Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 183
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39245614

ABSTRACT

Most maxillofacial traumas are caused by road traffic collisions and, in particular, by motorcycle accidents. Helmets represent an efficient protective tool in these traumas but they do not provide complete protection. The aim of this study was to perform an epidemiological analysis of facial fractures pattern in relation to the helmet type worn during the accident. The study was a retrospective analysis of 282 patients with a diagnosis of maxillofacial fracture caused by a motorcycle accident. The patients were divided in three groups based on helmet type (Group A: full-face helmet; Group B: modular [half-face] helmet; Group C: open-face helmet). For each group, fractures type and trauma severity, using the Comprehensive Facial Injury (CFI) scale, were recorded. Results showed that isolated midface fractures were strongly related to full-face helmet wearing (p < 0.001), while mandibular fractures and panfacial trauma/combined fractures were negatively correlated (p < 0.001). Mandibular fractures (p < 0.001) and panfacial trauma/combined fractures (p < 0.001) were strongly related to open helmet. Moreover, severe trauma (CFI 8.16) was recorded for open-face helmet wearing. In conclusion, full-face helmet wearing reduced the risk of facial fracture, in particular panfacial trauma/combined fractures, while open-face helmet wearing increased the risk of these fractures.

3.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 76(4): 3465-3469, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39130248

ABSTRACT

To evaluate the response capabilities, in a public healthcare system otolaryngology job competition examination, of ChatGPT 3.5 and an internet-connected GPT-4 engine (Microsoft Copilot) with the real scores of otolaryngology specialists as the control group. In September 2023, 135 questions divided into theoretical and practical parts were input into ChatGPT 3.5 and an internet-connected GPT-4. The accuracy of AI responses was compared with the official results from otolaryngologists who took the exam, and statistical analysis was conducted using Stata 14.2. Copilot (GPT-4) outperformed ChatGPT 3.5. Copilot achieved a score of 88.5 points, while ChatGPT scored 60 points. Both AIs had discrepancies in their incorrect answers. Despite ChatGPT's proficiency, Copilot displayed superior performance, ranking as the second-best score among the 108 otolaryngologists who took the exam, while ChatGPT was placed 83rd. A chat powered by GPT-4 with internet access (Copilot) demonstrates superior performance in responding to multiple-choice medical questions compared to ChatGPT 3.5.

4.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg ; : 102023, 2024 Aug 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39187038

ABSTRACT

Frontal sinus surgery and particularly frontal sinus osteotomy represent historically a procedure demanding precision and careful planning. Achieving optimal results while minimizing complications requires meticulous preoperative planning and execution. Cutting guides are crucial tools in surgical procedures, particularly in complex osteotomies like could be those involving the frontal sinus. The aim of the study is to show the worflow for the in-house custom made cutting guide for secure and accurated frontal sinus approach. Given the simplicity, efficacy, rapidity, and safety of the procedure, the workflow for programming the cutting guide can be considered valid for all surgical procedures that contemplate performing an osteotomy on the anterior wall of the frontal sinus, such as trauma pathology, inflammatory naso-sinus pathology, benign or malignant neoplastic pathology, and craniofacial malformation pathology.

5.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg ; : 102029, 2024 Aug 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39216729

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Jaw reconstruction after complex post-traumatic fracture is still a challenge for surgeons using traditional surgery. Virtual surgical planning has proven to be a valid tool for managing these fractures. The aim of this study is to quantitatively evaluate the VSP effectiveness compared to traditional surgery in the management of complex mandibular fractures. METHODS: 30 patients with diagnosis of complex mandibular fracture were enrolled and divided in two groups: Group A (virtually planned surgery), The plate was pre-modeled and employed during the surgery; Group B (traditional surgery), the plate was shaped directly during the surgery. Virtually planned and post-operative Computer Tomography were after compared for both the groups to highlight discrepancies in mm. RESULTS: Fracture surgical reduction was successful without intraoperative complications. In Group A, all the mean discrepancies' values were <1 mm while in Group B the values were included between 1.36 and 1.94 mm. The mean operative time was 69 min for Group A, while 106 min for Group B. CONCLUSIONS: Fracture virtual reduction and realization of pre-modeled plate are able to guarantee a more anatomically correct reduction and a decrease in operating times. These outcomes translate into a decrease in both short and long-term complications.

6.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 18(7): 987-992, 2024 Jul 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39078778

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the study was to analyze the effect of swabs on nasal mucosa. METHODOLOGY: Since May 2020, our department was responsible for screening coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among the employees of a company that continued its activity during the pandemic. The screening protocol consisted of two swabs per week. The samples were analyzed through objective endoscopic and subjective clinical evaluations with sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT Test) at three time points (T0, T1 - three months, T2 - six months). RESULTS: 23.76% of patients showed an increase in the SNOT score at T1, and the score decreased at T2. This could be due to the phenomenon of "adaptation" of the nasal mucosa. Endoscopic control showed that at T1, secretion, hyperemia, and edema are the most common signs. At T2, however, the crusts accounted for 52.94% of all damage. It is evident that at T1 the endoscopically detected signs of "acute" damage were more represented than at T2, while the signs of "chronic" damage increased as the number of swabs increased. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that mucosal damage and perceived symptoms were absolutely acceptable compared to the diagnostic advantage obtained with serial screening.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Nasal Mucosa , Nasopharynx , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , Nasal Mucosa/virology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Nasopharynx/virology , Mass Screening/methods , Specimen Handling/methods , COVID-19 Testing/methods
7.
Infection ; 2024 Jul 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38995551

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Advancements in Artificial Intelligence(AI) have made platforms like ChatGPT increasingly relevant in medicine. This study assesses ChatGPT's utility in addressing bacterial infection-related questions and antibiogram-based clinical cases. METHODS: This study involved a collaborative effort involving infectious disease (ID) specialists and residents. A group of experts formulated six true/false, six open-ended questions, and six clinical cases with antibiograms for four types of infections (endocarditis, pneumonia, intra-abdominal infections, and bloodstream infection) for a total of 96 questions. The questions were submitted to four senior residents and four specialists in ID and inputted into ChatGPT-4 and a trained version of ChatGPT-4. A total of 720 responses were obtained and reviewed by a blinded panel of experts in antibiotic treatments. They evaluated the responses for accuracy and completeness, the ability to identify correct resistance mechanisms from antibiograms, and the appropriateness of antibiotics prescriptions. RESULTS: No significant difference was noted among the four groups for true/false questions, with approximately 70% correct answers. The trained ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-4 offered more accurate and complete answers to the open-ended questions than both the residents and specialists. Regarding the clinical case, we observed a lower accuracy from ChatGPT-4 to recognize the correct resistance mechanism. ChatGPT-4 tended not to prescribe newer antibiotics like cefiderocol or imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, favoring less recommended options like colistin. Both trained- ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-4 recommended longer than necessary treatment periods (p-value = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights ChatGPT's capabilities and limitations in medical decision-making, specifically regarding bacterial infections and antibiogram analysis. While ChatGPT demonstrated proficiency in answering theoretical questions, it did not consistently align with expert decisions in clinical case management. Despite these limitations, the potential of ChatGPT as a supportive tool in ID education and preliminary analysis is evident. However, it should not replace expert consultation, especially in complex clinical decision-making.

8.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 52(9): 991-998, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38871617

ABSTRACT

The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze a series of patients who underwent full-arch rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla using additively manufactured subperiosteal implants, between August 2018 and January 2023, at the Universities of Sassari and Poznan. In total, 36 patients and 72 implants were included, with no implants lost during follow-up, and a success rate of 90.3%. Seven (9.7%) of the implants showed class 1 exposure. Bleeding on probing was detected in 10.4% of the abutments at 6 months, 7.9% at 1 year, 10% at 2 years, 7% at 3 years, and 11.4% at 4 years. No significant bone resorption under the abutments was detected during the whole observation period. Based on the findings from this study, additively manufactured subperiosteal implants could represent a safe and reliable technique for full-arch rehabilitation in patients with severe maxillary atrophy.


