Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition on prognosis and peritoneal lavage cytology in resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) on the prognosis and incidence of positive peritoneal lavage cytology (PLC) during laparotomy or staging laparoscopy in patients with resectable (R) or borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from patients diagnosed with body and tail PDAC with/without EUS-TA at our hospital from January 2006 to December 2021. RESULTS: To examine the effect of EUS-TA on prognosis, 153 patients (122 in the EUS-TA group, 31 in the non-EUS-TA group) were analyzed. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the EUS-TA and non-EUS-TA groups after PDAC resection (P = 0.777). In univariate and multivariate analysis, preoperative EUS-TA was not identified as an independent factor related to overall survival after pancreatectomy [hazard ratio 0.96, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.54-1.70, P = 0.897]. Next, to examine the direct influence of EUS-TA on the results of PLC, 114 patients (83 in the EUS-TA group and 31 in the non-EUS-TA group) were analyzed. Preoperative EUS-TA was not statistically associated with positive PLC (odds ratio 0.73, 95 % CI 0.25-2.20, P = 0.583). After propensity score matching, overall survival and positive PLC were the same in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-TA had no negative impact on postoperative survival and PLC-positive rates in R/BR PDAC.

Reconsideration of the clinical impact of neoadjuvant therapy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A dual-institution collaborative clinical study.

PURPOSE: We investigated true indication of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in resectable pancreatic cancer and the optimal surgical timing in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: A total of 687 patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were enrolled. Survival analysis was performed by intention-to-treat analysis and propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted. RESULTS: In resectable disease, the NAT group showed better overall survival (OS) compared with the upfront group. Multivariate analysis identified CA19-9 level (≥100 U/mL) and lymph node metastasis to be prognostic factors, and a tumor size of 25 mm was the optimal cut-off value to predict lymph node metastasis. There was no significant survival difference between patients with a tumor size ≤25 mm and CA19-9 < 100 U/mL and those in the NAT group. In borderline resectable disease, OS in the NAT group was significantly better than that in the upfront group. CEA (≥5 ng/mL) and CA19-9 (≥100 U/mL) were identified as prognostic factors; however, the OS of patients fulfilling these factors was worse than that of the NAT group. CONCLUSIONS: NAT could be unnecessary in patients with tumor size ≤25 mm and CA19-9 < 100 U/mL in resectable disease. In borderline resectable disease, surgery should be delayed until tumor marker levels are well controlled.

Is surgical resection justified for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with distant abdominal organ metastasis? A position paper by experts in pancreatic surgery at the Joint Meeting of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) & the Japan Pancreas Society (JPS) 2022 in Kyoto.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a typical refractory malignancy, and many patients have distant organ metastases at diagnosis, such as liver metastasis and peritoneal dissemination. The standard treatment for unresectable PDAC with distant organ metastasis (UR-M) is chemotherapy, but the prognosis remained poor. However, with recent dramatic developments in chemotherapy, the prognosis has gradually improved, and some patients have experienced marked shrinkage or disappearance of their metastatic lesions. With this trend, attempts have been made to resect a small number of metastases (so-called oligometastases) in combination with the primary tumor or to resect the primary and metastatic tumor in patients with a favorable response to anti-cancer treatment after a certain period of time (so-called conversion surgery). An international consensus meeting on surgical treatment for UR-M PDAC was held during the Joint Congress of the 26th Meeting of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) and the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Japan Pancreas Society (JPS) in Kyoto in July 2022. The presenters showed their indications for and results of surgical treatment for UR-M PDAC and discussed their advantages and disadvantages with the experts. Although these reports were limited to a small number of patients, findings suggest that these surgical treatments for patients with UR-M PDAC who have had a significant response to chemotherapy may contribute to a prognosis of prolonged survival. We hope that this article summarizing the discussion and agreements at the meeting will serve as the basis for future trials and guidelines.

A Retrospective Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of Nanoliposomal Irinotecan in Elderly Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer.

