groups, ranging from 35.1-41.4 ml/h/kg and 11.5-12.8 h. DISCUSSION: Carisbamate plasma exposure (AUC) and C(max) in Japanese subjects is approximately 20-25% higher than in Caucasians due to a higher mg/kg dose. After body weight normalization, carisbamate pharmacokinetics was similar between Japanese and Caucasian subjects following single and multiple dosing, and showed the same dose proportionality.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of the new antiepileptic carisbamate in the elderly.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of age on the disposition of two different oral formulations of carisbamate (RWJ-333369), a novel neuromodulator under investigation. METHODS: The disposition of carisbamate was studied in eight men and eight women in each of the three age groups: 18-55, 65-74, and >or= 75 years (N=48). Subjects received single (100mg immediate-release [IR] tablets or 250 mg controlled-release [CR] tablets) or repeated administration (up to 500 mg IR BID or 1250 mg CR QD) of carisbamate in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-center study. RESULTS: After either single or repeated IR administration, no apparent differences were observed between the two elderly and the non-elderly groups. Following single-dose CR administration, the two elderly age groups had higher exposure compared with non-elderly subjects, but the difference decreased for all doses tested after repeated administration. There was no effect of age on plasma protein binding of carisbamate. Renal clearance decreased with age for both formulations, but this decrease had no effect on the total clearance of the drug because of its limited renal elimination. CONCLUSION: Age had no effect on pharmacokinetics of carisbamate IR formulation. The small effect observed after single-dose CR carisbamate diminished after repeated dosing. The drug was generally safe and well tolerated.

An interaction study between the new antiepileptic and CNS drug carisbamate (RWJ-333369) and lamotrigine and valproic acid.

PURPOSE: To characterize possible pharmacokinetic interactions between the new antiepileptic drug carisbamate (RWJ-333369) and valproic acid (VPA) or lamotrigine (LTG) following multiple dosing in healthy subjects. METHODS: Two open-label, sequential-design studies were conducted in 24 healthy adults. In Study 1, subjects received carisbamate alone (5 days 250 mg q12h; 5 days 500 mg q12h), then VPA alone (7 days 300 mg q12h; 7 days 500 mg q12h), and then a combination of VPA (500 mg q12h) and carisbamate (5 days 250 mg q12h; 5 days 500 mg q12h). In Study 2, subjects received carisbamate alone as in Study 1, then LTG alone (14 days 25 mg q12h; 14 days 50 mg q12h), and then combination of LTG (50 mg q12h) and carisbamate (3 days 250 mg q12h; 14 days 500 mg q12h). RESULTS: Coadministration of VPA or LTG had minimal effect on carisbamate mean C(max) and AUC(ss) values. Mean VPA-C(max) and AUC(ss) values were approximately 15% lower when given concomitantly with carisbamate. However, the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the C(max) and AUC(ss) ratio with/without carisbamate were within the 80-125% equivalence range, C(max) 82-89%; AUC(ss) 81-88%. Mean LTG C(max) and AUC(ss) values were approximately 20% lower when given concomitantly with carisbamate. The 90% CIs with and without carisbamate for LTG C(max) and AUC(ss) were 79-86% and 75-81%, respectively. This modest change is not considered clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: There were no clinically significant interactions between carisbamate and VPA or LTG. Concomitant administration of carisbamate with VPA or LTG was generally safe and well tolerated.

Pharmacokinetic interaction study between the new antiepileptic and CNS drug RWJ-333369 and carbamazepine in healthy adults.

PURPOSE: To characterize the possible pharmacokinetic interaction between the new antiepileptic and CNS drug RWJ-333369 and carbamazepine (CBZ) following multiple dosing in healthy subjects. METHODS: In an 8-week, open-label, sequential design study, 24 healthy adults received multiple-dose RWJ-333369 alone (5 days 250 mg q12h; 5 days 500 mg q12h), then after a 4-day washout, multiple-dose CBZ alone (3 days 100 mg q12h; 3 days 200 mg q12h; 22 days 300 mg q12h), and then combination of CBZ (300 mg q12h), and RWJ-333369 (5 days 250 mg q12h; 5 days 500 mg q12h). RESULTS: At steady-state following multiple dosing, RWJ-333369 peak plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the concentration-time-curve within the dosing interval (AUCss) increased in proportion to dose. The C(max) and AUCss of CBZ were similar when given alone or concomitantly with RWJ-333369. The 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of CBZ C(max) and AUCss with/without RWJ-333369 were: 94-104% and 95-104%, respectively (well within the equivalence range of 80-125%). When RWJ-333369 was administered with CBZ, its mean (SD) oral clearance increased from 3.2 L/h to 4.9 L/h and consequently its mean half-life was shortened from 10.4 (1.9) h to 7.4 (1.2) h, and mean AUCss and C(max) were reduced by 37% and 30%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was no effect of multiple-dose RWJ-333369 on CBZ pharmacokinetics. CBZ induced RWJ-333369 clearance, resulting in shortened half-life and decreased exposure (AUCss) and C(max). Concomitant administration of RWJ-333369 with CBZ was generally safe and tolerated.

Measuring the effects of supratherapeutic doses of levofloxacin on healthy volunteers using four methods of QT correction and periodic and continuous ECG recordings.

A clinical trial was conducted in healthy volunteers using both periodic and continuous ECG recordings to assess the effect of increasing doses of levofloxacin on the QT and QTc interval. Periodic and continuous ECGs were recorded before and after subjects were dosed with placebo and increasing doses of levofloxacin (500 mg, 1000 mg, 1500 mg) that included doses twice the maximum recommended dose of 750 mg in a double-blind, randomized, four-period, four-sequence crossover trial. Mean heart rate (HR) and the QT and QTc interval after dosing with levofloxacin and placebo were compared, and HR-QT interval relationships defined by linear regression analysis were calculated. After single doses of 1000 and 1500 mg of levofloxacin, HR increased significantly, as measured by periodic and continuous ECG recordings. This transient increase occurred at times of peak plasma concentration and was without symptoms. Mean QT intervals after placebo and mean intervals after levofloxacin were indistinguishable. Using periodic ECG recordings, single doses of 1500 mg were associated with small increases in QTc that were statistically significant. In contrast, an effect on QTc was shown only using the Bazett formula with data obtained from continuous ECG recordings. Together with the finding that levofloxacin does not influence HR-QT relationships, these findings suggest that levofloxacin has little effect on prolonging ventricular repolarization and that small increases in HR associated with high doses of levofloxacin contribute to the drug's apparent effect on QTc. Single doses of 1000 or 1500 mg of levofloxacin transiently increase HR without affecting the uncorrected QT interval. Differences in mean QTc after levofloxacin compared to placebo vary depending on the correction formula used and whether the data analyzed are from periodic or continuous ECG recordings. This work suggests that using continuous ECG recordings in assessing QT/QTc effects of drugs may be of value, particularly with drugs that might influence HR.