Subject(s)
Atrophy , Dental Implants , Maxilla , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Maxilla/surgery , Aged , Adult , Dental Prosthesis Design , Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods , Treatment Outcome
9.
J Clin Med ; 13(11)2024 May 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38892767

ABSTRACT

Background: To investigate the perception of young European otolaryngologists (OTOs), i.e., head and neck surgeons, toward transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Methods: Members of the Young Confederation of European Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Young Otolaryngologists of International Federation of Otorhinolaryngological Societies were surveyed about TORS perception and practice. Results: The survey was completed by 120 young OTOS (26%). The most important barriers to TORS were robot availability (73%), cost (69%), and lack of training (37%). The participants believed that the main benefits include better surgical filed view (64%), shorter hospital stay (62%), and better postoperative outcomes (61%) than the conventional approach. Head and neck surgeons considered cT1-T2 oropharyngeal cancers (94%), resection of base of tongue for sleep apnea (86%), or primary unknown cancer (76%) as the most appropriate indications. A total of 67% of TORS surgeons assessed themselves as adequately trained in TORS. Conclusions: Young European OTOs report positive perception, adoption, and knowledge of TORS. The cost-related unavailability and the lack of training or access are reported to be the most important barriers for the spread of TORS.

10.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg ; : 101917, 2024 Jun 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38866670

ABSTRACT

Implant-prosthetic rehabilitations of severely atrophic posterior maxillary sectors currently is challenging, often requiring multiple surgeries and long rehabilitation times. Recently, graftless techniques (e.g. zygomatic, pterygoid and nasal implants) have gained popularity as they offer a reduction in rehabilitation time, aligning more closely with patient preferences but may not be feasible for sectorial rehabilitations. Subperiosteal implants, suggested for full-arch rehabilitations of atrophic maxilla, haven't been explored for sectorial rehabilitations. In this report we present the case of a patient with maxillary molar edentulism, rehabilitated with a subperiosteal implant.

11.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(9): 5001-5006, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38795148

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the efficacy of two advanced Large Language Models (LLMs), OpenAI's ChatGPT 4 and Google's Gemini Advanced, in providing treatment recommendations for head and neck oncology cases. The aim is to assess their utility in supporting multidisciplinary oncological evaluations and decision-making processes. METHODS: This comparative analysis examined the responses of ChatGPT 4 and Gemini Advanced to five hypothetical cases of head and neck cancer, each representing a different anatomical subsite. The responses were evaluated against the latest National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines by two blinded panels using the total disagreement score (TDS) and the artificial intelligence performance instrument (AIPI). Statistical assessments were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Friedman test. RESULTS: Both LLMs produced relevant treatment recommendations with ChatGPT 4 generally outperforming Gemini Advanced regarding adherence to guidelines and comprehensive treatment planning. ChatGPT 4 showed higher AIPI scores (median 3 [2-4]) compared to Gemini Advanced (median 2 [2-3]), indicating better overall performance. Notably, inconsistencies were observed in the management of induction chemotherapy and surgical decisions, such as neck dissection. CONCLUSIONS: While both LLMs demonstrated the potential to aid in the multidisciplinary management of head and neck oncology, discrepancies in certain critical areas highlight the need for further refinement. The study supports the growing role of AI in enhancing clinical decision-making but also emphasizes the necessity for continuous updates and validation against current clinical standards to integrate AI into healthcare practices fully.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Humans , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Reproducibility of Results , Clinical Decision-Making , Language , Artificial Intelligence
12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703195

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The widespread diffusion of Artificial Intelligence (AI) platforms is revolutionizing how health-related information is disseminated, thereby highlighting the need for tools to evaluate the quality of such information. This study aimed to propose and validate the Quality Assessment of Medical Artificial Intelligence (QAMAI), a tool specifically designed to assess the quality of health information provided by AI platforms. METHODS: The QAMAI tool has been developed by a panel of experts following guidelines for the development of new questionnaires. A total of 30 responses from ChatGPT4, addressing patient queries, theoretical questions, and clinical head and neck surgery scenarios were assessed by 27 reviewers from 25 academic centers worldwide. Construct validity, internal consistency, inter-rater and test-retest reliability were assessed to validate the tool. RESULTS: The validation was conducted on the basis of 792 assessments for the 30 responses given by ChatGPT4. The results of the exploratory factor analysis revealed a unidimensional structure of the QAMAI with a single factor comprising all the items that explained 51.1% of the variance with factor loadings ranging from 0.449 to 0.856. Overall internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.837). The Interclass Correlation Coefficient was 0.983 (95% CI 0.973-0.991; F (29,542) = 68.3; p < 0.001), indicating excellent reliability. Test-retest reliability analysis revealed a moderate-to-strong correlation with a Pearson's coefficient of 0.876 (95% CI 0.859-0.891; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The QAMAI tool demonstrated significant reliability and validity in assessing the quality of health information provided by AI platforms. Such a tool might become particularly important/useful for physicians as patients increasingly seek medical information on AI platforms.

13.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 170(6): 1519-1526, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38591726

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the performance of Chatbot Generative Pretrained Transformer-4 (ChatGPT-4) in the management of cases in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case series. SETTING: Multicenter University Hospitals. METHODS: History, clinical, physical, and additional examinations of adult outpatients consulting in otolaryngology departments of CHU Saint-Pierre and Dour Medical Center were presented to ChatGPT-4, which was interrogated for differential diagnoses, management, and treatment(s). According to specialty, the ChatGPT-4 responses were assessed by 2 distinct, blinded board-certified otolaryngologists with the Artificial Intelligence Performance Instrument. RESULTS: One hundred cases were presented to ChatGPT-4. ChaGPT-4 indicated a mean of 3.34 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.09, 3.59) additional examinations per patient versus 2.10 (95% CI: 1.76, 2.34; P = .001) for the practitioners. There was strong consistency (k > 0.600) between otolaryngologists and ChatGPT-4 for the indication of upper aerodigestive tract endoscopy, positron emission tomography and computed tomography, audiometry, tympanometry, and psychophysical evaluations. Primary diagnosis was correctly performed by ChatGPT-4 in 38% to 86% of cases depending on subspecialty. Additional examinations indicated by ChatGPT-4 were pertinent and necessary in 8% to 31% of cases, while the treatment regimen was pertinent in 12% to 44% of cases. The performance of ChatGPT-4 was not influenced by the human-reported level of difficulty of clinical cases. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT-4 may be a promising adjunctive tool in otolaryngology, providing extensive documentation about additional examinations, primary and differential diagnoses, and treatments. The ChatGPT-4 is more effective in providing a primary diagnosis, and less effective in the selection of additional examinations and treatments.


Subject(s)
Otolaryngology , Humans , Prospective Studies , Male , Female , Adult , Otolaryngologists , Middle Aged , Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases/therapy , Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential
14.
Biomedicines ; 12(4)2024 Apr 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38672163

ABSTRACT

Background: Long COVID has brought numerous challenges to healthcare, with olfactory dysfunction (OD) being a particularly distressing outcome for many patients. The persistent loss of smell significantly diminishes the affected individual's quality of life. Recent attention has been drawn to the potential of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy as a treatment for OD. This comprehensive review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of PRP therapy in ameliorating OD, especially when associated with long-term COVID-19. Methods: We executed a comprehensive search of the literature, encompassing clinical trials and observational studies that utilized PRP in treating OD limited to COVID-19. We retrieved and comprehensively discussed data such as design, participant demographics, and reported outcomes, focusing on the efficacy and safety of PRP therapy for OD in COVID-19 patients. Results: Our comprehensive analysis interestingly found promising perspectives for PRP in OD following COVID-19 infection. The collective data indicate that PRP therapy contributed to a significant improvement in olfactory function after COVID-19 infection. Conclusions: The evidence amassed suggests that PRP is a promising and safe therapeutic option for OD, including cases attributable to Long COVID-19. The observed uniform enhancement of olfactory function in patients receiving PRP highlights the necessity for well-designed, controlled trials. Such studies would help to refine treatment protocols and more definitively ascertain the efficacy of PRP in a broader, more varied patient cohort.

15.
Life (Basel) ; 14(3)2024 Feb 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38541627

ABSTRACT

In an era where modern medicine has made remarkable advances in managing diseases in the head and neck region, we present this Special Issue to provide a spotlight on the new research advances on olfactory and gustatory disorders [...].

