ABSTRACT
Pharmacogenomic testing (PGx) is a tool used to guide physicians in selecting an optimal medication for clients based on their genetic profile. The objective of this qualitative study is to understand patients' experiences with PGx testing as well as their opinions regarding the clinical adoption of such tests in psychiatry. A focus group was conducted to assess the needs of clients who had experience using a PGx test. Participants were recruited from a large study on PGx testing that offered physicians an opportunity to use PGx reports to guide psychotropic prescriptions. The focus group discussions were recorded, transcribed, and coded using NVivo to identify core themes. A total of 11 people participated in the focus group. Our analysis revealed that many participants were in favour of implementing PGx testing in psychiatric practice, and all expressed important considerations for patient-centred optimization of PGx testing. The main themes captured were: education and awareness among clinicians, cost considerations, PGx results-sharing and accessibility, and prospective benefits. The results of this study suggest that patients are keen to see PGx testing in widespread clinical care, but they report important opportunities to improve knowledge mobilization of PGx testing.
ABSTRACT
Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is the study of genetic influences on an individual's response to medications. Improvements in the quality and quantity of PGx research over the past two decades have enabled the establishment of commercial markets for PGx tests. Nevertheless, PGx testing has yet to be adopted as a routine practice in clinical care. Accordingly, policy regulating the commercialization and reimbursement of PGx testing is in its infancy. Several papers have been published on the topic of challenges, or 'barriers' to clinical adoption of this healthcare innovation. However, many do not include recent evidence from randomized controlled trials, economic utility studies, and qualitative assessments of stakeholder opinions. The present paper revisits the most cited barriers to adoption of PGx testing: evidence for clinical utility, evidence for economic effectiveness, and stakeholder awareness. We consider these barriers in the context of reviewing PGx literature published over the past two decades and emphasize data from commercial PGx testing companies, since they have published the largest datasets. We conclude with a discussion of existing limitations to PGx testing and recommendations for progress.
Subject(s)
Pharmacogenomic Testing , Psychiatry , Attitude , PharmacogeneticsABSTRACT
The interindividual variability in opioid response is an issue that contributes to the ongoing opioid crisis. Current evidence suggests this variability can be attributed to genetic factors. The pharmacogenetics of Opioid Treatment for acute post-operative Pain (OTP) project was a prospective study that aimed to identify genetic markers associated with opioid treatment outcomes. Healthy patients undergoing third-molar extractions were recruited from dental offices located within the Greater Toronto Area. Participants were evaluated using the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form, the Opioid Related Symptom Distress Scale, and the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire. Seventy-two participants had an active opioid prescription. Participants were prescribed one of the following opioids: codeine, morphine, hydromorphone, tramadol, or oxycodone. The majority of participants were female (57%), ranging from 16 to 44 years of age. Pain severity, pain interference, and side effects declined over the seven-day post-operative period. Additionally, 4% of participants displayed medium to high risk of dependence. It is anticipated that OTP will enable the development of a genetic test for opioid use and facilitate the introduction of this test into routine healthcare practice. The OTP study represents a novel approach to opioid treatment and has significant implications for future interventions targeting the ongoing opioid crisis. Employing a pharmacogenomic-guided strategy for prescribing opioids may improve patients' response to this treatment and, in so doing, increase adherence to the target treatment plan. Optimized prescriptions may also provide public healthcare systems with beneficial savings and reduce the risks associated with opioid use.
