Handling of Incidents in the Clinical Application of Ionizing Radiation in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology - a Multi-center Study. / Umgang mit unbeabsichtigten Expositionen bei medizinischen Anwendungen ionisierender Strahlung in der Röntgendiagnostik und interventionellen Radiologie ­ eine Multi-Center-Studie.

PURPOSE: According to the German legislation and regulation of radiation protection, i. e. Strahlenschutzgesetz und Strahlenschutzverordnung (StrlSchG and StrlSchV), which came into force on 31st December 2018, significant unintended or accidential exposures have to be reported to the competent authority. Furthermore, facilities have to implement measures to prevent and to recognize unintended or accidental exposures as well as to reduce their consequences. We developed a process to register incidents and tested its application in the framework of a multi-center-study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a period of 12 months, 16 institutions for x-ray diagnostics and interventions, documented their incidents. Documentation of the incidents was conducted using the software CIRSrad, which was developed, released for testing purposes and implemented in the frame of the study. Reporting criteria of the project were selected to be more sensitive compared to the legal criteria specifying "significant incidents". Reported incidents were evaluated after four, eight, and twelve months. Finally, all participating institutions were interviewed on their experience with the software and the correlated effort. RESULTS: The rate of reported incidents varied between institutions as well as between modalities. The majority of incidents were reported in conventional x-ray imaging, followed by computed tomography and therapeutic interventions. Incidents were attributed to several different causes, amongst others to the technical setup and patient positioning (19 %) and patient movement or insufficient cooperativeness of the patient (18 %). Most incidents were below corresponding thresholds stated in StrlSchV. The workload for documenting the incidents was rated as appropriate. CONCLUSION: It is possible to monitor and handle incidents complient with legal requirements with an acceptable effort. The number of reported incidents can be increased by frequent trainings on the detection and the processing workflow, on the software and legal regulation as well as by a transparent error handling within the institution. KEY POINTS: · The software CIRSrad was developed to enable the present study and as prototype platform for a future radiological incident management system.. · 586 exceedances of thresholds were recorded by 16 facilities in a period of one year.. · Frequent trainings of all users increase the number of reported cases.. CITATION FORMAT: · Müller BS, Singer J, Stamm G et al. Handling of Incidents in the Clinical Application of Ionizing Radiation in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology - a Multi-center Study. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 400 - 408.

Effectiveness of Radiation Protection Caps for Lowering dose to the Brain and the Eye Lenses.

PURPOSE: This work was designed to study the effectiveness of radiation protection caps in lowering the dose to the brain and the eye lens during fluoroscopically guided interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two types of radiation protection caps were examined with regards to their capacity to lower the radiation dose. One cap is equipped with lateral flaps, the other one is not. These caps were fitted to the head of an anthropomorphic Alderson-Rando (A.-R.) phantom. The phantom was positioned aside an angiographic table simulating the position of the first operator during a peripheral arterial intervention. One of the brain slices and both eyes of the A.-R. phantom were equipped with thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLDs). RESULTS: The analysis of the data showed that the cap without lateral flaps reduced the dose to the brain by 11,5-27,5 percent depending on the position within the brain. The cap with lateral protection flaps achieved a shielding effect between 44,7 and 78,9 percent. When evaluating the dose to the eye, we did see an increase of dose reduction from 63,3 to 66,5 percent in the left eye and from 45,8 to 46,8 percent in the right eye for the cap without lateral protection. When wearing the cap with lateral protection we observed an increase of dose reduction from 63,4 to 67,2 percent in the left eye and from 45,8 to 50,0 percent in the right eye. CONCLUSION: Radiation protection caps can be an effective tool to reduce the dose to the brain and the eyes.

How to Measure/Calculate Radiation Dose in Patients?

Patients in fluoroscopically guided interventions (FGI) may be exposed to substantial radiation dose levels (SRDL). The most commonly reported adverse reactions are skin injuries with erythema or necrosis. It is therefore important for the interventional radiologist to know deterministic effects with their threshold doses. If possible all relevant modality parameters should be displayed on the interventionalists screen. Dosimetric parameters should be displayed in digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) units and stored as DICOM Radiation Dose Structured Report (RDSR). The peak skin dose (PSD) is the most relevant risk parameter for skin injuries. Dose management systems (DMS) help optimising radiation exposure of patients. However, their calculation of skin dose maps is only available after a FGI. Therefore, dose maps and PSD should preferably be calculated and displayed in real time by the modality.

Prenatal radiation exposure in diagnostic and interventional radiology. / Pränatale Strahlenexposition in der diagnostischen und interventionellen Radiologie.

