Stereotactic body radiotherapy combined with sintilimab in patients with recurrent or oligometastatic hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and programmed cell death 1 inhibitors have shown potential in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in retrospective studies. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of combining SBRT with sintilimab for patients with recurrent or oligometastatic HCC. METHODS: This trial involved patients with recurrent or oligometastatic HCC intravenously treated with SBRT plus sintilimab every 3 wk for 12 mo or until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled from August 14, 2019, to August 23, 2021. The median treatment duration was 10.2 (range, 0.7-14.6) months. SBRT was delivered at a median dose of 54 (range, 48-60) Gy in 6 (range, 6-10) fractions. The median follow-up time was 21.9 (range, 10.3-39.7) mo, and 32 targeted lesions among 25 patients were evaluated for treatment response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. The median PFS was 19.7 mo [95% confidence interval (CI): 16.9-NA], with PFS rates of 68% (95%CI: 52-89) and 45.3% (95%CI: 28-73.4) at 12 and 24 mo, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached, with OS rates of 91.5% (95%CI: 80.8-100.0) and 83.2% (95%CI: 66.5-100.0) at 12 and 24 mo, respectively. The 1- and 2-year local control rate were 100% and 90.9% (95%CI: 75.4%-100.0%), respectively. The confirmed objective response rate and disease control rate was 96%, and 96%, respectively. Most adverse events were graded as 1 or 2, and grade 3 adverse events were observed in three patients. CONCLUSION: SBRT plus sintilimab is an effective, well-tolerated treatment regimen for patients with recurrent or oligometastatic HCC.

Interaction between glycolysis‒cholesterol synthesis axis and tumor microenvironment reveal that gamma-glutamyl hydrolase suppresses glycolysis in colon cancer.

Background: Metabolic reprogramming is a feature of cancer. However, colon cancer subtypes based on the glycolysis‒cholesterol synthesis axis have not been identified, and little is known about connections between metabolic features and the tumor microenvironment. Methods: Data for 430 colon cancer cases were extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas, including transcriptome data, clinical information, and survival outcomes. Glycolysis and cholesterol synthesis-related gene sets were obtained from the Molecular Signatures Database for a gene set variation analysis. The relationship between the genomic landscape and immune landscape were investigated among four metabolic subtypes. Hub genes were determined. The clinical significance of candidate hub gene was evaluated in 264 clinical samples and potential functions were validated in vitro and in vivo. Results: Colon cancer cases were clustered into four metabolic subtypes: quiescent, glycolytic, cholesterogenic, and mixed. The metabolic subtypes differed with respect to the immune score, stromal score, and estimate score using the ESTIMATE algorithm, cancer-immunity cycle, immunomodulator signatures, and signatures of immunotherapy responses. Patients in the cholesterogenic group had better survival outcomes than those for other subtypes, especially glycolytic. The glycolytic subtype was related to unfavorable clinical characteristics, including high mutation rates in TTN, APC, and TP53, high mutation burden, vascular invasion, right colon cancer, and low-frequency microsatellite instability. GGH, CACNG4, MME, SLC30A2, CKMT2, SYN3, and SLC22A31 were identified as differentially expressed both in glycolytic-cholesterogenic subgroups as well as between colon cancers and healthy samples, and were involved in glycolysis‒cholesterol synthesis. GGH was upregulated in colon cancer; its high expression was correlated with CD4+ T cell infiltration and longer overall survival and it was identified as a favorable independent prognostic factor. The overexpression of GGH in colon cancer-derived cell lines (SW48 and SW480) inhibited PKM, GLUT1, and LDHA expression and decreased the extracellular lactate content and intracellular ATP level. The opposite effects were obtained by GGH silencing. The phenotype associated with GGH was also validated in a xenograft nude mouse model. Conclusions: Our results provide insight into the connection between metabolism and the tumor microenvironment in colon cancer and provides preliminary evidence for the role of GGH, providing a basis for subsequent studies.

An integrated bioinformatic investigation of mitochondrial solute carrier family 25 (SLC25) in colon cancer followed by preliminary validation of member 5 (SLC25A5) in tumorigenesis.

Solute carrier family 25 (SLC25) encodes transport proteins at the inner mitochondrial membrane and functions as carriers for metabolites. Although SLC25 genetic variants correlate with human metabolic diseases, their roles in colon cancer remain unknown. Cases of colon cancer were retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas, and the transcriptionally differentially expressed members (DEMs) of SLC25 were identified. DNA level alterations, clinicopathological characteristics, and clinical survival were also investigated. A risk score model based on the DEMs was constructed to further evaluate their prognostic values in a clinical setting. The results were preliminarily validated using bioinformatic analysis of datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus, immunohistochemical evaluations in clinical specimens, and functional experiments in colon cancer-derived cell lines. Thirty-seven DEMs were identified among 53 members of SLC25. Eight of 37 DEMs were introduced into a risk score model using integrated LASSO regression and multivariate Cox regression. Validated by GSE395282 and GSE175356, DEMs with high-risk scores were associated with the phenotypes of increasing tumor immune infiltration and decreasing glycolysis and apoptosis contents. SLC25A5 was downregulated in cancer, and its upregulation was related to better overall survival in patients from public datasets and in clinical cases. High SLC25A5 expression was an independent prognostic factor for 79 patients after surgical treatment. A negative correlation between CD8 and SLC25A5 was determined in specimens from 106 patients with advanced colon cancer. SLC25A5 attenuated cell proliferation, upregulated the expression of programmed cell death-related signatures, and exerted its biological function by inhibiting the MAPK signaling pathway. Our study reveals that mitochondrial SLC25 has prognostic value in patients with colon cancer. The bioinformatic analyses by following verification in situ and in vitro provide direction for further functional and mechanistic studies on the identified member of SLC25.

Management of acute kidney injury in gastrointestinal tumor: An overview.

Gastrointestinal tumors remain a global health problem. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication during the treatment of gastrointestinal tumors. AKI can cause a decrease in the remission rate and an increase in mortality. In this review, we analyzed the causes and risk factors for AKI in gastrointestinal tumor patients. The possible mechanisms of AKI were divided into three groups: pretreatment, intrafraction and post-treatment causes. Treatment and prevention measures were proposed according to various factors to provide guidance to clinicians and oncologists that can reduce the incidence of AKI and improve the quality of life and survival rate of gastrointestinal tumor patients.

Epidemiological characteristics of nasopharyngeal Streptococcus pneumoniae strains among children with pneumonia in Chongqing, China.

Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) is the most common respiratory pathogen worldwide. Nasopharyngeal carriage with S. pneumoniae is the major source of lower respiratory tract infection and horizontal spread among children. Investigating nasopharyngeal S. pneumoniae is crucial for clinicians to control pneumococcus disease. Here, we retrospectively analyzed clinical information of 5,960 hospitalized children, focusing on pneumonia children less than five years with positive nasopharyngeal pneumococcal cultures. Nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPAs) were collected between June 2009 and December 2016, which were outside the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine(PCV) period. NPAs were subjected to common bacterial culture and antibiotic susceptibility tests, and serotypes were identified by both multiplex PCR and DNA sequencing. Results clearly revealed that clinical manifestations of the children whose NPAs were S. pneumoniae culture positive were serious, especially in those less than twelve months old. Fifteen different serotypes of nasopharyngeal S. pneumoniae were detected, the most common ones being 19F (35.2%), 6A/B (23.8%), 19A (11.4%), 15B/C (9.3%) and 23F (7.8%). Eight serotypes, accounting for 85.5% of the isolates, corresponded to the PCV13 serotypes. Approximately one-third of all S. pneumoniae strains were susceptible to penicillin. Overall, we consider nasopharyngeal S. pneumoniae culture is beneficial in assessing the situations of pneumonia children. Moreover, PCV13 could be useful in preventing pneumococcal disease in Chongqing, China.

Efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy regimens in patients with initially unresectable locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) or with epirubicin (EOX).

Purpose We assessed the effectiveness of EOX (capecitabine, oxaliplatin and epirubicin) compared with XELOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) as preoperative chemotherapy for initially unresectable locally advanced gastric cancer.Methods This is a prospective observational study. Patients with unresectable locally advanced gastric cancer were performed EOX regimen or XELOX regimen at the discretion of the investigators. They were assessed for response every 2 cycles by CT (computed tomography) scan. A multidisciplinary team reassessed resectability after 4 cycles. The primary endpoint was the response rate. Secondary end points included the R0 resection rate, survival and adverse events.Results From November 2008 to May 2015, 242 patients were enrolled; 112 of them were assigned to EOX regimen and 130 to XELOX regimen. The response rates were 33.0% and 33.8% respectively in EOX group and XELOX group (P = 0.997). After 4 cycles of chemotherapy, 63 patients (56.3%) in EOX group and 81 patients (62.3%) in XELOX group received radical operation (P = 0.408). There was no significant difference in progress-free survival (PFS, 12.0m vs. 15.4m, P = 0.925) and overall survival (OS, 25.7m vs. 29.0m, P = 0.783) in two groups. In addition, more adverse effects occurred in EOX group, such as more leucopenia (22.3% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.014), neutropenia (23.2% vs. 11.5%, P = 0.025), fatigue (11.6% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.041) and vomiting (10.7% vs. 2.3%, P = 0.015).Conclusions For unresectable locally advanced gastric cancer patients, XELOX regimen showed similar effects in response rate, radical resection rate and survival benefits, but with less toxicity effects.

Right-sided colon cancer and left-sided colorectal cancers respond differently to cetuximab.

INTRODUCTION: Right-sided colon cancer (RSCC) and left-sided colorectal cancer (LSCRC) differ with respect to their biology and genomic patterns. This study aimed to examine whether the primary tumor location is associated with the response to cetuximab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Patients with mCRC treated with cetuximab and standard chemotherapy as first- or second-line treatments were compared with randomly chosen patients who were treated with chemotherapy alone between 2005 and 2013. The main outcome measures were the overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The differences in the outcome were analyzed by using the chi-squared test, Student's t test, and Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The treatment results of 206 patients with mCRC treated with cetuximab and standard chemotherapy as first- or second-line treatments were compared with those of 210 patients who were treated with chemotherapy alone. As a first-line treatment, cetuximab with chemotherapy was associated with a significantly higher ORR (49.4 % vs. 28.6 %, P = 0.005) as well as longer PFS (9.1 vs. 6.2 months, P = 0.002) and OS (28.9 vs. 20.1 months, P = 0.036) than chemotherapy alone in patients with LSCRC. However, cetuximab neither improved the ORR (36.4 % vs. 26.2 %, P = 0.349) nor prolonged PFS (5.6 vs. 5.7 months, P = 0.904) or OS (25.1 vs. 19.8 months, P = 0.553) in patients with RSCC. As a second-line treatment, cetuximab exhibited a tendency to improve the ORR (23.5 % vs. 10.2 %, P = 0.087) and prolong PFS (4.9 vs. 3.5 months, P = 0.064), and it significantly prolonged OS (17.1 vs. 12.4 months, P = 0.047) compared with chemotherapy alone in the patients with LSCRC. In contrast, as a second-line treatment, cetuximab neither improved the ORR (7.1 % vs. 11.4 %, P = 0.698) nor prolonged PFS (3.3 vs. 4.2 months, P = 0.761) or OS (13.4 vs. 13.0 months, P = 0.652) in patients with RSCC. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy in both first- and second-line treatments of mCRC may only benefit patients with primary LSCRC.

A phase II trial of Xeloda and oxaliplatin (XELOX) neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery for advanced gastric cancer patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis.

PURPOSE: Gastric cancer with para-aortic lymph node (PAN) involvement is regarded as advanced disease, and only chemotherapy is recommended from the guidelines. In unresectable cases, neoadjuvant chemotherapy could prolong survival if conversion to resectability could be achieved. METHODS: The study was a single-arm phase II trial. Patients who were diagnosed with gastric cancer and PAN involvement (Stations No. 16a2/16b1) were treated with capecitabine and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. After every two cycles, abdominal computed tomographic scans were repeated to evaluate the response, and surgery was performed at the physician(')s discretion in patients with sufficient tumor response, followed by chemotherapy with the same regimen to complete a total of six cycles. The primary end point was the response rate of the preoperative chemotherapy. The secondary end points were R0 resection rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were enrolled. The response rate of the first-line chemotherapy was 49.0 %, and the clinical benefit response was 85.1 %. After a median of four cycles of chemotherapy, 28 patients received surgery (58.3 %). The median PFS and OS of all patients were 10.0 and 29.8 months, respectively. Patients in the surgery group had much longer PFS (18.1 vs. 5.6 mo, P = 0.001) and OS (not reached vs. 12.5 mo, P = 0.016) compared with those in the non-surgery group. CONCLUSIONS: For gastric cancer patients with PAN involvement, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with XELOX demonstrated a good response rate, and a sufficient R0 resection rate, with acceptable toxicities. Further study is needed to confirm the effectiveness of this regimen.

[Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (BEV) plus chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, mCRC].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (BEV) plus chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Seventy-seven mCRC patients received BEV plus 5-Fu type, oxaliplatin or irinotecan-based chemotherapy. The clinical efficacy and bevacizumab-related adverse reactions were observed. The efficacy assessment was conducted after at least 2 cycles of BEV therapy. The adverse reactions were recorded in each therapy cycle. Among the 77 cases, 64 patients had finished the efficacy assessment. The adverse reactions in all patients were assessed. RESULTS: The overall response rate (ORR) of BEV plus chemotherapy regimen was 18.75% (12/64), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 75.0% (48/64). In 27 patients who received the regimen as first-line treatment, the ORR reached 37.0% (10/27), while the DCR was 85.2%. Four patients with potentially resectable lesions became resectable after the regimen and received R0 resection of the liver metastases successfully. Twenty-five patients who received the regimen as second line therapy had poor result with ORR 8.0% and DCR 76.0%. Hypertension was observed in 12 cases, with 8 cases of grade 1, 3 cases of grade 2, 1 case of grade 3. Various bleedings occurred in 24/77 cases (31.2%), all were of grade 1-2, including 17 cases of epistaxis, grade 1 hemorrhoid bleeding in one case, hematuria in 3 case (2 of grade 1, 1 of grade 2), GI bleeding in 2 cases, hemoptysis in 1 case (grade 2), and proteinuria in 4 cases (grade 1). Intestinal perforation occurred in 1 case (0.3%). In two patients who had incomplete intestinal obstruction history appeared exacerbated intestinal obstruction symptoms after the application of BEV plus CPT11 regimen. CONCLUSIONS: BEV plus chemotherapy regimen as first-line treatment can improve the ORR and DCR of mCRC patients. When it was used as second- or later-line therapy, it may display satisfied DCR, although with a poor efficacy. The bevacizumab-related toxicity is mild and can be well tolerated.

Folate-linked lipoplexes for short hairpin RNA targeting claudin-3 delivery in ovarian cancer xenografts.

Ovarian cancers highly overexpress folate receptor α (FRα) and claudin3 (CLDN3), both of which are associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis of patients. Downregulation of FRα and CLDN3 in ovarian cancer may suppress tumor growth and promote benign differentiation of tumor. In this study, F-P-LP/CLDN3, a FRα targeted liposome loading with short hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting CLDN3 was prepared and the pharmaceutical properties were characterized. Then, the antitumor effect of F-P-LP/CLDN3 was studied in an in vivo model of advanced ovarian cancer. Compared with Control, F-P-LP/CLDN3 promoted benign differentiation of tumor and achieved about 90% tumor growth inhibition. In the meantime, malignant ascites production was completely inhibited, and tumor nodule number and tumor weight were significantly reduced (p<0.001). FRα and CLDN3 were downregulated together in tumor tissues treated by F-P-LP/CLDN3. The antitumor mechanisms were achieved by promoting tumor cell apoptosis, inhibiting tumor cell proliferation and reducing microvessel density. Finally, safety evaluation indicated that F-P-LP/CLDN3 was a safe formulation in intraperitoneally administered cancer therapy. We come to a conclusion that F-P-LP/CLDN3 is a potential targeting formulation for ovarian cancer gene therapy.

[Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherpy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer, and to analyze the relevant factors of recurrent death of gastric cancer after adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Clinical data of 49 patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer between July 2007 and June 2011 were reviewed. Preoperative staging was determined by endoscopic ultrasonography and abdominal computer tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Chemotherapy was administered for regimen of two or three drugs. Prognostic factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis with Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: The response rate was 33.3% (16/48) and disease control rate was 93.8% (45/48). Forty-four (89.8%, 44/49) patients received curative resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, among whom 90.9% (40/44) underwent D2 lymphadenctomy. Thirty-two cases had pathological response and 2 patients had pathological complete response. The average hospital stay was 11.6 days and 2 patients had longer hospitalization because of postoperative pancreatic complications. The toxicities were most in grade 1-2. All the patients were followed up postoperatively and the median follow-up was 21.6 months. Median progression-free survival was 29.6 (95%CI:24.0-35.2) months and median overall survival was 34.6 months (95%CI:29.8-39.4). Imaging response (P=0.038, RR=0.168, 95%CI:0.031-0.904) and pathological response (P=0.007, RR=0.203, 95%CI:0.064-0.642) were identified as independent prognostic factors with COX multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has quite high disease control rate and R0 resecting rate for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Imaging response and pathological response are most important prognostic factors in those patients.

[Impact of AJCC staging system (2010 edition) on the choice of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy after radical resection of gastric cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether AJCC staging system(2010 edition) for gastric cancer has influence on the adoption of adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: This was a cohort study and the data were collected from patients who underwent radical surgery and received adjuvant chemotherapy from January 2004 to December 2009. There were 48 patients with stage II( disease and 95 patients with stage III( disease according to TNM staging(2010 edition). Doublets were defined as 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin or oxaliplatin, while triplets had epirubicin added. Ninety-six patients received doublet chemotherapy and 47 received triplet. All the patients were followed-up in the outpatient clinic until death or the censor time of May 2011. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 48 months in this cohort of 143 patients. The two groups had similar disease-free survival(DFS)(median, 23 months vs. 30 months, P>0.05). The median overall survival was 48 months in both groups. Subgroup analysis by TNM staging(2010 edition) showed that the median DFS of patients with stage III( gastric cancer was 15 months in the doublet group, significantly shorter than that of patients in the triplet group (18 months, P<0.05). However, the difference in overall survival was not statistically significant between the two groups. Patients with stage II( disease had comparable DFS and OS between the two groups(all P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Triplets regimens (epirubicin, platins and fluorouracil) show benefit on disease-free survival for the stage III( gastric cancer patients staged by TNM staging 2010 edition.

[Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: more drugs do not mean better efficacy].

OBJECTIVE: To compare oncologic outcomes between doublet and triplet adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer patients undergoing radical resection. METHODS: Patients with gastric cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy after radical resection from January 2004 to December 2008 were included. Doublet was defined as 5-FU 750 mg/m² (days 1-5) or capecitabine 1000 mg/m² (days 1-14) plus cisplatin 60 mg/m² (day 1) or oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² (day 1), while triplets had epirubicin 50 mg/m² (day 1) added. Chemotherapy was initiated 4-6 weeks after surgery, repeated every three weeks for 6 cycles. Patients were followed-up in the outpatient clinic until death or the most recent follow up(April 30, 2010). Cox proportional- hazard model and Chi-square test were used to test statistical difference. RESULTS: A total of 316 patients (210 received doublets, 106 received triplets) had a median follow-up time of 47 months. Seventy-seven patients died at the end of the follow-up. Two groups were comparable except for age (median age of 57 in doublets, 51 in triplets, P<0.01). The two groups had similar disease-free survival (16 months vs. 23 months, P=0.656) and 3-year overall survival(59.6% vs. 64.8%, P=0.293). There was no significant difference in severe adverse side effects between the two groups (21.9% vs. 30.2%, P=0.107). CONCLUSION: Triplet adjuvant chemotherapy appears not to be associated with superior efficacy than doublet regimen for patients with gastric cancer after radical resection.

[Cost-effectiveness analysis of different chemotherapeutical regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To compare FOLFOX6 and FOLFIRI regimen in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with cost-effective analysis. METHODS: Cost-effective analysis was conducted based on the efficacy results of V308 clinical trial of FOLFOX6 and FOLFIRI regimen and the medical system price in Zhongshan hospital. RESULTS: The minimal cost analysis showed FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 had the cost of RMB 206365.78 Yuan for each patient during the whole treatment period, and RMB 170468.89 Yuan for the FOLFOX6 followed by FOLFIRI regimen. Incremental analysis showed FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 regimen could prolong one month of overall survival with additional cost of RMB 39885.44 Yuan in each patient while compared with the regimen of FOLFOX6 followed by FOLFIRI. CONCLUSIONS: Both FOLFOX and FOLFIRI regimens are able to prolong the survival time of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, but cost of such treatments are still quite expensive for Chinese patients. FOLFOX6 regimen suggests better cost-effectiveness than FOLFIRI.