Although nanoliposomal irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (nal-IRI+5-FU/LV) has been used to treat first-line resistant unresectable pancreatic cancer, the efficacy and safety data among the elderly remain limited. We retrospectively analyzed clinical outcomes among elderly patients. Patients treated with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV were assigned to the elderly (≥75 years) and non-elderly (<75 years) groups. Herein, 85 patients received nal-IRI+5-FU/LV, with 32 assigned to the elderly group. Patient characteristics in the elderly and non-elderly groups were as follows: age: 78.5 (75-88)/71 (48-74), male: 17/32 (53%/60%), performance status (ECOG) 0:9/20 (28%/38%), nal-IRI+5-FU/LV in second line: 23/24 (72%/45%), respectively. A significantly high number of elderly patients exhibited aggravated kidney and hepatic functions. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the elderly group vs. non-elderly group were 9.4 months vs. 9.9 months (hazard ratio (HR) 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85-2.67, p = 0.16) and 3.4 months vs. 3.7 months (HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.86-2.32, p = 0.17). Both groups exhibited a similar incidence of efficacy and adverse events. There were no significant differences in OS and PFS between groups. We analyzed the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as indicators that could determine eligibility for nal-IRI+5-FU/LV. The median CAR and NLR scores in the ineligible group were 1.17 and 4.23 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.018, respectively). Elderly patients with worse CAR and NLR score could be deemed ineligible for nal-IRI+5-FU/LV.

Impact of neoadjuvant therapy on gut microbiome in patients with resectable/borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: /Objectives: Effects of chemotherapy on gut microbiota have been reported in various carcinomas. The current study aimed to evaluate the changes in the gut microbiota before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with resectable (R) and borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and understand their clinical implications. METHODS: Twenty patients diagnosed with R/BR-PDAC were included in this study. Stool samples were collected at two points, before and after NAC, for microbiota analysis using 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene sequences. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients, 18 (90%) were treated with gemcitabine plus S-1 as NAC, and the remaining patients received gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and a fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combination. No significant differences were observed in the α- and ß-diversity before and after NAC. Bacterial diversity was not associated with Evans classification (histological grade of tumor destruction by NAC) or postoperative complications. The relative abundance of Actinobacteria phylum after NAC was significantly lower than that before NAC (P = 0.02). At the genus level, the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium before NAC in patients with Evans grade 2 disease was significantly higher than that in patients with Evans grade 1 disease (P = 0.03). Patients with Evans grade 2 lost significantly more Bifidobacterium than patients with Evans grade 1 (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The diversity of gut microbiota was neither decreased by NAC for R/BR-PDAC nor associated with postoperative complications. Lower incidence of Bifidobacterium genus before NAC may be associated with a lower pathological response to NAC.

The academic impact and value of an international online surgery lecture series.

Due to the worldwide travel restrictions caused by the 2019 coronavirus disease pandemic, many universities and students lost opportunities to engage in international exchange over the past 2 years. Teleconferencing systems have thus been developed to compensate for severe travel restrictions. Kansai Medical University in Japan and Vilnius University in Lithuania have a collaborative research and academic relationship. The two universities have been conducting an online joint international surgery lecture series for the medical students of both universities. Fifteen lectures were given from October 2021 to May 2022. The lectures focused on gastrointestinal surgery, gastroenterology, radiology, pathology, genetics, laboratory medicine, and organ transplantation. A survey of the attendees indicated that they were generally interested in the content and satisfied with attending this lecture series. Our efforts were successful in providing Japanese and Lithuanian medical students with the opportunity to engage in international exchange through lectures held in each other's countries.

Reevaluation of regional lymph nodes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the pancreatic body and tail.

Introduction: In patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in the pancreatic body (Pb) and tail (Pt), the appropriate area for lymphadenectomy is controversial. This study aimed to reevaluate the extent of lymph node (LN) metastasis in Pb- and Pt-PDAC, and to define the optimal area of LN dissection. Patients and methods: This single-center retrospective study evaluated patients with Pb- and Pt-PDAC who underwent distal pancreatectomy with extended lymphadenectomy between 2006 and 2020. LN metastasis in >3.0% of patients were defined as new regional LN. Results: The study cohort included 135 patients with Pb-PDAC and 42 patients with Pt-PDAC. In patients with Pb-PDAC, LNs around the splenic artery (SPA) had the highest metastasis-positive rate (54.1%). LNs along the left gastric artery, common hepatic artery, celiac axis (CA), superior mesenteric artery (SMA), and splenic hilus were defined as new regional LNs. In patients with Pt-PDAC, LNs at the splenic hilum had the highest metastasis-positive rate (38.1%). The station and LN around the SPA were defined as new regional LNs in those with Pt-PDAC. Metastasis beyond the newly defined regional LNs was not associated with survival. The incidence of LN metastasis was lower in patients who received preoperative chemotherapy than in those who underwent upfront surgery in both Pb- and Pt-PDAC. Conclusion: Although it needs to be verified in future multicenter studies, LN of both the CA and SMA systems should be dissected in patients with Pb-PDAC. However, only those around the SPA and splenic hilus should be dissected routinely in those with Pt-PDAC.

Efficacy of Lentinula edodes Mycelia Extract on Chemotherapy-Related Tasted Disorders in Pancreatic Cancer Patients.

Patients undergoing chemotherapy suffer from taste disorders that affect the quality of life (QOL). In this study, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to explore the effectiveness of AHCC®, a standardized extract of cultured Lentinula edodes mycelia, for chemotherapy-related adverse events and taste disorders in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Patients who received chemotherapy were randomized to receive either placebo or AHCC®. The study endpoints were the incidence of anemia and taste disorders assessed with changes in nutritional parameters. Ninety-eight patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) were enrolled in this study, with 55 patients randomly assigned to the AHCC® group and 43 to the placebo group. The incidence of grades 2-3 anemia in the AHCC® group who were receiving chemotherapy was not significantly different compared to that of the placebo group (Risk difference; -3.1% [95% confidence intervals (CI): -22.8% to 16.9%], p = 0.8392). In the AHCC® group, the occurrence of taste disorders during chemotherapy was significantly lower, and the nutritional parameters were significantly improved compared to those in the placebo group (Risk difference; 28.6% [95% CI: 7.5% to 47.8%], p = 0.0077). AHCC® appears to prevent taste disorders in patients with advanced PDAC who were receiving chemotherapy. AHCC® is expected to enable patients who need chemotherapy to improve nutritional status and their QOL.

Survival impact of occult liver metastasis and peritoneal dissemination compared with radiologically defined distant organ metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Characteristics and prognoses of patients with occult metastases (OM) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) compared with radiologically defined metastases (RM) have been rarely reported. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to clarify the prognosis of OM compared with RM and to establish a treatment strategy for PDAC patients with OM. METHODS: This single-institution, retrospective study evaluated patients with unresectable PDAC between 2008 and 2018. OM was defined as abdominal metastasis that was detected by staging laparoscopy or open laparotomy but not in the initial assessment of radiological images. RESULTS: OM and RM were identified in 135 and 112 patients, respectively. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), tumor diameter, and rate of local unresectability were significantly lower in the OM group. Median overall survival (OS) of OM was significantly better than that of RM (13.0 vs 8.9 months, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis of OS, ECOG PS ≥ 1 (HR 1.64, p = 0.009), NLR ≥5 (HR 1.97, p = 0.004), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 ≥1000 (HR 1.68, p = 0.001), tumor diameter ≥40 mm (HR 1.40, p = 0.027), conversion surgery (HR 0.12, p < 0.001), and multiple lines of chemotherapy (HR 0.38, p < 0.001) were independent predictors. However, type of metastasis (OM vs RM) not an independent predictor (HR 1.10, p = 0.590). CONCLUSION: The prognosis of PDAC with OM was relatively better than that with RM, but general and nutritional statuses, primary tumor size and CA19-9, conversion surgery and multiple lines of chemotherapy were independent predictors but not tumor burden.

