The effect of intravesical chemohyperthermia with mitomycin in non-muscle-invasive bladder tumour patients who cannot tolerate BCG treatment or recur after treatment and refuse cystectomy.

PURPOSE: Many patients receiving intravesical BCG treatment for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer experience high recurrence rates despite initial adequate response. In this study, the effectiveness of intravesical chemohyperthermia (CHT) with mitomycin C (MMC) was evaluated in patients who developed relapse after intravesical BCG treatment or could not tolerate the treatment and could not undergo radical cystectomy for any reason. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 59 patients who underwent complete bladder tumour resection, who had a T1 high-grade tumour and no variant histology was observed in the pathology, and who had previously received intravesical BCG treatment were included in the study. Adjuvant treatment with intravesical CHT-MMC was applied. As a treatment protocol, induction was applied once a week for 6 weeks, followed by maintenance treatment 6 times at 4-week intervals. Each treatment session, it involved bladder wall hyperthermia with a temperature of up to 42 â„ƒ ± 2 and intravesical administration of 20 mg/50 ml MMC solution twice at 30-min intervals. RESULTS: Recurrence-free survival after warm mitomycin was 58.7 and 48%, respectively, at 24 months and 44 months, and progression-free survival was 72.6 and 66.2%, respectively. In the subgroup analysis performed according to the number of tumours at diagnosis (single, 2-5, more than 5), recurrence-free survival rates were 81.8%, 48.2% and 11%, respectively, during the median follow-up period of 44 months. CONCLUSIONS: Intravesical CHT-MMC can be considered as an alternative treatment in selected well-informed patients with non-muscle-invasive papillary urothelial carcinoma who are unresponsive to BCG or intolerant to BCG. Prospectively designed studies with larger number of patients are needed.

The role of immunotherapy in urological cancers.

Immunotherapy is defined as a therapeutic approach that targets or manipulates the immune system. A deeper understanding of the cellular and molecular composition of the tumour environment, as well as the mechanisms controlling the immune system, has made possible the development and clinical investigation of many innovative cancer therapies. Historically, immunotherapy has played an essential role in treating urologic malignancies, while in the modern era, the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been critical to urology. Urothelial carcinoma is a common type of cancer in the genitourinary system, and treatment strategies in this area are constantly evolving. Intravesical and systemic immunotherapeutic agents have begun to be used increasingly frequently in treating urothelial carcinoma. These agents increase the anti-tumour response by affecting the body's defence mechanisms. Immunotherapeutic agents used in urothelial carcinoma include various options such as BCG, interferon, anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) and anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab). Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been known for many years as a tumour with unique sensitivity to immunotherapies. The recent emergence of ICIs that block PD-1/PD-L1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab) or CTLA4 (ipilimumab) signalling pathways has reestablished systemic immunotherapy as central to the treatment of advanced RCC. In light of randomized clinical trials conducted with increasing interest in the application of immunotherapies in the adjuvant setting, combination therapies (nivolumab/ipilimumab, nivolumab/cabozantinib, pembrolizumab/ axitinib, pembrolizumab/lenvantinib) have become the standard first-line treatment of metastatic RCC. Prostate cancer is in the immunologically "cold" tumour category; on the contrary, in recent years, immunotherapeutic agents have come to the fore as an essential area in the treatment of this disease. Especially in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer, immunotherapeutic agents constitute an alternative treatment method besides androgen deprivation therapy and chemotherapy. Ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and Sipuleucel T (Vaccine-based) are promising alternative treatment options. Considering ongoing randomized clinical trials, immunotherapeutic agents promise to transform the uro-oncology field significantly. In this review, we aimed to summarize the role of immunotherapy in urothelial, renal and prostate cancer in the light of randomized clinical trials.

The systemic inflammation response index: An independent predictive factor for survival outcomes of bladder cancer stronger than other inflammatory markers.

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the preoperative systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) to predict the outcomes after open radical cystectomy (RC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the institutional cystectomy database and identified 241 consecutive RC patients. Patient demographics and oncologic outcomes were noted. We calculated the SIRI as previously described (NeutrophilxMonocytes/Lymphocytes), based on the blood-tests at the day before surgery and a minimum >30-day later. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 20 months (interquartile range 9-52). Two, 3 and 5 years recurrence free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 60.6%, 57.1%, 48.9%, and 54.7%, 47.0%, 37.2%, respectively. Patients with preoperative SIRI >1.91 had significantly higher recurrence rates (P < 0.001) and lower OS (P < 0.001). For internal validation, we evaluated postoperative SIRI >1.91 (repeatability testing), and again found significantly higher recurrence rates (P < 0.001) and lower OS (P = 0.004). Persistently high SIRI increased the recurrence and death risk 5.79 and 2.87 fold, respectively. SIRI was also a significant independent predictive factor for RFS and OS in the multivariable cox regression analyses (P < 0.05). SIRI improved the discriminative ability of the models 1.5% to 4.2% and this was quite higher than other inflammatory markers (NLR, MLR, PLR, SII) in all models. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SIRI >1.91 had significantly higher recurrence and lower OS rates. The cut-off value is validated internally. SIRI is an independent predictive factor for RFS and OS. The contribution of SIRI in the cox models is higher than other inflammatory markers.

Oncological and functional outcomes of patients who underwent open partial nephrectomy for kidney tumor.

OBJECTIVE: To report long-term functional and oncological outcomes of OPN Methods: We enrolled 182 patients who underwent consecutive OPN with a diagnosis of kidney tumor in our clinic between April 2002 and February 2020 and were selected from our prospective OPN database. Preoperative demographic and clinical characteristics, intraoperative and pathological results, and patients' postoperative functional and oncological follow-up data were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and disease- free survival (DFS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The time-dependent variation between preoperative and postoperative functional results was statistically analyzed and presented in a graph. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The mean age was 54.4 ± 10.8 yr, and the median age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) was 1 (interquartile range [IQR] 0-1). The mean tumor size was 3.1 ± 1.2 cm, and the median RENAL score was 6 (IQR 5-8). The most common malign histopathological subtype was clear cell carcinoma with 76.6%, and five cases (3.4%) had positive surgical margins (PSMs). The most common surgical techniques were the retroperitoneal approach (98.9%) and cold ischemia (88.5%). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) preservation was 92% (80.8-99.3, IQR), which translates to 32% chronic kidney disease (CKD) upstaging. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was detected in 27 (14.8%) patients according to RIFLE criteria. The intraoperative complication rate was 5.5%, and the postoperative overall complication rate (Clavien-Dindo 1-5) was 30.2%. Major complications (Clavien-Dindo 3-5) were observed in 13 (7.1%) patients. The median oncological follow-up was 42 mo (21.3- 84.6, IQR), and the 5- and 10-yr OS were 90.1% and 78.6%, 5 and 10-yr DFS were 99.4% and 92.1%, respectively. No local recurrence was observed in 5 (3.4%) patients with PSMs; only one had distant metastasis in the 8th postoperative month. The retrospective design, the small number of patients who underwent PN based on mandatory indication, and one type of surgical approach may limit the generalizability of our findings. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms excellent long-term oncologic and functional outcomes after OPN in a cohort of patients selected from a single institution. In light of the information provided by the literature and our study, our recommendation is to push the limits of PN under every technically feasible condition in the treatment of kidney tumors to protect the kidney reserve and achieve near-perfect oncological results.