Severe inflammatory disorder in trisomy 8 without myelodysplastic syndrome and response to methylprednisolone: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Patients with trisomy 8 consistently present with myeloid neoplasms and/or auto-inflammatory syndrome. A possible link between myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with trisomy 8 (+8-MDS) and inflammatory disorders is well recognized, several cases having been reported. However, inflammatory disorders in patients without MDS have been largely overlooked. Generally, Behçet's disease is the most common type in +8-MDS. However, inflammatory disorders with pulmonary involvement are less frequent, and no effective treatment has been established. CASE SUMMARY: A 27-year-old man with recurrent fever, fatigue for > 2 mo, and unconsciousness for 1 day was admitted to our emergency department with a provisional diagnosis of severe pneumonia. Vancomycin and imipenem were administered and sputum collected for metagenomic next-generation sequencing. Epstein-Barr virus and Mycobacterium kansasii were detected. Additionally, chromosomal analysis showed duplications on chromosome 8. Two days later, repeat metagenomic next-generation sequencing was performed with blood culture. Cordyceps portugal, M. kansasii, and Candida portugal were detected, and duplications on chromosome 8 confirmed. Suspecting hematological disease, we aspirated a bone marrow sample from the iliac spine, examination of which showed evidence of infection. We added fluconazole as further antibiotic therapy. Seven days later, the patient's condition had not improved, prompting addition of methylprednisolone as an anti-inflammatory agent. Fortunately, this treatment was effective and the patient eventually recovered. CONCLUSION: Severe inflammatory disorders with pulmonary involvement can occur in patients with trisomy 8. Methylprednisolone may be an effective treatment.

Early enteral nutrition prevents intra-abdominal hypertension and reduces the severity of severe acute pancreatitis compared with delayed enteral nutrition: a prospective pilot study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effects of early enteral nutrition (EEN) on intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and disease severity in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). METHODS: Enteral nutrition (EN) was started within 48 h after admission in the EEN group and from the 8th day in the delayed enteral nutrition (DEN) group. The IAP and intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) incidence were recorded for 2 weeks. The caloric intake and feeding intolerance (FI) incidence were recorded daily after EN was started. The severity markers and clinical outcome variables were also recorded. RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled to this study. No difference about IAP was found. The IAH incidence of the EEN group was significantly lower than that of the DEN group from the 9th day (8/30 versus 18/30; P = 0.009) after admission. The FI incidence of the EEN group was higher than that of the DEN group during the initial 3 days of feeding (25/30 versus 12/30; P = 0.001; 22/30 versus 9/30; P = 0.001; 15/30 versus 4/30; P = 0.002). Patients with an IAP <15 mmHg had lower FI incidence than those with an IAP ≥15 mmHg on the 1st day (20/22 versus 17/38; P < 0.001), the 3rd day (11/13 versus 8/47; P < 0.001), and the 7th day (3/5 versus 3/55; P = 0.005) of feeding. The severity markers and clinical outcome variables of the EEN group were significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS: Early enteral nutrition did not increase IAP. In contrast, it might prevent the development of IAH. In addition, EEN might be not appropriate during the initial 3-4 days of SAP onset. Moreover, EN might be of benefit to patients with an IAP <15 mmHg. Early enteral nutrition could improve disease severity and clinical outcome, but did not decrease mortality of SAP.

[The clinical effectiveness of percutaneous drainage and laparotomy for patients with infective pancreatic necrosis].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effectiveness of percutaneous US- or CT-guided drainage and laparotomy for patients with infective pancreatic necrosis. METHODS: Data of 90 infective pancreatic necrosis patients admitted from January 2008 to December 2009 were included. They were divided into two groups by the different treatment choices. Twenty-seven patients in the percutaneous group received percutaneous US- or CT-guided drainage as first choice. After that a sump suction apparatus was applied for controlled drainage. If no improvement was achieved after 3 days, they would received operation soon. While patients in the laparotomy group received surgical drainage at the time when the diagnosis of infected pancreatic necrosis was confirmed. Continuous drainage was also applied for these ones. RESULTS: The percutaneous group had a significant low rate of reoperation (7.1% vs. 14.3%, P < 0.05) and postoperative residual abscesses (7.1% vs. 28.6%, P < 0.05). Furthermore, 48.1% of patients in percutaneous group successfully avoid laparotomy. In the regard of complications, the percutaneous group presented lower incidence of both single organ dysfunction (7.4% vs. 28.6%, P < 0.05), intestinal fistula (7.4% vs. 27.0%, P < 0.05) and long-term complications (3.7% vs. 22.2%, P < 0.05). In addition, the percutaneous group costed less medical resources as evidenced by shorter ICU duration (21.2 ± 9.7 vs. 28.7 ± 12.1, P < 0.01), shorter hospital duration (48.2 ± 12.5 vs. 59.6 ± 17.5, P < 0.05) and less expenditure (191 762 ± 5892 vs. 341 689 ± 10 854, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous drainage can effectively lower the surgical rates and the rates of complications and reoperations in patients with infective pancreatic necrosis. Besides that, it could also reduce the cost of medical resources.

[Treatment experience of severe acute pancreatitis on 1033 cases.].

OBJECTIVE: To summary the treatment experience of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). METHODS: From January 1997 to March 2009, a total of 1033 patients suffered SAP were admitted with a mean APACHE II score 12.0 +/- 4.3. There were 622 males and 411 females, aged from 13 to 98 years old. All patients were cared by the multidisciplinary team with intensivist, endoscopists, gastroenterologists, radiologist, nephrologist and surgeons.Patients treated in SICU in the early phase of the disease. In these 1033 patients, 365 cases received mechanical ventilation, 218 with tracheotomy, 159 cases received high-volume continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), 179 received nasobiliary drainage, 513 were treated with early enteral nutrition. CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainge for peripancreatic fluid collection was pefromed for 477 times and 438 patients received surgical debridement for infected pancreatic necrosis. RESULTS: In all these 1033 cases, 975 patients (94.4%) survived, and 38 patients died (3.7%). The mortality of patients who received surgical debridement for infected pancreatic necrosis was 7.1% (31/438). CONCLUSION: The muti-discipline management of severe acute pancreatitis can remarkably improve the prognosis of patients.