Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 19393, 2024 08 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39169118

ABSTRACT

The X-rays emitted during CT scans can increase solid cancer risks by damaging DNA, with the risk tied to patient-specific organ doses. This study aims to establish a new method to predict patient specific abdominal organ doses from CT examinations using minimized computational resources at a fast speed. The CT data of 247 abdominal patients were selected and exported to the auto-segmentation software named DeepViewer to generate abdominal regions of interest (ROIs). Radiomics feature were extracted based on the selected CT data and ROIs. Reference organ doses were obtained by GPU-based Monte Carlo simulations. The support vector regression (SVR) model was trained based on the radiomics features and reference organ doses to predict abdominal organ doses from CT examinations. The prediction performance of the SVR model was tested and verified by changing the abdominal patients of the train and test sets randomly. For the abdominal organs, the maximal difference between the reference and the predicted dose was less than 1 mGy. For the body and bowel, the organ doses were predicted with a percentage error of less than 5.2%, and the coefficient of determination (R2) reached up to 0.9. For the left kidney, right kidney, liver, and spinal cord, the mean absolute percentage error ranged from 5.1 to 8.9%, and the R2 values were more than 0.74. The SVR model could be trained to achieve accurate prediction of personalized abdominal organ doses in less than one second using a single CPU core.


Subject(s)
Abdomen , Machine Learning , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Female , Male , Abdomen/diagnostic imaging , Radiation Dosage , Middle Aged , Precision Medicine/methods , Aged , Adult , Monte Carlo Method , Software , Radiography, Abdominal/methods , Radiomics
2.
J Radiol Prot ; 44(2)2024 Jun 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38834051

ABSTRACT

The measurement of linear energy transfer (LET) is crucial for the evaluation of the radiation effect in heavy ion therapy. As two detectors which are convenient to implant into the phantom, the performance of CR-39 and thermoluminescence detector (TLD) for LET measurement was compared by experiment and simulation in this study. The results confirmed the applicability of both detectors for LET measurements, but also revealed that the CR-39 detector would lead to potential overestimation of dose-averaged LET compared with the simulation by PHITS, while the TLD would have a large uncertainty measuring ions with LET larger than 20 keVµm-1. The results of this study were expected to improve the detection method of LET for therapeutic carbon beam and would finally be benefit to the quality assurance of heavy ion radiotherapy.


Subject(s)
Heavy Ion Radiotherapy , Linear Energy Transfer , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/instrumentation , Phantoms, Imaging , Carbon , Equipment Design , Polyethylene Glycols
3.
J Xray Sci Technol ; 32(4): 1199-1208, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701130

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the feasibility of DenseNet in the establishment of a three-dimensional (3D) gamma prediction model of IMRT based on the actual parameters recorded in the log files during delivery. METHODS: A total of 55 IMRT plans (including 367 fields) were randomly selected. The gamma analysis was performed using gamma criteria of 3% /3 mm (Dose Difference/Distance to Agreement), 3% /2 mm, 2% /3 mm, and 2% /2 mm with a 10% dose threshold. In addition, the log files that recorded the gantry angle, monitor units (MU), multi-leaf collimator (MLC), and jaws position during delivery were collected. These log files were then converted to MU-weighted fluence maps as the input of DenseNet, gamma passing rates (GPRs) under four different gamma criteria as the output, and mean square errors (MSEs) as the loss function of this model. RESULTS: Under different gamma criteria, the accuracy of a 3D GPR prediction model decreased with the implementation of stricter gamma criteria. In the test set, the mean absolute error (MAE) of the prediction model under the gamma criteria of 3% /3 mm, 2% /3 mm, 3% /2 mm, and 2% /2 mm was 1.41, 1.44, 3.29, and 3.54, respectively; the root mean square error (RMSE) was 1.91, 1.85, 4.27, and 4.40, respectively; the Sr was 0.487, 0.554, 0.573, and 0.506, respectively. There was a correlation between predicted and measured GPRs (P < 0.01). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the accuracy between the validation set and the test set. The accuracy in the high GPR group was high, and the MAE in the high GPR group was smaller than that in the low GPR group under four different gamma criteria. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a 3D GPR prediction model of patient-specific QA using DenseNet was established based on log files. As an auxiliary tool for 3D dose verification in IMRT, this model is expected to improve the accuracy and efficiency of dose validation.


