Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Publication year range
1.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 28(6): 2493-2500, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38567609

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to compare the effect of topical laryngeal lidocaine with intravenous lidocaine before endotracheal intubation on the incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, and cough. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled study enrolled 144 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with endotracheal intubation. The patients were randomized to three groups and received 2% lidocaine by topical laryngeal spray (group T), intravenous 2% lidocaine (group I), and the equivalent volume of intravenous saline (group C) before intubation. The incidence and severity of sore throat, hoarseness, and cough reaction at 0.5, 1, 6, and 24 h after extubation were collected. RESULTS: The incidence of sore throat was significantly lower in group T than in groups I and C (6.4% vs. 37.2% and 86.7%, p < 0.001), respectively at 0.5 h after extubation, and it was significantly lower in group I than that in group C (37.2% vs. 86.7%, p < 0.001). Both the incidence of hoarseness and cough were significantly lower in group T than in group I and in group C (14.9% vs. 97.7% and 97.8%, p < 0.001, and 19.1% vs. 72.0% and 93.3%, p < 0.001), respectively. The severity of sore throat, hoarseness and cough in group T was significantly lower than that in group I and that in group C (p < 0.05), and it was significantly lower in group I than in group C (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both topical laryngeal lidocaine and intravenous lidocaine before intubation have positive effects on preventing sore throat. Topical laryngeal route was superior to intravenous route. Chictr.org.cn ID: ChiCTR2100042442.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local , Pharyngitis , Humans , Airway Extubation/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Cough/etiology , Cough/complications , Hoarseness/epidemiology , Hoarseness/etiology , Hoarseness/prevention & control , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Lidocaine/therapeutic use , Pharyngitis/epidemiology , Pharyngitis/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Prospective Studies
2.
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 56(3): 351-354, 2022 Mar 06.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35381658

ABSTRACT

From 2011 to 2020, there were 111 213 cases of rabies exposed people recruited from the rabies immunization clinic of a hospital in Beijing. The monthly distribution of patients in each year was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The distribution of patients showed remarkable seasonality, with the exposure peak from May to October. The ratio of male to female was 1∶1.3. The majority of patients were aged 20-29 years old (39.1%) and in-service personnel (56.5%). Level-Ⅱ wounds (84.2%) were more common than level-Ⅲ wounds (14.9%). The number of visits to level-Ⅲwounds increased rapidly since 2017. The most common injured body part was hand (60.7%). Dogs were the most common animal for injuries (60.6%), followed by cats (32.3%), of which most were host animals (75.5%). The vaccination rate from 2016 to 2020 [49.8% (24 276/48 703)] was significantly higher than that from 2011 to 2015[18.6% (6 559/35 272)](χ²=8597.18, P<0.001).


Subject(s)
Bites and Stings , Rabies Vaccines , Rabies , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Animals , Bites and Stings/epidemiology , Dogs , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Rabies/epidemiology , Rabies/prevention & control , Rabies Vaccines/therapeutic use , Vaccination
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL