The diagnostic value of the pulsatility curve to predict shunt responsiveness in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the pulsatility curve to predict shunt response in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). METHODS: Lumbar cerebrospinal fluid dynamics were derived from an automatic lumbar infusion test (LIT) protocol. All patients were treated with ventriculoperitoneal shunting and re-examined 6 months after shunting. Patient demographics and outcomes were gathered in a prospective, electronic database that spanned from January 2012 to January 2020. A validated iNPH scale was used to assess patients preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. The relationship of the relative pulse pressure coefficient (RPPC), delta amplitude, successful lowering of amplitude, and the pressure-value at a hypothetical amplitude of zero (P0), resistance to outflow (Rout), and outcome, were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: We included 38 patients. The RPPC, delta amplitude, successful lowering of amplitude, and P0 parameters did not predict shunt response. Mean P0 was 0.5 (IQR 0.4-0.9) in improved patients and 0.4 (IQR 0-1.2) in non-improved patients. The delta amplitude was 0.16 kPa (IQR 0.10-0.23) in improved patients and 0.18 kPa (IQR 0.11-0.24) in non-improved patients. Furthermore, we found a technical failure rate of pulsatility curve measurements of 32%. CONCLUSION: Pulsatility curve results were not suitable in predicting shunt response in our cohort. The diagnostic value of LIT in case of normal pressure hydrocephalus should be subject to more rigorous research.

Conquering the Rock-A Retrospective Single-Center Experience of the Transapical Petrosal Transtentorial (Kawase) Approach: Operative Technique and Impact on Cranial Nerve Function.

Since its description in 1985, the transapical petrosal transtentorial or Kawase approach has become a viable option of approaching lesions located in and around the apex of the petrous bone, Meckel's cave, and the anterolateral surface of the brain stem while preserving cranial nerve function. At the Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC, 25 patients were treated using the Kawase approach between 2004 and 2018 for various indications, including petroclival meningiomas, chondrosarcomas, pontine cavernomas, trigeminal schwannomas, and posterior circulation aneurysms. Hearing preservation was achieved in all patients; new abducens nerve and trochlear nerve palsies were present in three and six patients, respectively, of which a total of eight required ophthalmological correction. Seven patients experienced a cerebrospinal fluid fistula postoperatively, but this complication appeared self-limiting in all cases, with one patient experiencing secondary meningitis. After modifying our closure technique, the rate of fistulas dropped to zero. The observed direct postoperative mortality was 4% (one patient), although not related to the approach itself. In conclusion, the Kawase approach is a highly complex, but essential middle fossa approach, extremely robust, and able to serve a wide array of pathologies together with its extensions. It is very accurate for performing hearing preservation surgery, but not without caveats and inherent risk of complications.

The membrane of Liliequist-a safe haven in the middle of the brain. A narrative review.

BACKGROUND: The membrane of Liliequist is one of the best-known inner arachnoid membranes and an essential intraoperative landmark when approaching the interpeduncular cistern but also an obstacle in the growth of lesions in the sellar and parasellar regions. The limits and exact anatomical description of this membrane are still unclear, as it blends into surrounding structures and joins other arachnoid membranes. METHODS: We performed a systematic narrative review by searching for articles describing the anatomy and the relationship of the membrane of Liliequist with surrounding structures in MEDLINE, Embase and Google Scholar. Included articles were cross-checked for missing references. Both preclinical and clinical studies were included, if they detailed the clinical relevance of the membrane of Liliequist. RESULTS: Despite a common definition of the localisation of the membrane of Liliequist, important differences exist with respect to its anatomical borders. The membrane appears to be continuous with the pontomesencephalic and pontomedullary membranes, leading to an arachnoid membrane complex around the brainstem. Furthermore, Liliequist's membrane most likely continues along the oculomotor nerve sheath in the cavernous sinus, blending into and giving rise to the carotid-oculomotor membrane. CONCLUSION: Further standardized anatomical studies are needed to clarify the relation of the membrane of Liliequist with surrounding structures but also the anatomy of the arachnoid membranes in general. Our study supports this endeavour by identifying the knowledge hiatuses and reviewing the current knowledge base.

[Serious delayed intracranial complications after mild traumatic brain injury in oral anticoagulant use]. / Ernstige late intracraniële afwijkingen na licht schedel-hersenletsel bij oraal anticoagulantiagebruik.

BACKGROUND: Patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) who use anticoagulants prior to injury have an increased risk of intracranial complications. Sometimes these complications are delayed, even if the initial CT scan of the head is normal. CASE DESCRIPTION: An 84-year-old woman who was using acenocoumarol presented elsewhere with mild TBI. She had no focal neurological deficit. The initial CT scan revealed no abnormalities and the patient was discharged home. That evening she had diffuse headache. The next day she was found with a reduced level of consciousness and was brought to our hospital. Her INR was 9.0 and a new CT scan showed an acute, left-sided subdural haematoma with a large mass effect. CONCLUSION: Serious delayed intracranial complications in patients with mild TBI who use anticoagulants are rare. In these patients INR measurement and a CT scan of the head are always indicated. Admission for observation may be considered. On discharge it is necessary to give clear instructions about warning symptoms.