Subject(s)
Feasibility Studies , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Humans , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Algorithms
4.
J Xray Sci Technol ; 32(4): 1185-1197, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38607729

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aims to propose and develop a fast, accurate, and robust prediction method of patient-specific organ doses from CT examinations using minimized computational resources. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We randomly selected the image data of 723 patients who underwent thoracic CT examinations. We performed auto-segmentation based on the selected data to generate the regions of interest (ROIs) of thoracic organs using the DeepViewer software. For each patient, radiomics features of the thoracic ROIs were extracted via the Pyradiomics package. The support vector regression (SVR) model was trained based on the radiomics features and reference organ dose obtained by Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. The root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and coefficient of determination (R-squared) were evaluated. The robustness was verified by randomly assigning patients to the train and test sets of data and comparing regression metrics of different patient assignments. RESULTS: For the right lung, left lung, lungs, esophagus, heart, and trachea, results showed that the trained SVR model achieved the RMSEs of 2 mGy to 2.8 mGy on the test sets, 1.5 mGy to 2.5 mGy on the train sets. The calculated MAPE ranged from 0.1 to 0.18 on the test sets, and 0.08 to 0.15 on the train sets. The calculated R-squared was 0.75 to 0.89 on test sets. CONCLUSIONS: By combined utilization of the SVR algorithm and thoracic radiomics features, patient-specific thoracic organ doses could be predicted accurately, fast, and robustly in one second even using one single CPU core.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Radiation Dosage , Support Vector Machine , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Male , Female , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Monte Carlo Method , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged
5.
J Radiol Prot ; 44(2)2024 Apr 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38537256

ABSTRACT

Understanding the spatial distribution of radiation levels outside of a patient undergoing177Lu radioligand therapy is not only helpful for conducting correct tests for patient release, but also useful for estimation of its potential exposure to healthcare workers, caregivers, family members, and the general public. In this study, by mimicking the177Lu-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen radioligand therapy for prostate cancers in an adult male, the spatial distribution of radiation levels outside of the phantom was simulated based on the Monte Carlo software of Particle and Heavy Ion Transport System, and verified by a series of measurements. Moreover, the normalized dose rates were further formulized on the three transverse planes representing the heights of pelvis, abdomen and chest. The results showed that the distributions of radiation levels were quite complex. Multi-directional and multi-height measurements are needed to ensure the external dose rate to meet the release criteria. In general, the radiation level was higher at the horizontal plane where the source was located, and the levels in front and behind of the body were higher than those of the left and right sides at the same height. The ratio of simulated dose rates to measured ones ranged from 0.82 to 1.19 within 1 m away from the body surface in all directions. Based on the established functions, the relative root mean square deviation between the calculated and simulated values were 0.21, 0.25 and 0.23 within a radius of 1 m on the pelvis, abdomen and chest transverse planes, respectively. It is expected that the results of this study would be helpful for guiding the test of extracorporeal radiation to determine the patient's release, and of benefit to estimate the radiation exposure to others.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Radiation Exposure , Software , Adult , Humans , Male , Family , Radiotherapy , Lutetium/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy
6.
J Xray Sci Technol ; 32(3): 797-807, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38457139

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The error magnitude is closely related to patient-specific dosimetry and plays an important role in evaluating the delivery of the radiotherapy plan in QA. No previous study has investigated the feasibility of deep learning to predict error magnitude. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to predict the error magnitude of different delivery error types in radiotherapy based on ResNet. METHODS: A total of 34 chest cancer plans (172 fields) of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) from Eclipse were selected, of which 30 plans (151 fields) were used for model training and validation, and 4 plans including 21 fields were used for external testing. The collimator misalignment (COLL), monitor unit variation (MU), random multi-leaf collimator shift (MLCR), and systematic MLC shift (MLCS) were introduced. These dose distributions of portal dose predictions for the original plans were defined as the reference dose distribution (RDD), while those for the error-introduced plans were defined as the error-introduced dose distribution (EDD). Different inputs were used in the ResNet for predicting the error magnitude. RESULTS: In the test set, the accuracy of error type prediction based on the dose difference, gamma distribution, and RDD + EDD was 98.36%, 98.91%, and 100%, respectively; the root mean squared error (RMSE) was 1.45-1.54, 0.58-0.90, 0.32-0.36, and 0.15-0.24; the mean absolute error (MAE) was 1.06-1.18, 0.32-0.78, 0.25-0.27, and 0.11-0.18, respectively, for COLL, MU, MLCR and MLCS. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, error magnitude prediction models with dose difference, gamma distribution, and RDD + EDD are established based on ResNet. The accurate prediction of the error magnitude under different error types can provide reference for error analysis in patient-specific QA.


Subject(s)
Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Humans , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Radiometry/methods , Radiometry/standards , Deep Learning
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL