Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
BMC Med Educ ; 22(1): 375, 2022 May 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35578233

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has precipitated rapid changes in medical education to protect students and patients from the risk of infection. Virtual Patient Simulators (VPS) provide a simulated clinical environment in which students can interview and examine a patient, order tests and exams, prioritize interventions, and observe response to therapy, all with minimal risk to themselves and their patients. Like high-fidelity simulators (HFS), VPS are a tool to improve curricular integration. Unlike HFS, VPS require limited infrastructure investment and can be used in low-resource settings. Few studies have examined the impact of VPS training on clinical education. This international, multicenter cohort study was designed to assess the impact of small-group VPS training on individual learning process and curricular integration from the perspective of nursing and medical students. METHODS: We conducted a multi-centre, international cohort study of nursing and medical students. Baseline perceptions of individual learning process and curricular integration were assessed using a 27-item pre-session questionnaire. Students subsequently participated in small-group VPS training sessions lead by a clinical tutor and then completed a 32-item post-session questionnaire, including 25 paired items. Pre- and post-session responses were compared to determine the impact of the small-group VPS experience. RESULTS: Participants included 617 nursing and medical students from 11 institutions in 8 countries. At baseline, nursing students reported greater curricular integration and more clinical and simulation experience than did medical students. After exposure to small-group VPS training, participants reported significant improvements in 5/6 items relating to individual learning process and 7/7 items relating to curricular integration. The impact of the VPS experience was similar amongst nursing and medical students. CONCLUSIONS: In this multi-centre study, perceptions of individual learning process and curricular integration improved after exposure to small-group VPS training. Nursing and medical students showed similar impact. Small-group VPS training is an accessible, low-risk educational strategy that can improve student perceptions of individual learning process and curricular integration.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Medical/methods , Education, Nursing/methods , Patient Simulation , Students, Medical , Students, Nursing , Virtual Reality , Clinical Competence , Cohort Studies , Humans , Pandemics
2.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 8(12): ofab551, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34877367

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although rapid molecular diagnostic tests for tuberculosis (TB) have decreased detection time of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and drug resistance, whether their use improves clinical care and outcomes is uncertain. To address these knowledge gaps, we evaluated whether use of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay impacts treatment and clinical outcome metrics among patients treated for sputum smear-negative multidrug-resistant (MDR)-TB. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients initiating treatment for sputum smear-negative MDR-TB at the National Center for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases in Tbilisi, Georgia from 2011 to 2016. The Xpert MTB/RIF was introduced in Georgia in 2010 and implemented into programmatic use in 2014. Exposure was availability of an Xpert result at time of diagnosis. Time to second-line treatment initiation, sputum culture conversion, and end-of-treatment outcomes were determined. Time to event was compared using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Among 151 patients treated for sputum smear-negative MDR-TB (96% culture positive), the Xpert was utilized in the clinical management of 78 (52%) patients and not used in 73 (48%). An adjusted analysis controlling for potential confounders found that patients in the Xpert group had shorter median time to second-line treatment (13 vs 56 days; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 10.21; P < .0001) and culture conversion (61 vs 93 days; aHR, 1.93; P < .001). There was no difference in treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the Xpert in the management of sputum smear-negative MDR-TB decreases time to second-line therapy and sputum culture conversion, providing evidence of its clinical impact and supporting its programmatic utility.

3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 36(5): 522-8, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25648218

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To better understand tuberculosis (TB) infection control (IC) in healthcare facilities (HCFs) in Georgia. DESIGN: A cross-sectional evaluation of healthcare worker (HCW) knowledge, beliefs and behaviors toward TB IC measures including latent TB infection (LTBI) screening and treatment of HCWs. SETTING: Georgia, a high-burden multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) country. PARTICIPANTS: HCWs from the National TB Program and affiliated HCFs. METHODS: An anonymous self-administered 55-question survey developed based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) conceptual framework. RESULTS: In total, 240 HCWs (48% physicians; 39% nurses) completed the survey. The overall average TB knowledge score was 61%. Only 60% of HCWs reported frequent use of respirators when in contact with TB patients. Only 52% of HCWs were willing to undergo annual LTBI screening; 48% were willing to undergo LTBI treatment. In multivariate analysis, HCWs who worried about acquiring MDR-TB infection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-2.25), who thought screening contacts of TB cases is important (aOR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.35-8.65), and who were physicians (aOR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.08-2.60) were more likely to accept annual LTBI screening. With regard to LTBI treatment, HCWs who worked in an outpatient TB facility (aOR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.11-0.58) or perceived a high personal risk of TB reinfection (aOR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.37-0.64) were less likely to accept LTBI treatment. CONCLUSION: The concern about TB reinfection is a major barrier to HCW acceptance of LTBI treatment. TB IC measures must be strengthened in parallel with or prior to the introduction of LTBI screening and treatment of HCWs.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/prevention & control , Health Personnel/psychology , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/prevention & control , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Georgia/epidemiology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Practice Patterns, Nurses'/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/prevention & control
4.
PLoS One ; 8(3): e58202, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23536789

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis is a major occupational hazard in low and middle-income countries. Limited data exist on serial testing of healthcare workers (HCWs) with interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs) for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), especially in low and middle-income countries. We sought to evaluate the rates of and risk factors for LTBI prevalence and LTBI test conversion among HCWs using the tuberculin skin test (TST) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-tube assay (QFT-GIT). METHODS: A prospective longitudinal study was conducted among HCWs in the country of Georgia. Subjects completed a questionnaire, and TST and QFT-GIT tests were performed. LTBI testing was repeated 6-26 months after baseline testing. RESULTS: Among 319 HCWs enrolled, 89% reported prior BCG vaccination, and 60% worked in TB healthcare facilities (HCFs). HCWs from TB HCFs had higher prevalence of positive QFT-GIT and TST than those from non-TB HCFs: 107/194 (55%) vs. 30/125 (31%) QFT-GIT positive (p<0.0001) and 128/189 (69%) vs. 64/119 (54%) TST positive (p = 0.01). There was fair agreement between TST and QFT-GIT (kappa = 0.42, 95% CI 0.31-0.52). In multivariate analysis, frequent contact with TB patients was associated with increased risk of positive QFT-GIT (aOR 3.04, 95% CI 1.79-5.14) but not positive TST. Increasing age was associated with increased risk of positive QFT-GIT (aOR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09) and TST (aOR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.10). High rates of HCW conversion were seen: the QFT-GIT conversion rate was 22.8/100 person-years, and TST conversion rate was 17.1/100 person-years. In multivariate analysis, female HCWs had decreased risk of TST conversion (aOR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.43), and older HCWs had increased risk of QFT-GIT conversion (aOR 1.07 per year, 95% CI 1.01-1.13). CONCLUSION: LTBI prevalence and LTBI test conversion rates were high among Georgian HCWs, especially among those working at TB HCFs. These data highlight the need for increased implementation of TB infection control measures.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel , Latent Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Georgia (Republic)/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Interferon-gamma Release Tests , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Tuberculin Test , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL