Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 24(1): 478, 2024 Sep 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39251900

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There has been no consensus on what power of radiofrequency energy can be used to produce the best surgical results in patients with atrial fibrillation. In addition, patients undergoing local anesthesia and fentanyl analgesia may experience pain when radiofrequency ablation is performed. This study investigated the effect of different power radiofrequency ablations in treatment and postoperative pain in patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed with 60 patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation between January and June 2023. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the power of the radiofrequency ablation catheter used, with 30 patients in the conventional power group (35 W) and 30 patients in the high-power group (50 W). The cardiac electrophysiological indexes and postoperative pain of the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: Most of the procedural key parameters between the 2 groups had no significant differences. However, the total application time during radiofrequency ablation and pulmonary vein isolation time in the high-power group were significantly shorter than those in the conventional power group (p < 0.001). Patients in the high-power group reported significantly less pain than those in the conventional power group in the immediate postoperative period and the late postoperative period (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: High-power radiofrequency ablation showed a shorter treatment time, and could reduce postoperative pain compared to conventional power ablation.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Pain, Postoperative , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Male , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Female , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Aged , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Time Factors , Pain Measurement , Heart Rate
2.
Talanta ; 74(4): 599-604, 2008 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18371681

ABSTRACT

A new approach for the extraction of nine kinds of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) from vegetable samples coupling single-drop microextraction with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was presented. Experimental parameters, such as organic solvent, exposure time, agitation and organic drop volume were controlled and optimized. An effective extraction was achieved by suspending a 1.00microL mixed drop of p-xylene and acetone (8:2, v/v) to the tip of a microsyringe immersed in a 2mL donor aqueous solution and stirred at 400rpm. The approach was applied to the determination of OCPs in vegetable samples with a linearity range of 0.05-20ng mL(-1) for alpha-, beta-, gamma-, delta-hexachlorobenzene (BHC) and dicofol, 0.5-20ng mL(-1) for dieldrin and 2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dichloroethane (DDD) or 0.5-50ng mL(-1) for 2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dichloroethylene (DDE) and 2-(2-chlorophenyl)-2 (4-chlorophenyl)-1,1,1-trichloroethane (p,p'-DDT). Correspondingly, the determination limit at an S/N of 3 ranged from 0.05ng mL(-1) for alpha-, beta-, gamma-, delta-BHC to 0.2ng mL(-1) for dicofol, dieldrin or p,p'-DDT. The relative recoveries were from 63.3 to 100%, with repeatability ranging from 8.74 to 18.9% (relative standard deviation, R.S.D.). The single-drop microextraction was proved to be a fast and simple approach for the pre-concentration of organochlorine pesticides in vegetable samples.


Subject(s)
Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated/analysis , Pesticides/analysis , Vegetables/chemistry , Solvents
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL