Oral dexamethasone pulse therapy versus daily prednisolone in sub-acute onset myositis, a randomised clinical trial.

To determine if high-dose pulsed dexamethasone is more effective and safer than daily high-dose prednisolone in treatment-naive adult patients with inflammatory myopathies (sporadic inclusion body myositis excluded) we performed a multicenter, double-blind randomised controlled clinical trial with 18 months follow-up. Sixty-two patients were randomised into 28-day cycles of oral high-dose dexamethasone or daily high-dose prednisolone. Primary outcome measures included (1) seven point composite score of six clinically relevant outcomes and (2) (time-to) remission and (time-to) relapse. No difference between both treatment groups on the composite score was found. Side-effects occurred significantly less frequently in the dexamethasone group. Median time to relapse was 60 (2.9) weeks in the prednisolone and 44 (4.7) weeks in the dexamethasone group (log-rank test p=0.03). In conclusion, pulsed high-dose oral dexamethasone is not superior to daily prednisolone as first-line treatment of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, but is a good alternative by causing substantially fewer side-effects.

Decontamination of the digestive tract and oropharynx in ICU patients.

BACKGROUND: Selective digestive tract decontamination (SDD) and selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) are infection-prevention measures used in the treatment of some patients in intensive care, but reported effects on patient outcome are conflicting. METHODS: We evaluated the effectiveness of SDD and SOD in a crossover study using cluster randomization in 13 intensive care units (ICUs), all in The Netherlands. Patients with an expected duration of intubation of more than 48 hours or an expected ICU stay of more than 72 hours were eligible. In each ICU, three regimens (SDD, SOD, and standard care) were applied in random order over the course of 6 months. Mortality at day 28 was the primary end point. SDD consisted of 4 days of intravenous cefotaxime and topical application of tobramycin, colistin, and amphotericin B in the oropharynx and stomach. SOD consisted of oropharyngeal application only of the same antibiotics. Monthly point-prevalence studies were performed to analyze antibiotic resistance. RESULTS: A total of 5939 patients were enrolled in the study, with 1990 assigned to standard care, 1904 to SOD, and 2045 to SDD; crude mortality in the groups at day 28 was 27.5%, 26.6%, and 26.9%, respectively. In a random-effects logistic-regression model with age, sex, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score, intubation status, and medical specialty used as covariates, odds ratios for death at day 28 in the SOD and SDD groups, as compared with the standard-care group, were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 0.99) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.97), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In an ICU population in which the mortality rate associated with standard care was 27.5% at day 28, the rate was reduced by an estimated 3.5 percentage points with SDD and by 2.9 percentage points with SOD. (Controlled Clinical Trials number, ISRCTN35176830.)

Once-daily versus multiple-daily gentamicin in infants and children.

In this prospective randomized trial, the efficacy and safety of once-daily administration of gentamicin were compared with multiple-daily administration in infants and children. In addition, pharmacokinetic variables were calculated. Gentamicin therapy was started at a dose of 5 mg/kg per day under individual dose or dosage interval adjustments to achieve target levels. Fifty-two infants and children aged 1 month (postterm) to 16 years were enrolled. The duration of fever from the start of therapy, the percentage decline of C-reactive protein (CRP) on day 3 of treatment, and the clinical outcome were used as efficacy parameters. Nephrotoxicity was evaluated using creatinine serum levels. Basic characteristics in both groups were comparable. A good clinical response was observed in both groups. Fever may have resolved faster with multiple-daily administration, but this was not statistically significant. The percentage of decline of CRP was also comparable in both groups. Nephrotoxicity occurred in six patients, three per group. Many patients were too ill or too young to perform hearing tests, but no clinical signs of ototoxicity were observed. Mean doses of 6.8 mg/kg per day (multiple-daily administration) and 7.3 mg/kg per day (once-daily administration) were necessary to meet the target gentamicin levels. Triple-daily doses had to be reduced to a twice-daily regimen in 17 of 26 children. Dose and dosage interval adaptations can be performed by Bayesian forecasting using a one-compartment model with one set of K(e) and V(d) parameters. The authors consider both regimens equally effective, with a comparable incidence of nephrotoxicity. A starting dose of 6.5 mg/kg once daily is advised.