[Are the immunization services offered to students at university hospitals in Germany sufficient?]. / Ist das Impfangebot für Studierende an medizinischen Fakultäten in Deutschland ausreichend?

OBJECTIVE: Healthcare professionals have an increased risk of acquiring infectious diseases and can also serve as a source of infection to their patients. The German Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) recommends that healthcare professionals should be sufficiently vaccinated against vaccine-preventable infections. Also medical students belong to this target group. For this reason their vaccination status should be checked and -if necessary- completed before working with patients. METHODS: Anonymous questionnaire-based survey among occupational physicians at university hospitals in Germany provided information about immunization services and the acceptance of vaccination. RESULTS: In total 34 of 37 university hospitals (response 91.9%) participated in this survey. Except one university hospital, all offered occupation-related vaccinations to their medical students. While hepatitis B vaccination was offered in all 33 university hospitals with immunization services, more than 44% did not offer at all or only to restricted groups (e. g. students with an internship in Pediatrics) vaccinations against measles-mumps-rubella (MMR). In 50% of the university hospitals this also applied to the pertussis vaccinations. Only 33% of university hospitals reported to collect data for a precise vaccination coverage assessment. A seasonal influenza vaccination program for medical staff was established at 30 (88%) university hospitals, but of these only 56% included medical students. CONCLUSION: The forceful implementation of evidence-based vaccination recommendations supports the reduction of nosocomial infections and outbreaks. In view of the WHO goal of eliminating measles and a documented increased risk of acquiring measles, it is alarming that university hospitals do not offer MMR-vaccines to their medical students at all or only to restricted groups. There is also a need to improve health services in respect to offering influenza and pertussis vaccinations to medical students and collecting data to better assess vaccination coverage.

Characteristics and practices of National Immunisation Technical Advisory Groups in Europe and potential for collaboration, April 2014.

In many countries, national vaccination recommendations are developed by independent expert committees, so-called national immunisation technical advisory groups (NITAG). Since the evaluation of vaccines is complex and resource-demanding, collaboration between NITAGs that evaluate the same vaccines could be beneficial. We conducted a cross-sectional survey among 30 European countries in February 2014, to explore basic characteristics and current practices of European NITAGs and identify potential modes and barriers for collaboration. Of 28 responding countries, 26 reported to have a NITAG or an equivalent expert group. Of these, 20 apply a systematic approach in the vaccine decision-making process, e.g. by considering criteria such as country-specific disease epidemiology, vaccine efficacy/effectiveness/safety, health economics, programme implementation/logistics or country-specific values/preferences. However, applied frameworks and extent of evidence review differ widely. The use of systematic reviews is required for 15 of 26 NITAGs, while results from transmission modelling and health economic evaluations are routinely considered by 18 and 20 of 26 NITAGs, respectively. Twenty-five countries saw potential for NITAG-collaboration, but most often named structural concerns, e.g. different NITAG structures or countries' healthcare systems. Our survey gathered information that can serve as an inventory on European NITAGs, allowing further exploration of options and structures for NITAG collaboration.

[Influenza, tetanus, and pertussis vaccination coverage among adults in Germany]. / Impfquoten unter Erwachsenen in Deutschland für die Impfungen gegen saisonale Influenza, Tetanus und Pertussis.

In order to be adequately protected throughout life and to protect specific risk groups from particular diseases, regular booster or specific indicator vaccinations are also recommended during adulthood. Adults should be vaccinated against seasonal influenza (annually, e.g., persons with underlying chronic diseases and persons aged ≥ 60 years), tetanus (every 10 years), and pertussis (as a one-time vaccination with the next due tetanus vaccine and, e.g., when people have close contact to newborn babies). The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the current status of vaccination uptake among adults living in Germany, focusing on these three vaccines. In line with nationwide continuous health monitoring, the Robert Koch Institute conducted the representative study "German Health Update" (GEDA 2012) between 2012 and 2013. The survey is conducted regularly and adults are asked questions relating to their vaccination status through computer-assisted telephone interviews. Overall, 19,294 interviews were held. In 2010/2011 and 2011/2012, seasonal influenza uptake among persons aged ≥ 60 years was 54.3 and 52.6 % and among individuals with underlying chronic diseases 46.2 and 42.9 %. 7.6 and 75.6 % of participants reported up-to-date pertussis and tetanus vaccination, respectively. 22 % of people living with a baby in one household were vaccinated against pertussis. In general, vaccination rates against seasonal influenza, pertussis, and tetanus among adults are still low, but differ depending on the specific vaccination. The required aim of the European Commission to reach influenza vaccination coverage by the 2014/2015 winter season of 75 % of higher age groups has not yet been reached. The low pertussis vaccination coverage among persons in close household contact to infants poses a big challenge to the implementation of the cocooning strategy to protect the very vulnerable newborns. To emphasize the importance of a complete vaccination schedule and to increase vaccination uptake, tailored interventions should be provided for both physicians and adults.

[Implementation of the influenza vaccination recommendation in nursing homes in Germany : results of a survey as part of the national influenza immunization campaign]. / Umsetzung der Influenzaimpfempfehlung in Alten- und Pflegeheimen : Ergebnisse einer Erhebung im Rahmen der nationalen Influenza-Impfaufklärungskampagne.

Residents and staff of nursing homes are important target groups for influenza vaccination in Germany. The aim of this study was to gain the first insights into whether nursing homes organize activities with respect to vaccination against influenza and whether there is a demand for further information. In the context of the national influenza immunization campaign-which is jointly carried out by the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) and the Federal Centre for Health Education (BZgA) on an annual basis-influenza information kits were sent to the management of 10,700 nursing homes in September 2013. Along with the information material, the institutions also received a questionnaire to which they were able to respond via mail, fax, or online. Data from 988 homes were included in the analysis. The majority of institutions informed both residents (88.9 %) and nursing staff (81.2 %) about influenza vaccination. However, only 64.7 % of nursing homes carried out specific immunization activities for their residents and only half (49.3 %) offered a flu shot to their staff. When asked why the institutions do not provide influenza-specific information and vaccination to their staff, the majority had the opinion that this is the responsibility of each individual's general practitioner. Overall, only 4.9 % of nursing homes assessed influenza vaccination coverage among their staff annually. A third of all surveyed institutions (33.6 %) expressed a demand for additional influenza vaccine-related information. In conclusion, improved health education is needed to raise awareness about the importance of influenza vaccination among residents and employees of nursing homes in Germany so as to prevent influenza-associated morbidity and mortality in this risk group.

[Seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccination: coverage and attitude among private physicians in Germany]. / Saisonale und pandemische Influenzaimpfung: Impfquoten und Einstellung niedergelassener Ärzte in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: General practitioners serve as important multipliers for seasonal influenza vaccination in risk groups such as elderly or chronically ill persons, for whom vaccination is recommended in Germany by the Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO). Moreover, physicians are a target group for influenza vaccination themselves. METHODS: Data from 1 590 telephone interviews were analysed. The study population comprised private physicians from 4 different disciplines (general and internal medicine, gynaecology, paediatrics). We assessed seasonal and pandemic vaccination coverage, attitudes and informational needs related to vaccination in general, and opinions about the pandemic situation 2009. RESULTS: Of the interviewed physicians, 61% stated that they have been vaccinated against seasonal influenza regularly. Main reasons for not/only occasionally having received a flu shot were: the belief that seasonal influenza vaccination is not necessary for them (78%) or having forgotten about the vaccination (28%). The interviewed physicians expressed a great demand for active information on STIKO recommendations and certain aspects of the seasonal influenza vaccination. There was a significant association between physicians' own influenza vaccination status and the provision of vaccination information materials, utilisation of a data management system for the vaccination of patients, and active vaccination reminders in the physicians' office. In 2009/10, almost 60% had received a pandemic influenza A(H1N1) vaccination. A major barrier to vaccine uptake was the mistrust in the safety of H1N1 vaccines (stated by 54% of non-vaccinees). Information for the public and physicians by the German public health authorities during the pandemic was rather critically appraised by the respondents. CONCLUSION: Compared to other subgroups of health-care workers, among private physicians seasonal and pandemic vaccine uptake was rather high. The physicians' need for more information on vaccination topics can be met by intensified publishing and communication activities of STIKO and by using existing physician-information channels.

Measles outbreak spreading from the community to an anthroposophic school, Berlin, 2011.

Between April and July 2011 there was an outbreak of measles virus, genotype D4, in Berlin, Germany. We identified 73 case-patients from the community and among students of an anthroposophic school, who participated in a 4-day school trip, as well as their family and friends. Overall, 27% were aged ≥ 20 years, 57% were female and 15% were hospitalized. Of 39 community case-patients, 38% were aged ≥ 20 years, 67% were female and 63% required hospitalization. Unvaccinated students returning from the school trip were excluded from school, limiting transmission. Within the group of 55 school-trip participants, including 20 measles case-patients, a measles vaccine effectiveness of 97.1% (95% confidence interval 83.4-100) for two doses was estimated using exact Poisson regression. Our findings support school exclusions and the recommendation of one-dose catch-up vaccination for everyone born after 1970 with incomplete or unknown vaccination status, in addition to the two-dose routine childhood immunization recommendation.

National Advisory Groups and their role in immunization policy-making processes in European countries.

During the twenty-first century, the development of national immunization programmes (NIP) has matured into robust processes where evidence-based methodologies and frameworks have increasingly been adopted. A key role in the decision-making and recommending processes is played by National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs). In a survey performed among European Union member states, Norway and Iceland, in February 2013, 85% of the 27 responding countries reported having established a NITAG, and of these, 45% have formal frameworks in place for the systematic development of vaccination recommendations. Independent of whether a formal framework is in place, common key factors are addressed by all NITAGs and also in countries without NITAGs. The four main factors addressed by all were: disease burden in the country, severity of the disease, vaccine effectiveness or efficacy, and vaccine safety at population level. Mathematical modelling and cost-effectiveness analyses are still not common tools. Differences in the relative weighting of these key factors, differences in data or assumptions on country-specific key factors, and differences in existing vaccination systems and financing, are likely to be reasons for differences in NITAG recommendations, and eventually NIPs, across Europe. Even if harmonization of NIPs is presently not a reasonable aim, systematic reviews and the development of mathematical/economic models could be performed at supranational level, thus sharing resources and easing the present work-load of NITAGs. Nevertheless, it has been argued that harmonization would ease central purchase of vaccines, thus reducing the price and increasing access to new vaccines.

Mumps epidemiology in Germany 2007-11.

In Germany, mumps has been notifiable until 2013 only in the five Eastern federal states (EFS) of former East Germany. Due to different immunisation policies until 1990 and varying vaccination coverages thereafter, mumps incidences cannot be extrapolated to the 11 Western federal states (WFS). We studied mumps-related International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) code diagnoses claimed through statutory health insurances between 2007 and 2011 to estimate countrywide mumps incidences in the outpatient sector, and compared them with case numbers from ambulatory notification data. Overall, 32,330 outpatient mumps cases were claimed. Annual incidence ranged between 9.3/100,000 and 11.8/100,000 and showed a significant decreasing trend. Compared with EFS, mumps incidence in WFS was higher and indicated a shift towards older age groups. Notified outpatient case numbers in EFS were 13-fold lower and from voluntary surveillance during an outbreak in the WFS Bavaria 8-fold lower than from insurance data (n=316 versus n=4,217 and n=238 versus 1,995, respectively). Of all notified cases with available information, 75.4% (EFS) and 57.6% (Bavaria) were unvaccinated; 6.8% (EFS) and 19.3% (Bavaria) required hospitalisation. In Germany, mumps is still endemic despite decades of vaccination, with considerable underreporting in the established notification systems.

[Effectiveness, population-level effects, and heath economics of measles and rubella vaccination]. / Effektivität, Populationseffekte und Gesundheitsökonomie der Impfungen gegen Masern und Röteln.

Vaccination against measles and rubella has been included in national immunization programs worldwide for several decades. In this article, we present the evidence related to the effectiveness of measles and rubella vaccination based on published systematic reviews, and we describe the epidemiological and health economic effects of vaccination at a population level. Several observational studies demonstrate the high effectiveness (> 90 %) of both measles and rubella vaccination. The global measles mortality reduction and the dramatic decrease in rubella and measles incidences after introduction of routine immunization contribute to the very high quality of evidence. The countries of the Americas have proved that it is feasible to eliminate measles and rubella by strengthening infant immunization through routine vaccination services and by conducting supplemental immunization activities in other childhood age groups so as to close immunity gaps. An economic evaluation of measles and rubella vaccination specifically for the healthcare system in Germany does not exist. However, we conducted a systematic review and identified 11 health-economic studies from other industrialized countries and one for a hypothetical industrialized country. Results indicate that vaccination against measles and rubella had either a cost-effective or even a cost-saving potential, which could be assumed with some limitations also for the German setting. In conclusion, there is compelling evidence that the available vaccines are very effective and that measles and rubella elimination is feasible if adequate vaccination strategies are implemented. In Germany, catch-up vaccination programs are urgently needed for children, adolescents, and young adults specifically in the western federal states.

[Factors influencing the uptake of vaccines by adolescents with migration background. A qualitative study of adolescents, mothers, and physicians]. / Einflussfaktoren auf die Inanspruchnahme von Impfungen durch Jugendliche mit Migrationshintergrund. Eine qualitative Untersuchung mit Jugendlichen, Müttern und Ärzten.

One of the special challenges in immunization policy is communication and access to adolescents. To identify barriers and enablers for the immunization of this specific target group, we conducted 11 focus group discussions with adolescents with and without migration background, mothers with Turkish and Russian migration background, and physicians in private practice in March 2011. The results showed that for adolescents, the utilization of immunization was guided by informational and organizational processes in families and by the consulting physician. The low awareness of immunization-related issues that was observed among adolescents is especially challenging, because routine visits to the doctor often stop with the transition from pediatric to adult health care. Immigration-related factors may additionally affect the utilization of immunization services. Besides improving access to information and lowering the barriers to immunization for adolescents in general, culturally sensitive interventions may be a promising approach for improving communication between mothers and the immunizing physician and thereby improving vaccination coverage in the adolescent target group.

A cluster of invasive meningococcal disease in young men who have sex with men in Berlin, October 2012 to May 2013.

Between October 2012 and May 2013, five cases of invasive meningococcal disease in young men who have sex with men (MSM) living in Berlin were notified to local health authorities in Germany. Three of the five cases died. All were caused by serogroup C variants with the finetype P1.5-1,10-8:F3-6. Awareness was increased through the use of community networks; an extension of the existing vaccination recommendation to all MSM is currently being considered.

[Pertussis vaccination coverage among adults in Germany]. / Pertussis-impfquoten bei erwachsenen in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: Pertussis vaccination for risk-groups (e. g. healthcare workers, employees of communal facilities, or persons with close contact to infants) has been recommended in Germany since 2001. In 2009, single-dose acellular pertussis (ap) vaccination was recommended for all adults at the next tetanus-diphtheria (Td) booster. Study aims were to assess 1) pertussis vaccination coverage in adults, and 2) use of tetanus-containing combination vaccines in hospitals. METHODS: For 1) we analysed data from two population-based telephone surveys conducted among adults in Germany in 2009/2010 (GEDA09: n = 21,262; GEDA10: n = 22,050). Factors associated with vaccination were identified by logistic regression analyses. For 2) a questionnaire survey of 133 hospital pharmacies serving 454 German hospitals was undertaken for the year 2007. RESULTS: Overall, 5.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.5-6.3%) of GEDA10 participants reported up-to-date pertussis vaccination (ap-vaccination in past 10 years). In risk-groups, vaccination coverage was 10.7% (95%-CI 9.8-11.7%). Residence in former East-Germany and younger age were independently associated with an adequate vaccination status. Contrary to prevailing recommendations, ~75% of tetanus vaccines were administered as monovalent rather than Td- (or Tdap-)combination vaccines in hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: In light of high pertussis-incidence and low vaccination coverage in German adults, improvement of pertussis vaccine uptake is vital, e. g. through awareness campaigns targeting both physicians in private practice and hospitals.

Background paper to the recommendation for routine rotavirus vaccination of infants in Germany.

Two rotavirus (RV) vaccines were introduced to the European market in 2006. To support the decision-making process of the German Standing Committee on Vaccination ("Ständige Impfkommission", STIKO) regarding adoption of routine RV vaccination into the national vaccination schedule in Germany relevant scientific background was reviewed. According to STIKO's Standard Operating Procedures for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations, a set of key questions was addressed and systematic reviews were performed with a focus on the efficacy, effectiveness, impact and safety of RV vaccines. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was applied to assess the quality of available evidence. Data from 5 randomized controlled trials demonstrated a high efficacy of RV vaccines in preventing severe RV-associated gastroenteritis (91%) and hospitalization (92%) in settings comparable to Germany. Post-marketing observational studies confirmed these findings. In several countries, impact studies suggest that age groups not eligible for vaccination might also benefit from herd effects and demonstrated a decrease in the number of nosocomial RV infections after RV vaccine introduction. The vaccines were considered safe, except for a slightly increased risk of intussusception shortly after the first dose, corresponding to 1-2 additional cases per 100,000 infants vaccinated (relative risk =1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-2.14). RV case-fatality is extremely low in Germany. However, RV incidence among children aged <5 years is high (reported 8-14 cases per 1000 children annually), and of these almost half require hositalization. In view of the available evidence and expected benefits, STIKO recommends routine rotavirus vaccination of children under the age of 6 months with the main goal of preventing RV-associated hospitalizations in Germany, especially among infants and young children.

Estimating the long-term effects of HPV vaccination in Germany.

In Germany, vaccination against the most oncogenic HPV types 16/18 is recommended by the Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) for 12-17 year old girls since March 2007. We developed a dynamic mathematical model for the natural history and transmission of HPV infections to estimate the impact of vaccination on incidence and mortality of cervical cancer and its pre-stages, and on anogenital warts. We focused on an extensive model calibration to epidemiologic data for all stages of the natural history model as well as on a detailed implementation of cervical cancer screening modalities in Germany. Our model predicts first a substantial reduction of cervical cancer incidence and mortality over the next 30 years, which is mainly attributable to an increase in screening participation in the 1990s and not to HPV vaccination, followed by a further reduction attributable to vaccination. Over the next 100 years, HPV vaccination will prevent approximately 37% of cervical cancer cases even if vaccination coverage is only 50% (as currently observed in Germany). Consideration of cross-protection results in a further reduction of approximately 7% of all cervical cancer cases for the bivalent and about 5% for the quadrivalent vaccine in our model. Vaccination of boys was only reasonable if moderate to high vaccination coverage in girls was not achieved. Strategies should be implemented in Germany to increase HPV vaccination coverage among girls thereby making better use of the demonstrated benefits of the vaccine.

[Concepts, effectiveness, and perspectives of pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccines]. / Konzepte, Wirksamkeit und Perspektiven pandemischer und nichtpandemischer Influenzaimpfungen.

For the first time in history, the conditions to influence the course of an influenza pandemic through vaccination were set during the influenza A H1N1 pandemic in 2009. The specific requirements for pandemic vaccines are to be highly immunogenic in immunologically naive individuals and to be producible quickly in large quantities. In contrast, seasonal influenza vaccines induce a booster response and a broadening of preexisting immunity. In this article the concepts of seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccines and data on their immunogenicity and clinical efficacy are reviewed and discussed. In the upcoming years, seasonal influenza vaccination will continue to be based on inactivated split-virion and subunit vaccines or the live attenuated cold-adapted vaccine. The pandemic vaccines used in 2009 proved to be more immunogenic than expected from prepandemic vaccine trials, while the adverse events observed with AS03-adjuvanted vaccines call their future use into question. However, neither seasonal nor pandemic influenza vaccines can be regarded to be an ideal solution, because they have to be frequently adapted to new virus strains and they lack effectiveness in particular risk groups. They can be regarded as interim approaches to highly immunogenic vaccines that hopefully become available in the future. The underlying principles of future vaccines are also presented in this article.

Risk perception and information-seeking behaviour during the 2009/10 influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 pandemic in Germany.

During the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 pandemic in 2009/10, a total of 13 consecutive surveys were carried out of the general population in Germany to monitor knowledge, attitude and behaviour concerning the disease and vaccination against pandemic influenza in real time. In total, 13,010 persons aged 14 years or older were interviewed by computer-assisted telephone techniques between November 2009 and April 2010. During the peak of the pandemic, only 18% of participants stated that they perceived the risk of pandemic influenza as high; this proportion fell to 10% in January 2010. There was a significant difference in information-seeking behaviour among population subgroups concerning the disease and vaccine uptake. However, in all subgroups, conventional media sources such as television, radio and newspapers were more frequently used than the Internet. While the majority of participants (78%) felt sufficiently informed to make a decision for or against vaccination, overall vaccination coverage remained low. Among those who decided against vaccination, fear of adverse events and perception that the available vaccines were not sufficiently evaluated were the most frequently stated reasons. Such mistrust in the vaccines and the perceived low risk of the disease were the main barriers that contributed to the low vaccination coverage in Germany during the pandemic.