Oncological role of surgical resection in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with liver-only synchronous metastases in a single-center retrospective study.

Background: Surgical resection for liver-only synchronous metastases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains controversial. We investigated the role of conversion surgery in patients with a favorable response to systemic chemotherapy. Methods: Patients (n=49) were diagnosed liver-only synchronous metastases using staging laparoscopy or open laparotomy between 2007 and 2022. Clinical outcomes were retrospectively compared among patients who underwent conversion surgery (n=10), upfront surgery with or without short-term neoadjuvant chemotherapy (UpS/short NAC) for oligometastases and occult metastases limited to the liver (n=8), and chemotherapy only for resectable or borderline resectable disease with occult liver-only metastases (n=31). The surgical indication of conversion surgery was fixed as the ABC criteria, namely, Anatomical objective response of disappearance of liver metastases on imaging studies, Biological response of CA19-9 level decrease to ≤150 U/mL, and Conditional response of surgical fitness. In addition to the above ABC criteria, tumor disappearance at the liver was repeatedly confirmed using staging laparoscopy (laparoscopic response; L), and metabolic complete responses were confirmed using positron emission tomography-computed tomography (CT) (metabolic response; M). Results: Median survival time from initial treatment was 9.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 8.3-10.9] in the chemotherapy group, 10.4 months (95% CI: 6.6-17.8) in the UpS/short NAC group, and 36.7 months (95% CI: 19.0-84.8) in the conversion surgery group (conversion surgery vs. UpS/short NAC, P=0.002; conversion surgery vs. chemotherapy, P<0.001; UpS/short NAC vs. chemotherapy, P=0.554). One patient in the UpS/short NAC group and three in the conversion surgery group achieved 5-year survival. Among them, two patients with initially multiple liver metastases (≥10) in the conversion surgery group survived beyond 5 years. Only conversion surgery was a significant independent prognostic factor in a total cohort (hazard ratio; 0.173, P=0.002). Conclusions: Conversion surgery, but not UpS/short NAC, may enhance survival in patients with synchronous liver metastases and favorably anatomical, biological and conditional responses to systemic chemotherapy.

Long-term outcomes of patients with multifocal intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm following pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: The decision to perform surgery is complicated by the presence of multifocal (MF) intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), which are characterized by two or more cysts located in different areas of the pancreas. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to establish a suitable treatment strategy and surgical indications in patients with MF-IPMNs. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included patients with IPMNs who underwent pancreatic resection from 2006 to 2020. Patients with distant metastasis and patients with IPMNs of the main pancreatic duct were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: After excluding 22 patients, 194 patients were included. One hundred thirteen patients (58.2%) had unifocal IPMNs, while 81 patients (41.8%) had MF-IPMNs. There were no significant differences in the 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate (92.3% vs. 92.4%, p = 0.976) and the 5-year disease-free survival rate (88.6% vs. 86.5%, p = 0.461). The multivariate analysis identified high-risk stigmata, invasive carcinoma, and lymph node metastasis as independent predictors of DSS. The presence of cystic lesions in the pancreatic remnant was not a predictor of survival. Even in the MF-IPMN group, there were no significant differences in DSS when stratified by procedure (total pancreatectomy vs. segmental pancreatectomy, p = 0.268) or presence of cystic lesions in the pancreatic remnant (p = 0.476). The multivariate analysis identified lymph node metastasis as an independent predictor of DSS in the MF-IPMN group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MF-IPMNs, each cyst should be evaluated individually for the presence of features associated with malignancy.

Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel Treatment for Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma with Peritoneal Dissemination Provides a Survival Benefit.

Background: Intraperitoneal chemotherapy using paclitaxel (i.p.-PTX) is expected to be a new therapeutic strategy for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and peritoneal dissemination. We evaluated the survival benefit of i.p.-PTX compared with standard systemic chemotherapy. Methods: Clinical data of 101 consecutive PDAC patients with peritoneal dissemination between 2007 and 2018 were analyzed. All patients were determined to have no other sites of distant organ metastasis to the lung, bone, or liver on contrast-enhanced CT imaging. Patients underwent staging laparoscopy or open laparotomy to confirm pathological evidence of peritoneal dissemination, and to exclude occult liver metastasis. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan−Meier method, and differences were compared using the log-rank test. Results: Forty-three patients were treated with i.p.-PTX (i.p.-PTX group) and forty-nine patients received standard systemic chemotherapy (Ctrl group). Nine patients did not receive any treatment (BSC group). The median survival time (MST) in the i.p.-PTX group was significantly longer than that in the Ctrl group (17.9 months vs. 10.2 months, p = 0.006). Negative peritoneal washing cytology was observed in 24 out of 43 patients in the i.p.-PTX group. The i.p.-PTX group tended to have a higher proportion of clinical responses than the Ctrl group (30% vs. 18%, p = 0.183). Conversion surgery was performed in 10 patients in the i.p.-PTX group and 2 patients in the Ctrl group after confirming disappearance of peritoneal dissemination with staging laparoscopy or open laparotomy (p = 0.005). The MST in patients who underwent surgical resection was significantly longer than that in patients who did not (27.4 months vs. 11.3 months; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: i.p.-PTX therapy provided improved survival in PDAC patients with peritoneal dissemination, and conversion surgery enhanced it in patients with favorable responses to chemotherapy. i.p.-PTX might become one of the treatment options to PDAC patients with peritoneal dissemination.

Randomized phase III trial of intravenous and intraperitoneal paclitaxel with S-1 versus gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with peritoneal metastasis (SP study).

The prognosis of pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDAC) with peritoneal metastasis remains dismal. Systemic chemotherapy alone may not be effective, and the combination of intraperitoneal chemotherapy with systemic chemotherapy is expected to prolong the overall survival in patients with peritoneal metastasis. We have designed a randomized phase III trial to confirm the superiority of intravenous (i.v.) and intraperitoneal (i.p.) paclitaxel (PTX) with S-1 relative to gemcitabine plus nab-PTX (GnP), which is the current standard therapy for patients with metastatic PDAC. A total of 180 patients will be accrued from 30 institutions within 3 years. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either i.v. and i.p. PTX with S-1 or GnP (target of 90 patients per group). The primary endpoint is overall survival; secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, response rate, proportion with negative peritoneal washing cytology during chemotherapy, proportion requiring conversion surgery, and adverse event profiles. Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs051180199 ( https://jrct.niph.go.jp/ ).

High tumor budding predicts a poor prognosis in resected duodenal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Tumor budding is a histological characteristic defined as the presence of small clusters of cancer cells at the invasion front. Its significance in duodenal adenocarcinoma (DA) has not been fully described. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective study was conducted. Patients who underwent curative surgery for histologically diagnosed DA from January 2006 to December 2018 at Kansai Medical University Hospital were included. Tumor budding was counted per 0.785 mm2 and classified as low (0-4 buds), intermediate (5-9 buds), or high (≥ 10 buds). RESULTS: In total, 47 patients were included. The 5-year overall survival and relapse-free survival rates were 77% and 72%, respectively. High tumor budding was seen in 15 patients (32%). Excluding patients with superficial type (pT1) DA (n = 22), high tumor budding [hazard ratio (HR) 13.4, p = 0.028], regional lymph node metastasis (HR 19.9, p = 0.039), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.056, p = 0.036) were independent factors related to the overall survival in multivariate analyses. Distant metastases occurred significantly more often in patients who had high tumor budding than in others (p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: The data suggest that high tumor budding is a predictor of a poor prognosis in resected DA.

Synopsis of a clinical practice guideline for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with peritoneal dissemination in Japan; Japan Peritoneal Malignancy Study Group.

Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with peritoneal dissemination have a dismal prognosis because discontinuation of systemic chemotherapy is required for massive ascites or poor performance status. The natural history, diagnosis and treatment of PDAC with peritoneal dissemination have not been fully investigated. We systematically reviewed published information on the clinical diagnosis and treatment of PDAC with peritoneal dissemination using the PubMed database (2000-2020) and provided recommendations in response to clinical questions. This guideline was created according to the "Minds Clinical Practice Guideline Development Guide 2017". The literature quality and body of evidence were evaluated with the GRADE System and classified into four levels ("strong", "medium", "weak", "very weak"). The strength of each final recommendation was decided by a vote of committee members based on the GRADE Grid method. These guidelines address three subjects: diagnostic, chemotherapeutic, and surgical approaches. They include nine clinical questions and statements with recommendation strengths, evidence levels, and agreement rates, in addition to one "column". This is the English synopsis of the 2021 Japanese clinical practice guideline for PDAC with peritoneal dissemination. It summarizes the clinical evidence for the diagnosis and treatment of PDAC with peritoneal dissemination and provides future perspectives.

Estimation of the degree of surgical difficulty anticipated for pancreatoduodenectomy: Preoperative and intraoperative factors.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a technically complex procedure. Preoperative anticipation of the degree of difficulty could contribute to patient safety during trainee surgical education. METHODS: We prospectively administered a questionnaire to the chief surgeon after each PD performed between 2016 and 2018 at our institution (99 consecutive patients). The surgeon rated the difficulty of the procedure; we then analyzed this information against perioperative data. RESULTS: The difficulty of PD was ranked as simple (29.3%), moderate (40.4%), or difficult (30.3%). The difficult procedures required an operative time of 2 h longer than the simple procedures and involved an additional 800 mL of intraoperative blood loss. Postoperative complications were similar in all groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that an unrecognized tissue plane for dissection was an independent determinant of a difficult PD (odds ratio [OR]: 89.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.2-861.2; P < .001). Independent predictors of a difficult PD were a pretreatment status of borderline resectable or unresectable (OR: 21.9, CI: 5.3-90.6; P < .001) and cholangitis during the preoperative period (OR: 4.1, CI: 1.3-13.0; P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons deem the PD procedure to be difficult when the proper tissue plane for dissection is unrecognized. Preoperative assessment of the anticipated difficulty could contribute to better operative management.

A simple risk score for detecting radiological occult metastasis in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We advocated carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 ≥ 150 U/mL and tumor size ≥30 mm as "high-risk markers" for predicting unresectability among patients with radiologically resectable (R) or borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The main aim is to establish a risk scoring system for occult abdominal metastasis (OAM) in R/BR PDAC. METHODS: Predictors of OAM were investigated retrospectively in an experiment cohort from 2006 to 2018. The proposed risk scoring system was validated in another cohort from 2019 to 2020. RESULTS: Five hundred and thirteen eligible patients were divided into the experimental (405 patients; OAM, 22%) and validation cohorts (108 patients). Multivariate analysis identified tumor location of body/tail (odds ratio [OR] 4.45, P < .0001) and "high-risk markers" (OR 2.07, P = .011) as independent predictors of OAM. A scoring system consisting of body/tail (yes: 1, no: 0) and "high-risk markers" (yes: 1, no: 0) was constructed. In the validation cohort, when staging laparoscopy (SL) was performed for patients with scores 1/2, the eligibility for SL, sensitivity, and negative predictive value of OAM were 55%, 91%, and 96%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor location of body/tail and "high-risk markers" were independent predictors of OAM, composing our simple and reproducible risk scoring system.

Validation of the triple-checked criteria for drain management after pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Drain management is important for the detection and treatment of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). We previously established the triple-checked criteria for drain removal: drain fluid amylase (DFA) <5000 U/L on postoperative day (POD) 1 and DFA <3000 U/L on POD 3, or C-reactive protein <15 mg/dL on POD 3. This study aimed to validate the efficacy of the triple-checked criteria. METHODS: In this study, 681 patients who underwent pancreatectomy were included. Drains were removed according to our previous criteria (sequentially checked criteria: DFA <5000 U/L on POD 1 and DFA <3000 U/L on POD 3) from 2012 to 2016 (control group) and the triple-checked criteria from 2017 to 2019 (intervention group). RESULTS: The control group included 406 patients, and the intervention group included 275 patients. Significantly more patients (n = 237, 86.2%) met the triple-checked criteria in the intervention group, relative to the sequentially checked criteria for early drain removal policy (n = 309, 76.1%; P = .001). Sensitivity, accuracy, and negative predictive value were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P < .001). The incidence of CR-POPF was not significantly different (11.1% vs 13.8%, P = .285). CONCLUSIONS: The triple-checked criteria contributed to effective drain removal after pancreatectomy without increasing CR-POPF.

Risk factors and treatment strategy for clinical hepatico-jejunostomy stenosis defined with intrahepatic bile duct dilatation after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUNDS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors and establish a treatment strategy for clinical hepatico-jejunostomy stenosis defined with intrahepatic bile duct dilatation after pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: The 443 patients who underwent PD from April 2006 to December 2015 were analyzed. Clinical characteristics were compared between patients with and without clinical HJ stenosis, and risk factors for clinical HJ stenosis were analyzed. In addition, the treatment and clinical course of patients with clinical HJ stenosis were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Clinical HJ stenosis defined with intrahepatic bile duct dilatation was identified in 40 patients (9.0%). Multivariate analysis revealed that the independent risk factor for clinical HJ stenosis was the hepatic duct at surgery ≤8 mm. Endoscopic HJ stenosis was identified in 36 patients, and 31 patients were treated successfully with double balloon endoscopic retrograde cholangiography; five patients required re-anastomosis (n = 3) and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (n = 2). Complete obstruction of HJ was found in five patients, and treatment with DB-ERC was successful in only one patient. CONCLUSION: The independent risk factor for clinical HJ stenosis was hepatic duct diameter ≤8 mm. Most cases of endoscopic HJ stenosis were treated successfully with DB-ERC, except in patients with complete obstruction.

Hepatic actinomycosis after total pancreatectomy: A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Hepatic actinomycosis (HA) is a rare infection mimicking a malignancy. HA after total pancreatectomy for a pancreatic tumor has not been reported. CASE PRESENTATION: A 70-year-old woman with a history of gastrectomy and sigmoidectomy for benign lesions, underwent a total pancreatectomy for a non-invasive, intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (IPMC). She required partial resection of the transverse colon due to insufficient blood flow and had an anastomotic failure. Four months later, she developed a fever and effusion from the upper abdominal midline incision. No bacteria were cultured from the effusion. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography demonstrated an 80-mm iso-vascular liver mass. A slightly high-signal intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging was demonstrated. Positron emission tomography (PET) showed a standardized uptake value of 11.9 at the liver mass. The percutaneous liver biopsy did not establish a diagnosis. Because a malignancy could not be ruled out, an exploratory laparotomy was performed. A tissue sample revealed aggregates of branched filamentous microorganisms; actinomycosis was diagnosed. Oral amoxicillin for 4 months resolved the mass. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: This patient had several causative factors for HA, including multiple surgical procedures involving the gastrointestinal tract, reconstruction of the biliary tract, anastomotic failure of the transverse colon, and diabetes mellitus following total pancreatectomy. Based on the past treatment history for IPMC and PET findings mimicking a malignancy, a laparotomy was performed to biopsy the lesion. Typically, penicillin is recommended for >6 months. CONCLUSION: A rare case of HA mimicking a malignancy after a total pancreatectomy for IPMC is presented.