Bowel preparation after mid-gut tubing enhanced the efficacy and compliance of magnetic resonance enterography in Crohn's disease: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) has become a routine intestinal imaging examination for Crohn's disease (CD). Sufficient bowel preparation is fundamental for MRE. Objectives: To compare the efficacy and compliance of bowel preparation between through a mid-gut tube and oral administration for MRE in CD. Design: This was an open-label, prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Methods: Eligible patients were randomized at a 1:1 ratio into an oral group (bowel preparation by oral administration) and a tubing group (bowel preparation through a mid-gut tube). Bowel preparation for MRE included bowel cleaning and bowel distention. The primary outcomes were the degree of discomfort and grade of bowel distention. The secondary outcomes were diagnostic accuracy rate through MRE, mental stress, and bowel preparation method preference. Results: A total of 95 CD patients were included in the final analysis. Subjects in the tubing group complained of less vomiting during bowel preparation than those in the oral group (p < 0.05). The degree of nausea and bloating during bowel cleaning for MRE was lower in the tubing group than in the oral group (all p < 0.05). The distention grade was higher in the tubing group compared to the oral group in the splenic flexure of the colon and rectosigmoid colon. The tubing group demonstrated a higher overall diagnostic sensitivity in ulcers compared to the oral group (p = 0.048). Additionally, bowel preparation via the mid-gut tube ameliorated mental stress (p = 0.020) and increased bowel preparation preference (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Bowel preparation through the mid-gut tube enhanced the efficacy and compliance for MRE in CD. This study highlighted the concept of physician-patient satisfaction using mid-gut tube for proper bowel preparation for MRE, enteral nutrition and microbial therapy. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03541733, registered 5 May 2018.

A predictive machine-learning model for clinical decision-making in washed microbiota transplantation on ulcerative colitis.

Machine learning based on clinical data and treatment protocols for better clinical decision-making is a current research hotspot. This study aimed to build a machine learning model on washed microbiota transplantation (WMT) for ulcerative colitis (UC), providing patients and clinicians with a new evaluation system to optimize clinical decision-making. Methods Patients with UC who underwent WMT via mid-gut or colonic delivery route at an affiliated hospital of Nanjing Medical University from April 2013 to June 2022 were recruited. Model ensembles based on the clinical indicators were constructed by machine-learning to predict the clinical response of WMT after one month. Results A total of 366 patients were enrolled in this study, with 210 patients allocated for training and internal validation, and 156 patients for external validation. The low level of indirect bilirubin, activated antithrombin III, defecation frequency and cholinesterase and the elderly and high level of creatine kinase, HCO3 - and thrombin time were related to the clinical response of WMT at one month. Besides, the voting ensembles exhibited an area under curve (AUC) of 0.769 ± 0.019 [accuracy, 0.754; F1-score, 0.845] in the internal validation; the AUC of the external validation was 0.614 ± 0.017 [accuracy, 0.801; F1-score, 0.887]. Additionally, the model was available at https://wmtpredict.streamlit.app. Conclusions This study pioneered the development of a machine learning model to predict the one-month clinical response of WMT on UC. The findings demonstrate the potential value of machine learning applications in the field of WMT, opening new avenues for personalized treatment strategies in gastrointestinal disorders. Trial registration clinical trials, NCT01790061. Registered 09 February 2013 - Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01790061.

Washed Microbiota Transplantation Improves the Sleep Quality in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Purpose: There is scarce evidence to support the effectiveness of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in improving sleep among individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Our study aimed to evaluate the effect of washed microbiota transplantation (WMT) (the new method of FMT) on the sleep of patients with IBD in short term. Patients and Methods: This prospective study was conducted as part of two interventional clinical trials (starting on February 2013 and expected to end on December 2025) and placed significant emphasis on evaluating sleep quality in patients with IBD. To measure subjective sleep, we used the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI). The primary endpoint was the PSQI score one month after WMT. Results: This stage study included 52 eligible patients evaluated by PSQI questionnaire who underwent WMT from January 2020 to March 2021 and 47 patients were enrolled for analysis. The age of the patients ranged from 13 to 60 years, with a mean of 33.4 years, and 57.4% (25/47) of the patients were male. The PSQI scores for all 47 patients one month after undergoing WMT were significantly lower (Cohen d = 0.59, p < 0.001) compared to the baseline. Moreover, baseline PSQI score was correlated with the difference value of the PSQI score before and after WMT (post-PSQI minus pre-PSQI) (r = 0.61, p < 0.05). Conclusion: The study suggests that WMT might be a helpful intervention for improving the sleep quality of patients with IBD, encouraging clinicians to consider its use in clinical practice for addressing poor sleep in IBD patients. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; ID: NCT01793831, NCT01790061.

Washed microbiota transplantation for Crohn's disease: A metagenomic, metatranscriptomic, and metabolomic-based study.