BACKGROUND: The exposure of a pregnant woman to X-rays is an event that can cause uncertainty for all concerned. This review provides guidance on how to assess such a situation and how to determine the dose to the unborn child. In general, the use of X-rays in pregnant women in radiology should be avoided. If possible, alternatives should be used, or examinations postponed to a time after the pregnancy. This review gives a summary of the procedure for determining the radiation exposure of a pregnant woman. METHOD: Based on the previous report of 2002 and the literature on prenatal radiation exposure published thereafter, the DGMP/DRG report on the procedure for the assessment of prenatal radiation exposure was adapted to the current state of science and technology. RESULTS: Typically, only relatively low radiation exposures of less than 20 mSv occur for the unborn child in X-ray diagnostics in the vast majority of cases. At these dose level the additional risk of damage to the embryo or fetus caused by the radiation is low and therefore only a rough conservative estimate using tabulated values are made. Only in a few types of examination (CT and interventional radiology) higher doses values might occur in the uterus. Instead of dose estimates (step 1 in the two-step model) in these cases the calculation of dose (step 2) are required and further action by the physician may be necessary. CONCLUSIONS: During the assessment, it is useful to initially use simple conservative estimation procedures to quickly determine whether a case falls into this large group less than 20 mSv, where there is a very low risk to the unborn child. If this is the case, the pregnant woman should be informed immediately by the doctor who performed the examination/treatment. This avoids a psychological burden on the patient. The DGMP/DRG report suggests a relatively simple, clearly structured procedure with advantages for all parties involved (physician, medical physics experts, MTRA and patient). KEY POINTS: · The DGMP/DRG report on prenatal radiation exposure describes the procedure for calculating radiation exposures and the associated risks for the unborn child.. · Using the two-step model, only a simple assessment based on the first step is necessary for most prenatal radiation exposures.. · With the given tables it is possible to estimate individual risks for the unborn child taking into account the radiation exposure.. · Only in the rare case that the first estimate results in a uterine dose larger 20 mSv a more accurate calculation is necessary.. CITATION FORMAT: · Fiebich M, Block A, Borowski M et al. Prenatal radiation exposure in diagnostic and interventional radiology. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 778 - 786.

The new radiation protection framework since 2019 - Implementation in Germany and comparison of some aspects in seven European countries. / Das neue Strahlenschutzrecht ab 2019 ­ Umsetzung in Deutschland und Vergleich einzelner Aspekte in 7 europäischen Ländern.

PURPOSE: The implementation of EU Directive 2013/59 EURATOM (EU-BSS) of 2014 led to a reorganization of radiation protection legislation in Germany in the form of a new radiation protection law Strahlenschutzgesetz (StrlSchG) of 2017 and a new radiation protection ordinance Strahlenschutzverordnung (StrlSchV) of 2018. For application of ionizing radiation in medicine these changes affect radiology, nuclear medicine and radiotherapy. A comparison between the old and the new legal system analyses changes that are relevant for diagnostic and interventional radiology. For the important new regulation of unintended exposures, a comparison is made with the implementation of Art. 63 EU-BSS in 7 European countries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The provisions of the Röntgenverordnung (RöV) and the old Strahlenschutzverordnung (StrlSchV alt), which were valid until 2018, are compared with the new legislation of StrlSchG and StrlSchV for changes in radiation protection for patients, the population and occupational radiation protection of staff members. The occupational dose limit of the eye lens was reduced. The reduction by a factor of 7.5 results in new requirements for radiation protection equipment. New requirements in teleradiology are compared with the previous regulation, as well as the necessary involvement of medical physics experts (MPE) in high dose procedures, such as CT and fluoroscopic interventions. The regulation for unintended exposures of the German StrlSchV are analyzed in terms of their reporting criteria. RESULTS: The principles of medical radiation protection in Germany have not changed as a result of the new radiation protection legislation from 2019 onwards. However, there are a number of changes and new requirements that must be considered and implemented. Important points are e. g. new regulations on teleradiology, early detection of diseases in asymptomatic individuals and reporting of unintended exposure of patients. As all new regulations are no longer found in only one single regulation, both knowledge of the StrlSchG and the StrlSchV are necessary. KEY POINTS: · The EU Directive 2013/59 EURATOM (EU-BSS) was transposed into the new German radiation protection law 2018. · The basic regulations of the RöV and old StrlSchV remain unchanged. · Newly added regulations must be known and implemented in practice. · Many regulations of the EU-BSS are so vaguely formulated that they allow a wide scope for national implementation. CITATION FORMAT: · Loose R, Wucherer M, Walz M et al. The new radiation protection framework since 2019 - Implementation in Germany and comparison of some aspects in seven European countries. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2020; 192: 1036 - 1045.

Work and Training Conditions of German Residents in Radiology - Results from a Nationwide Survey Conducted by the Young Radiology Forum in the German Roentgen Society. / Arbeits- und Weiterbildungsbedingungen in der Facharztweiterbildung Radiologie ­ Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Weiterbildungsumfrage durch das Forum Junge Radiologie in der Deutschen Röntgengesellschaft.

PURPOSE: Good training is the basis for high job satisfaction and high-quality patient care in radiology. The aim of this survey was to record the current state of working conditions for residents in radiology training in Germany and to focus on the aspects of training and psychosocial workload. The description of the actual state should help to identify possible problem areas and to develop improvement approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At the beginning of 2018, we sent an electronic questionnaire to the German Roentgen Society (DRG), the German Association of Chairmen in Academic Radiology (KLR), the Chief Physician Forum of the DRG (CAFRAD) and the Forum of Registered Radiologists (FUNRAD) with the request to forward it to radiology residents. With 63 questions, the questionnaire covered seven essential areas of medical working and training conditions. In order to ensure interdisciplinary comparability, most questions were identical to previous surveys among residents of other disciplines. RESULTS: 643 residents started the survey. 501 (78 %) questionnaires were fully processed and included in the final analysis. 65 % of respondents were satisfied with their current job situation. At the same time, shortcomings, especially with regard to the reconciliation of family and work as well as scientific and clinical work, became clear. Only 36 % of participants with children were satisfied with the compatibility of family and work at their workplace. Only 31 % of the researchers were satisfied with their research conditions. In addition, residents experienced a high psychosocial workload. CONCLUSION: Job satisfaction is high among radiology residents in direct comparison to other disciplines. However, based on this survey, adjustments to working conditions and training in radiology seem necessary to maintain the health of the physicians concerned, to encourage motivation for scientific work and to enhance development opportunities, especially for women, through a better compatibility of work and family life. The present survey identifies strategies and leadership tools that can help to achieve this. KEY POINTS: Residents in radiology training ... · have a relatively high job satisfaction.. · experience a high psychosocial workload.. · evaluate the compatibility of family and work as in need of improvement.. · are interested in research, but evaluate research conditions as insufficient. CITATION FORMAT: · Oechtering TH, Panagiotopoulos N, Völker M et al. Work and Training Conditions of German Residents in Radiology - Results from a Nationwide Survey Conducted by the Young Radiology Forum in the German Roentgen Society. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2020; 192: 458 - 469.

Transhepatic forceps biopsy after PTCD for histological assessment of bile duct stenoses or occlusions.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the experience of 11 years of wire-guided forceps biopsy via PTCD in patients with obstructive jaundice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective approach, 56 biopsies in 51 patients were analyzed (22 female, 29 male). Data was collected from 2006 to 2016. Mean age was 71 years (range: 34 - 86 years). Data was extracted from dig. Patients' records (KIS, PACS, RIS) to be analyzed in Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: All 56 procedures were technically successful. Stenosis in anastomoses were benign due to scarring in 7 patients and in 9 due to papillitis or others. In 4 patients, results in anastomosis were malignant. In 19 patients without anastomosis, CCC was the diagnosis, thereof 10 klatskin, 9 stenosis in other locations, followed by gastric, pancreatic, and colon carcinoma in 5, 3, and 2 patients. Three patients had a CUP (multimetering in case of more than 1 related category). Overall results were 35 mal. and 16 benign, 76.8 % of all proc. had a correct histopathologic result, and 23.2 % were false negative. Sensitivity was 65.8 %, which results in negative predictive value of 58.1 %. There was no false positive and so specificity was 100 %, as was the positive predictive value. False negative results (no malignancy but clinically and imaging suspect) were corrected by rerunning the procedure, by CT-guided biopsy or by 1 PET-CT. In 1 case the surg. sample brought the result. Minor complications occurred in 8 patients: shivering in 1 case, distinct but hemodynamically not relevant hemobilia in 5 cases, 2 portovenal bleedings. All bleedings were short-term and self-limiting. CONCLUSION: Despite good feasibility, low peri- and post-interv. risk and high validity the forceps biopsy via PTCD is not widely used. For experienced interventionalists, it is an effective method for obtaining histology.

[What are the implications of the new radiation protection ordinance?] / Was bringt die neue Strahlenschutzverordnung?

The new regulatory basis in Germany for medical radiation protection ("Strahlenschutzverordnung" and "Strahlenschutzgesetz") went into effect on 31 December 2018 and has brought many changes. A system for record keeping and analysis of unintended exposures must be established and the occurrence of significant events must be reported to the competent authority. In the future, medical physics experts have to be consulted for equipment with high doses. Further programs for the early detection of diseases may be considered and approved by the federal office for radiation protection. Changes have been defined for teleradiology, procedure descriptions, tasks of the medical institutions for quality assurance and dose limits. Because of extended requirements for documentation and evaluations, the functionality of a dose management system will practically be necessary in bigger radiology departments or offices. Uncertainties in interpretation still exist for several parts of the regulations. The existing complementing guidelines shall be used for the time being.

Whole-Body CT in Multiple Trauma Patients: Clinically Adapted Usage of Differently Weighted CT Protocols. / Polytrauma-Ganzkörper-CT: Klinisch adaptierter Einsatz unterschiedlich gewichteter CT-Untersuchungsprotokolle.

PURPOSE: Whole-body CT (wbCT) has been established as an internationally accepted diagnostic modality in multiple trauma. Until 2011, a uniform CT scanning protocol was used for all multiple trauma patients (pat.) at our hospital (OLD protocol = OP). In 2011, 2 new differently weighted protocols were introduced: TIME protocol (TP) for hemodynamically unstable pat. and DOSE protocol (DP) for pat. with stable vital parameters. The aim of this study was to compare the original "One-fits-all-concept" with the new, clinically oriented approach to wbCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated 3 distinct wbCT protocols, looking at automatic exposure control variation (AEC; OP/TP) and arm positioning close to the body/overhead (TP/DP). The analysis included waist circumference (WC, cm), injury severity score (ISS), examination time (ET, min), image noise (IN), and effective dose (E, mSv). Normality of distribution was assessed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Data are given as median and range. Test of significance with Kruskal-Wallis test or Mann-Whitney-U-test. Level of significance: 0.05. RESULTS: 308 pat. were included in the study (77 % m; age: 46 a, 18 - 90 a; WC: 93 cm, 66 - 145 cm). ISS was 14 (OP; n = 104; 0 - 75), 18 (TP; n = 102; 0 - 75) and 9 (DP; n = 102; 0 - 50). ET was 3.9 min (OP; 3.3 - 5.6 min), 4.1 min (TP; 2.8 - 7.2 min) and 7.7 min (DP; 6 - 10 min). IN showed no significant differences when comparing OP/TP but was significantly reduced in DP. For a wbCT (vertex to ischium), E could be reduced from 49.7 mSv to 35.4 mSv by optimizing AEC (OP/TP). Through the overhead repositioning of the arms in DP, a further reduction to 28.2 mSv was achieved. CONCLUSION: AEC and arm repositioning have a crucial influence on image quality and dose. The presented clinical approach is superior to the original concept. KEY POINTS: · The use of 2 differently weighted wbCT protocols allows a more flexible approach to the patient's clinical presentation.. · The clinically adapted concept presented in this study allows trauma care centers to reduce the collective dose.. · Whole-body CT is leading to exposure to relevant radiation doses - further multicenter research is required.. CITATION FORMAT: · Reske SU, Braunschweig R, Reske AW et al. Whole-Body CT in Multiple Trauma Patients: Clinically Adapted Usage of Differently Weighted CT Protocols. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2018; 190: 1141 - 1151.

Risk of Radiation-Induced Cataracts: Investigation of Radiation Exposure to the Eye Lens During Endourologic Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Due to new radiobiologic data, the International Commission on Radiological Protection recommends a dose limit of 20 mSv per year to the eye lens. Therefore, the IAEA International Basic Safety Standard and the European council directive 2013/59/EURATOM require a reduction of the annual dose limit from 150 to 20 mSv. Urologists are exposed to an elevated radiation exposure in the head region during fluoroscopic interventions, due to the commonly used overtable X-ray tubes and the rarely used radiation protection for the head. Aim of the study was to analyze real radiation exposure to the eye lens of the urologist during various interventions, during which the patient is in the lithotomy position. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The partial body doses (forehead and apron collar) of the urologists and surgical staff were measured over a period of 2 months. 95 interventions were performed on Uroskop Omnia Max workplaces (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). Interventions were class-divided in less (stage I) and more complex (stage II) interventions. Two dosimeter-types were applied, well-calibrated electronic personal dosimeter Mk2 and self-calibrated thermoluminescent dosimeter-100H (both Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The radiation exposure parameters were documented using the dose area product (DAP) and the fluoroscopy time. RESULTS: The correlation between DAP and the apron dose of the urologist was in average 0.07 µSv per 1 µGym2. The more experienced urologists yielded a mean DAP of 166 µGym2 for stage I and 415 µGym2 for stage II procedures. The interventionist was exposed with 10 µSv in mean outside the lead apron collar. The mean dose value of the eye lenses per intervention was ascertained to 20 µSv (mean DAP: 233 µGym2). CONCLUSIONS: The study setup allows a differentiated and time-resolved measurement of the radiation exposure, which was found heterogeneous depending on intervention and surgeon. In this setting, ∼1000 interventions can be performed until the annual eye lens dose limit is achieved.

Stent Implantation for Superior Vena Cava Syndrome of Malignant Cause.

Purpose The purpose of this paper is the retrospective analysis of endovascular therapy for the treatment of superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) of malignant cause. This study focuses on the effectiveness of the therapy regarding the duration of remission, symptom control and practicability. Materials and Methods From January 2003 to November 2012, therapeutic implantation of one or more stents was performed in 141 patients suffering from SVCS. The medical history was retrospectively researched using digitalized patient files. If those were incomplete, secondary research was conducted using the cancer registry of the General Hospital Nuremberg, the cancer registry of the tumor center at Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU) or information given by physicians in private practice. This data was collected using Microsoft Office Excel® and statistically analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 22®. Results 168 stents were implanted in 141 patients (median age: 64.6 years; range: 36 - 84), 86 being male and 55 being female. In 121 patients, SVCS was caused by lung cancer (85.8 %), in 9 patients by mediastinal metastasis of an extrathoracic carcinoma (6.4 %), in 3 patients by mesothelioma of the pleura (2.1 %) and in 1 patient by Hodgkin's disease (0.7 %). There was no histological diagnosis in 7 cases (4.9 %). The primary intervention was successful in 138 patients (97.9 %). Immediate thrombosis in the stent occurred in the remaining 3 cases. Recurrence of SVCS was observed in 22 patients (15.6 %), including 5 early and 17 late occlusions. Stent dislocation or breakage was not observed. As expected, the survival after implantation was poor. The median survival was 101 days, and the median occlusion-free survival was 80 days. Conclusion The symptomatic therapy of SVCS with endovascular stents is effective and safe. Despite effective symptom control and a low rate of recurrence, the patients' prognosis is poor. Key Points: · Patients with SVCS of malignant cause have a poor prognosis.. · Lung cancer is the most common cause for SVCS.. · Endovascular therapy is safe and effective.. Citation Format · Büstgens FA, Loose R, Ficker JH et al. Stent Implantation for Superior Vena Cava Syndrome of Malignant Cause. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2017; 189: 423 - 430.

Identification of less-irradiating tube angulations in invasive cardiology.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify tube angulations in invasive cardiology, which promise minimal radiation exposure to patients and operators. BACKGROUND: Radiation exposure in invasive cardiology is high. METHODS: We mapped the fluoroscopic dose-area product per second (DAP/s), applied to an anthropomorphic Alderson-Rando phantom and, in absence of radiation protection devices, the mean personal dose in the operator's position in 10 degrees steps from the 100 degrees right anterior oblique (RAO) to the 100 degrees left anterior oblique (LAO) projection, as well as for all geometrically feasible craniocaudal tube angulations. RESULTS: For our specific setting conditions RAO 20 degrees /0 degrees tube angulation generated the lowest DAP/s and operator's personal dose. The mean patient DAP/s and operator personal dose for all postero-anterior (PA) projections, cranialized and caudalized together, rose significantly: 3.7 and 10.6 times the PA 0 degrees baseline values toward LAO 100 degrees and 3.7 and 2.4 times toward RAO 100 degrees , respectively. Patient and operator values for all PA projections, angulated to the right and left, increased approximately 2.5 times toward 30 degrees craniocaudal angulations. Caudal PA 0 degrees /30 degrees - angulation instead of caudal LAO 60 degrees /20 degrees - angulation for the left coronary main stem and cranial PA 0 degrees /30 degrees + view in place of cranial LAO 60 degrees /20 degrees + view for the left anterior descending coronary artery bifurcation enable 2.6-fold dose reductions to the patient and eight- and five-fold dose reductions to the operator, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The PA views and RAO views >or=40 degrees , heretofore unconventional in clinical routine, should be favored over steep LAO projections >or=40 degrees whenever possible. Tube angulations that are radiation intensive to the patient exponentially increase the operator's radiation risk.