Pathophysiology of Facial Nerve Stimulation and Its Implications for Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.

OBJECTIVES: A small number of cochlear implant (CI) users experience facial nerve stimulation (FNS), which can manifest as facial twitching. In some patients, this can be resolved by adjusting the electrical stimulation parameters. However, for others, facial stimulation can significantly impair CI outcomes or even prevent its use. The exact mechanisms underlying FNS are unclear and may vary among patients. DESIGN: Transimpedance measurements were used to assess lateral and longitudinal spread of current within 15 cochlea of nucleus CI recipients with FNS (13 unilateral recipients and 1 bilateral recipient). We compared the transimpedance measurements with programming parameters from clinical visits and pre- and postoperative temporal bone computed tomography (CT) scans to identify factors that may contribute to FNS in each CI ear. RESULTS: In nine ears, transimpedance curves showed inflection, which suggests a localized current sink within the cochlea. This indicates a low-impedance pathway through which current exits the cochlea and stimulates the labyrinthine segment of the facial nerve canal. Electrodes near this current sink were disabled or underfit to minimize facial stimulation. In the other seven ears, current flow peaked toward the basal end of the cochlea, suggesting that current exits through the round window or other structures near the basal end of the cochlea, stimulating the tympanic segment of the facial nerve. CONCLUSIONS: Objective transimpedance measurements can be used to elucidate the mechanisms of FNS and to develop strategies for optimizing electrical stimulation parameters and speech coding to minimize or eliminate FNS in a small subset of CI users.

The Development of Remote Speech Recognition Tests for Adult Cochlear Implant Users: The Effect of Presentation Mode of the Noise and a Reliable Method to Deliver Sound in Home Environments.

The number of cochlear implant (CI) users is increasing annually, resulting in an increase in the workload of implant centers in ongoing patient management and evaluation. Remote testing of speech recognition could be time-saving for both the implant centers as well as the patient. This study addresses two methodological challenges we encountered in the development of a remote speech recognition tool for adult CI users. First, we examined whether speech recognition in noise performance differed when the steady-state masking noise was presented throughout the test (i.e. continuous) instead of the standard clinical use for evaluation where the masking noise stops after each stimulus (i.e. discontinuous). A direct coupling between the audio port of a tablet computer to the accessory input of the sound processor with a personal audio cable was used. The setup was calibrated to facilitate presentation of stimuli at a predefined sound level. Finally, differences in frequency response between the audio cable and microphones were investigated.

Restoring speech perception with cochlear implants by spanning defective electrode contacts.

CONCLUSION: Even with six defective contacts, spanning can largely restore speech perception with the HiRes 120 speech processing strategy to the level supported by an intact electrode array. Moreover, the sound quality is not degraded. OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have demonstrated reduced speech perception scores (SPS) with defective contacts in HiRes 120. This study investigated whether replacing defective contacts by spanning, i.e. current steering on non-adjacent contacts, is able to restore speech recognition to the level supported by an intact electrode array. METHODS: Ten adult cochlear implant recipients (HiRes90K, HiFocus1J) with experience with HiRes 120 participated in this study. Three different defective electrode arrays were simulated (six separate defective contacts, three pairs or two triplets). The participants received three take-home strategies and were asked to evaluate the sound quality in five predefined listening conditions. After 3 weeks, SPS were evaluated with monosyllabic words in quiet and in speech-shaped background noise. RESULTS: The participants rated the sound quality equal for all take-home strategies. SPS with background noise were equal for all conditions tested. However, SPS in quiet (85% phonemes correct on average with the full array) decreased significantly with increasing spanning distance, with a 3% decrease for each spanned contact.

Assessing the placement of a cochlear electrode array by multidimensional scaling.

Correct placement of the electrode is crucial for cochlear implantation (CI) surgery. It determines the access to the auditory nerve and subsequent hearing performance. Here, we propose an objective measures tool that can partially verify the electrode position. The intracochlear spread of the electrical fields is measured and analyzed by means of multidimensional scaling resulting in an intuitive visual representation. The user can then detect major issues, such as electrode foldover or ossification. Other implantation issues, such as electrode migration into the scala vestibuli, may not significantly alter the electrical conduction pattern and remain undetected. Still, as the measurement is quick and readily available, it may be a valuable intraoperative verification tool.

Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single- and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation.

OBJECTIVES: To determine how simultaneous dual-electrode stimulation (DES) can be optimized for the individual patient to deliver better sound quality and speech recognition. DES was compared with single-electrode stimulation (SES) with respect to the site of stimulation (X) in the cochlea, the spread of excitation (SOE), and channel interaction. Second, it was investigated whether the number of intermediate pitches created with DES can be predicted from SOE, channel interaction measures, current distribution in the cochlea, or distance of the electrode to the medial wall. DESIGN: Twelve users of the HiRes90K cochlear implant with HiFocus1J electrode were randomly selected to participate in this study. Electrode contacts were selected based on their location in the cochlea as determined by multislice computed tomography, viz. 120 degrees (basal), 240 degrees (middle), and 360 degrees (apical) from the round window. The number of intermediate pitches with simultaneous DES was assessed with a three-alternative forced choice pitch discrimination experiment. The channel interactions between two single-electrode contacts and two DES pairs were determined with a threshold detection experiment (three-alternative forced choice). The eCAP-based SOE method with fixed probe and variable masker was used to determine the location of the neurons responding to a single-electrode contact or dual-electrode contact stimulus. Furthermore, the intracochlear electrical fields were determined with the Electrical Field Imaging tool kit. RESULTS: DES was not different from SES in terms of channel interaction and SOE. The X of DES was 0.54 electrode contacts more basal compared with SES stimulation, which was not different from the predicted shift of 0.5. SOE and current distribution were significantly different for the three locations in the cochlea but showed no correlation with the number of perceivable pitches. A correlation was found between channel interaction and the number of intermediate pitches along the array within a patient, not between patients. CONCLUSION: SES and DES are equivalent with regard to SOE and channel interaction. The excitation site of DES has the predicted displacement compared with the excitation region induced by the neighboring single-electrode contact. Unfortunately, no predictor for the number of intermediate pitches was found.

Influence of widening electrode separation on current steering performance.

OBJECTIVES: Current steering between adjacent electrodes makes it possible to create more spectral channels than the number of electrodes in an electrode array. With current steering on nonadjacent electrodes, called "spanning," it could be possible to bridge a defective electrode contact or potentially reduce the number of electrode contacts for the same level of access to the auditory nerve. This study investigates the effectiveness of spanning in terms of the number of intermediate pitches, loudness effects, and linearity of the current weighting coefficient (α) with respect to the perceived pitch. DESIGN: Twelve postlingually deafened users of the HiRes90K cochlear implant with HiFocus1j electrode were randomly selected to participate in this study. Electrode contacts were selected at two locations in the cochlea, as determined on multislice computed tomography: 180° (basal) and 360° (apical) from the round window. For both cochlear locations, three psychophysical experiments were performed using simultaneous stimulation of electrode contacts. An adaptive staircase-based procedure was used. The number of intermediate pitches was assessed with a three-alternative forced choice (3AFC) pitch discrimination task, and the extent of current adjustment required when varying the current weighting coefficient (α) was determined with loudness balancing (2AFC). Finally, the pitch of a spanned channel was matched with the pitch of an intermediate physical electrode in a 2AFC procedure to assess the place of the spanned channel on the electrode array. RESULTS: Spanning required significantly more current compensation to maintain equal loudness than current steering between adjacent electrode contacts. A significant decrease of discriminable intermediate pitches occurred with spanning in comparison with current steering between adjacent electrode contacts. No significant difference was found between the pitch-matched current steering coefficient and the theoretical coefficient corresponding a priori with the intermediate physical electrode. No significant difference was found between the data from the apical and the basal sections of the electrode array. CONCLUSIONS: Spanning over wider electrode distance is feasible. With increasing electrode spanning distance, more current compensation is needed to maintain equal loudness, and a gradual deterioration in the just noticeable difference for pitch is observed. However, the pitch progression is linear. For a spanned signal with equal proportions of current delivered to both electrodes, pitch is equivalent to that produced by an intermediate physical electrode.

Electrical field imaging as a means to predict the loudness of monopolar and tripolar stimuli in cochlear implant patients.

Tripolar and other electrode configurations that use simultaneous stimulation inside the cochlea have been tested to reduce channel interactions compared to the monopolar stimulation conventionally used in cochlear implant systems. However, these "focused" configurations require increased current levels to achieve sufficient loudness. In this study, we investigate whether highly accurate recordings of the intracochlear electrical field set up by monopolar and tripolar configurations correlate to their effect on loudness. We related the intra-scalar potential distribution to behavioral loudness, by introducing a free parameter (α) which parameterizes the degree to which the potential field peak set up inside the scala tympani is still present at the location of the targeted neural tissue. Loudness balancing was performed on four levels between behavioral threshold and the most comfortable loudness level in a group of 10 experienced Advanced Bionics cochlear implant users. The effect of the amount of focusing on loudness was well explained by α per subject location along the basilar membrane. We found that α was unaffected by presentation level. Moreover, the ratios between the monopolar and tripolar currents, balanced for equal loudness, were approximately the same for all presentation levels. This suggests a linear loudness growth with increasing current level and that the equal peak hypothesis may predict the loudness of threshold as well as at supra-threshold levels. These results suggest that advanced electrical field imaging, complemented with limited psychophysical testing, more specifically at only one presentation level, enables estimation of the loudness growth of complex electrode configurations.

