The use of actigraphy to objectively define motion and function before and after shoulder arthroplasty.

Introduction: Actigraphy is a quantitative means of measuring activity data that has proven viable in post-surgery recovery analysis for arthroplasties in lower extremities, but scant literature has been published on the utilization actigraphy to evaluate shoulder motion and function before and after shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this prospective cohort study is to identify if actigraphy can serve as a valid means for objective evaluation of shoulder function and motion before and after shoulder arthroplasty. Secondarily, the data collected by the actigraphy can be analyzed with standard patient-reported outcomes to report correlations between the subjective and objective methods used in this study. Materials and methods: Sixty-four subjects wore an actigraphy device for one day at pre-op, six, twelve and twenty-four weeks. In addition, subjects completed three patient-reported outcome surveys at each time-point. Student t-tests were used to compare percent activity preoperatively with 24-weeks and to compare PROs preoperatively with 24-week results; categorical variables were compared with one-way ANOVAs. Results: All Patient reported outcome scores significantly improved following arthroplasty (p-value<0.001). The percent of physical activity was highly correlated with vector magnitude (p-value<0.001), but neither percent activity or the vector magnitude were correlated with any of the PROs: UCLA Pain p-value = 0.656, SANE p-value = 0.328, UCLA Function p-value = 0.532. Conclusions: Actigraphy results from this study mirror findings in previous literature utilizing the technology in similar manners and demonstrate its potential for motion and function analysis before and after total shoulder arthroplasties. Despite both being suitable methods independently for the evaluation of shoulder function, there was no significant correlation between standard actigraphy measurements and PROs at 24-weeks. Future research to determine clinical utility and an overall broader scope for actigraphy monitoring could benefit from improved technology, such as increased battery life for prolonged durations of data collection during observation periods.

Efficacy of a Novel Intraoperative Surgical Irrigant in Preventing Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Primary Knee, Hip, and Shoulder Arthroplasties: A Retrospective Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Primary joint arthroplasty (JA) is one of the most common operating room (OR) procedures, with knee and hip arthroplasties being listed in the top five most frequent OR procedures and while not as common, shoulder arthroplasties are increasing at greater rates than knee and hip arthroplasties. Periprosthetic joint/shoulder infections (PJI/PSI) are a devastating complication of primary JAs with infection prevention deemed as the single most important strategy in combating them. The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of XPERIENCE® Advanced Surgical Irrigation (XP) in preventing PJI following primary joint arthroplasty. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of primary knee, hip and shoulder arthroplasties that were performed by multiple orthopedic surgeons at a single hospital setting. XPERIENCE was used as an intraoperative surgical irrigant either solely, or with other intraoperative practices for prevention of infection. Incidence of acute PJI occurring within 90 days of index surgery were retrospectively collated. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-three (423) primary joint replacement surgeries treated intraoperatively with XP, were evaluated for acute PJI incidence. Retrospective evaluations determined that 95% of the subjects had at least one risk factor predisposing them to PJI. There were zero PJIs diagnosed in the knee and hip arthroplasty cohorts and zero PSIs diagnosed in the shoulder arthroplasty cohorts. CONCLUSION: The absence of PJI/PSI diagnoses in the JA cohorts treated intraoperatively with XP indicates that it could be an efficacious antimicrobial irrigant in preventing PJI, and warrants being evaluated in prospective, randomized controlled clinical trials as the sole intraoperative irrigant, as well as in combination with the other intraoperative infection prevention regimens evaluated in this retrospective study.

Suspensory fixation for bone transfer procedures in shoulder instability is superior to screws in an angled construct: a biomechanical analysis.

Background: The Latarjet procedure is a common bony augmentation procedure for anterior shoulder instability. Historically, screw fixation is used to secure the coracoid graft to the anterior glenoid surface; however, malpositioning of the graft leads to oblique screw insertion that contributes to complications. Suture buttons (SBs) are a more recent fixation technique that have not been studied alongside standard screw fixation in the context of biomechanical models of angulated fixation. This study aims to compare the biomechanical strength of single and double, screw and SB fixation at various levels of angulation. Methods: Testing was performed using polyurethane models from Sawbones. The graft piece was secured with screw fixation (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA) or suspensory button (ABS Tightrope, Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA). Single or double constructs of screws and SBs were affixed at 0°, 15°, and 30° angles to the face of the glenoid component. An aluminum testing jig held the samples securely while a materials testing system applied loads. Five constructs were used for each condition and assessed load to failure testing. Results: For single fixation constructs, suspensory buttons were 60% stronger than screws at 0° (P < .001), and 52% stronger at 15° (P = .004); however, at 30°, both were comparable (P = .180). Interestingly, single suspensory button at 15° was equivalent to a single screw at 0° (P = .310). For double fixation, suspensory buttons (DT) were 32% stronger than screws at 0° (P < .001) and 35% stronger than screws at 15° (P < .001). Both double fixation methods were comparable at 30° (P = .061). Suspensory buttons at 15° and 30° were equivalent to double screws at 0 (P = .280) and 15° (P = .772), respectively. Conclusion: These measurements indicate that the suspensory button has a significantly higher load to failure capacity over the screw fixation technique, perpendicularly and with up to 15° of angulation. These analyses also indicate that the suspensory button fixation offers superior strength even when positioned more obliquely than the screw fixation. Therefore, suspensory button fixation may confer more strength while offering greater margin for error when positioning the graft.

Impact of Sling Use on Functional Mobility in a Geriatric Population.

OBJECTIVES: Sling immobilization is commonly used following rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this study was to determine the detrimental impact of sling usage on mobility and balance in an older adult population through validated gait and balance testing. The authors hypothesize that sling use will negatively affect balance and stability. METHODS: This institutional review board-approved and registered randomized prospective clinical trial enrolled patients from 2019 to 2021. Following informed consent, patients were randomized into two groups: a sling worn (group 1) and no sling worn (group 2). Participants were assessed via the Edmonton Frail Scale as well as Tinetti gait and balance scoring. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included in the study, 23 (46%) men and 27 (54%) women, with a mean age of 72.2 years. The balance score median was 16.00 for participants not wearing a sling and 15.00 for participants wearing a sling. The gait score median was 12.00 for participants not wearing a sling and 11.50 for participants wearing a sling. The balance and gait scores were significantly greater when patients were not wearing a shoulder sling with P values of 0.006 and 0.011, respectively. The overall combined gait and balance score was significantly greater, with median values of 27.00 for participants not wearing a sling and 26.00 for participants wearing a sling (P = 0.001). Patients reported little to no anxiety about falling while wearing the sling, with a score of 0.16. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative sling immobilization negatively affects balance and gait in the geriatric population, potentially increasing the risk of postoperative falls in an already at-risk population.