Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila) ; 14(10): 919-926, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34607876

ABSTRACT

The World Health Organization global call to eliminate cervical cancer encourages countries to consider introducing or improving cervical cancer screening programs. Brazil's Unified Health System (SUS) is among the world's largest public health systems offering free cytology testing, follow-up colposcopy, and treatment. Yet, health care networks across the country have unequal infrastructure, human resources, equipment, and supplies resulting in uneven program performance and large disparities in cervical cancer incidence and mortality. An effective screening program needs multiple strategies feasible for each community's reality, facilitating coverage and follow-up adherence. Prioritizing those at highest risk with tests that better stratify risk will limit inefficiencies, improving program impact across different resource settings. Highly sensitive human papillomavirus (HPV)-DNA testing performs better than cytology and, with self-collection closer to homes and workplaces, improves access, even in remote regions. Molecular triage strategies like HPV genotyping can identify from the same self-collected sample, those at highest risk requiring follow-up. If proven acceptable, affordable, cost-effective, and efficient in the Brazilian context, these strategies would increase coverage while removing the need for speculum exams for routine screening and reducing follow-up visits. SUS could implement a nationwide organized program that accommodates heterogenous settings across Brazil, informing a variety of screening programs worldwide.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Cytodiagnosis/methods , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Brazil/epidemiology , DNA, Viral/analysis , DNA, Viral/genetics , Female , Humans , Papillomavirus Infections/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology
2.
Cancer Res ; 80(18): 3803-3809, 2020 09 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32631904

ABSTRACT

Human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 displays substantial sequence variation; four HPV16 lineages (A, B, C, and D) have been described as well as multiple sublineages. To identify molecular events associated with HPV16 carcinogenesis, we evaluated viral variation, the integration of HPV16, and somatic mutation in 96 cervical cancer samples from Guatemala. A total of 65% (62/96) of the samples had integrated HPV16 sequences and integration was associated with an earlier age of diagnosis and premenopausal disease. HPV16 integration sites were broadly distributed in the genome, but in one tumor, HPV16 integrated into the promoter of the IFN regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) gene, which plays an important role in the regulation of the IFN response to viral infection. The HPV16 D2 and D3 sublineages were found in 23% and 30% of the tumors, respectively, and were significantly associated with adenocarcinoma. D2-positive tumors had a higher rate of integration, earlier age of diagnosis, and a lower rate of somatic mutation, whereas D3-positive tumors were less likely to integrate, had later age of diagnosis, and exhibited a higher rate of somatic mutation. In conclusion, Guatemalan cervical tumors have a high frequency of very high-risk HPV16 D2 and D3 sublineages harboring distinct histology, which may help guide future therapeutic strategies to target the tumor and reduce recurrence. SIGNIFICANCE: This study details the biological and molecular properties of the most pathogenic forms of HPV16, the cause of the majority of cervical cancers.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Human papillomavirus 16/genetics , Interferon Regulatory Factors/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/genetics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/genetics , Virus Integration/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/virology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/genetics , DNA, Viral/analysis , DNA, Viral/genetics , Female , Genome, Viral , Guatemala , Human papillomavirus 16/classification , Humans , Middle Aged , Mutation , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Precancerous Conditions/complications , Precancerous Conditions/genetics , Precancerous Conditions/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology
3.
J Infect Dis ; 220(10): 1609-1619, 2019 10 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31536132

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Human papillomaviruses (HPV) cause over 500 000 cervical cancers each year, most of which occur in low-resource settings. Human papillomavirus genotyping is important to study natural history and vaccine efficacy. We evaluated TypeSeq, a novel, next-generation, sequencing-based assay that detects 51 HPV genotypes, in 2 large international epidemiologic studies. METHODS: TypeSeq was evaluated in 2804 cervical specimens from the Study to Understand Cervical Cancer Endpoints and Early Determinants (SUCCEED) and in 2357 specimens from the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial (CVT). Positive agreement and risks of precancer for individual genotypes were calculated for TypeSeq in comparison to Linear Array (SUCCEED). In CVT, positive agreement and vaccine efficacy were calculated for TypeSeq and SPF10-LiPA. RESULTS: We observed high overall and positive agreement for most genotypes between TypeSeq and Linear Array in SUCCEED and SPF10-LiPA in CVT. There was no significant difference in risk of precancer between TypeSeq and Linear Array in SUCCEED or in estimates of vaccine efficacy between TypeSeq and SPF10-LiPA in CVT. CONCLUSIONS: The agreement of TypeSeq with Linear Array and SPF10-LiPA, 2 well established standards for HPV genotyping, demonstrates its high accuracy. TypeSeq provides high-throughput, affordable HPV genotyping for world-wide studies of cervical precancer risk and of HPV vaccine efficacy.