Simultaneous and non-simultaneous dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants: evidence for two neural response modalities.

CONCLUSION: There are two modalities of dual electrode stimulation: a shifting, continuous excitation, which is the desired effect, and a split excitation with considerable variation in loudness. The first one most likely occurs in the basal turn, with adjacent contacts, stimulated simultaneously rather than sequentially. OBJECTIVES: This study examines the effects on place pitch and loudness of simultaneous current steering and sequential stimulation. These can give cochlear implant patients access to more perceptual channels than physical contacts in the electrode array. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For both lateral wall and perimodiolar electrodes, simultaneous current steering as well as sequential stimulation, place pitch and loudness of the percept were predicted with a computational model of the implanted human cochlea. The loudness predictions were validated with psychophysical loudness balancing experiments. RESULTS: Simultaneous stimulation with adjacent electrode contacts in the basal end of the cochlea was generally able to produce a single, gradually shifting intermediate pitch percept. Simultaneous stimulation beyond the first cochlear turn, sequential stimulation and simultaneous stimulation with non-adjacent electrode contacts often produced two regions of excitation. In the case of sequential stimulation the total amount of current to reach most comfortable loudness was raised, both in the model and in the patients.

Current steering and current focusing in cochlear implants: comparison of monopolar, tripolar, and virtual channel electrode configurations.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of Monopole (Mono), Tripole (Tri), and "Virtual channel" (Vchan) electrode configurations on spectral resolution and speech perception in a crossover design. DESIGN: Nine experienced adults who received an Advanced Bionics CII/90K cochlear implant participated in a crossover design using three experimental strategies for 2 wk each. Three strategies were compared: (1) Mono; (2) Tri with current partly returning to adjacent electrodes and partly (25 or 75%) to the extracochlear reference; and (3) a monopolar "Vchan" strategy creating seven intermediate channels between two contacts. Each strategy was a variant of the standard "HiRes" processing strategy using 14 channels and 1105 pulses/sec/ channel, and a pulse duration of 32 microsec/phase. Spectral resolution was measured using broadband noise with a sinusoidally rippled spectral envelope with peaks evenly spaced on a logarithmic frequency scale. Speech perception was measured for monosyllables in quiet and in steady-state and fluctuating noises. Subjective comments on music experience and preferences in everyday use were assessed through questionnaires. RESULTS: Thresholds and most comfortable levels with Mono and Vchan were both significantly lower than levels with Tri. Spectral resolution was significantly higher with Tri than with Mono; spectral resolution with Vchan did not differ significantly from the other configurations. Moderate but significant correlations between word recognition and spectral resolution were found in speech in quiet and fluctuating noise. For speech in quiet, word recognition was best with Mono and worst with Vchan; Tri did not significantly differ from the other configurations. Pooled across the noise conditions, word recognition was best with Tri and worst with Vchan (Mono did not significantly differ from the other configurations). These differences were small and insufficient to result in a clear increase in performance across subjects if the result from the best configuration per subject was compared with the result from Mono. Across all subjects, music appreciation and satisfaction in everyday use did not clearly differ between configurations. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Although spectral resolution was improved with the tripolar configuration, differences in speech performance were too small in this limited group of subjects to justify clinical introduction. (2) Overall spectral resolution remained extremely poor compared with normal hearing; it remains to be seen whether further manipulations of the electrical field will be more effective.

Identification of the impedance model of an implanted cochlear prosthesis from intracochlear potential measurements.

Those suffering from a severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss can obtain substantial benefit from a cochlear implant prosthesis. An electrode array implanted in the inner ear stimulates auditory nerve fibers by direct injection of electrical current. A major limitation of today's technology is the imprecise control of intracochlear current flow, particularly the relatively wide spread of neural excitation. A better understanding of the intracochlear electrical fields is, therefore, required. This paper analyzes the structure of intracochlear potential measurements in relation to both the subject's anatomy and to the properties of the electrode array. An electrically equivalent network is proposed, composed of small lumped circuits for the interface impedance and for the cochlear tissues. The numerical methods required to estimate the model parameters from high-quality electrical potential recordings are developed. Finally, some models are presented for subjects wearing a Clarion CII device with a HiFocus electrode and discussed in terms of model reliability.