BACKGROUND: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a promising therapeutic approach for treating Crohn's disease (CD). The new method of FMT, based on the automatic washing process, was named as washed microbiota transplantation (WMT). Most existing studies have focused on observing the clinical phenomena. However, the mechanism of action of FMT for the effective management of CD-particularly in-depth multi-omics analysis involving the metagenome, metatranscriptome, and metabolome-has not yet been reported. AIM: To assess the efficacy of WMT for CD and explore alterations in the microbiome and metabolome in response to WMT. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, open-label, single-center clinical study. Eleven CD patients underwent WMT. Their clinical responses (defined as a decrease in their CD Activity Index score of > 100 points) and their microbiome (metagenome, metatranscriptome) and metabolome profiles were evaluated three months after the procedure. RESULTS: Seven of the 11 patients (63.6%) showed an optimal clinical response three months post-WMT. Gut microbiome diversity significantly increased after WMT, consistent with improved clinical symptoms. Comparison of the metagenome and metatranscriptome analyses revealed consistent alterations in certain strains, such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Roseburia intestinalis, and Escherichia coli. In addition, metabolomics analyses demonstrated that CD patients had elevated levels of various amino acids before treatment compared to the donors. However, levels of vital amino acids that may be associated with disease progression (e.g., L-glutamic acid, gamma-glutamyl-leucine, and prolyl-glutamine) were reduced after WMT. CONCLUSION: WMT demonstrated therapeutic efficacy in CD treatment, likely due to the effective reconstruction of the patient's microbiome. Multi-omics techniques can effectively help decipher the potential mechanisms of WMT in treating CD.

Comparison between washed microbiota transplantation and infliximab: Medical cost during long-term management in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Both infliximab (IFX) and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) have shown the efficacy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, there has no head-to-head study on the cost-value of the such treatments on IBD. This study aimed to compare the medical costs using IFX and the new method of FMT (washed microbiota transplantation [WMT]) in the long-term management for IBD under the current health economic condition in China. METHODS: Patients with IBD who underwent initial WMT via upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, mid-gut tube, or colonic transendoscopic enteral tubing at a university hospital between April 2013 and August 2021 and achieved the long-term sustainment with WMT or WMT combined with mesalazine until August 2022 were recruited in the real-world. The costs and hospitalizations were analyzed among two therapies mentioned above and IFX standard therapy. The charge of WMT was stable in the long term at our center, and the charge of IFX came from virtual statistics publicized by China Healthcare Security. RESULTS: Sixty eligible patients with IBD were included in the study. The long-term costs of patients using WMT monotherapy annually or per hospitalization were lower than those on WMT combined with mesalazine, respectively ( p < 0.001, respectively). The cumulative costs of IFX at the time of 0.52 and 0.85 years exceeded that of the above WMT, respectively ( p < 0.001, respectively). Besides, patients on WMT monotherapy paid 51.1 k CNY annually in the nonsustain phase but cut down the costs by 7.2 k CNY and duration of hospitalization by 5.1 days per hospitalization when reaching the goal of sustainment. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that WMT could dramatically reduce the cost and duration of hospitalizations in the long-term sustainment in the current Chinese IBD cohort. Compared with IFX, WMT could be a good way for the patients with IBD achieving long-term sustainment and saving medical costs.

Global Trends in Research of Pain-Gut-Microbiota Relationship and How Nutrition Can Modulate This Link.

INTRODUCTION: The link between gut microbiota and chronic painful conditions has recently gained attention. Nutrition, as a common intervention in daily life and medical practice, is closely related to microbiota and pain. However, no published bibliometric reports have analyzed the scientific literature concerning the link. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used bibliometrics to identify the characteristics of the global scientific output over the past 20 years. We also aimed to capture and describe how nutrition can modulate the abovementioned link. Relevant papers were searched in the Web of Science database. All necessary publication and citation data were acquired and exported to Bibliometrix for further analyses. The keywords mentioned were illustrated using visualization maps. In total, 1551 papers shed light on the relationship from 2003 to 2022. However, only 122 papers discussed how nutritional interventions can modulate this link. The citations and attention were concentrated on the gut microbiota, pain, and probiotics in terms of the pain-gut relationship. Nutritional status has gained attention in motor themes of a thematic map. CONCLUSIONS: This bibliometric analysis was applied to identify the scientific literature linking gut microbiota, chronic painful conditions, and nutrition, revealing the popular research topics and authors, scientific institutions, countries, and journals in this field. This study enriches the evidence moving boundaries of microbiota medicine as a clinical medicine.

Washed microbiota transplantation targeting both gastrointestinal and extraintestinal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been reported with the treatment potential for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, the knowledge of its effect on extraintestinal symptoms of IBS is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the improved methodology of FMT, washed microbiota transplantation (WMT), on sleep disturbances, and psychological and gastrointestinal symptoms among patients with IBS. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study involving patients with IBS who underwent WMT. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was used to assess sleep quality. The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and IBS Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) were used to evaluate gastrointestinal symptoms and IBS severity, respectively. The Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) and Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) were used to evaluate depression and anxiety, respectively. All the symptoms were evaluated at baseline and one month after WMT. A multiple logistic regression model was used to determine the predictive factors of sleep improvement one month after WMT. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients with IBS were included in the study. Sleep quality (Z = -4.211, P < 0.001), anxiety (Z = -4.775, P < 0.001), depression (Z = -4.610, P < 0.001), gastrointestinal symptoms (Z = -5.364, P < 0.001), and IBS severity (Z = -6.468, P < 0.001) significantly improved one month after WMT in all patients. The scores of the five components of PSQI including subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, and sleep disturbances decreased in 52 patients with poor sleep quality (all P < 0.05). Baseline sleep duration scores were identified as an independent predictive factor of sleep improvement one month after WMT in patients with poor sleep quality (OR 2.180 [95% CI = 1.017-4.673]; P = 0.045). Patients that experienced sleep improvement demonstrated greater alleviation in depression (Z = -1.990, P = 0.047) and IBS severity (Z = -2.486, P = 0.013) compared with patients without sleep improvement. CONCLUSION: This study suggested that WMT might be a promising therapy for patients with IBS, especially those with comorbid sleep and psychological disorders.