16.
J Clin Med ; 13(6)2024 Mar 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38541940

ABSTRACT

Background: Revision rhinoplasty is a technically demanding surgical procedure that can put every surgeon in trouble. The main issue of these cases is often an altered osteocartilaginous framework following over-resection during the first intervention. Moreover, the available septal or auricular cartilage for grafting is usually not enough. This review aims to examine contemporary advances in applications of fresh frozen cartilage in rhinoplasty. Methods: A structured review of the current literature (up to December 2023) was performed on four bibliographic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane and Medline. The search terms were combinations of "Rhinoplasty" and "Cartilage Graft", "Allograft" or "Fresh Frozen Cartilage". The citations of selected studies and review articles were also evaluated if present. Results: The research resulted in 152 articles, and only ten met the inclusion criteria: nine clinical articles and one in vitro study. One of the ten eligible articles was excluded. Conclusions: Fresh frozen rib cartilage proved to be a viable alternative to autologous rib grafts and irradiated homologous rib graft. Despite the higher costs, FFRG can provide a sufficient amount of tissue for grafting avoiding donor site complications and reducing the operative time and proved to have more chondrocytes and to be less prone to resorption compared to irradiated rib.

19.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(4): 2167-2173, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38329526

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Biologic therapies for Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) have emerged as an auspicious treatment alternative. However, the ideal patient population, dosage, and treatment duration are yet to be well-defined. Moreover, biologic therapy has disadvantages, such as high costs and limited access. The proposal of a novel Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm offers an intriguing solution for optimizing decision-making protocols. METHODS: The AI algorithm was initially programmed to conduct a systematic literature review searching for the current primary guidelines on biologics' clinical efficacy and safety in treating CRSwNP. The review included a total of 12 studies: 6 systematic reviews, 4 expert consensus guidelines, and 2 surveys. Simultaneously, two independent human researchers conducted a literature search to compare the results. Subsequently, the AI was tasked to critically analyze the identified papers, highlighting strengths and weaknesses, thereby creating a decision-making algorithm and pyramid flow chart. RESULTS: The studies evaluated various biologics, including monoclonal antibodies targeting Interleukin-5 (IL-5), IL-4, IL-13, and Immunoglobulin E (IgE), assessing their effectiveness in different patient populations, such as those with comorbid asthma or refractory CRSwNP. Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-4 receptor alpha subunit, demonstrated significant improvement in nasal symptoms and quality of life in patients with CRSwNP in several randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews. Similarly, mepolizumab and reslizumab, which target IL-5, have also shown efficacy in reducing nasal polyp burden and improving symptoms in patients with CRSwNP, particularly those with comorbid asthma. However, additional studies are required to confirm the long-term efficacy and safety of these biologics in treating CRSwNP. CONCLUSIONS: Biologic therapies have surfaced as a promising treatment option for patients with severe or refractory CRSwNP; however, the optimal patient population, dosage, and treatment duration are yet to be defined. The application of AI in decision-making protocols and the creation of therapeutic algorithms for biologic drug selection, could offer fascinating future prospects in the management of CRSwNP.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Biological Products , Nasal Polyps , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Humans , Interleukin-5 , Rhinitis/complications , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Artificial Intelligence , Quality of Life , Asthma/epidemiology , Nasal Polyps/complications , Nasal Polyps/drug therapy , Nasal Polyps/epidemiology , Chronic Disease , Sinusitis/complications , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Sinusitis/epidemiology , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Biological Therapy
20.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 52(3): 334-339, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38341367

ABSTRACT

Isolated orbital floor fractures are more frequent due to low bone thickness (2 mm). The aim of this study was to conduct a retrospective epidemiological analysis on these fractures, investigating demographic variables and fractures' features and their statistical correlation. A total of 120 patients with isolated orbital floor fracture, admitted at the Maxillofacial Surgery Unit of University of Naples Federico II, from 2010 to 2022 were enrolled in the study. Patients were evaluated for age, sex, smoke, comorbidities, post-traumatic clinical manifestation,s and defect side and size. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Pearson regression coefficient (r). The fractures were more frequent in men (male:female 2.2:1) because of road accidents (30% of cases). The average age was 48 years. Enophthalmos, diplopia and ocular motility anomalies were observed in 31%, 23% and 21% of cases, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed that age was related to fracture area; in particular, older patients showed larger fractures (p < 0.001). Interpersonal violence and traffic accidents were related to younger age (p < 0.001). Data analysis revealed that isolated orbital floor fractures are more frequent in young men (<40 years) because of road accidents or interpersonal violence. There is a statistical correlation between fracture area and patient age; in particular, older age corresponds to larger defects.


Subject(s)
Enophthalmos , Orbital Fractures , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Orbit/surgery , Enophthalmos/etiology , Orbital Fractures/surgery , Demography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL