ABSTRACT
In order to tackle climate change and increasing competition in access to resources, the European Union has defined far-reaching transformations in the areas of energy and digitalisation as well as the conversion of the economic system towards an inclusive, circular economy in the so-called Green Deal. From a mining perspective, these transformations mean a continued growing demand for raw materials, which must be met by extracting mineral raw materials from primary deposits. However, increased quantities with "business as usual" would also increase the environmental and social impacts of mining, which is not an option, especially in Europe and Austria.Due to these facts, there is a need for research on new and improved mining methods and planning, as well as on optimised processes and machinery. This article describes how the Chair of Mining Engineering and Mineral Economics at Montanuniversität Leoben intends to use these challenges as an opportunity with its updated strategy, both for research and for teaching. For the research area, sustainability and involvement in the shaping of raw materials policy should form the framework. With a focus on digitisation and underground mining as well as strengthening the areas of open-pit mining, conveying technology and geoinformatics, research is to be future-proofed for these upcoming transformations. Teaching will continue to include a basic engineering education with specialisation in mining, whereby digitalisation will play an increasingly strong role.
ABSTRACT
Mineral resource policy deals not only with industrial and trade aspects but is nowadays also increasingly concerned with topics such as environmental protection and social development. The tensions associated with strongly divergent opinions among various stakeholder groups cast it as a 'wicked problem'. The process of redeveloping the 'Austrian Mineral Resources Strategy' allows for examination of the different frames and identification of potential frame conflicts in consultation processes at the national level. Using Q-methodology, this paper reveals four frames represented in the Austrian policy design process and unravels conflicts between economy-focused and integrated policy framings. The predominance of the first frame indicates a narrow sectoral approach favouring domestic mineral extraction and economic growth over other means (e.g. international distributional conflicts of benefits and burdens). The article also demonstrates the suitability of Q-methodology as a tool to investigate frames and to improve their understanding in policy design processes.
Subject(s)
Conservation of Natural Resources , Economic Development , Austria , Policy , MineralsABSTRACT
Growing demand for minerals continues to drive deforestation worldwide. Tropical forests are particularly vulnerable to the environmental impacts of mining and mineral processing. Many local- to regional-scale studies document extensive, long-lasting impacts of mining on biodiversity and ecosystem services. However, the full scope of deforestation induced by industrial mining across the tropics is yet unknown. Here, we present a biome-wide assessment to show where industrial mine expansion has caused the most deforestation from 2000 to 2019. We find that 3,264 km2 of forest was directly lost due to industrial mining, with 80% occurring in only four countries: Indonesia, Brazil, Ghana, and Suriname. Additionally, controlling for other nonmining determinants of deforestation, we find that mining caused indirect forest loss in two-thirds of the investigated countries. Our results illustrate significant yet unevenly distributed and often unmanaged impacts on these biodiverse ecosystems. Impact assessments and mitigation plans of industrial mining activities must address direct and indirect impacts to support conservation of the world's tropical forests.
