Factors Affecting Usage of a Digital Asthma Monitoring Application by Old-Age Asthmatics Living in Inner Central Portugal.

Purpose: To analyse factors affecting the ability to use the digital asthma monitoring application Mask-Air® in old-age individuals living in inland Portugal. Patients and Methods: In this observational study, patients with medically confirmed asthma who agreed to participate were interviewed and subdivided into Non-users Group: those who could not use the application and Users Group: those who could. Sociodemographic and psychological data, comorbidities, and asthma status were compared between groups. Assessment of reasons for refusal was based on a 6-item questionnaire. Results: Among the 72 sequentially recruited patients (mean age±SD 73.26±5.43 yrs; 61 women; 11 men), 44 (61.1%; mean age±SD 74.64±5.68 yrs; 38 women; 6 men)) were included in Non-users Group and 28 (38.9%; mean age±SD 71.11±4.26 yrs; 23 women; 5 men) in Users Group. Non-users Group patients were significantly older, had lower socioeconomic level, and more frequently had severe asthma (25% vs 3.6%; Odds ratio=0.08 (95% CI=0.01-0.81; p=0.033)) and diabetes (32.6% vs 7.4%; Odds ratio=0.17 (95% CI=0.03-0.80; p=0.025)) than Users Group. The main reasons for not using the App were "Lack of required hardware" (n=35) and "Digital illiteracy" (n=26), but lack of interest to use the App among those who had conditions to use it was uncommon. Conclusion: Most old-age asthmatics living in Beira Interior either lack a smartphone or digital skills, which are significant obstacles to implementing app-based monitoring studies.

This study was done to see whether it was possible to use a mobile phone application (App) to help old-age asthmatics living in inner Central Portugal better monitor and self-manage their disease. The researchers interviewed a group of 72 patients with proven asthma who agreed to participate in the study. This group was subdivided into two subgroups: Non-users Group (44 patients) included those who could not use the App because they did not have a smartphone; Users Group (28 patients) included those who had all the conditions to use the App. Patients were helped to download the App (called MASK-Air), were given a thorough explanation about it, and about how it should be used on a daily basis to monitor their asthma symptoms. The researchers found that patients in Non-users Group were significantly older, had worse socioeconomic conditions, and more often had severe asthma and diabetes. They also discovered that the main reasons for not using the App were lack of a smartphone and not knowing how to use a smartphone. These results show that lacking a smartphone and not knowing how to use digital tools are frequent situations in old-age asthmatics living in inner Central Portugal, and these may be obstacles for patients in monitoring their own asthma symptoms.

A 30-Year-Old Man With Cough, Dyspnea, and Upper Lobe Opacities.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 30-year-old man presents with dry cough and dyspnea on exertion (modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale of 3), with progressive worsening over several months. He denies other respiratory or cardiac symptoms such as wheezing, hemoptysis, thoracalgia, palpitations, or leg swelling. He also denies constitutional symptoms, namely fever, sweating, anorexia, or weight loss. The patient is a current smoker (five cigarettes per day), with no other significant exposures, diseases, or medications. He had no personal history of respiratory diseases or TB. Relevant family history included an aunt with nonspecified interstitial lung disease and lung transplant.

Inhaler training and asthma knowledge are associated with a higher proportion of patients with correct inhaler technique in young but not in elderly asthmatic patients.

Objective: Incorrect inhaler usage is frequent, particularly in elderly asthmatic patients. This study aimed at comparing inhaler technique errors and their determinants, as well inhaler technique self-perception versus real performance, between elderly and non-elderly asthmatics. Methods: Cross-sectional assessment of 92 elderly and 100 non-elderly asthmatics followed at specialty clinics. A standardized questionnaire was applied and inhaler technique demonstration was requested. Errors were assessed using checklists based on manufacturers' instructions and inhaler technique was graded as correct, acceptable or incorrect. Chi-Square Test and Fischer's Exact Test were used for comparative analysis of nominal variables. A p value equal to or less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Inhaler technique was correct in a minority of elderly and young patients, without significant differences between study groups. Only 11.1% of the elderly who classified their inhaler as easy and 12.7% who stated their technique was correct had no errors. Previous regular inhaler training was associated with better actual performance in young but not in elderly patients. Conclusion: Our study showed that in spite of regular follow up at specialized outpatient clinics, inhaler devices are associated with a high frequency of errors in elderly and non-elderly asthmatics. In addition, most patients tend to overestimate their technique as correct. Finally, previous, frequent training was associated with a significantly higher percentage of patients showing correct or acceptable technique but only in non-elderly asthmatics, which suggests that elderly asthmatics may need specifically tailored inhaler education programs.