Impact of Aerobic High-Intensity Interval Training Intervention and Mediterranean Diet Recommendations on Health-Related Quality of Life and Lifestyle Modification in Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients: Results From the INTERFARCT Surveys.

This study aims to determine the impact of 2 (low vs high volume) high-intensity interval training (HIIT) programs with Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) recommendations on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and lifestyle modification, and to examine the relationships between the changes in anxiety and depression with HRQoL and lifestyle variables after myocardial infarction (MI). Participants (n = 80) were randomized to attention control or one of the two supervised HIIT groups (2 d/weeks). Surveys before and after intervention (16 weeks): HRQoL (SF-36), anxiety and depression (HADS), MedDiet adherence (MEDAS), and physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) levels. After intervention, there were improvements (P < .05) in HRQoL, HADS scores, and MedDiet adherence, with higher PA level in both HIIT groups with no between-HIIT group differences. The HADS score decline correlated (P < .05) with both the increase in physical component of SF-36 (r = .42), the overall metabolic expenditure (r = .26), and adherence to the MedDiet (r = .24), and the reduction in the SB (r = .35). HIIT exercise intervention with MedDiet recommendations improved HRQoL, along with reduced anxiety and depression symptoms, and a healthier lifestyle after MI. Better mental health was related to higher values of PA and MedDiet adherence.

Chronotropic Responses to Exercise and Recovery in Myocardial Infarction Patients Taking ß-Blockers Following Aerobic High-Intensity Interval Training: AN INTERFARCT STUDY.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to compare the effects of two different high-intensity interval training (HIIT) programs (low-volume vs high-volume) on chronotropic responses during exercise and recovery, and to contrast the results of the HIIT groups together to only physical activity recommendations in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients taking ß-blockers. METHODS: Resting heart rate (HRrest), peak HR (HRpeak), HR reserve (HRreserve = HRpeak-HRrest), HR recovery (HRR) as the difference between HRpeak and post-exercise HR, and chronotropic incompetence were assessed in 70 patients (58 ± 8 yr) following MI with a cardiopulmonary exercise test to peak exertion before and after a 16-wk exercise intervention period. All participants were randomized to either attention control (AC) (physical activity recommendations) or one of the two supervised HIIT groups (2 d/wk). RESULTS: After the intervention, no significant between-HIIT group differences were observed. The HRpeak increased (P < .05) in low- (Δ= 8 ± 18%) and high-volume HIIT (Δ= 6 ± 9%), with a small decrease in AC (Δ=- 2 ± 12%, P > .05) resulting in large differences (P < .05) between HIIT and AC. The HRreserve increased (P < .05) in high-volume HIIT. The HRR slightly increased (P < .05) in low-volume (5th min, Δ= 19 ± 31%) and high-volume HIIT (2nd min, Δ= 15 ± 29%, and 5th min, Δ= 19 ± 28%). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that both low- and high-volume HIIT elicit similar improvements in chronotropic responses after MI, independent of ß-blocker treatment. Supervised HIIT was more effective than giving physical activity recommendations alone. Low-volume HIIT is presented as a potent and time-efficient exercise strategy that could enhance the sympathovagal balance in this population.

Low-Volume High-Intensity Aerobic Interval Training Is an Efficient Method to Improve Cardiorespiratory Fitness After Myocardial Infarction: PILOT STUDY FROM THE INTERFARCT PROJECT.

PURPOSE: To analyze the changes in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and body composition following 2 different (low-volume vs high-volume) high-intensity aerobic interval training (HIIT) programs with Mediterranean diet (Mediet) recommendations in individuals after myocardial infarction (MI) and compared with an attention control group (AC). METHODS: Body composition and CRF were assessed before and after a 16-wk intervention in 70 participants (58.4 ± 8.5 yr) diagnosed with MI. All participants received Mediet recommendations and were randomly assigned to the AC group (physical activity recommendations, n = 14) or one of the 2 supervised aerobic exercise groups (2 d/wk training): high-volume (40 min) HIIT (n = 28) and low-volume (20 min) HIIT (n = 28). RESULTS: Following the intervention, no significant changes were seen in the AC group and no differences between HIIT groups were found in any of the studied variables. Only HIIT groups showed reductions in waist circumference (low-volume HIIT, Δ = -4%, P < .05; high-volume HIIT, Δ = -2%, P < .001) and improvements in CRF (low-volume HIIT, Δ = 15%, P < .01; high-volume HIIT, Δ = 22%; P < .001) with significant between-group differences (attention control vs HIIT groups). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that a 16-wk intervention (2 d/wk) of different HIIT volumes with Mediet recommendations could equally improve CRF and waist circumference after MI. Low-volume HIIT may be a potent and time-efficient exercise training strategy to improve functional capacity.

Effects of combined high-intensity aerobic interval training program and Mediterranean diet recommendations after myocardial infarction (INTERFARCT Project): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Exercise therapy has long been used for rehabilitation purposes after myocardial infarction (MI) and the benefit of regular physical exercise is also well-established. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has been proposed to be more effective than continuous exercise for improving exercise capacity and health-related adaptations to low-volume (LV) and HIIT are also known. Furthermore, the Mediterranean diet (Mediet) has been widely reported to be a model of healthy eating for its contribution to a favorable health status and a better quality of life, reducing overall mortality. This study will investigate the effects of different HIIT programs (high-volume [HV] vs LV) and Mediet recommendations in clinical condition, cardiorespiratory fitness, biomarkers, ventricular function, and perception of quality of life after MI, and compared to an attention control group that is recommended to Mediet and physical activity without supervision sessions. METHODS/DESIGN: In this randomized controlled trial, cardiorespiratory fitness, anthropometry, central and peripheral cardiovascular variables, biochemical and nutritional condition, and quality of life will be assessed before and after 16 weeks of intervention in 177 participants diagnosed with MI type 1. All participants will be randomly (1:1:1) assigned to the attention control group or two exercise groups (Mediet recommendations plus supervised aerobic exercise two days/week: (1) HV (40 min) HIIT group and (2) LV (20 min) HIIT group. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first clinical trial comparing the effects of two different volumes of HIIT programs with Mediet recommendations for people after MI. The results of this study will provide good evidence for physical rehabilitation in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02876952 . Registered on 24 August 2016.