Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Radiologe ; 53(6): 503-12, 2013 Jun.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23695033

ABSTRACT

The catheter-based interventional therapy (endovascular aortic repair EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) has gained an established place in the spectrum of therapeutic options. The procedure is characterized by low peri-interventional morbidity and mortality. Multislice computed tomography (CT) has a dominant role in defining the correct indications and in selecting an appropriate stent graft prior to the intervention. The rate of acute conversions could be reduced from 2.9 % to 0 % in our own elective patient population since 2010. In our vascular centre the proportion of patients treated by EVAR was 39.5 % (102 out of 258). The procedure is used routinely in patients who have an increased risk for general anesthesia or open surgery due to concomitant diseases. It is also used in patients with a reduced local operability due to prior surgery, abdominal diseases or radiation therapy. Arterial closure devices allow a completely percutaneous approach in a certain group of patients. However, after EVAR a life-long surveillance is mandatory because delayed therapy failure has been described. In younger patients who do not have a higher risk open surgery is still an option. The paper describes techniques, results und complications of EVAR.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Angiography/methods , Humans , Preoperative Care/methods
2.
Rofo ; 168(2): 175-9, 1998 Feb.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9519051

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate risk and feasibility of outpatient PTA in patients with iliac-femoral artery disease we conducted a prospective study. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Out of a total group of 263 patients we selected 100 p. (38%) according to pre-defined criteria. The following criteria and others excluded the patients from outpatient procedures: insulin-dependent diabetes, poorly controlled hypertension, cardiac failure grade III and IV, chronic haemodialysis, severe overweight, elective stent implants. RESULTS: 90 of 100 patients for whom we had planned an outpatient procedure, could leave the day-clinic after a maximum of 10 hours of observation. For 10 patients we changed the procedure to an inpatient stay because of prolonged heparinisation, sudden elevation of arterial pressure, secondary stent implants and the need for local fibrinolysis therapy. Complications showed a trend to be lower in the outpatient group than in the inpatient group (2.0% vs 4.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Performing iliac-femoral PTA on an outpatient basis demands strict selection criteria and a close tie-up to a day clinic. In 2/3 of our patients we preferred to perform PTA on an inpatient basis. A higher incidence of risks was seen in the inpatient group.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Angioplasty, Balloon , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/therapy , Radiography, Interventional , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ambulatory Care/methods , Angioplasty, Balloon/adverse effects , Angioplasty, Balloon/instrumentation , Angioplasty, Balloon/methods , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/complications , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Peripheral Vascular Diseases/complications , Peripheral Vascular Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Peripheral Vascular Diseases/therapy , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL