Treatment of a chronic esophageal perforation after vertebral surgery with external vacuum therapy - a case report.

Esophageal perforations of any cause may escape early diagnosis and progress to lethal mediastinitis despite aggressive management. The treatment and outcome depends on the extent and chronicity of the injury. A CASE REPORT: We present a case of a late-diagnosed cervical esophageal rupture treated successfully with external vacuum therapy. A blunt trauma patient with cervical vertebral column fractures underwent fixation with a titanium bracket. A procedure-related esophageal perforation created an open fistulous communication to the skin. This was diagnosed with one month's delay. In diagnostic endoscopy the prosthesis was visible through a large esophageal defect. Evidence of mediastinitis was absent. The external wound was explored and a standard vacuum device was inserted. Nine weeks of continuous vacuum therapy achieved complete fistula closure and prevented infection. Mediastinitis was avoided and complete oral feeding was resumed. CONCLUSIONS: Different clinical presentations indicate surgical, endoscopic or conservative treatment. In this report, we provide the ground for discussion for the alternative application of the vacuum technology in a case where otherwise surgery would be the definite treatment.

Pelvic Exenteration Put into Therapeutical and Palliative Perspective: It Is Worth to Try.

Pelvic exenteration (PE) is one of the most drastic operations in surgical oncology, associated with severe morbidity and mortality. The objective of our study was to review our experience of PE in terms of surgical characteristics, complications, and overall survival. All patients who had PE surgery between January 1999 and December 2015 were identified. Patients with verified distant metastatic disease were excluded. Patients with advanced pelvic tumors experiencing incapacitating postradiation severe damages were included. The following parameters were recorded: age, sex, indication for surgery, tumor histology, type of exenteration, urinary tract and colon reconstruction methods, operative time, blood transfusion, intensive care unit admissions, length of hospital stay and readmissions, and characteristics of perioperative morbidity and mortality. A total of 25 patients were submitted to PE by our surgical team. Most of the patients suffered from cervical cancer followed by bowel cancer. There was no perioperative mortality. Early postoperative complications ensued in 56% of the patients. Most complications involved the urinary system. Five years survival was estimated at 38%. Most patients (n = 9, 36%) died due to their primary disease, 5 (20%) died because of complications following operation, and 2 (8%) died because they denied oral feeding, which was associated with depression. Patients with a variety of malignancies can benefit from PE. Meticulous surgical technique, perioperative care, counseling, and nutritional support play an important role.

Central hepatectomy under sequential hemihepatic control.

PURPOSE: Central hepatectomy is a complex, parenchymal-sparing procedure which has been associated with increased blood loss, prolonged operating time, and increased duration of remnant hypoxia. In this report, we compare two different techniques of vascular control, namely sequential hemihepatic vascular control (SHHVC) and selective hepatic vascular exclusion (SHVE) in central hepatectomies. METHODS: From January 2000 to September 2011, 36 consecutive patients underwent a central hepatectomy. SVHE was applied in 16 consecutive patients, and SHHVC was applied in 20 patients. Both groups were comparable regarding their demographics. RESULTS: Total operative time and morbidity rates were similar in both groups. Warm ischemia time was significantly longer in SVHE patients (46 min vs 28 min, p = 0.03). Total blood loss and number of transfusions per patient were also higher in the SVHE group (650 vs. 400 mL, p = 0.04 and 2.2 vs. 1.2 units, p = 0.04, respectively). AST values were significantly higher in SVHE on days 1 and 3 compared to SHHVC patients (650 vs. 400, p = 0.04 and 550 vs. 250, p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Sequential hemihepatic vascular control is a safe technique for central hepatectomies. Decreased intraoperative blood loss and transfusions and attenuated liver injury are the main advantages of this approach.