ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adolescents in contexts of social vulnerability experience obstacles in the development of their resilience, which compromises the development of coping/response strategies to daily adversities. This study aimed to understand the resilience process of school adolescents in situations of social vulnerability in the light of Barker's and Buchanan-Barker's Tidal Model. METHODS: This qualitative and exploratory study was carried out at a public school in the city of Recife, Pernambuco State, Brazil. The sample was composed of 17 adolescents. Data collection was carried out through in-depth narrative interviews. The material was analyzed with the aid of the software Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires, interpreted through the assumptions of Tidal Model. RESULTS: The dendrogram demonstrated the corpus delimited in five classes named as "Navigation Plan," "Storms," "Ocean of Experiences," "Rescue," and "Safe Harbor." CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Through learning from narratives, nurses understand the important resources of a recovery journey and take care "with" adolescents, supporting the development of resilience to face storms by taking the helm of the vessel and resuming their travel.
ABSTRACT
Objetivo: analisar o perfil de Força de Preensão Manual em pacientes idosos com câncer de próstata, atendidos em instituição hospitalar filantrópica do Recife. Métodos: estudo transversal com análise de dados secundários, coletados no Ambulatório de Oncogeriatria do Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira, utilizando uma amostra por conveniência com uma amostragem de 72 idosos. A análise estatística foi realizada utilizando o programa estatístico STATA 12. O teste de Kolmogorov-Smirnov foi aplicado a variáveis numéricas para se determinar a normalidade da amostra. Em caso de não normalidade, foi utilizado o teste de Mann-Whitney. Adotou-se o nível de significância de 0,05%. Resultados: observou-se uma Força de Preensão Manual reduzida nos pacientes com estadiamento de uma doença mais avançada quando comparado a outros estágios mais localizados ou clinicamente melhores (estadiamento I: 27,78 vs. estadiamento IV: 27,20 no braço dominante (p=0, 340)/ estadiamento I: 27,33 vs. estadiamento IV: 24,13 no braço não dominante) sendo esse resultado melhor reproduzido na mão não dominante (p=0,090). Por meio da análise das comorbidades (hipertensão, diabetes, cardiomiopatia e osteoartrite) em relação à mão dominante e não dominante, não foram verificadas diferenças significativas na Força de Preensão Manual na presença ou ausência das comorbidades analisadas tanto na mão dominante quanto da não dominante (p=0,189 vs.p=0,437). Conclusões: o estudo trouxe subsídios relevantes sobre a importância da Força de Preensão Manual como um importante parâmetro geral para força e um indicativo de saúde, principalmente quando analisados em idosos com câncer, onde afeta significativamente sua função física e neuromuscular, incluindo atrofia muscular, diminuição da força muscular e diminuição do desempenho funcional em atividades diárias, comprometendo significativamente a qualidade de vida e seu prognóstico.
Aims: to analyze the profile of Handgrip Strength in elderly prostate cancer patients treated at a philanthropic hospital in Recife. Methods: cross-sectional study with analysis of secondary data collected at the Oncogeriatric Outpatient Clinic of the Professor Fernando Figueira Institute of Integral Medicine, using a convenience sample with a sample of 72 elderly. Statistical analysis was performed using the STATA 12 statistical program. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was applied to numerical variables to determine sample normality. In case of non-normality, the Mann-Whitney test was used. The significance level of 0.05% was adopted. Results: reduced Handgrip Strength was observed in patients with staging of a more advanced disease when compared to other more localized or clinically better stages(staging I: 27.78 vs. staging IV: 27.20 in the dominant arm (p = 0.349) / staging I: 27.33 vs. staging IV: 24.13 in the non-dominant arm), this result being better reproduced in the non-dominant hand(p=0,090). By analyzing the comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, cardiomyopathy and osteoarthritis) in relation to the dominant and non-dominant hand, no significant differences were found in the Handgrip Strength in the presence or absence of the comorbidities analyzed in both the dominant and non-dominant hands (p=0,189 vs.p=0,437). Conclusions: The study provided relevant insights into the importance of Handgrip Strength as an important general parameter for muscle strength and a health code, especially when analyzed in older adults with cancer, where it significantly affects their physical and neuromuscular function, including muscle atrophy, decreased strength. muscle function and decreased functional performance in daily activities, significantly compromising quality of life and its prognosis.