Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 2 de 2
1.
Prog Transplant ; 34(1-2): 11-19, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38454748

Introduction: Transplantation is a field with unique medical and administrative challenges that involve an equally diverse array of stakeholders. Expectantly, the litigation stemming from this field should be similarly nuanced. There is a paucity of comprehensive reviews characterizing this medicolegal landscape. Design: The Caselaw Access Project Database was used to collect official court briefs of 2053 lawsuits related to kidney, liver, heart, lung, and pancreas transplantation. A thematic analysis was undertaken to characterize grounds for litigation, defendant type, and outcomes. Cases were grouped into policy, discrimination, poor or unsuccessful outcome, or other categories. Results: One hundred sixty-four court cases were included for analysis. Cases involving disputes over policy coverage were the most common across all organ types (N = 55, 33.5%). This was followed by poor outcomes (N = 51, 31.1%), allegations of discrimination against prison systems and employers (N = 37, 22.6%) and other (N = 21, 12.8%). Defendants involved in discrimination trials won with the greatest frequency (N = 29, 90.62%). Defendants implicated in policy suits won 65.3% (N = 32), poor outcomes 62.2% (N = 28), and other 70% (N = 14). Of the 51 cases involving poor outcomes, plaintiffs indicated lack of informed consent in 23 (45.1%). Conclusion: Reconsidering the informed consent process may be a viable means of mitigating future legal action. Most discrimination suits favoring defendants suggested previous concerns of structural injustices in transplantation may not be founded. The prevalence of policy-related cases could be an indication of financial burden on patients. Future work and advocacy will need to substantiate these concerns and address change where legal recourse falls short.


Malpractice , Organ Transplantation , Humans , Organ Transplantation/legislation & jurisprudence , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Malpractice/statistics & numerical data , United States , Prejudice , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence
2.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 194: 104244, 2024 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38135017

Peripheral neuropathy is a well-described complication of chemotherapy. There are no known treatments to reverse peripheral neuropathy. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is a dose-limiting toxicity in cancer treatment and is debilitating. Cryotherapy, or the use of cold garments/ice bags applied to extremities during chemotherapy, is a method to prevent or minimize treatment related neuropathy. There is no standard method of providing cryotherapy currently. A review of the literature was performed revealing that a variety of cryotherapy methods exist. While small studies suggest potential preventive effect of some forms of cryotherapy, consistent results from well-designed randomized studies are lacking. A small benefit from the use of cryotherapy to prevent peripheral neuropathy might exist, but conflicting studies exist. In light of the low cost to implement ice bags during chemotherapy and the low risk of toxicity, the use of ice bags may be reasonable during taxane chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer.


Antineoplastic Agents , Breast Neoplasms , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Cryotherapy/methods , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/prevention & control , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects
...