Biomarkers and new therapeutic targets in renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is the most common malignancy in adult kidneys. The American Cancer Society estimated 62,700 new cases and 14,240 deaths in 2018. Although early detection has improved in recent years, the treatment remains a challenge and reliable biomarkers for poor outcomes become necessary for the prevention of metastases and improve the quality of patients' life during and after treatment. Then, the current status of the search for new RCC biomarkers was discussed, as well as the latest discoveries in the RCC risk and metastatic treatment were discussed in this review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Extensive research was carried out in the online databases and full-free text articles published in the last 5 years, or more when convenient, were evaluated. Articles were included that addressed the proposed theme and were published in the English language. RESULTS: The present state of knowledge on biomarkers for RCC carcinogenesis and progression is still much to be understood about RCC risk factors and molecular pathways resulting in metastatic progression. Newest RCC target therapies were discussed, mainly in relation to immunological therapy, and vaccines that have been tested in numerous trials with different cancer types. CONCLUSIONS: The development of targeted therapies has revolutionized the treatment of advanced and metastatic cancers or non-responder patients. Combined therapy between classical chemotherapy and adjuvant immunotherapies has been modifying the cancer patients prognosis and bringing the hope of a cure in many cases.

The merits of cytology in the workup for upper tract urothelial carcinoma - a contemporary review of a perplexing issue.

INTRODUCTION: The importance of upper tract cytology for evaluating tumors is unclear. We correlated upper tract cytology with histologic findings in patients who underwent nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) at a single tertiary care referral center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 137 patients underwent nephroureterectomy between 2004 and 2012. 18 patients were excluded (benign tumors, atrophic kidneys with the remaining 119 patients serving as our study population). Upper tract cytology from the renal pelvis and/or ureter were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed with final pathology data in the remaining patients with UTUC. RESULTS: 57% (68/119) had preoperative upper tract cytology collected. 73% (50/68) patients had abnormal cytology (positive, suspicious) with a sensitivity of 74% (which increased to 90% if atypical included), specificity of 50% and a positive predictive value of 98%. High grade tumors were more common than expected (77% high grade vs. 20% low grade). Abnormal cytology did not predict T stage or tumor grade. Interestingly, positive upper tract cytology was found in all of the UTUC CIS specimen. CONCLUSIONS: Upper tract cytology has been utilized to support the diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Our data demonstrates that abnormal cytology correlates well with the presence of disease but does not predict staging or grading in these respective patients.

The merits of cytology in the workup for upper tract urothelial carcinoma - a contemporary review of a perplexing issue

Introduction The importance of upper tract cytology for evaluating tumors is unclear. We correlated upper tract cytology with histologic findings in patients who underwent nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) at a single tertiary care referral center. Materials and Methods 137 patients underwent nephroureterectomy between 2004 and 2012. 18 patients were excluded (benign tumors, atrophic kidneys with the remaining 119 patients serving as our study population). Upper tract cytology from the renal pelvis and/or ureter were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed with final pathology data in the remaining patients with UTUC. Results 57% (68/119) had preoperative upper tract cytology collected. 73% (50/68) patients had abnormal cytology (positive, suspicious) with a sensitivity of 74% (which increased to 90% if atypical included), specificity of 50% and a positive predictive value of 98%. High grade tumors were more common than expected (77% high grade vs. 20% low grade). Abnormal cytology did not predict T stage or tumor grade. Interestingly, positive upper tract cytology was found in all of the UTUC CIS specimen. Conclusions Upper tract cytology has been utilized to support the diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Our data demonstrates that abnormal cytology correlates well with the presence of disease but does not predict staging or grading in these respective patients. .