Prognostic Value of the Progesterone Receptor by Subtype in Patients with Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER-2 Negative Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: In estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) negative breast cancers, the progesterone receptor (PR) is an independent prognostic marker. Little is known about the prognostic value of PR by tumor grade. We assessed this in two independent datasets. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with primary operable, invasive ER+ HER-2 negative breast cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2012, treated at University Hospitals Leuven, were included. We assessed the association of PR status and subtype (grade 1-2 vs. grade 3) with distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) and breast cancer-specific survival. The interaction between PR status and subtype was investigated, and associations of PR status by subtype were calculated. The BIG 1-98 data set was used for validation. RESULTS: In total, 4,228 patients from Leuven and 5,419 from BIG 1-98 were analyzed. In the Leuven cohort, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of PR-positive versus PR-negative tumors for DRFI was 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.89). For the interaction with subtype (p = .34), the HR of PR status was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.61-1.01) in luminal A-like and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.46-0.76) in luminal B-like tumors. In luminal A-like tumors, observed 5-year cumulative incidences of distant recurrence were 4.1% for PR-negative and 2.8% for PR-positive tumors, and in luminal B-like 18.7% and 9.2%, respectively. In the BIG 1-98 cohort, similar results were observed; for the interaction with subtype (p = .12), the adjusted HR of PR status for DRFI was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.57-1.35) in luminal A-like and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.43-0.77) in luminal B-like tumors. Observed 5-year cumulative incidences were similar. CONCLUSION: PR positivity may be more protective against metastatic relapse in luminal B-like versus luminal A-like breast cancer, but no strong conclusions can be made. In absolute risk, results suggest an absent PR is clinically more important in high compared with low proliferative ER+ HER-2 negative tumors. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: An absent progesterone receptor (PR) predicts a worse outcome in women treated for an estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative breast cancer. As low proliferative tumors lacking PR are now also classified high risk, the prognostic value of PR across risk groups was studied. Despite a negative test for interaction of the prognostic value of PR by tumor grade, the magnitude of an absent PR on breast cancer relapse is much larger in high than in low proliferative breast cancers.

Tamoxifen Metabolism and Efficacy in Breast Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Trial.

Purpose: Levels of endoxifen, the most active metabolite of tamoxifen, vary by the highly polymorphic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 enzyme. We prospectively investigated tamoxifen efficacy by serum endoxifen levels and the tamoxifen activity score (TAS).Experimental Design: A prospective observational multicenter study included postmenopausal women with an estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer receiving first-line tamoxifen, 20 mg daily in the neoadjuvant or metastatic setting, recruited between February 2009 and May 2014. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) using RECIST criteria 1.0. Secondary endpoints were clinical benefit (CB), progression-free survival (PFS), and tolerability of tamoxifen. The main analysis used logistic regression to relate ORR to serum endoxifen levels after 3 months. Endpoints were also related to other tamoxifen metabolites and to TAS.Results: Endoxifen levels were available for 247 of all 297 patients (83%), of which 209 with target lesions (85%). Median follow-up time for PFS was 32.5 months, and 62% progressed. ORR and CB were 45% and 84%, respectively. ORR was not related to endoxifen, and the OR of ORR was 1.008 per µg/L increase in endoxifen (95% confidence interval, 0.971-1.046; P = 0.56). In general, none of the endpoints was associated with endoxifen levels, tamoxifen metabolites, or TAS.Conclusions: Under the prespecified assumptions, the results from this prospective clinical trial do not suggest therapeutic drug monitoring of endoxifen to be of clinical value in postmenopausal women treated with tamoxifen for breast cancer in the neoadjuvant or metastatic setting. Clin Cancer Res; 24(10); 2312-8. ©2018 AACR.

The prognostic performance of Adjuvant! Online and Nottingham Prognostic Index in young breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the prognostic performance of Adjuvant! Online (AOL) and Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) in young breast cancer patients. METHODS: This multicentre hospital-based retrospective cohort study included young (⩽40 years) and older (55-60 years) breast cancer patients treated from January 2000 to December 2004 at four large Belgian and Italian institutions. Predicted 10-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) using AOL and 10-year OS using NPI were calculated for every patient. Tools ability to predict outcomes (i.e., calibration) and their discriminatory accuracy was assessed. RESULTS: The study included 1283 patients, 376 young and 907 older women. Adjuvant! Online accurately predicted 10-year OS (absolute difference: 0.7%; P=0.37) in young cohort, but overestimated 10-year DFS by 7.7% (P=0.003). In older cohort, AOL significantly underestimated both 10-year OS and DFS by 7.2% (P<0.001) and 3.2% (P=0.04), respectively. Nottingham Prognostic Index significantly underestimated 10-year OS in both young (8.5%; P<0.001) and older (4.0%; P<0.001) cohorts. Adjuvant! Online and NPI had comparable discriminatory accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: In young breast cancer patients, AOL is a reliable tool in predicting OS at 10 years but not DFS, whereas the performance of NPI is sub-optimal.

The UZ Leuven Policy for Extended Adjuvant Anti-estrogen Therapy in Women With Early Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.

Opinion statement: Five years after adjuvant endocrine treatment for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, patients have a 2 to 20 % risk of metastatic relapse during the next 5 years. Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy seems to further lower this. In UZ Leuven, extended endocrine therapy is now discussed unless the tumor was a grade 1-2, pT1N0, ER-positive, progesterone receptor (PR)-positive, HER2-negative lesion. After 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen treatment for ER-positive breast cancer, we encourage women to take another 5 years of tamoxifen. If the tumor was lymph node-positive at diagnosis and patients are menopausal after the first 5 years of tamoxifen, we advise to take prolonged treatment with an oral aromatase inhibitor (AI). For this particular group, available data for extending endocrine therapy with an AI after 5 years of tamoxifen are strongest and more convincing for letrozole than for anastrozole or exemestane. Under these conditions, letrozole is reimbursed for 3 years in Belgium. If women are postmenopausal at diagnosis and already used an oral AI at any time during the first 5 years, we discuss an extra 5 years of tamoxifen. Results from ongoing clinical trials will tell us whether in these cases prolonged AI use is better than tamoxifen so that therapy can be adapted. Benefit from extended adjuvant endocrine therapy is likely larger with better compliance and potential side effects of extended endocrine therapy need to be discussed. Therefore, when advising extended adjuvant endocrine treatment, a balance should always be made between relapse risk and treatment tolerance/compliance.

Arthralgia induced by endocrine treatment for breast cancer: A prospective study of serum levels of insulin like growth factor-I, its binding protein and oestrogens.

BACKGROUND: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) frequently induce or enhance musculoskeletal problems (AI-induced musculoskeletal syndrome (AIMSS)) which sometimes are debilitating. Apart from low oestrogen levels, underlying mechanisms are unknown and likely multiple. We previously hypothesised a role for the growth hormone/insulin like growth factor-I (IGF-I) axis. Here, we report the effect of tamoxifen and AI on IGF-I, IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) and oestrogen levels from a prospective study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal women with an early breast cancer scheduled to start adjuvant endocrine therapy with an AI or tamoxifen were recruited. A rheumatologic questionnaire was completed and serum was collected for assessment of IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and oestrogen levels. Re-evaluation was done after 3, 6 and 1 2months of therapy. RESULTS: 84 patients started on tamoxifen (n=42) or an AI (n=42). 66% of the latter group experienced worsening of pre-existing or de novo complaints in joint and/or muscle, compared to 29% of tamoxifen-treated patients. AI therapy resulted in elevated IGF-I levels with a statistically significant increase at 6months (p=0.0088), whereas tamoxifen users were characterised by a decrease in IGF-I levels at all follow-up times (p<0.0004). No effect on IGFBP-3 was seen in the latter group. AI-users, however, showed decreased IGFBP-3 levels at 12 months (p=0.0467). AIMSS was characterised by a decrease in IGFBP-3 levels (p=0.0007) and a trend towards increased IGF-I/IGFBP-3 ratio (p=0.0710). CONCLUSION: These findings provide preliminary evidence that AI-induced musculoskeletal symptoms are associated with changes in the growth hormone (GH)/IGF-I axis.

Aromatase inhibitors in the breast cancer clinic: focus on exemestane.

Breast cancer is the most prevalent type of cancer in women and responsible for significant female cancer-related mortality worldwide. In the Western world, over 80% of breast cancers are hormone-receptor positive for which endocrine therapy is administered. The main anti-estrogen treatments in use consist of selective estrogen-receptor modulators, such as tamoxifen, and third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), such as exemestane, letrozole, and anastrozole. In this review, the focus will lie on exemestane, its clinical use, and its side-effect profile. Exemestane is the only third-generation steroidal AI. Its efficacy as a first-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer has been demonstrated. Therefore, exemestane could be considered a valid first-line therapeutic option, but it also can be used in second-line or further situations. Exemestane is mostly used as part of sequential adjuvant treatment following tamoxifen, but in this setting it is also active in monotherapy. Furthermore, this AI has been studied in the neoadjuvant setting as presurgical treatment, and even as chemoprevention in high-risk healthy postmenopausal women. It may reverse side effects of tamoxifen, such as endometrial changes and thromboembolic disease but may also cause some inconvenient side effects itself. Additionally, there is a lack of total cross-resistance between exemestane and nonsteroidal AIs as far as their anti-tumoral efficacy is concerned; moreover the two classes of AIs display a nontotal overlapping toxicity profile. Taking together, exemestane can be considered as a useful treatment option at all stages of breast cancer.

Structural characterization of the PliG lysozyme inhibitor family.

Several Gram-negative bacteria protect themselves against the lytic action of host lysozymes by producing specific proteinaceous inhibitors. So far, four different families of lysozyme inhibitors have been identified including Ivy (Inhibitor of vertebrate lysozyme), MliC/PliC (Membrane associated/periplasmic inhibitor of C-type lysozyme), PliI and PliG (periplasmic inhibitors of I- and G-type lysozymes, respectively). Here we provide the first crystallographic description of the PliG family. Crystal structures were obtained for the PliG homologues from Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium and Aeromonas hydrophila. These structures show that the fold of the PliG family is very distinct from that of all other families of lysozyme inhibitors. Small-angle X-ray scattering studies reveal that PliG is monomeric in solution as opposed to the dimeric PliC and PliI. The PliG family shares a highly conserved SG(x)xY sequence motif with the MliC/PliC and PliI families where it was shown to reside on a loop that blocks the active site of lysozyme leading to inhibition. Surprisingly, we found that in PliG this motif is not well exposed and not involved in the inhibitory action. Instead, we could identify a distinct cluster of surface residues that are conserved across the PliG family and are essential for efficient G-type lysozyme inhibition, as evidenced by mutagenesis studies.