ABSTRACT
Frostbite remains a severe medical condition that causes long-lasting sequelae and can threaten military operations. Information on prehospital treatment of frostbite is scarce and existing guidelines are aimed at the general population.This paper provides a guideline on prehospital emergency care of frostbite in the (Netherlands) Armed Forces. The insights gained from studies reporting on frostbite treatment in the prehospital setting were combined with the expert opinions of the authors and applied to the military context. The resulting guideline consists of two stages: (prolonged) field care and care at a Medical Treatment Facility. The cornerstones are rewarming in warm water and evacuation to a medical facility. Additional aspects of prehospital treatment are rehydration, proper analgesia, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and wound care.We suggest further collaboration among North Atlantic Treaty Organization partners and other affiliated nations, focusing on the full spectrum of military injury management including state-of-the-art aftercare, long-lasting sequelae and return to duty after frostbite.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Military practice or deployment in extreme conditions includes risks, dangers and rare disorders. One of the challenges is frostbite; however, current literature does not provide an overview of this condition in a military context. This review aims to map the incidence, risk factors and outcome of frostbite in military casualties in the armed forces. METHODS: A systematic literature search on frostbite (freezing cold injuries) in military settings from 1995 to the present was performed. A critical appraisal of the included articles was conducted. Data on incidence, risk factors, treatment and outcome were extracted. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in our systematic review. Most studies of frostbite in a military setting were published nearly half a century ago. Frostbite incidence has declined from 7% to around 1% in armed forces in arctic regions but could be as high as 20% in small-scale arctic manoeuvres. Overall and military-specific risk factors for contracting frostbite were identified. CONCLUSION: During inevitable arctic manoeuvres, frostbite is a frequently diagnosed injury in service members. Postfreezing symptoms often persist after severe frostbite injury, which decreases employability within the service. Over time, military practice has changed considerably, and modern protective materials have been introduced; therefore, re-evaluation and future study in the military field are appropriate, preferably with other North Atlantic Treaty Organization partners.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Acute acoustic trauma (AAT) is an acute hearing impairment caused by intense noise-impact. The current management strategy for AAT with substantial hearing loss in the Dutch military is the combination therapy with corticosteroids and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). In a previous study, early initiation of the combination therapy was associated with better outcomes. Therefore, we performed a new analysis to assess the difference in hearing outcome between patients in whom combination therapy was started within two days, versus after more than two days. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on military patients diagnosed with AAT with substantial hearing loss who presented between February 2018 and March 2020. Absolute and relative hearing improvement between first and last audiograms were calculated for all affected frequencies (defined as loss of ≥20 dB on initial audiogram). We also determined the amount of patients who recovered to the level of Dutch military requirement, and performed speech discrimination tests. RESULTS: In this analysis, 30 male patients (49 ears) with AAT were included. The median age was 24.5 years (IQR 23-29). The median time to initiation of therapy with corticosteroids and HBOT were one and two days, respectively. HBOT was started within two days in 31 ears, and after more than two days in 18 ears. The mean absolute and relative hearing gains were 18.8 dB (SD 14.6) and 46.8% (SD 31.3) on all affected frequencies. The 100% discrimination/speech perception level improved from 64.0 dB to 51.7 dB (gain 12.3 dB ± 14.1). There was significantly more improvement in absolute and relative hearing improvement when HBOT was started in ≤2 days, compared to >2 days. CONCLUSION: Our analysis shows results in favor of early initiation (≤2 days) of the combination treatment of HBOT and corticosteroids in patients with AAT.