Subject(s)
Genotype , Genotyping Techniques/methods , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Papillomaviridae/classification , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Costa Rica , Costs and Cost Analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Genotyping Techniques/economics , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/economics , Humans , Middle Aged , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Papillomavirus Vaccines/immunology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Young Adult
4.
Gynecol Oncol ; 138(1): 94-100, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26001326

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate HPV16 CpG methylation and methyl-haplotypes and their association with cervix precancer and cancer utilizing massively parallel single molecule next-generation sequencing (NGS). METHODS: A nested case-control study of HPV16 positive women was performed in a prospective cohort from Guanacaste, Costa Rica designed to study the natural history of HPV and cervical neoplasia. Controls encompassed 31 women with transient infections; there were 44 cases, including 31 women with CIN3 and 13 with cervical cancer. DNA samples from exfoliated cervical cells were treated with bisulfite and four regions (E6, E2, L2 and L1) were amplified with barcoded primers and tested by NGS. CpG methylation was quantified using a bioinformatics pipeline. RESULTS: Median methylation levels were significantly different between the CIN3+ cases versus controls in the E2, L2, and L1 regions. Methyl-haplotypes, specifically in 5 CpG sites included in the targeted L2 region, with the pattern "--+-+" had the highest Area Under the Curve value (AUC=88.40%) observed for CIN3 vs. CONTROLS: The most significant CpG site, L2 4277, determined by bisulfite NGS had an AUC=78.62%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that NGS of bisulfite treated HPV DNA is a useful and efficient technique to survey methylation patterns in HPV16. This procedure provides quantitative information on both individual CpG sites and methyl-haplotypes that identify women with elevated present or subsequent risk for HPV16 CIN3 and cancer.


Subject(s)
CpG Islands , DNA Methylation , DNA, Viral/genetics , Human papillomavirus 16/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Costa Rica , DNA, Neoplasm/genetics , DNA, Neoplasm/metabolism , DNA, Viral/metabolism , Female , Haplotypes , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , Sulfites/chemistry , Young Adult
5.
J Low Genit Tract Dis ; 19(2): 91-6, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25574659

ABSTRACT

In 2011, the American Cancer Society, the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and the American Society for Clinical Pathology updated screening guidelines for the early detection of cervical cancer and its precursors. Recommended screening strategies were cytology or cotesting (cytology in combination with high-risk HPV (hrHPV) testing). These guidelines also addressed the use of hrHPV testing alone as a primary screening approach, which was not recommended for use at that time. There is now a growing body of evidence for screening with primary hrHPV testing, including a prospective US-based registration study. Thirteen experts including representatives from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Cancer Society, American Society of Cytopathology, College of American Pathologists, and the American Society for Clinical Pathology, convened to provide interim guidance for primary hrHPV screening. This guidance panel was specifically triggered by an application to the FDA for a currently marketed HPV test to be labeled for the additional indication of primary cervical cancer screening. Guidance was based on literature review and review of data from the FDA registration study, supplemented by expert opinion. This document aims to provide information for health care providers who are interested in primary hrHPV testing and an overview of the potential advantages and disadvantages of this strategy for screening as well as to highlight areas in need of further investigation.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Papillomaviridae/classification , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Early Diagnosis , Female , Humans , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
6.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 104(7): 556-65, 2012 Apr 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22448030

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested an association between human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) genome methylation and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) (ie, cervical precancer) and cancer, but the results have been inconsistent. METHODS: We designed a case-control study within a large prospective cohort of women who underwent multiple screenings for cervical cancer in Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Diagnostic specimens were collected at the time of CIN3 diagnosis (n = 30 case subjects) and persistent HPV16 infection (persistence; n = 35 case subjects), prediagnostic specimens at the first HPV16-positive screening visit (n = 20 CIN3 case subjects; n = 35 persistence case subjects), and control specimens from women with infection clearance within 2 years (n = 34 control subjects). DNA extracted from specimens (cervical cells) was analyzed for methylation levels at 67 CpG sites throughout the HPV16 genome using pyrosequencing. Benjamini-Hochberg method was used to account for multiple testing. Associations between methylation levels and risk of CIN3 or persistence were assessed using logistic regression models to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Increased methylation in diagnostic vs control specimens at nine CpG sites, three in each L1, L2, and E2/E4 genomic regions, was associated with an increased risk of CIN3 (third tertile [high] vs first and second tertiles combined [low], OR = 3.29 [95% CI = 1.16 to 9.34] to 11.12 [95% CI = 2.29 to 76.80]) and persistence. High methylation at three of these CpG sites was associated with a much higher risk when combined compared with low methylation at these sites (OR = 52, 95% CI = 4.0 to 670). In prediagnostic vs control specimens, increased methylation at a CpG site (nucleotide position 4261) in L2 was associated with an increased risk of CIN3. CONCLUSION: In this HPV16-infected cohort, increased methylation of CpG sites within the HPV16 genome before diagnosis and at the time of diagnosis was associated with cervical precancer.


Subject(s)
CpG Islands/genetics , DNA Methylation , Genome, Viral/genetics , Human papillomavirus 16/genetics , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Costa Rica/epidemiology , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology
7.
Int J Cancer ; 130(8): 1879-87, 2012 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21607948

ABSTRACT

Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is more sensitive than cytology; some cervical cancer prevention programs will switch from cytology to carcinogenic HPV test-based screening. The objective of our study is to evaluate the clinical implications of a switch to HPV test-based screening on performance and workload of colposcopy. Women in the population-based, 7-year Guanacaste cohort study were screened at enrollment using cytology. We also took another specimen for HPV DNA testing and collected magnified cervical photographic images (cervigrams). A final case diagnosis (≥cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] grade 3, CIN2,

Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Vaginal Smears/methods , Adult , Age Factors , Alphapapillomavirus/genetics , Alphapapillomavirus/isolation & purification , Cohort Studies , Colposcopy , Costa Rica , Cytodiagnosis/methods , DNA, Viral/genetics , Female , Humans , Mass Screening/methods , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Young Adult , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL